Citations

ABSTRACT Objective Idiopathic subglottic stenosis (iSGS) is a rare, fibroinflammatory airway disorder with non‐standardized management. This study aimed to quantify the global clinical variation in surgical strategies for iSGS and identify barriers and facilitators to the adoption of both established and novel techniques. Methods An international cross‐sectional online survey was responded to by 193 clinicians (otolaryngologists, thoracic surgeons, and interventional pulmonologists) across 42 countries. Data on demographics, technique execution, treatment algorithms, clinician satisfaction (7‐point Likert scale), and adoption barriers were collected. Both statistical analysis and thematic analysis were performed. Results Otolaryngologists constituted the majority of respondents (84%), predominantly from Europe (52%) and North America (28%). Endoscopic dilation was nearly universal (95%), but execution was heterogeneous (85% used occlusive balloons, 56% used CO 2 laser). Newer techniques showed varied adoption: In‐office serial intralesional steroid injections were used by 57% of clinicians and the Maddern procedure by 17%. Overall satisfaction with current treatment strategies was moderate (mean Likert score: 5.07; SD = 1.15). Significant variation was found in the definition of treatment failure. Fellowship‐trained surgeons managed higher case volumes and were more likely to perform complex open surgery ( p = 0.019). Key barriers to adoption included lack of experience and insufficient supporting evidence. Conclusion Significant global clinical variation exists in the management of iSGS, affecting surgical technique, adjuvant therapy, and the definition of treatment failure. Standardization of clinical outcomes, continued large‐scale comparative effectiveness trials, and newer efforts aimed at implementing emerging evidence are needed to reduce variability, establish evidence‐based guidelines, and improve global patient care for this complex disease. Level of Evidence 5.

Abstract Background Robotic left pancreatectomy (RLP) is increasingly adopted worldwide. Current guidelines suggest a learning curve of 21 cases, yet its impact on major morbidity and oncological quality remains uncertain. Methods A retrospective multicentre international study was undertaken across 10 centres in the UK, Spain, Germany, the USA, and Australia (2014–2025). Consecutive patients undergoing RLP were categorised into competency (first 21 cases per centre) or proficiency phase (>21). The primary outcome was major morbidity (Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ IIIa), and secondary outcome was the R1-margin rate. Mixed-effects logistic regression and risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) analyses were performed. Results 521 patients underwent RLP, including 200 (38.4%) in the competency phase and 321 (61.6%) in the proficiency phase. Median age was 63 years (IQR 54–73), and 56.4% were female. Rates of major morbidity were similar between phases (14.5% versus 14.0%, P = 0.981), as were R1 margin rates (21.6% versus 19.7%, P = 0.092). Independent predictors of major morbidity included male sex (OR 1.76, P = 0.037), preoperative pancreatitis (OR 2.23, P = 0.031), and multivisceral resection (OR 2.29, P = 0.034). Among patients with adenocarcinoma (n = 110), prolonged operative time (OR 1.39 per hour, P = 0.004) and nodal positivity (OR 2.62, P = 0.047) predicted R1 resection, while learning phase was not associated with margin status. RA-CUSUM demonstrated no excess morbidity over time in any centre. Conclusions In this first multicentre international analysis, the learning phase of RLP did not increase the risk of major morbidity or compromise oncological quality. These findings support the safe global adoption of RLP with appropriate training and case selection.

Importance Adjuvant chemotherapy regimens may be administered after pancreatic resection for adenocarcinoma arising from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (A-IPMNs), although the evidence supporting their use is limited. Objective To evaluate the survival benefit associated with contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy regimens after resection in A-IPMNs between 2017 and 2023. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study was an international, multicenter study with 69 participating centers across Europe, North America, South America, and the Asia-Pacific region. Patients undergoing resection for A-IPMNs were included. Data were analyzed from May to August 2025. Intervention Contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, such as gemcitabine-capecitabine (GemCap); 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX), modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX), and S-1. Main Outcome and Measure Overall survival (months). Results Among 1321 patients (median [IQR] age 70 [63 to 76] years; 713 males [54.0%] and 608 females [46.0%]), 781 patients (59.1%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, while in 181 patients (13.7%) it was omitted due to poor patient fitness. Of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, 568 patients (72.6%) received contemporary regimens, including GemCap (232 patients [29.7%]), FOLFIRINOX (176 patients [22.5%]), mFOLFIRINOX (71 patients [9.1%]), and S-1 (70 patients [9.0%]). The median (IQR) follow-up for the cohort was 64.2 (40.4 to 85.0) months, and the median overall survival was 73.8 months (95% CI, 66.4 to 81.9 months). After 90-day landmark analysis and exclusion of patients ineligible for chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy vs no adjuvant chemotherapy (propensity score–matched populations, 243:243 patients) was not associated with improved overall survival (median, 82.3 months; 95% CI, 78.2 months to not applicable [NA] vs not reached; 95% CI, 75.3 months to NA; P = .58). Contemporary regimens vs no adjuvant chemotherapy (propensity score–matched populations, 309:309 patients) was not associated with longer survival, and a mean survival benefit greater than 4.2 months over 5 years was excluded (difference in restricted mean survival, 1.26 months; 95%, −1.72 to 4.24 months). Treatment outcomes did not vary by chemotherapy regimen or disease characteristic (eg, N stage or carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level). Conclusions and Relevance In this study, contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with improved overall survival in A-IPMNs, and a randomized clinical trial is indicated.

Abstract The transition from internship to residency represents an important period for trainees. However, little is known about self-assessed preparedness among physiatry trainees. This national cross-sectional exploratory survey of United States postgraduate year 2–4 physiatry residents aimed to examine self-reported preparedness at the start of postgraduate year 2. A total of 109 postgraduate year 2–4 residents completed this survey, with 57.8% (63/109) reporting feeling prepared to assume patient care responsibilities at the start of postgraduate year 2 and 42.2% (46/109) reporting feeling unprepared to do so. Specific internship experiences (e.g., developing comfort handling overnight calls and rapid responses), but not type of intern year (e.g., transitional year, preliminary internal medicine or surgery year, intern year included in a categorical physiatry residency program) may be associated with self-reported clinical preparedness. Further research is warranted to explore in more detail factors identified as potentially associated with self-assessed clinical preparedness, as well as opportunities to identify and address physiatry trainee needs.

Introduction: Procedural competence is essential to clinical practice, yet assessment of technical skills such as suturing remains highly variable and often relies on subjective evaluations. While tools with limited validity evidence exist in surgical specialties, their use in family medicine is limited. This study evaluated the interrater reliability of a suture assessment tool developed by Sundhagen et al when used by family medicine faculty to evaluate the simple interrupted suturing skills of family medicine residents. Methods: In this cross-sectional reliability study, 15 core faculty members from four family medicine residency programs were recruited to evaluate the simple interrupted suturing skills of 20 family medicine residents using a modified suture assessment tool developed by Sundhagen et al. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to evaluate interrater reliability. Light’s κ was calculated for each question. Results: A total of 15 evaluators assessed 20 videos of resident suturing performance. The Light’s κ estimates ranged from 0.11 to 0.50, indicating slight to moderate agreement. None of the items reached the threshold for substantial agreement (κ≥0.61). Conclusions: The modified Sundhagen suture assessment tool demonstrated fair to moderate reliability when used to evaluate family medicine residents. While the level of agreement limits the tool’s effectiveness for standardized summative assessment, the tool may still offer value as a structured framework for formative feedback. Future studies may improve reliability through refined rater training, behaviorally anchored scoring criteria, and the use of visual exemplars.

Abstract Introduction The new preference-informed allocation (PIA) system introduced for the 2024 UK cohort Foundation Programme (UKFPO) marks a shift away from the traditional meritocratic ‘ranking’ used in previous years. Instead of appointment to Foundation Programme places, PIA is a computer-generated allocation and deanery preferencing system. This change has raised numerous concerns among both students and clinicians. Aims To investigate the opinions of medical students on the new UKFPO PIA system. Methodology An online questionnaire was distributed to medical students graduating in 2024, 2025, or 2026 across the UK. Results In total, 2297 responses were collected and 2288 were included in the study. Overall, 51.6% (n = 1183) of respondents felt the PIA system was unfair, 76.3% (n = 1746) felt they had lost control of their application, and 46.3% (n = 1049) had noticed a negative effect on their physical or mental health. Notably, 48.2% (n = 1094) of students who responded are now considering a career outside the National Health Service (NHS). Conclusions Overall, the PIA system falls short of students’ expectations and has led to record numbers of students considering careers outside the NHS. Further changes to this system are needed and should aim to address fairness and equity while rewarding students for their hard work. According to these data, the PIA system risks further deteriorating workforce morale and attrition rates.

BACKGROUND Tumor-to-tumor metastasis (TTM) is an exceptionally rare phenomenon. To date, only 12 cases of the metastasis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) to a meningioma have been reported in the literature. The authors present a unique case of TTM involving ccRCC metastasizing to a meningioma in a patient with a history of both primary cancers. OBSERVATIONS A 58-year-old male with a history of 2 primary cancers developed a biphasic tumor diagnosed as TTM of ccRCC to meningioma. The patient initially presented with left lower-extremity (LLE) weakness and underwent subtotal resection of his meningioma. Postsurgical imaging revealed rapid tumor progression, for which the patient completed adjuvant radiotherapy. Concurrently, the patient developed hematuria and was diagnosed with ccRCC. Subsequent recurrent LLE weakness and intracranial tumor progression prompted re-resection, revealing a TTM. LESSONS In patients with a history of multiple cancers who present with recurrent intracranial disease progression radiographically and/or clinically, it is worth considering TTM in the differential diagnosis to facilitate multidisciplinary workup, management, and treatment. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24670

Abstract Low-grade gliomas (LGG) are slowly growing brain cancers that ultimately undergo a malignant progression to lethal secondary glioblastomas with a dismal prognosis. Despite intensive research, very little progress has been made in our understanding of this transformation. Hence, outside of known alternations in well-characterized driver genes CDKN2A, PTEN and PDGFRA, genetic drivers that underlie LGG transformation are largely unknown. Contrary to other types of cancer, LGGs exhibit very few driver mutations (30-40 mutations) as they progress. Interestingly, LGGs also exhibit a highly prevalent and heterogenous pattern of copy-number-alterations (CNAs) suggesting that they might be driven by changes in gene dosages that result from widespread chromosomal instability observed within these tumors. Through analysis of the human Mayo Clinic and TCGA LGG datasets (~1500 patients), we have identified eleven highly recurrent CNAs affecting LGG patients, many of which correlate with patient survival. We hypothesized that these CNAs contain driver genes that confer a growth advantage resulting in the highly recurrent CNA pattern and prognostic associations. To investigate the tumor suppressive potential of the ~1800 genes located in recurrently deleted regions and the oncogenic potential of the ~1200 genes located in recurrently amplified regions, our lab developed a novel in vivo ‘CRISPR-Knock Out and Activation Linked Assay’ (CRISPR-KOALA). Stereotaxic delivery of arm-level CNA lentiviral gRNA libraries targeting the mouse orthologs of genes in CNAs into the brain of our animal model (rs557mut;IDHmut;P53KO;AtrxKO;Cas9GFP: Yanchus et. al Science 2022) resulted in rapid formation of tumors compared to animals injected with control libraries. Deconvoluting the screen revealed enrichment of immune modulators such as Them6 as well as a modulator of NMDA receptors (Grina) implicating immune system and glutamate dysregulation in LGG malignant transformation. Taken together, our study provides insights into mechanisms underlying LGG progression which may serve to inform intervention strategies for this lethal disease.