Citations

Objective To characterize regional brain atrophy patterns, evaluate their association with regional leucine‐rich glioma‐inactivated‐1 ( LGI1 ) gene expression, and identify clinical predictors of hippocampal atrophy in LGI1 autoimmune encephalitis (AE). Methods This study compared regional brain volumes in LGI1‐AE patients versus age‐ and sex‐matched healthy controls (HC) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. LGI1 gene expression was derived from the Allen Human Brain Atlas. Multivariable linear regression and generalized linear models were utilized. Results A total of 55 LGI1‐AE patients were included. Median age was 68 years (IQR 62.5–74.2 years) at volumetric analysis, after 19 months (IQR 11–45 months) from symptom onset. Compared with HC ( n = 55) and AD patients ( n = 55), LGI1‐AE patients had greater regional atrophy of the hippocampus, insula, caudate, and putamen ( p < 0.002). Longitudinal analyses demonstrated hippocampal and pallidal atrophy after covariate adjustment. Among those who did not fulfill limbic encephalitis criteria and/or had non‐lesional magnetic resonance imaging, limbic and striatal atrophy were identified compared with HC ( p < 0.01). Regions with the greatest differential atrophy corresponded to higher LGI1 gene expression (Spearman ρ = 0.7, p = 0.005). Severe cognitive deficits at diagnosis ( β = −0.56; p = 0.002) and longer disease duration ( β = −0.01; p = 0.001) independently predicted total hippocampal volume ( R 2 = 0.31). Interpretation LGI1‐AE demonstrates a distinct pattern of limbic and striatal atrophy that differs from AD and aligns with regional LGI1 expression, supporting a model of selective network vulnerability. Greater baseline cognitive impairment and longer disease duration independently associated with hippocampal atrophy, underscoring the potential importance of early diagnosis and treatment to limit structural brain injury. ANN NEUROL 2026

Acute cholecystitis affects ∼200,000 individuals annually in the United States, with laparoscopic cholecystectomy as the gold standard treatment. However, in high-risk surgical candidates, alternative drainage methods are necessary. Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PT-GBD) has traditionally served as the primary alternative intervention, offering rapid decompression, but is limited by a negative impact on the patient’s quality of life, the risk of long-term or even permanent tube placement, adverse events, and high recurrence rates. Endoscopic approaches, such as endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ET-GBD) and, more recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD), have emerged as viable alternatives to PT-GBD. EUS-GBD, first introduced in 2007, offers technical and clinical outcomes comparable to PT-GBD with fewer adverse events, shorter hospital stays, and lower rates of recurrence. The introduction of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) has revolutionized EUS-GBD, simplifying deployment and enabling subsequent internal gallbladder access, which allows additional interventions such as cholecystoscopy and stone removal. EUS-GBD is now supported by international guidelines, and 1 device has achieved FDA approval for the management of acute cholecystitis in nonsurgical candidates. Proper patient selection is essential, guided by multidisciplinary evaluation, with EUS-GBD contraindicated in specific scenarios such as gallbladder perforation, coagulopathy, and large-volume ascites. Technical considerations include choice of access site (transgastric versus transduodenal), stent type, and procedural route [direct (freehand) or wire-guided]. Postprocedural care and stent management remain variable and nonstandardized. Emerging data suggest that interval cholecystectomy can still be performed safely after EUS-GBD. As adoption of EUS-GBD with LAMS expands, structured training and standardization of practice are crucial to optimizing outcomes.

This Viewpoint describes a plateau in the discovery of clinically meaningful autoantibodies in autoimmune encephalitis (AE) and suggests efforts that are likely to offer greater benefits to patients living with AE.

Abstract Background N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate receptor antibody encephalitis (NMDAR‐Ab‐E) is an autoantibody‐mediated disorder, characterized by acute development of neuropsychiatric symptoms, seizures, movement disorders, and autonomic instability. Objectives To describe acute seizure semiology and electroencephalogram (EEG) findings in patients with a first episode of NMDAR‐Ab‐E. Methods Medical records and EEG results were retrospectively evaluated from 14 adult patients with definite NMDAR‐Ab‐E, recruited between April 2009 and September 2017, and followed up until October 2024. Results A total of 92.8% (13/14) were women with a mean age of 29.6 years. 85.7% (12/14) patients experienced seizures. Focal and/or generalized seizures were described at presentation or in the first days of the illness in 57% (8/14). EEGs showed diffuse slowing in 13/14 and this coexisted with epileptiform activity in 10/13; fast frequencies in 7/13 (potentially owing to a benzodiazepine effect); and asymmetric focal slowing in 6/13. Six patients had periods of rhythmic slow activity (focal or diffuse), without evolution to electrographic seizures. An extreme delta brush (EDB) pattern was recorded in 2/13 patients, and this was associated with non‐convulsive status epilepticus in one of these individuals. Significance Most patients in this case series of NMDAR‐Ab‐E were young adult females with early focal and/or generalized seizures. Diffuse slowing in theta/delta range was the most common EEG finding, with or without epileptiform discharges, focal slowing, superimposed fast activities, and focal or diffuse rhythmic slowing. An EDB pattern was rare. Even with non‐specific findings, EEG seems to be a sensitive tool to aid diagnosis and decision‐making in NMDAR‐Ab‐E.

ABSTRACT Background Polypharmacy is common in autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) and increases adverse drug events (ADEs), but comparative evidence across diseases is limited. We aimed to quantify ADE burden and identify medications associated with ADE risk across six ARDs, and to examine shared and disease-specific patterns across diseases. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary medical center (2010–2024). Adults with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Sjögren’s disease (SjD), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), or systemic sclerosis (SSc) were identified using diagnostic codes. ADEs were ascertained using validated case definitions. Medications were mapped to Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classes; active exposure was defined within 30 days before the index date. Polypharmacy was defined as ≥5 concurrent medications (minor 5–10; major >10). Within each ARD, nested case–control analyses matched on encounter type (1:4) were performed, and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were estimated using conditional logistic regression. Findings Among 10,578 patients, 3,154 (29.8%) experienced at least one ADE. ADE burden varied across diseases, with the highest prevalence observed in SSc (35.9%). Polypharmacy was common (57.3% minor, 39.4% major) and medication burden was consistently higher in ADE cases across encounter types (eg, SLE outpatient median 12 vs 6; inpatient 20 vs 10; emergency 17 vs 8). Across ARDs, the strongest associations with ADEs were observed for supportive and symptom-directed therapies (acid suppressors, pain adjuncts, and sedative-hypnotic/psychotropic medications), whereas conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) showed weaker associations. Disease-specific signatures included gastrointestinal agents in SSc (metoclopramide aOR 12.32), antibiotics and respiratory agents in AS (ciprofloxacin aOR 13.71, fluticasone aOR 8.88). Interpretation ADEs affect nearly one-third of ARD patients and increase with medication burden. Risk concentrates in supportive and symptom-directed therapies rather than DMARDs, with both shared and disease-specific patterns. Optimizing prescribing, particularly for pain management and corticosteroid use, can reduce medication-related harm.