Citations

Key Points Health care utilization rates in elderly kidney transplant were no different between the high kidney donor profile index and low kidney donor profile index group. Number of readmissions and surgical interventions in elderly kidney transplant was no different between the high kidney donor profile index and low kidney donor profile index group. Death censored graft loss was higher in the high kidney donor profile index group, whereas the patient survival was no different between the high kidney donor profile index and low kidney donor profile index groups. Background High kidney donor profile index (KDPI) kidneys (KDPI >85%) are often associated with increased risks of post-kidney transplant (KT) complications and greater health care utilization (HCU), particularly in elderly recipients with multiple comorbidities. These concerns frequently lead to underutilization of high KDPI kidneys in older transplant candidates, thereby limiting their access to transplantation despite potential clinical benefits. The aim of this study was to compare post-KT HCU between elderly recipients of high versus low KDPI deceased donor kidneys. The primary outcome included differences in hospital readmissions, surgical interventions, and outpatient service use at multiple post-transplant time points. Secondary outcome included graft function, graft survival, and patient survival. Methods A retrospective analysis of elderly solitary KT recipients (age ≥65 years) between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020. Patients were stratified into high KDPI (>85%, n =160) and low KDPI (≤85%, n =453) groups. We assessed inpatient and outpatient HCU, including readmissions at 30, 90, and 365 days post-transplant, surgical interventions, and outpatient visits (emergency department, transplant clinic, endocrine clinic, and ambulatory infusion units). Results There were no statistically significant differences between high and low KDPI groups in rates of hospital readmissions, surgical interventions, or outpatient visits (all P > 0.05). Delayed graft function rates were also similar ( P = 0.61). The low KDPI group had significantly higher eGFR at 4 months, 1, 2, and 3 years post-transplant (all P < 0.001). However, days alive and out of the hospital within 90 and 365 days post-transplant were comparable between the groups (all P > 0.05). Overall patient survival was similar ( P = 0.08), although death-censored graft loss was significantly higher in the high KDPI group ( P = 0.001). Conclusions Among elderly KT recipients, high KDPI kidney recipients had comparable post-transplant HCU and overall survival with those receiving low KDPI kidneys, despite lower long-term graft function. These findings suggest that high KDPI kidneys remain a viable option for older patients, offering timely access to transplantation.

Currently, approximately 90,000 patients are on the kidney transplant waitlist in the United States, including 10,000 individuals awaiting re-transplantation due to prior graft failure. Allograft rejection remains a leading cause of kidney transplant failure. While the current gold standard for diagnosing rejection is tissue biopsy, it is invasive and impractical for routine or longitudinal graft surveillance. This review summarizes the current landscape of non-invasive biomarkers for detecting and predicting kidney transplant rejection, with a focus on both historical context and recent advancements. In particular, we highlight the roles of donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) and gene expression profiling (GEP) in identifying acute rejection. We also discuss emerging biomarkers such as torque teno virus (TTV), which has shown potential as an indirect indicator of immunosuppression levels and rejection risk. Importantly, this review excludes biomarker studies that rely on tissue biopsy, emphasizing non-invasive approaches to rejection monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Although most transplant centers preferentially offer minimally invasive approaches to donor nephrectomies, there remains less standardization specific to the kidney extraction site. This study aimed to evaluate incisional hernia occurrence in living kidney donors based on kidney extraction site location. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of all donors who underwent minimally invasive living donor nephrectomies at the Mayo Clinic Arizona between 2011 and 2023 with a 2-year external validation cohort from Mayo Clinic Florida and Mayo Clinic Minnesota. The cohort was divided into 2 groups based on the kidney extraction site type: midline infraumbilical and Pfannenstiel. RESULTS: In the primary cohort, incisional hernia occurrence was observed in 1.2% of donors with an infraumbilical midline kidney extraction site compared with 0.1% with a Pfannenstiel extraction site (p = 0.04). Donors with an infraumbilical midline kidney extraction site were more likely to be men (50.8% vs 23.3%, p < 0.0001), have a higher BMI (mean 27.2 vs 26 kg/m2, p < 0.0001), and have current or former tobacco use (p = 0.002). There were no differences in incisional hernia occurrence when comparing minimally invasive surgical techniques (p = 0.52). In the external validation cohort, hernia occurrence was observed in 4.5% of donors with a midline incision compared with 0.0% with a Pfannenstiel incision (p = 0.09). Using combined data from the 3 sites, the use of a Pfannenstiel incision as the extraction site was associated with significantly lower odds of developing a hernia compared with the infraumbilical midline incision (odds ratio 0.06, 95% CI 0.008 to 0.456). CONCLUSIONS: Although the risk of hernia in living kidney donors is generally low, the use of a Pfannenstiel incision for kidney extraction appears to offer an additional incremental reduction in risk.

Introduction: Improved treatments for children with congenital heart disease (CHD) have led to a growing interest in long-term functional outcomes such as health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Studies on HRQOL in children with CHD have yielded contradictory results. In this study, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze the effect of surgery on HRQOL outcomes in children with CHD in low-income and middle-income countries. Methods: A comprehensive search for articles was performed using the Medline (PubMed), Scopus, and Embase databases from their inception to September 5, 2023. Studies reporting QOL outcomes in children <18 years and published in English were included. Results: Of the 1239 records screened, 10 studies, including 1721 participants, were included in the study. The overall QOL was significantly better in the control group than in the children who underwent surgery for CHD (P=0.04, standard mean difference of −0.62, 95% CI: −1.2 to −0.04), and the overall QOL was significantly better in the children with CHD after surgery than before surgery (P=0.05, standard mean difference of −0.56, 95% CI: −1.11 to −0.01). Conclusion: The QOL of children from low-income and middle-income countries who undergo surgery for CHD is significantly poorer than that of controls in all dimensions except the emotional domain. Meanwhile, surgery has the greatest impact on improving the physical domain in children with CHD after surgery. Strategies to improve HRQOL in this subgroup of patients should be further investigated.

Abstract Background and Aims The advent of 3D printing has revolutionized plastic surgery and prosthetic devices, providing personalized solutions for patients with traumatic injuries, deformities, and appearance‐related conditions. This review offers a comprehensive overview of 3D printing's applications, advantages, limitations, and future prospects in these fields. Methods A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus for studies on 3D printing in plastic surgery. Results 3D printing has significantly contributed to personalized medical interventions, with benefits like enhanced design flexibility, reduced production time, and improved patient outcomes. Using computer‐aided design (CAD) software, precise models tailored to a patient's anatomy can be created, ensuring better fit, functionality, and comfort. 3D printing allows for intricate geometries, leading to improved aesthetic outcomes and patient‐specific prosthetic limbs and orthoses. The historical development of 3D printing, key milestones, and breakthroughs are highlighted. Recent progress in bioprinting and tissue engineering shows promising applications in regenerative medicine and transplantation. The integration of AI and automation with 3D printing enhances surgical planning and outcomes. Emerging trends in patient‐specific treatment planning and precision medicine are potential game‐changers. However, challenges like technical considerations, economic implications, and ethical issues exist. Addressing these challenges and advancing research in materials, design processes, and long‐term outcomes are crucial for widespread adoption. Conclusion The review underscores the increasing adoption of 3D printing in healthcare and its impact on plastic surgery and prosthetic devices. It emphasizes the importance of evaluating the current state and addressing knowledge gaps through future research to foster further advancements

AbstractBackgroundWe aimed to cluster deceased donor kidney transplant recipients with prolonged cold ischemia time (CIT) using an unsupervised machine learning approach.MethodsWe performed consensus cluster analysis on 11 615 deceased donor kidney transplant patients with CIT exceeding 24 h using OPTN/UNOS data from 2015 to 2019. Cluster characteristics of clinical significance were identified, and post‐transplant outcomes were compared.ResultsConsensus cluster analysis identified two clinically distinct clusters. Cluster 1 was characterized by young, non‐diabetic patients who received kidney transplants from young, non‐hypertensive, non‐ECD deceased donors with lower KDPI scores. In contrast, the patients in cluster 2 were older and more likely to have diabetes. Cluster 2 recipients were more likely to receive transplants from older donors with a higher KDPI. There was lower use of machine perfusion in Cluster 1 and incrementally longer CIT in Cluster 2. Cluster 2 had a higher incidence of delayed graft function (42% vs. 29%), and lower 1‐year patient (95% vs. 98%) and death‐censored (95% vs. 97%) graft survival compared to Cluster 1.ConclusionsUnsupervised machine learning characterized deceased donor kidney transplant recipients with prolonged CIT into two clusters with differing outcomes. Although Cluster 1 had more favorable recipient and donor characteristics and better survival, the outcomes observed in Cluster 2 were also satisfactory. Overall, both clusters demonstrated good survival suggesting opportunities for transplant centers to incrementally increase CIT.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) kidneys, including those from donors on dialysis, are often underutilized, although there is increasing data available demonstrating good transplant outcomes. To date, data on the duration of donor dialysis and transplant outcomes are limited. STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-center study of deceased donor kidney transplants from 2010 to 2022. The study cohort consisted of recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants from donors with AKI and on dialysis. Three groups were identified based on the predetermined interquartile range of donor dialysis duration: 1 to 2 dialysis days, 3 to 4 dialysis days, and 5 or more dialysis days. RESULTS: During this period, 765 AKI deceased donor transplants were performed, of which 230 were from donors on dialysis. The median dialysis duration was 2 days with a maximum of 13 days. Across the 3 groups, there were no differences in recipient age (p = 0.23) or dialysis vintage (p = 0.70). Donor age (p = 0.86) and kidney donor profile index (p = 0.57) were comparable between the groups. Recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants from donors on dialysis 5 or more days had lower terminal creatinine levels (p = 0.003) and longer cold ischemia times (p = 0.04). Posttransplant, the median length of hospital stay was 3 days for all groups (p = 0.75). There were no differences in delayed graft function occurrence (94.4% vs 86.8% vs 92.1%, p = 0.19), duration of delayed graft function (p = 0.56), or readmissions (p = 0.99). At 1 year posttransplant, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (p = 0.76), patient survival (p = 0.82), or death-censored graft survival (p = 0.28) were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent outcomes have been observed in AKI deceased donor kidney transplants, including those coming from donors on dialysis. In this small cohort, the duration of donor dialysis did not adversely affect outcomes. Cautious expansion of the donor pool, including donors on dialysis, should be considered given the ongoing organ shortage.

(1) Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) kidneys have high non-utilization rates due to concerns regarding unfavorable outcomes. In this paper, we aimed to review the past, present, and future opinions on AKI kidneys. (2) Methods: A PubMed search was conducted for topics relevant to AKI kidney transplantation. (3) Results: Current short- and long-term data on AKI kidneys have demonstrated good outcomes including favorable graft function and survival. The role of procurement biopsies is controversial, but they have been shown to be beneficial in AKI kidneys by allowing clinicians to differentiate between reversible tubular injury and irreversible cortical necrosis. Machine perfusion has also been applied to AKI kidneys and has been shown to reduce delayed graft function (DGF). The incidence of DGF increases with AKI severity and its management can be challenging. Strategies employed to counteract this have included early initiation of dialysis after kidney transplantation, early targeting of adequate immunosuppression levels to minimize rejection risk, and establishment of outpatient dialysis. (4) Conclusions: Despite good outcomes, there continue to be barriers that impact AKI kidney utilization. Successful strategies have included use of procurement biopsies or machine perfusion and expectant management of DGF. With increasing experience, better use of AKI kidneys can result in additional opportunities to expand the donor pool.

AbstractIntroductionExpedited out‐of‐sequence deceased donor kidney allocation is a strategy to avoid discards after early placement attempts have been unsuccessful. Our study aimed to assess outcomes and characteristics of these transplanted kidneys.MethodsKDPI matching was performed between expedited allocation (EA) and standard allocation (SA) deceased donor kidney transplants performed at our center.ResultsBetween 2018 and 2021, there were 225 EA offers, and 189 (84%) were transplanted. EA recipients were older (p = .007) and had shorter dialysis vintage (p < .0001). EA kidneys were likely to be nationally allocated (p < .001), have AKI (p < .0001) and longer CIT (p < .0001). There were no differences in EA and SA time‐zero kidney biopsies (ci, p = .07; ct, p = .89; cv, p = .95; ah, p = .79). EA kidneys had more DGF (p = .0006), but there were no differences in DGF duration (p = .83), hospital length of stay (p = .43), 1‐ and 2‐year eGFR (p = .16, p = .99), patient (p = .34), or death‐censored graft (p = .66) survival.ConclusionDuring this study period, our center transplanted 189 kidneys through EA following local‐regional declines. These kidneys often came from AKI donors and had more DGF but had similar outcomes to KDPI‐matched SA kidneys. Although it has been suggested that EA has the potential to worsen transplant disparities, transplant center level decisions on organ acceptance contribute to these variations.