Citations

Abstract Facial paralysis can impair one'™s ability to form facial expressions that are congruent with internal emotion. This hinders communication and the cognitive processing of emotional experience. Facial reanimation surgery, which aims to restore full facial expressivity is a relatively recent undertaking which is still evolving. Due in large part to published techniques, refinements, and clinical outcomes in the scientific literature, consensus on best practice is gradually emerging, whereas controversies still exist. Taking stock of how the discipline reached its current state can help delineate areas of agreement and debate, and more clearly reveal a path forward. To do this, the authors have analyzed the 50 seminal publications pertaining to facial reanimation surgery. In longstanding cases, the free gracilis transfer emerges as a clear muscle of choice but the nerve selection remains controversial with prevailing philosophies advocating cross facial nerve grafts (with or without the support of an ipsilateral motor donor) or an ipsilateral motor donor only, of which the hypoglossal and nerve to masseter predominate. The alternative orthodoxy has refined the approach popularized by Gillies in 1934 and does not require the deployment of microsurgical principles. Although this citation analysis does not tell the whole story, surgeons with an interest in facial reanimation will find that this is a good place to start.

Purpose: The availability of an objective outcome measure for facial reconstructive surgery remains elusive. Evaluations submitted by external raters or by patient self-report are subjective, and may unreliably convey how one is perceived by others. We are interested in observers’ instantaneous responses to the human face. The goal of modern facelift and associated procedures for facial rejuvenation are to achieved subtle differences that lead to the perception of youth and attractiveness, yet the observer cannot pinpoint what exactly have been done to the patient’s face. We explored the visual markers that lead to differential perception of patients before and after facial rejuvenation surgery (high SMAS facelift, neck lift, fat grafting, brow lifts and blepharoplasty). Methods: 40 images were obtained which portrayed pre and post operative photos of patients who underwent high SMAS facelift, fat grafting, and browlifts and blepharoplasty for facial rejuvenation. Photographs were obtained before and after surgical correction (>3 months postop). 40 observers examined the images while an infrared eye-tracking camera recorded their eye movements. The observers were then asked to rate the image for character attributes (attractiveness, trustworthiness, sociability, healthy, and capability, 1-7 scale, and also estimate the age of the patient). Results: (i) The surgical intervention was found to decrease observers’ attention to the cervical region, but did not change how other areas are perceived significantly.(ii) The surgical intervention was found to significantly increase the character ratings for all five attributes compared to pre op controls: (sociable 3.53 to 4.18, trustworthy 3.85 to 4.20, attractive 3.34 to 3.3.90, health 4.07 to 4.61, capable 3.91 to 4.43.(iii) Average age estimate of the photos decreased significantly from 54 years (SD 6) to 48.6 years (SD 5.2), with true average age of 57.4 (7.6). Conclusion: We provide data illustrating a novel and objective technique to evaluate the effect of reconstructive intervention for facial rejuvenation. Consistent with the goals of subtle facial rejuvenation, the observers did not detect any particular areas of difference post operatively, but gain a more favorable impression of the person, and also perceived them as younger by a decade compared to their true age.