Dourado, Justin

Abstract Background Patients with Crohn disease (CD) face an elevated risk of developing small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA), a malignancy characterized by late-stage diagnosis and poor prognosis. In this study we aimed to characterize surgical management and oncologic outcomes for CD-associated SBA. Methods A retrospective review was conducted across 3 tertiary IBD centers, analyzing 99 patients with CD who underwent surgery for SBA between 1992 and 2025. Data included patient demographics, CD history, surgical details, and oncologic outcomes. Results The median time from CD diagnosis to SBA was 25 years. The SBA diagnosis was incidental in 74.8% of cases, discovered during surgery for other complications. Tumors were predominantly located in the ileum (80.8%) and showed aggressive features: 56.6% were poorly differentiated (grade 3), and 85.9% were pathologically advanced (T3/T4 on TNM staging). Nodal involvement was present in 45.5% of patients, and 18.2% had distant metastases at diagnosis. A complete (R0) resection was achieved in 90.9% of surgeries, with a 30-day morbidity rate of 26.3%. After a median follow-up of 36 months, the distant recurrence rate was 28.3%, and overall mortality was 27.3% (18.2% cancer related). Conclusion In patients with long-standing CD, SBA is typically an incidental diagnosis made at an advanced stage. While high rates of complete surgical resection are possible, the prognosis remains guarded due to aggressive tumor biology and high recurrence rates. These findings highlight a critical need for improved risk stratification to guide surveillance and for the development of evidence-based adjuvant treatment strategies.

AbstractBackgroundInflammatory bowel disease (IBD) affects more than 10 million people worldwide. Men and women are equally affected by Crohn's disease (CD). It has been shown that patients with CD are at an increased risk of a colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis and CRC‐related mortality. During the last two decades, biological therapies have revolutionized the treatment of CD. There are no current studies investigating the prevalence of CRC in patients with CD in the era of biological therapy and the possible features of patients with CD who are at high risk of developing CRC.AimWe aim to assess the prevalence of CRC, risk factors and profile of CRC in patients with CD receiving biological treatment compared with those who are not under biological therapy and the impact of CD‐associated colorectal strictures on CRC development. The study hypothesis is that the use of biological therapy in the control of CD activity may decrease the risk of developing CRC.Study design and settingAn international, retrospective, snapshot of the prevalence of CRC in patients with CD, reported according to the SPIRIT guidelines. The study will involve centres that hold regular IBD multidisciplinary team meetings and have both IBD colorectal surgeons and gastroenterologists. Each participating centre will provide a local consultant lead and a local trainee lead. Data will be collected within a 2‐year recruitment period (January 2017–January 2019).Study populationAdult patients who presented with CD during the study period. Patients with an incidental diagnosis of CD during evaluation for CRC will be excluded.Statistical planBaseline patient characteristics will be summarized using the appropriate descriptive statistics. Univariable, multivariable and Cox regression models will be used to identify factors significantly associated with CRC. For noncontinuous variables a comparison between the subgroups will be carried out using the chi‐square test corrected by Fisher's exact test if appropriate. A p‐value of <0.05 will be considered statistically significant.Data storageData will be stored on a secured server, pin‐code protected according to the local data management agreement.

AbstractBackgroundThermal ablation has recently become a key therapy for the treatment of colorectal liver metastasis (CLM). However, the role of ablation in combination with resection has not yet been firmly established. We hypothesize that in patients with CLM, those who undergo liver resection with ablation (RA) have similar outcomes compared with those who undergo liver resection only.MethodsWe reviewed a multicenter international database of 906 surgical procedures for CLM from 5 high volume hepatobiliary surgical units. Patients undergoing RA (n = 63) were matched based on the number of lesions and tumor size using a 1:1 balanced propensity score analysis with those having resection only (n = 63). Our primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease‐free survival (DFS).ResultsThe mean age of our cohort was 58 ± 11 years, with 43% females. With a median follow‐up of 70.8 months, patients in the resection and RA group had a median OS of 45.1 and 54.8 months (p = 0.71), respectively. The median DFS was 22.7 and 14.2 months (p = 0.045), respectively. Using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model, the treatment approach was not associated with OS (p = 0.94) or DFS (p = 0.059). A higher number of lesions is independently associated with worse DFS (hazard ratio: 1.12, p < 0.01). When there was disease recurrence, the region of recurrence was similar between the RA versus resection only groups (p = 0.27), but there was a shorter time to recurrence in the RA group (p = 0.002).ConclusionFor CLM, the treatment approach was not significantly associated with OS or DFS, while tumor biology likely played an important role. Prospective research on the quality and effectiveness of thermal ablation combined with hepatic resection is warranted.

AbstractBackgroundResection of colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) is beneficial when feasible. However, the benefit of second hepatectomy for hepatic recurrence in CLM remains unclear.MethodsThe Colorectal Liver Operative Metastasis International Collaborative retrospectively examined 1004 CLM cases from 2000 to 2018 from a total of 953 patients. Hepatic recurrence after initial hepatectomy was identified in 218 patients. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed for overall survival (OS) and recurrence‐free survival (RFS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to offset selection bias. Cox proportional‐hazards regression was performed to identify risk factors associated with OS.ResultsA total of 51 patients underwent second hepatectomy. Unadjusted median OS was 60.1 months in repeat‐hepatectomy versus 38.3 months in the single‐hepatectomy group (p = 0.015). In the PSM population, median OS remained significantly better in the repeat‐hepatectomy group (60.1 vs. 33.1 months; p = 0.0023); median RFS was 12.4 months for the repeat‐hepatectomy group, versus 9.8 months in the single‐hepatectomy group (p = 0.0050). Repeat hepatectomy was associated with lower risk of death (hazard ratio: 0.283; p = 0.000012). Obesity, tobacco use, and high intraoperative blood loss were associated with significant risk of death (p < 0.05).ConclusionIn CLM with hepatic recurrence, second hepatectomy was beneficial for OS. With PSM, the OS benefit of performing a second hepatectomy remained significant.

AbstractBackgroundChemotherapy has been increasingly combined with surgery as multimodality treatment for resectable colorectal‐liver metastases (CLM). There is paucity of clinical data addressing optimal timing of chemotherapy relative to surgery. We examined outcomes of patients undergoing hepatectomy for resectable CLM.MethodsSeven hundred and eighteen patients treated with hepatectomy for CLM were analyzed from five hepatobiliary institutions between 2000 and 2018. Overall survival (OS) was measured from time of hepatectomy for patients receiving: surgery alone, neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and neoadjuvant‐plus‐adjuvant (perioperative) chemotherapy. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed to detect differences in OS between treatment groups. Single‐ and multi‐variable analysis with Cox proportional hazards were run for OS between groups.ResultsOne hundred and thirty‐seven patients (19.08%) received surgery, 104 (14.48%) received neoadjuvant‐only, 214 (29.81%) received adjuvant‐only, and 263 (36.63%) received perioperative chemotherapy; with median OS of 48.20, 46.83, 56.27, and 49.93 months, respectively. No differences in median OS were seen between groups on Kaplan–Meier analysis. No significant difference in Charlson‐Deyo comorbidity status was seen between groups (p = 0.853), while significant difference was seen in maximum tumor size (p = 0.0023). On multivariate analysis, adjuvant (p = 0.010) and perioperative (p = 0.020) chemotherapy were independently associated with OS compared to surgery alone.DiscussionDespite group differences, chemotherapy after surgery was independently associated with improved OS in CLM.