Citations

Objective To characterize regional brain atrophy patterns, evaluate their association with regional leucine‐rich glioma‐inactivated‐1 ( LGI1 ) gene expression, and identify clinical predictors of hippocampal atrophy in LGI1 autoimmune encephalitis (AE). Methods This study compared regional brain volumes in LGI1‐AE patients versus age‐ and sex‐matched healthy controls (HC) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. LGI1 gene expression was derived from the Allen Human Brain Atlas. Multivariable linear regression and generalized linear models were utilized. Results A total of 55 LGI1‐AE patients were included. Median age was 68 years (IQR 62.5–74.2 years) at volumetric analysis, after 19 months (IQR 11–45 months) from symptom onset. Compared with HC ( n = 55) and AD patients ( n = 55), LGI1‐AE patients had greater regional atrophy of the hippocampus, insula, caudate, and putamen ( p < 0.002). Longitudinal analyses demonstrated hippocampal and pallidal atrophy after covariate adjustment. Among those who did not fulfill limbic encephalitis criteria and/or had non‐lesional magnetic resonance imaging, limbic and striatal atrophy were identified compared with HC ( p < 0.01). Regions with the greatest differential atrophy corresponded to higher LGI1 gene expression (Spearman ρ = 0.7, p = 0.005). Severe cognitive deficits at diagnosis ( β = −0.56; p = 0.002) and longer disease duration ( β = −0.01; p = 0.001) independently predicted total hippocampal volume ( R 2 = 0.31). Interpretation LGI1‐AE demonstrates a distinct pattern of limbic and striatal atrophy that differs from AD and aligns with regional LGI1 expression, supporting a model of selective network vulnerability. Greater baseline cognitive impairment and longer disease duration independently associated with hippocampal atrophy, underscoring the potential importance of early diagnosis and treatment to limit structural brain injury. ANN NEUROL 2026

This Viewpoint describes a plateau in the discovery of clinically meaningful autoantibodies in autoimmune encephalitis (AE) and suggests efforts that are likely to offer greater benefits to patients living with AE.

Abstract Background N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate receptor antibody encephalitis (NMDAR‐Ab‐E) is an autoantibody‐mediated disorder, characterized by acute development of neuropsychiatric symptoms, seizures, movement disorders, and autonomic instability. Objectives To describe acute seizure semiology and electroencephalogram (EEG) findings in patients with a first episode of NMDAR‐Ab‐E. Methods Medical records and EEG results were retrospectively evaluated from 14 adult patients with definite NMDAR‐Ab‐E, recruited between April 2009 and September 2017, and followed up until October 2024. Results A total of 92.8% (13/14) were women with a mean age of 29.6 years. 85.7% (12/14) patients experienced seizures. Focal and/or generalized seizures were described at presentation or in the first days of the illness in 57% (8/14). EEGs showed diffuse slowing in 13/14 and this coexisted with epileptiform activity in 10/13; fast frequencies in 7/13 (potentially owing to a benzodiazepine effect); and asymmetric focal slowing in 6/13. Six patients had periods of rhythmic slow activity (focal or diffuse), without evolution to electrographic seizures. An extreme delta brush (EDB) pattern was recorded in 2/13 patients, and this was associated with non‐convulsive status epilepticus in one of these individuals. Significance Most patients in this case series of NMDAR‐Ab‐E were young adult females with early focal and/or generalized seizures. Diffuse slowing in theta/delta range was the most common EEG finding, with or without epileptiform discharges, focal slowing, superimposed fast activities, and focal or diffuse rhythmic slowing. An EDB pattern was rare. Even with non‐specific findings, EEG seems to be a sensitive tool to aid diagnosis and decision‐making in NMDAR‐Ab‐E.

Abstract The discovery of pathogenic neuroglial surface-directed autoantibodies (NGSAbs) has fundamentally transformed clinical neurology, by enabling molecular-level diagnoses in potentially treatable, yet previously unrecognized, diseases. Annual descriptions of novel CNS-targeting antibodies create a continuous stream of new conditions in which to evaluate distinct phenotypes, specific tumour associations and immunotherapy responses. Alongside this clinical growth, increasing basic knowledge has highlighted origins and mechanisms underlying disease causation, most comprehensively interrogated in the well-established autoantibody-mediated conditions of autoimmune encephalitis (AE), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD). The corresponding most common ‘big six’ autoantigens are LGI1, the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, CASPR2, IgLON5, in forms of AE, AQP4 and MOG. Each of these autoantigens associates with a homogenous set of basic clinical features, across age, sex, tumour associations and ethnicities, coupled with partly distinctive profiles of triggers and predispositions, paradigms of immune tolerance escape in the periphery, how cells and autoantibodies gain access to the CNS, and discrete mechanisms by which the CNS autoantibodies induce neuroglial dysfunction. These observations lead us to reconstruct a proposed chronological series of events as the ‘cascade to pathogenicity’, which together culminate in a rare CNS disease. By extension, we hypothesize elucidating the underlying biology of each condition will present differing precision medicine approaches to optimize patient care. Despite distinctions, there are also clinical and biological overlaps between these diseases, collectively creating opportunities to compare and contrast their individual features. Here, in each condition, we review current knowledge regarding the similarities and differences between the triggering events, underlying immunological processes and pathogenic mechanisms of autoantibodies. In some instances, we identify scientific clues that drive hypothetical pathways of pathogenesis and, for others, highlight striking observations that aim to generate hypothesis-driven next steps. Our aim is to construct a model across the major autoantibody-mediated CNS diseases to highlight distinct components of cascades to pathogenicity, which may offer targeted therapeutic approaches to improve patient outcomes, and identify key areas and questions for future research.

ABSTRACT Objective To (1) validate GAD65‐ELISA detection and quantification for type 1 diabetes mellitus and autoimmune neurological diagnoses, (2) correlate ELISA results (reference range < 5 IU/mL) with established radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIA; ≤ 0.02 nmol/L), and (3) define ELISA clinical utility and pitfalls. Methods Serum performance for diabetes (FDA‐cleared, undiluted) was verified, and neurological laboratory‐developed serum and CSF dilution protocols were validated to extend the reportable range beyond > 250 IU/mL. ELISA and RIA values were correlated, including established neurological RIA cut‐offs (serum ≥ 20 nmol/L; CSF any positive). Results ELISA met analytical criteria (precision, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, reference range) in serum and CSF and was clinically equivalent to RIA for autoimmune diabetes. Neurological ELISA cut‐offs were established at 10,000 IU/mL (serum) and 100 IU/mL (CSF). Precision was better below 10,000 IU/mL (CVs < 20%) than above (CVs 30.8% serum; 26.5% CSF). ELISA–RIA correlation and agreement was stronger below the neurological cut‐off (R 2 = 0.89) than above (R 2 = 0.36). Positive agreement for RIA‐defined neurological disease was 100% in serum and CSF; all serums were > 10,000 IU/mL. Clinical specificity was 97.5% in serum and 100% in CSF, exceeding reported RIA specificity. Screen results > 250 IU/mL spanned a wide range of dilution values; many were below the neurological cut‐off. Most patients with paired serum/CSF positivity showed elevated GAD65 IgG indices. Interpretation GAD65 ELISA and RIA have equivalent sensitivity for autoimmune diabetes and neurological testing, with higher specificity for ELISA. A serum cut‐off of 10,000 IU/mL is informative but requires clinical context, and dilution of screen > 250 IU/mL samples is essential for neurological interpretation.