Citations

ABSTRACT Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) in hospitalised children is a major complication associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning (ML) models may enable early detection and risk stratification. This systematic review evaluates the performance of AI/ML models for predicting paediatric AKI across clinical settings. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for studies applying AI/ML models to predict AKI in paediatric populations. Studies reporting performance metrics such as the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and F1 score were included. Results Among 470 records identified, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria, with 14 AI/ML models used. The overall sample size included 33 949 paediatric patients with an AKI proportion of 12.5%. Meta-analyses of the AUC were conducted on neural network, gradient boosting, and logistic regression. Gradient boosting had the highest pooled AUC of 0.873 (95% confidence interval 0.836–0.909). Random forest demonstrated the highest median sensitivity (0.821), specificity (0.942), PPV (0.860), NPV (0.935), and accuracy (0.821); however, these metrics could not be pooled due to inconsistent reporting and limited validation. Conclusion Gradient boosting, random forest, and logistic regression demonstrated reasonable predictive performance for paediatric AKI prediction within specific clinical contexts. However, small sample size, heterogeneity, lack of testing/validation cohorts, insufficient data, and inconsistent patient populations and AKI diagnostic criteria restrict generalisability.

ABSTRACT IPTA created the SMARTER Initiative to address persistent gaps in pediatric transplant education worldwide. Through webinars, podcasts, case discussions, and interactive resources, SMARTER provides trainees and allied professionals with accessible, peer‐reviewed content across all major organ systems. The program is designed for global reach, with downloadable modules, mobile compatibility, and recorded sessions to accommodate different regions and time zones. Since its launch, SMARTER has shown strong engagement, with fellows reporting that the platform helps them prepare for board exams, improve clinical decision‐making, and connect learning directly to patient care. Survey feedback highlights high satisfaction and identifies opportunities for further growth, such as expanded case‐based modules, procedural videos, and simulation exercises. By reducing disparities in transplant training and supporting collaboration, SMARTER is positioned to strengthen existing curricula and promote a better‐prepared, more globally connected transplant workforce.

ABSTRACT Background Advancements in organ transplant technology are pushing global transplant capabilities to new heights. However, challenges persist in pediatric surgical and medical transplant fellowship training, primarily due to a limited number of adequate training programs and gaps in education. Addressing these gaps is essential for improving patient outcomes and advancing the field of pediatric transplantation. Methods An international survey was distributed to 416 pediatric transplant fellows via multiple global transplant associations. The 29‐question survey, available in English and Spanish, assessed current clinical knowledge, training satisfaction, and preferred learning formats. The survey received responses from 237 pediatric transplant fellows. Results One of the key findings was that respondents felt most confident in their pre‐transplantation clinical knowledge. About 75.5% of fellows reported being extremely or very aware of pre‐transplant workups and assessments. However, significant gaps were identified in other areas of training. Notably, 24% of respondents felt extremely knowledgeable about the side effects of immunosuppression, and only 22.8% were very confident in managing acute rejection. Fellows expressed strong interest in dynamic educational formats, particularly clinical case discussions (88.8%). Preferred methods to enhance training included continuing medical education (64.6%), hands‐on workshops, and support for transition protocols and psychosocial counseling. Conclusion This global survey highlights critical educational gaps in pediatric transplant fellowship training and identifies preferred learning methods among fellows. Targeted improvements such as standardized curricula, case‐based learning, interdisciplinary collaboration, and accessible continuing education are essential to enhance training. These strategies will ensure that future transplant professionals are well‐equipped to deliver high‐quality care across diverse healthcare settings.

ABSTRACTBackgroundPediatric organ transplantation is the primary treatment for end‐organ failure. Improving medication adherence and healthcare compliance can decrease healthcare burdens, graft rejection, morbidity, and mortality. Adolescents commonly struggle with non‐adherence, necessitating a smooth transition to adult care. This systematic review aims to assess and evaluate the effectiveness of existing transition tools and models used in the care of pediatric solid organ transplant recipients (pSOTR).MethodsA systematic literature review of studies in electronic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, and Mendeley) on interventions improving transition in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients (pSOTR) from 2000 to 2022 was conducted. Included studies involved pSOTR before the age of 12 years transitioning to adult care.ResultsA lower proportion of graft acute rejection was observed among pSOTR with more than two transition interventions (10.088%, 95% CI: 0.901%–27.441%, I2 = 85.95%, p < 0.0001, random effects, five studies, n = 155) compared to those with two or fewer interventions (13.892%, 95% CI: 4.588%–27.142%, I2 = 74.73%, p = 0.0014, random effects, six studies, n = 140). Additionally, a significant association was found between transition protocols and lower rejection rates (χ2 = 10.57, p = 0.0011), with multiple protocols showing better outcomes (χ2 = 5.091, p = 0.024). Although adherence scores differed significantly with and without transition protocols (χ2 = 8.75, p = 0.0126), no significant difference was found between single and multiple protocol groups (χ2 = 4.8, p = 0.091).ConclusionThis review identifies various transition models and their impact on adherence and graft rejection, which correlate with morbidity and mortality and influence transplant outcomes. The heterogeneity of data within the current literature necessitates further research to establish causality and develop a standardized transition program aimed at improving patient outcomes.

ABSTRACT Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) has rapidly evolved from a niche technology to an indispensable tool across medical specialties, including nephrology. This evolution is driven by advancements in technology and the visionary efforts of clinicians in emergency medicine and beyond. Recognizing its potential, medical schools are increasingly integrating POCUS into training curricula, emphasizing its role in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and patient care. Despite these advancements, barriers such as limited faculty expertise and ‘lack of’ standardized guidelines hinder widespread adoption and regulation. The International Alliance for POCUS in Nephrology (IAPN), through this position statement, aims to guide nephrologists in harnessing the diagnostic power of POCUS responsibly and effectively. By outlining core competencies, recommending training modalities and advocating for robust quality assurance measures, we envision a future where POCUS enhances nephrology practice globally, ensuring optimal patient outcomes through informed, evidence-based decision-making. International collaboration and education are essential to overcome current challenges and realize the full potential of POCUS in nephrology and beyond.

AbstractBackgroundThe SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic and corresponding acute respiratory syndrome have affected all populations and led to millions of deaths worldwide. The pandemic disproportionately affected immunocompromised and immunosuppressed adult patients who had received solid organ transplants (SOTs). With the onset of the pandemic, transplant societies across the world recommended reducing SOT activities to avoid exposing immunosuppressed recipients. Due to the risk of COVID‐19‐related outcomes, SOT providers adapted the way they deliver care to their patients, leading to a reliance on telehealth. Telehealth has helped organ transplant programs continue treatment regimens while protecting patients and physicians from COVID‐19 transmission. This review highlights the adverse effects of COVID‐19 on transplant activities and summarizes the increased role of telehealth in the management of solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) in both pediatric and adult populations.MethodsA comprehensive systematic review and meta‐analysis were conducted to accentuate the outcomes of COVID‐19 and analyze the efficacy of telehealth on transplant activities. This in‐depth examination summarizes extensive data on the clinical detriments of COVID‐19 in transplant recipients, advantages, disadvantages, patient/physician perspectives, and effectiveness in transplant treatment plans via telehealth.ResultsCOVID‐19 has caused an increase in mortality, morbidity, hospitalization, and ICU admission in SOTRs. Telehealth efficacy and benefits to both patients and physicians have increasingly been reported.ConclusionsDeveloping effective systems of telehealth delivery has become a top priority for healthcare providers during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Further research is necessary to validate the effectiveness of telehealth in other settings.