Citations

Abstract Background Encountering an intra-abdominal abscess during elective surgery for Crohn disease (CD) presents a clinical dilemma. While guidelines often recommend temporary fecal diversion, stomas carry substantial morbidity. Existing literature is heavily confounded by selection bias, obscuring the true safety of bowel reconstruction. This study evaluated the safety of primary anastomosis in the presence of an intraoperative abscess. Methods A retrospective review of patients undergoing ileocecal resection for CD was conducted. To isolate the impact of the abscess and eliminate selection bias, an a priori multivariable logistic regression model and a 1:2 propensity score matched (PSM) analysis were utilized on the subcohort of patients who underwent primary anastomosis. The primary endpoint was the rate of 30-day postoperative complications. Results Among the 810 included patients (210 with an intraoperative abscess, 600 without), an abscess significantly increased operative complexity, resulting in higher rates of open conversion (29.3% vs 10.3%, P < .001) and fecal diversion (24.8% vs 6.2%, P < .001). However, multivariable analysis demonstrated that an abscess was not an independent predictor of overall 30-day complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.25; P = .190). Furthermore, in the PSM cohort of 474 patients, rates of anastomotic leak (10.1% vs 11.7%, P = .718), overall complications (41.1% vs 38.0%, P = .571), and severe complications (8.2% vs 10.8%, P = .480) were statistically identical between the abscess and non-abscess groups. Conclusion While an intraoperative abscess increases operative difficulty, it does not independently compromise anastomotic integrity. Primary anastomosis in an infected field is safe, allowing surgeons to spare appropriately selected patients at experienced centers the profound morbidity of an unnecessary stoma.

Abstract Background Patients with Crohn disease (CD) face an elevated risk of developing small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA), a malignancy characterized by late-stage diagnosis and poor prognosis. In this study we aimed to characterize surgical management and oncologic outcomes for CD-associated SBA. Methods A retrospective review was conducted across 3 tertiary IBD centers, analyzing 99 patients with CD who underwent surgery for SBA between 1992 and 2025. Data included patient demographics, CD history, surgical details, and oncologic outcomes. Results The median time from CD diagnosis to SBA was 25 years. The SBA diagnosis was incidental in 74.8% of cases, discovered during surgery for other complications. Tumors were predominantly located in the ileum (80.8%) and showed aggressive features: 56.6% were poorly differentiated (grade 3), and 85.9% were pathologically advanced (T3/T4 on TNM staging). Nodal involvement was present in 45.5% of patients, and 18.2% had distant metastases at diagnosis. A complete (R0) resection was achieved in 90.9% of surgeries, with a 30-day morbidity rate of 26.3%. After a median follow-up of 36 months, the distant recurrence rate was 28.3%, and overall mortality was 27.3% (18.2% cancer related). Conclusion In patients with long-standing CD, SBA is typically an incidental diagnosis made at an advanced stage. While high rates of complete surgical resection are possible, the prognosis remains guarded due to aggressive tumor biology and high recurrence rates. These findings highlight a critical need for improved risk stratification to guide surveillance and for the development of evidence-based adjuvant treatment strategies.

Abstract Introduction Ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) is a common surgical procedure for patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. This study compared the outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic, and open IPAA techniques, with a focus on surgical complications and pouch failure rates. Methods A retrospective study was conducted of patients who underwent IPAA at three Mayo Clinic locations between 2015 and 2020. Data on patient demographics, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were collected and compared across the three surgical approaches. Pouch failure was defined as the need for pouch excision or a diverting loop ileostomy. Results In all, 401 patients underwent IPAA with either an open (149, 37.2%), robotic (145, 36.2%), or laparoscopic (107, 26.7%) technique. The overall rate of pouch failure was 6.5% and did not differ significantly between the three surgical approaches. Compared with laparoscopy, robotic IPAA was associated with a lower conversion rate to open surgery (1.4 versus 17.8%; P < 0.0001) and fewer 30-day readmissions (15.9% versus 28.0%; P = 0.02). However, robotic and laparoscopic IPAA approaches had higher rates of venous thromboembolism/pulmonary embolism and readmission than the open approach. Pouchitis was the most common cause of pouch failure across all surgical techniques. Conclusion Robotic IPAA had lower conversion and reduced 30-day admission rates compared with a laparoscopic approach. However, open surgery had lower rates of 30-day readmission and rates thromboembolism than robotic IPAA. The surgical approach itself does not appear to significantly impact long-term pouch failure rates.

BACKGROUND: Emergency colorectal surgery traditionally uses open approaches, with limited minimally invasive adoption. Although robotic surgery demonstrates benefits in elective procedures, its role in emergency settings remains unclear. This retrospective study evaluated outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic and open approaches in emergency colorectal procedures and predicted future adoption trends. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed 83,483 patients from the American College of Surgeons NSQIP database (2012 to 2021) who underwent emergency colorectal surgery: 53,731 open, 26,649 laparoscopic, and 3,103 robotic procedures. Outcomes were analyzed using multivariable regression, propensity score matching, and g-computation analysis. Classification and Regression Trees were used to analyze surgical approaches to selection factors, whereas vector autoregressive models projected future usage trends. RESULTS: Robotic surgery demonstrated significantly lower conversion rates to open surgery compared with laparoscopy (7.8% vs 24.2%; adjusted odds ratio 0.32, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.36), shorter length of stay (incidence rate ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.69), and fewer surgical complications (odds ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.72). Robotic usage increased from 0% to 6.6% (2012 to 2021), with trends suggesting substantial growth toward 20.2% by 2025. Patient selection favored robotics for stable patients with diverticulitis (68.4%) and cancer without sepsis, whereas open surgery remained predominant in patients with perforation, severe sepsis, or significant comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: In selected emergency colorectal procedures, robotic surgery demonstrates superior outcomes vs conventional approaches. These outcomes may be partially influenced by patient selection factors because robotic cases involved more clinically stable patients. These findings support expanded robotic platform availability for emergency procedures, although careful patient selection remains essential. The projected increase in robotic usage reflects a growing acceptance of this technology, suggesting that its technical advantages can extend to more complex emergency cases than previously considered.

Objective: To determine if a Super Learner (SL) machine learning approach could improve the predictive accuracy of the American College of Surgeons Risk Calculator (ACS-RC) for postoperative complications in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Summary of Background Data: Machine learning (ML) has shown significant potential to advance medical fields, including surgical risk prediction. Current tools, like the ACS-RC which uses logistic regression and extreme gradient boosting, are standard but may be enhanced by more advanced ML ensembles. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed colorectal surgery cases from the 2018-2022 ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. An SL model, which combines multiple ML algorithms, was developed to predict fourteen postoperative outcomes. Its performance was compared against traditional logistic regression (LOG) and extreme gradient boosting (XGB) models. Key performance metrics included discrimination (AUROC, AUPRC) and calibration (Brier score, Hosmer-Lemeshow test). Results: The SL model demonstrated superior performance across all predicted complications when compared to both LOG and XGB. It showed superior discrimination for severe outcomes, achieving an AUROC greater than 0.94 for predicting mortality. The SL model was also more accurate in predicting infectious complications and length of stay, and its calibration metrics indicated a better overall fit and accuracy. Conclusions: The Super Learner model enhances the accuracy of postoperative risk prediction in colorectal surgery. Its superior performance suggests it is a promising tool for improving personalized patient counseling, aiding clinical decision-making, and optimizing resource allocation.

Objective: To assess trends in surgical approaches (robotic, laparoscopic, and open) for various procedures, including prostatectomy, nephrectomy, cystectomy, colectomy, proctectomy, pancreatectomy, hepatectomy, and esophagectomy, and predict the future of these surgical approaches. Summary Background Data: The rapid adoption of robotic surgery has raised critical questions about the future of traditional laparoscopic techniques. Understanding the trends and potential dominance of robotic surgery is essential for surgical training, healthcare infrastructure, and resource allocation. Methods: This retrospective observational study utilized data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) from 2012 to 2023. Vector Autoregressive modeling analyzed trends and predicted future patterns for robotic, laparoscopic, or open surgical approaches across the specified procedures. The study included all reported cases in the database where the surgical approach was specified. Results: The analysis revealed a continued shift towards robotic surgery, particularly dominant in urologic procedures and rapidly adopted for complex operations like hepatectomy and esophagectomy. Laparoscopy’s use is declining across most specialties, though it remains significant in colectomy. Open surgery persists at high rates, especially in pancreatic and rectal operations. Projections suggest robotic surgery will surpass laparoscopy in colectomy (44.5%) and proctectomy (38.3%) by 2026. Conclusions: The transition toward robotic surgery continues across specialties at varying rates. These findings have significant implications for surgical training, healthcare infrastructure, and resource allocation. The high rates of open surgery in certain procedures highlight opportunities for broader adoption of minimally invasive techniques.

Objective: To compare robotic-assisted proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (R-IPAA) outcomes and laparoscopic proctectomy with IPAA within a specialized robotic surgery center, using matching techniques to minimize potential confounding factors. Background: Minimally invasive approaches, particularly laparoscopy, have improved outcomes for patients with inflammatory bowel disease and familial adenomatous polyposis undergoing IPAA. Robotic-assisted surgery offers potential technical advantages, but its definitive superiority over laparoscopy in this context remains under debate. Methods: This retrospective, “Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology”–compliant study analyzed 234 consecutive patients undergoing IPAA (117 robotic and 117 laparoscopic). Data encompassed patient demographics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes. We employed various matching techniques to address potential bias. Primary endpoints focused on 30-day complications, readmissions, and reoperations, with secondary endpoints including hospital stay, blood loss, and stoma closure rates. Results: R-IPAA demonstrated a lower conversion rate to open surgery ( P = 0.02), a shorter hospital stay ( P = 0.04), and reduced blood loss ( P = 0.0003) compared with laparoscopic proctectomy with IPAA. While overall 30-day morbidity rates were similar ( P = 0.4), matched analyses suggested a trend towards fewer reoperations and 3-month IPAA-associated complications after diverting loop ileostomy closure in the robotic group. However, these differences did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: In a high-volume robotic surgery center, R-IPAA reduced the risk of conversion to open surgery while reducing intraoperative blood loss and providing shorter lengths of stay with equivalent perioperative outcomes. Promising trends to reduce 30-day reoperations and surgical complications after diverting loop ileostomy closure were observed after a matching analysis.

Abstract Background Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been associated with lower rates of postoperative complications in ulcerative colitis (UC), both in the elective and emergency setting, compared to the traditional open approach. Despite these findings, some clinical guidelines state that minimally invasive surgery is not superior to open surgery in UC and emphasize an individual approach based on the surgeon’s judgment. This study analyzed the trends in open and minimally invasive approaches in total colectomies for UC. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the ACS-NSQIP database encompassing all patients undergoing total colectomy for UC from 2012 to 2021. The primary endpoint involved analyzing open, laparoscopic, hand-assisted, and robotic surgery trends. A time series analysis was performed to forecast the future direction of these surgical techniques. Quarter (Q) and admission year were reported for time trend analysis. Dynamic relationships between various time series representing different surgical techniques were modeled using Vector Autoregressive (VAR) models. These models were employed to predict future trends in operative approaches until Q2 of 2025, along with 95% confidence intervals. Results A total of 7099 patients (44.5% female) were included, with a mean age of 45.1 (±17.8) years and mean BMI of 25.5 (±7.7) kg/m². Smoking was reported in only 8.7% of patients, with 49.1% classified as ASA 3 and 41.4% as ASA 2. Most patients (71.5%) were on steroids or immunosuppressants at the time of intervention. At the beginning of the study period, nearly half of the interventions were performed with an open approach (45.2%), followed by laparoscopy (35.7%) and hand-assisted laparoscopy (19%). Trends indicated a decline in open surgery to 17.7% by Q2 of 2021, with an increase in laparoscopic (45%), hand-assisted (25%), and a consistent growth of robotic surgery to 12.3%. Forecasting shown in Figure 1 suggested a continuous decrease in open surgery until Q2 of 2025 (8.7%, 95% CI 0-32.5%), with laparoscopic (51.2%, 95% CI 26.4-75.9%), hand-assisted (29.1%, 95% CI 11.9-46.3%), and robotic (11.0%, 95% CI 7.5-14.6%) approaches on the rise. Conclusion Minimally invasive surgical techniques have steadily grown over the past decade in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Predictions indicate continued growth, displacing traditional open approach, which may persist as a rescue procedure.

Abstract Background Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disorder that can cause transmural inflammation throughout the digestive tract. When CD affects the colon, it is known as Crohn's colitis (CC), a serious condition often requiring surgical resection. Surgical trends in CC have changed significantly over the past decade, shifting towards minimally invasive surgery, with laparoscopic and robotic procedures becoming increasingly common. This study examines how surgical trends in CC have changed in recent years and predicts how they may change. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis using the ACS-NSQIP database, focusing on patients who underwent colonic resections for CC between 2012 and 2021, including 20,109 patients. Our main goal was to examine trends in open, laparoscopic, hand-assisted, and robotic surgery. We utilized time series analysis, specifically quarter and year of admission data, and employed Vector Autoregressive (VAR) models to explore the dynamic relationships among these surgical techniques. To analyze the time trends, we reported the quarter (Q) and year of admission. These models enabled us to forecast future trends, accompanied by 95% confidence intervals, extending our predictions up until Q2 of 2025. Results As shown in Figure 1, open surgery has been the most common approach to CC since Q1 2012, accounting for 52.3% of all procedures. Laparoscopic surgery was the next most common approach, at 33.3%, followed by hand-assisted laparoscopy at 14.4%. Laparoscopy rapidly expressed market supremacy, by steadily becoming the most widespread approach by Q2 of 2017, representing 42.2% of CC surgery and peaking in Q2 2020 at 43.5%. This growth in laparoscopy came at the expense of open surgery, which experienced a significant decline, reaching its lowest point of 28.5% in Q2 2021. Hand-assisted procedures gradually increased in popularity over the years but remained less popular than open and laparoscopic methods, peaking at 24.0% in Q4 2019. Robotic procedures experienced slow but steady growth, from 1.9% in Q1 2013 to 10% in Q2 2021. Future trends suggest that laparoscopy will continue to grow steadily, reaching 45% (95% CI 28.2-61.7%) by the end of our prediction period. Robotic surgery is poised to significantly shift CC surgery trends, with resections expected to reach 12.6% (95% CI 9.3-15.8%) by Q2 2025, while a subsequent decline in open procedures to 20.8% (95% CI 0-43%). Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery has emerged as the favored surgical approach in CC and is expected to maintain its supremacy into the near future. Open colonic resections are anticipated to decline, making way for the increasing prevalence of robotic surgery.