Citations

Background:Crohn’s disease (CD) exhibits variability in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and prognostic factors due to diverse clinical and behavioral characteristics, presenting inconsistencies between Western and Eastern patients.Objectives:This study compared clinical characteristics between CD patients with CRC from the US and Korean tertiary referral centers and defined the prognostic factors related to mortality.Design:Retrospective study.Methods:We reviewed the electronic medical records of 236 adult CD patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma evaluated at Mayo Clinic Rochester, Florida, or Arizona ( N = 200) and Asan Medical Center in Korea ( N = 36) between January 1989 and August 2022.Results:Asan patients had a younger age, shorter CD duration, more colonic involvement (L2 plus L3), penetrating behavior, perianal fistula, and shorter biological treatment duration before CRC diagnosis than Mayo patients. Furthermore, despite significant differences in body mass index, smoking status, primary sclerosing cholangitis, immunomodulators, CRC diagnosis period, clinical presentation, CRC location, surgery, and some histopathological details between the two groups, overall survival was not statistically different ( p value, 0.29, log-rank test). Advanced age (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.03 per year; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01–1.04; p value, <0.01), unresectable CRC (aHR, 5.02; 95% CI, 2.49–10.12; p value, <0.01), and advanced CRC stage (aHR, 1.45 per stage; 95% CI, 1.07–1.97; p value, 0.02) were significantly associated with increased risk of death. CD remission at CRC diagnosis (aHR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08–0.91; p value, 0.04), CRC diagnosis period of 2011–2022 (aHR relative to 1989–2000, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.25–0.87; p value, 0.02), and CRC diagnosis by surveillance (aHR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32–0.98; p value, 0.04) were significantly associated with decreased risk of death.Conclusion:Notably, some clinical features of CD with CRC differed between Asan and Mayo patients; however, overall survival was not different. CD remission, CRC surveillance, and more recent diagnosis of CRC were associated with a reduced risk of death.

AbstractIntroductionSolid organ transplant recipients have a higher frequency of tuberculosis (TB) than the general population, with mortality rates of approximately 30%. Although donor‐derived TB is reported to account for <5% of TB in solid organ transplants, the source of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection is infrequently determined.MethodsWe report 3 new cases of pulmonary TB in lung transplant recipients attributed to donor infection, and review the 12 previously reported cases to assess whether cases could have been prevented and whether any cases that might occur in the future could be detected and investigated more quickly. Specifically, we evaluate whether opportunities existed to determine TB risk on the basis of routine donor history, to expedite diagnosis through routine mycobacterial smears and cultures of respiratory specimens early post transplant, and to utilize molecular tools to investigate infection sources epidemiologically.FindingsOn review, donor TB risk was present among 7 cases. Routine smears and cultures diagnosed 4 asymptomatic cases. Genotyping was used to support epidemiologic findings in 6 cases.ConclusionValidated screening protocols, including microbiological testing and newer technologies (e.g., interferon‐gamma release assays) to identify unrecognized M. tuberculosis infection in deceased donors, are warranted.