Citations

Abstract Biallelic colony‐stimulating factor 1 receptor ( CSF1R ) variants are a major cause of early‐onset CSF1R ‐related disorder (CSF1R‐RD), although fewer than 30 cases have been reported and genotype–phenotype correlations remain unclear. The aim of this study was to characterize the clinical, radiological, and genetic features of patients with brain abnormalities, neurodegeneration, and dysosteosclerosis (BANDDOS). Six patients with biallelic CSF1R variants underwent detailed clinical, neurological, and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. Three siblings with a homozygous p.Gly585Val variant showed marked phenotypic variability, ranging from severe childhood‐onset neurodegeneration to an asymptomatic presentation, all with white matter abnormalities. Three unrelated patients carried different biallelic CSF1R variants and presented with congenital skeletal abnormalities or early‐onset neurological disease of variable severity. These cases broaden the phenotypic spectrum of biallelic CSF1R‐RD and demonstrate that disease severity cannot be predicted solely by genotype, suggesting an important role for genetic or environmental modifiers.

Background: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A + B) and durvalumab plus tremelimumab (D + T) are approved first-line systemic therapy options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with no head-to-head comparison. In this propensity-matched analysis, we compared the survival of patients with advanced HCC who received either A + B or D + T therapy. Methods: Patients with advanced HCC who received A + B or D + T treatment in the first-line setting were identified using the TriNetX platform, a health research network that provides access to electronic health record data from 112 healthcare organizations. Propensity-score-matched (PSM) analysis was conducted, and the median overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: We identified 2819 patients with HCC who were treated with A + B or D + T: 2031 patients received A + B and 788 received D + T. Compared to patients in the A + B cohort, those who received D + T were more likely to be older (median age: 68.4 vs. 66.9 years), have lower platelet counts (186.8 vs. 201.3), higher prevalence of hypoalbuminemia with levels < 2.7 g/dL (35.2% vs. 28.4%), higher prevalence of bilirubin levels between 2.0 and 2.9 mg/dL (28.8% vs. 23.8%), and decreased INR with levels between 0.0 and 1.6 (92.1% vs. 86.3%). After PSM, 1536 patients were included in the survival analyses, with all variables adequately matched. There was no significant difference in the median OS between those receiving A + B or D + T [16.3 vs. 22.5 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76–1.0]. Higher rates of immune-mediated colitis were noted in the D + T group. Conclusions: Similar survival rates were observed among patients with advanced HCC who received A + B and D + T in the first-line setting. Our study suggests that both A + B and D + T are valid treatment options, and that therapy can be tailored based on comorbidities, adverse effects, and patient preferences.

Abstract Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor-related adult-onset leukoencephalopathy with axonal spheroids and pigmented glia (CSF1R-ALSP) is a rare, fatal, autosomal-dominant neurodegenerative disorder caused by pathogenic CSF1R variants and characterized by progressive cognitive, neuropsychiatric, and motor dysfunction, white matter lesions on brain imaging, and white matter demyelination, swollen axons, and pigmented glial cells on pathology. Limited data regarding clinical, biofluid or radiological biomarkers of disease severity are available, and no clinical trial endpoints have yet been validated. The objectives of this first-of-its-kind, prospective, observational natural history study were to characterize the clinical trajectory of CSF1R-ALSP and to identify and evaluate key biomarkers and clinical endpoints indicative of disease severity and progression. ILLUMINATE (NCT05020743) was a multicentre, noninterventional natural history study of adults with CSF1R-ALSP and prodromal carriers of CSF1R variants. Participants were followed for up to 36 months, with clinical assessments, fluid biomarkers and volumetric MRI assessments of brain atrophy collected at screening and every 6 months. This study was terminated early (4 June 2025). The analyses reported here include data collected through 19 February 2025. Of 53 participants, 19 were prodromal and 34 were symptomatic (11 of whom had a history of haematopoietic stem cell transplant and 23 who did not). Mean participant age was 47.8 (standard deviation, 4.5) years, and 36.4% were female. Prodromal participants remained relatively stable over 36 months, with little change in neurological function, neurodegeneration biomarkers or radiological disease burden. Impaired neurological function, MRI characteristics of CSF1R-ALSP, and elevated NfL (neurofilament light chain; neurodegeneration biomarker) and GFAP (glial fibrillary acidic protein; astrogliosis biomarker) levels were more pronounced at baseline and often showed progression over time among symptomatic participants who had not previously received haematopoietic stem cell transplant compared with participants who had previously received haematopoietic stem cell transplant. Significant correlations were observed at baseline and longitudinally between MRI measures of brain atrophy and clinical outcome measures. Based on the fluid biomarkers, MRI measures, and clinical outcome assessments evaluated here, active neurodegeneration, widespread changes visualized on brain MRI, and impaired cognitive and motor function were observed in symptomatic patients with CSF1R-ALSP. The neurological impairment can be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Cortical Basal ganglia Functional Scale. Our data suggest that quantification of brain atrophy using MRI volumetry is a potential biomarker of disease severity and progression in CSF1R-ALSP. It is hoped that this report will contribute to the understanding of disease progression in CSF1R-ALSP and inform future drug development.

139 Background: Statins have been shown to reduce the risk of HCC in high-risk populations with metabolic diseases. However, emerging data suggests that GLP-1 RA’s may also offer hepatoprotection by reversing metabolic and inflammatory drivers contributing to HCC development. Patients with T2DM are at an increased risk of metabolic associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and HCC. To our knowledge, no real-world studies have directly compared the effectiveness of GLP-1 RA’s and statins for prevention of HCC in patients with T2DM. In this study, we aim to compare the incidence of HCC and hepatic decompensation events in patients with T2DM treated with GLP-1 RA’s vs statins. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from TriNetX, a healthcare database of over 150 million patients in the United States. Adult patients with T2DM were identified and stratified by use of GLP-1 RA (semaglutide, dulaglutide, tirzepatide, exenatide, liraglutide, and lixisenatide) or statin (pitavastatin, simvastatin, fluvastatin, atorvastatin, rosuvastatin or lovastatin). Exposure groups were mutually exclusive with no overlap in GLP-1 RA or statin use. Propensity score matching was conducted between cohorts, matching for age, sex, race, tobacco use, alcohol use, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, MASLD, aspirin use, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesic drug use, and other T2DM medications. Five-year incidence of HCC was compared between the GLP-1 RA and statin cohorts. In a subsequent analysis, hepatic decompensation events of ascites, hepatic encephalopathy (HE), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), and esophageal varices (EV) were compared. Results: We identified 1,411,022 patients with T2DM, including 254,832 GLP-1 RA users and 1,156,190 statin users. After PSM, 219,984 patients were included in the analysis. There was no significant difference in the five-year incidence of HCC between the GLP-1 RA and statin cohorts (0.14% vs 0.15%, odds ratio (OR) 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI)0.81-1.11, p =0.5). In the subsequent analysis, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a lower incidence of ascites (0.98% vs 1.99%, OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.46-0.51, p <0.001), HE (0.18% vs 0.22%, OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.96, p =0.01), and SBP (0.05% vs 0.1%, OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.42-0.65, p <0.001). There was no difference in incidence of EV (0.33% vs 0.35%, OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.85-1.04, p =0.25). Conclusions: In patients with T2DM at elevated risk for MASLD and HCC, we found that GLP-1 RA use was associated with significantly lower incidence of hepatic decompensation events compared to statin use. However, there was no significant difference in HCC incidence between the cohorts. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm the hepatoprotective effect of GLP-1 RA medications and evaluate long-term oncologic outcomes.

138 Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA’s) have advanced the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), yet their association with cancer risk remains subject of ongoing research. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is a well-established risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC). Studies have shown a reduced risk of CRC with GLP-1 RA use however, the impact of GLP-1 RA therapy in the high-risk IBD population is unknown. In this study, we aim to evaluate the association between GLP-1 RA use and CRC incidence among patients with IBD, and among those with IBD and T2DM. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from TriNetX, a healthcare database of over 150 million patients in the United States. In the first analysis, adult patients with pre-existing IBD were identified and stratified by use of a GLP-1 RA (semaglutide, dulaglutide, tirzepatide, exenatide, liraglutide, and lixisenatide) or not. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted between GLP1-RA users and non-users, matching for age, sex, race, tobacco use, alcohol use, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, IBD subtype (CD or UC), steroid use, immunosuppressive use including biologics, and other T2DM medications. Five-year incidence of CRC was compared between GLP-1 RA users and non-users in the matched cohort between 2015 and 2025. We then restricted the cohort to patients with IBD and T2DM and repeated this analysis. Results: We identified 1,137,300 patients with IBD, including 70,303 GLP-1 RA users and 1,066,997 non-users. After PSM with all variables adequately matched, 69,221 patients were included in the analyses. GLP-1 RA use was associated with a lower 5-year incidence of CRC (0.2% vs. 0.43%, odds ratio (OR) 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3-0.57, p <0.001). We then identified 209,649 patients with IBD and T2DM, including 38,567 GLP-1 RA users and 171,082 non-users. After matching for all variables, 37,740 patients were included in the analyses. Among patients with IBD and T2DM, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a lower 5-year incidence of CRC (0.31% vs. 0.57%, OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.43-0.68, p <0.001). Conclusions: GLP-1 RA use was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of CRC in all patients with IBD, as well as the subpopulation with both IBD and T2DM. Given the elevated CRC risk in IBD, these findings suggest a potential protective effect of GLP-1 RA use in this high-risk population. Prospective studies will be important to further analyze and confirm this potential benefit.

e16246 Background: First line systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) includes immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapy, with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), lenvatinib or cabozantinib, commonly used as second line therapy. However, there is limited data comparing efficacy of TKIs following first line ICI therapy. In the present study, we compared survival and risk of hospitalization in a propensity score matched analysis of patients who received lenvatinib or cabozantinib following progression on first line ICI therapy in patients with advanced HCC. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from TriNetX, a healthcare database of over 150 million patients in the United States. We identified adult patients with a history of HCC who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A+B) or durvalumab plus tremelimumab (D+T) as first line treatment. We then stratified patients by use of lenvatinib or cabozantinib in the subsequent line setting. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted between those who received lenvatinib and those who received cabozantinib, matching for demographic factors (age, sex, race), clinical characteristics (history of alcohol use, ascites, esophageal varices, or viral hepatitis), and laboratory parameters [platelets, albumin, bilirubin, INR and alpha-1-fetoprotein (AFP)]. Results: We identified 416 patients who were initially treated with either A+B or D+T, with 327 patients receiving A+B and 89 patients receiving D+T. Of these, 336 patients (80.8%) subsequently received lenvatinib and 80 patients (19.2%) received cabozantinib. Baseline characteristics of demographic factors, clinical characteristics, and laboratory parameters were comparable between patients in the lenvatinib arm and cabozantinib arm with all standardized mean differences (SMD) < 0.10. After PSM, 76 patients were included in the analyses, with all variables adequately balanced. There was no significant difference in the risk of hospitalization between those receiving lenvatinib or cabozantinib at 3 months [31.6% vs 34%, odds ratio (OR) 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-2.2]. There was also no significant difference in mOS between those receiving lenvatinib and cabozantinib [9.5 vs 9.0 months, hazard ratio (HR) 1.03, 95% CI 0.62-1.7]. Conclusions: In patients with HCC who received lenvatinib or cabozantinib as second-line therapy following first-line ICI combination therapy, we found no significant differences in rate of hospitalization or survival. These findings suggest that either option may be appropriate, and decisions may be based in side effect profile and patient preferences. Prospective studies will be important to further assess differences in patient outcomes.

4163 Background: Standard first-line systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma involves immune checkpoint inhibitors, including A+B and the STRIDE regimen consisting of D+T. However, there is limited data comparing outcomes of patients receiving these two regimens. We aimed to compare the survival and safety profiles of patients receiving A+B versus D+T as first-line systemic therapy for advanced HCC in a propensity score matched analysis. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from TriNetX, a healthcare database of over 150 million patients in the United States. We identified adult patients with a history of HCC and included those who received A+B or D+T as first line treatment. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted, matching for patient demographics (age, sex, race), clinical history (alcohol use, ascites, esophageal varices, viral hepatitis), and laboratory parameters [platelets, albumin, bilirubin, INR, alpha-1-fetoprotein (AFP)]. Median overall survival (mOS) and relevant patient safety events were compared between those who received A+B or D+T. Results: We identified 2,762 patients who had HCC who were treated with A+B or D+T, of which 2,030 patients received A+B and 723 patients received D+T. Compared to patients in the A+B cohort, those who received D+T were more often older (68.5 vs 66.9 years, standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.17), had lower platelet counts (186.4 vs 198.6, SMD = 0.11), had higher prevalence of ascites (33.1% vs 20.3%, SMD = 0.29), and alcohol use (23.8% vs 18.8%, SMD = 0.12). After PSM, 723 patients were included in survival analyses, with all variables adequately balanced except for albumin, which was higher in the A+B group (3.6 vs 3.5, SMD = 0.19). At 90 days after starting therapy, D+T was associated with higher incidence of immune-mediated colitis [5.3% vs 2.6%, odds ratio (OR) 2.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2-3.7], and a higher risk of hospitalization [35.4% vs 27.9%, OR 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.8]. At 6 months, the risk of hypertension and proteinuria was higher in the A+B cohort [21.9% vs 13.7%, OR 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34-0.95], which persisted at 1 year [28.1% vs 16.5%, OR 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32-0.81]. There was no significant difference in mOS between those receiving A+B or D+T [18.3 months vs 22.8 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.94; 95% CI, 0.79-1.1]. Conclusions: In patients with advanced HCC who received A+B or D+T as first-line systemic therapy, we found that A+B was associated with higher risk of hypertension and proteinuria, while D+T was associated with a higher risk of immune-mediated colitis and hospitalization. No significant difference in mOS was observed between the cohorts. These findings suggest that safety profiles, rather than survival differences, may be used to guide optimal first-line treatment regimens. Prospective studies are warranted to further assess differences in patient outcomes.

Abstract Advances in biomarker technology, digital cognitive assessments, and amyloid‐targeting therapies have redefined the opportunities for accurate and early diagnosis and care of Alzheimer's disease (AD). These advances also create new possibilities for intervention before the onset of cognitive impairment. This paradigm shift has increased the focus on Stages 1 and 2 of AD, in which individuals are cognitively unimpaired but exhibit biological evidence of disease. While early identification of AD offers an opportunity to intervene early to delay progression and preserve quality of life, it also presents complex challenges related to communicating diagnostic results to patients and their families, contextualizing the cost effectiveness of early diagnosis and treatment, and implementation of and equitable access to treatments. Recent, successfully enrolled, preclinical AD trials highlight the complex strategies required to identify asymptomatic, biomarker‐positive individuals on a large scale, and demonstrate critical knowledge gaps in inclusion, follow‐up, and long‐term outcome measurement. The Spring 2025 Alzheimer's Association Research Roundtable (AARR) meeting brought together academics, clinicians, industry, and regulatory leaders to exchange perspectives on current challenges, key learnings, and potential strategies for identifying and treating individuals in very early stages of AD, effectively and safely. This paper presents key takeaways from the Spring 2025 AARR meeting. Highlights New criteria for Alzheimer's disease (AD) enable early identification of AD pathology. Blood tests and digital cognitive assessment tools may facilitate early and personalized care. Plasma biomarkers may be scalable in clinical settings but need confirmation or follow‐up assessments in those individuals with equivocal results. Early therapy shows best results in people with lower initial amyloid and tau burden.

733 Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) have advanced the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) yet their association with cancer risk remains subject of ongoing research. While case reports and pharmacovigilance data have linked GLP-1RA’s to pancreatitis, large randomized trials and observational studies have not consistently shown an increased risk of pancreatic cancer. Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a well-established risk factor for pancreatic cancer, yet the impact of GLP-1 RA therapy in this high-risk population is unknown. In this study, we aim to evaluate the association between GLP-1 RA use and pancreatic cancer incidence among patients with CP, and among those with CP and T2DM. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using ICD-10 codes within TriNetX, a healthcare database of over 150 million patients in the United States. In the first analysis, adult patients with pre-existing CP were identified, and the 5-year incidence of pancreatic cancer between GLP-1 RA (semaglutide, dulaglutide, tirzepatide, exenatide, liraglutide, and lixisenatide) users and non-users was compared from 2015-2025. In the subsequent analysis, we restricted the cohort to adults with CP and T2DM and repeated the comparison. Patients with prior diagnosis of pancreatic cancer were excluded from both analyses. All cohorts were propensity score matched (PSM) on age, sex, race, tobacco use, alcohol use, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, and pancreatic cysts. Results: We identified 95,391 with CP, including 3,139 GLP-1 RA users and 92,252 non-users. After PSM, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a lower incidence of pancreatic cancer (0.6% vs. 1.5%, OR 0.39 [0.22, 0.67]). Similarly, amongst patients with CP and T2DM, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a lower incidence of pancreatic cancer (0.7% vs. 1.6%, OR 0.44 [0.25, 0.75]). Conclusions: GLP-1 RA use was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of pancreatic cancer in all patients with CP and in those with CP and T2DM. Given the elevated cancer risk in CP, these findings suggest a potential protective effect of GLP-1RA use in this high risk population. Prospective studies will be important to further analyze and confirm this potential benefit.

Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have advanced the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), yet their association with cancer risk remains subject of ongoing research. Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a well-established risk factor for pancreatic cancer, yet the impact of GLP-1 RA therapy in this high-risk population is unknown. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between GLP-1 RA use and pancreatic cancer incidence among patients with CP, and among those with CP and T2DM. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from TriNetX, a healthcare database of over 150 million patients in the United States. In the first analysis, adult patients with pre-existing CP were identified and stratified by use of a GLP-1 RA (semaglutide, dulaglutide, tirzepatide, exenatide, liraglutide, lixisenatide, and albiglutide). Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted between GLP1-RA users and non-users, matching for age, sex, race, tobacco use, alcohol use, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, and pancreatic cysts. Five-year incidence of pancreatic cancer was compared between GLP-1 RA users and non-users in the matched cohort between 2015 and 2025. We then restricted the cohort to patients with CP and T2DM and repeated this analysis. Results: We identified 89,596 patients with CP, including 3183 GLP-1 RA users and 86,413 non-users. After PSM, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a lower 5-year incidence of pancreatic cancer (hazard ratio (HR) 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30–0.80, p < 0.005). Similarly, amongst patients with CP and T2DM, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a lower 5-year incidence of pancreatic cancer (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31–0.91, p < 0.05). Conclusions: GLP-1 RA use was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of pancreatic cancer in all patients with CP, as well as the subpopulation with both CP and T2DM. Given the elevated cancer risk in CP, these findings suggest a potential beneficial effect of GLP-1RA use in this high-risk population. Prospective studies will be important to further analyze and confirm this potential benefit.