Citations

Background/Objectives: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have emerged as a promising therapeutic option for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Clinical trials and data demonstrate significant improvements in body weight, insulin resistance, hyperandrogenism, and, in some studies, menstrual regularity and reproductive outcomes. However, the current evidence base remains disproportionately focused on short-term metabolic and anthropometric endpoints, while outcomes most relevant to patients—including treatment satisfaction, gastrointestinal tolerability, psychological well-being, body image, fertility planning, financial burden, and long-term adherence—remain inadequately characterized. Methods: We searched PubMed and Google Scholar for English-language literature published between 2021 and 2026, using structured keyword searches. This narrative review evaluates the literature on GLP-1RA use in PCOS beyond weight-focused outcomes, examining mechanisms of action, comparative tolerability across agents, and patient-centered domains including quality of life, eating behavior, and reproductive planning. Results: The published literature reveals a substantial gap between trial-reported completion rates and treatment success, and actual persistence and patient satisfaction. This discrepancy is particularly consequential in PCOS, where treatment decisions intersect with high baseline rates of depression, anxiety, and body image disturbance, and where ovulatory benefits must be weighed against mandatory discontinuation before conception. Conclusions: We identify a systematic absence of validated patient-reported outcome measures, standardized core outcome sets, and long-term follow-up data after treatment withdrawal. This review proposes a research agenda prioritizing patient-centered endpoints as co-primary outcomes, structured assessment of acceptability and persistence, qualitative and mixed-methods approaches, and a dedicated study of fertility planning and treatment interruption.

ABSTRACT The HLA‐C*06:358 allele is characterised by a single nucleotide substitution in codon 95 in exon 3.

Atezolizumab-bevacizumab and durvalumab-tremelimumab have established immunotherapy as a first-line standard of care in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Yet, objective response rates (ORRs) remain confined to approximately 15-20%, and no validated predictive biomarker exists for patient selection. Unlike melanoma and lung cancer, conventional markers, including programmed death-ligand 1, microsatellite instability-high status, and tumor mutational burden, have not demonstrated reliable predictive value in HCC. Prior narrative reviews comprehensively catalogued the biomarker landscape through 2022 but predate a wave of clinically significant publications. This narrative review synthesizes evidence published between 2020 and 2026, with particular emphasis on 2023–2026 data, within a unified clinical framework not provided by prior reviews. We critically evaluate tissue-based biomarkers, including the AI-derived Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab Response Signature-Pathology model, spatial multiplex immunohistochemistry, and β-catenin mutational profiling; blood-based biomarkers encompassing circulating tumor DNA for minimal residual disease detection and peripheral immune phenotyping; and serum indices including the CRAFITY score and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Hepatitis B virus etiology and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis are discussed as biological modifiers of biomarker performance. We propose an original biomarker-guided clinical algorithm, a comparative clinical readiness table, and a disease-continuum biomarker timeline as practical tools for clinicians and trialists. Prospective biomarker-enrichment trials represent the most critical next step toward clinical translation.

Importance Patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass often require platelet transfusions for bleeding. Platelets are routinely stored at room temperature (20-24 °C) for up to 5 to 7 days; however, cold storage (1-6 °C) may allow for increased storage duration without loss of hemostatic function. Objective To determine the maximum cold-storage duration, up to 21 days, for which cold-stored platelets (CSPs) are noninferior or superior in hemostatic efficacy to room-temperature platelets (RTPs) when transfused in actively bleeding patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Design, Setting, and Participants A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, partially blinded, adaptive, noninferiority, storage duration–ranging trial conducted in pediatric and adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with planned cardiopulmonary bypass at 27 sites in the US and Australia from December 2021 to March 2025. Statistical analysis was conducted from September 9 to October 3, 2025. Intervention Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive CSPs with a maximum of 21 days of storage vs RTPs with a maximum of 7 days of storage. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was a hemostatic efficacy score with values ranging from 1 to 5 and higher values indicating greater bleeding. The noninferiority margin was 1 point. The success criterion was met if at least 1 cold-storage duration of 7 days or more had a posterior probability of noninferiority of at least 97.5%. The secondary outcome was 24-hour chest tube output. Results Of the 1000 patients who underwent platelet transfusion, 989 were included in the primary analysis (650 CSPs and 339 RTPs). The cohort had a mean (SD) age of 42.1 (30.1) years and 67.8% were male. CSPs were noninferior to RTPs for the primary outcome, with a probability of greater than 99.9% for all cold-storage durations. Pooled across storage durations, CSPs had a mean difference from RTPs of 0.09 (95% credible interval, −0.06 to 0.23). Median (IQR) chest tube output at 24 hours (8.9 mL/kg [5.2-15.4] for CSPs vs 8.4 mL/kg [5.5-15.9] for RTPs; difference in medians, 0.4 [95% CI, −1.0 to 1.5]) was not statistically different between study groups. In a post hoc analysis, as all storage durations were noninferior, considering the CSPs as a single group, the hemostatic efficacy score was similar between both groups: mean (SD) of 3.08 (1.15) CSPs vs 2.99 (1.10) RTPs. There were no differences in venous or arterial thrombotic events, transfusion-associated adverse events, acute respiratory distress syndrome, kidney failure, septic shock, and mortality between the study groups, except for increased reexploration rates in the CSP group. Conclusions and Relevance For patients undergoing cardiac surgery, CSPs stored up to 21 days are noninferior to RTPs for the control of active surgical bleeding. Use of CSPs may allow for increased availability of platelets by reducing wastage and shortages and may allow for incorporation of platelets into inventory at locations where platelets cannot be maintained due to the 5- to 7-day shelf life of RTPs. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04834414

ABSTRACT HLA‐DRB1*10:52 is characterised by a single nucleotide substitution in codon 133 in exon 3.

ABSTRACT The HLA‐DQA1*01:205N allele is characterised by a nonsense mutation in codon 114 in exon 3.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Medical management options for nontraumatic subdural hematoma (SDH) remain limited, with only atorvastatin demonstrating benefit in a single phase 2 randomized clinical trial and mixed evidence for dexamethasone. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) may benefit SDH outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between GLP-1 RA use and rescue surgery rates and mortality in patients with medically managed nontraumatic SDH. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX database from 2016 to 2025, including adults with SDH who were managed conservatively without surgical evacuation or middle meningeal artery embolization. Patients prescribed GLP-1 RAs were compared with nonusers. After propensity matching, rescue surgical evacuation, all-cause mortality at 1 year, and GLP-1 RA–associated adverse events were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 134 901 patients with conservatively managed nontraumatic SDH were identified, of whom 1470 (1.1%) were GLP-1 RA users. After propensity score matching, 2922 patients remained, with 1461 in each group. At 1 year, GLP-1 RA users experienced significantly lower rates of rescue surgery (2.23% vs 3.51%; P = .046), culminating in an overall 38% reduction in relative hazard. All-cause mortality was also significantly lower for GLP-1 RA users at 1 year (16.1% vs 23.7%, P < .001), reflecting a 33% reduction in hazards. GLP-1 RA users did not experience different rates of adverse events, such as pancreatitis, gallbladder disease, or ileus/bowel obstruction (all P > .05). CONCLUSION: Among patients with medically managed nontraumatic SDH, GLP-1 RA use was associated with significantly lower rates of rescue surgery and all-cause mortality without significantly increased risk of common GLP-1 RA–related complications.

Abstract Background Biological sex and endocrine signaling influence cancer biology, immune response, and therapeutic outcomes. Recent evidence suggests that testosterone signaling may exert brain-context-dependent protective effects in glioblastoma through the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, reduced glucocorticoid-mediated immune suppression, and altered tumor-immune interactions. We assessed whether testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) exposure was associated with survival in solid tumor central nervous system (CNS) metastases and glioblastoma (GBM, IDH-wildtype, WHO grade 4), settings in which post-diagnosis survival and TRT timing can be clinically defined. Methods We performed a retrospective Mayo Clinic cohort study of adult patients with molecularly confirmed glioblastoma and solid tumor CNS metastases confirmed from neuroimaging reports using large language model-assisted adjudication. TRT exposure was defined by testosterone-specific prescription evidence within prespecified peri-diagnostic windows. Overall survival was evaluated using propensity score-matched Cox models, 24-month administratively censored Cox models, time-dependent Cox sensitivity analyses, and 24-month restricted mean survival time. Results In the pooled solid tumor CNS metastasis cohort, TRT exposure was associated with improved overall survival after propensity score matching (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.65–0.98, p=0.029) and a 3.22-month improvement in 24-month restricted mean survival time. In glioblastoma, TRT exposure was similarly associated with improved overall survival after propensity score matching (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.38–0.82, p=0.003) and a 5.81-month improvement in 24-month restricted mean survival time. Conclusions TRT exposure was associated with improved survival in CNS metastases and glioblastoma. These hypothesis-generating findings support prospective studies incorporating TRT timing, hormone levels, corticosteroid exposure, immune correlates, and tumor-specific stratification. Key points TRT exposure is associated with improved survival in aggressive brain tumors. Survival associations persist after propensity score matching. Prospective studies should define TRT timing, hormone levels, and immune effects. Importance of Study This study evaluates testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) in aggressive intracranial tumors with clinically interpretable survival timelines. Building on recent evidence that androgen signaling may have protective brain-specific effects in glioblastoma, we extend this question to CNS metastases. In a multi-site Mayo Clinic cohort, TRT exposure was associated with improved survival in CNS metastases and glioblastoma, supporting androgen biology as an underrecognized factor in neuro-oncology outcomes. These findings provide rationale for prospective clinical trials incorporating TRT timing, hormone levels, corticosteroid exposure, immune profiling, and tumor-specific stratification.

Abstract Introduction Postoperative radiotherapy is an adjuvant therapy for brain metastases(BrMs) that improves local recurrence(LR). The radiosensitivity index(RSI) is a 10-gene index of pan-cancer molecular radiosensitivity previously validated for predicting radiotherapy response in clinical datasets. In this external validation study, we evaluate RSI as a predictor of local recurrence(LR) after radiotherapy in resected BrM. Methods Patients from University Health Network Toronto(UHN) and McGill University who had a resected BrM and subsequently underwent whole brain radiation(WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery(SRS). RSI was calculated using a ranked linear regression model from the weighted expression of 10 radiosensitivity genes, with higher values corresponding to radioresistance. Radiophenotype was determined using a previously validated RSI cutoff of &lt; 0.375 to identify radiosensitive tumors. LR was defined as recurrence in the resection cavity and overall survival(OS) was measured from time of BrM diagnosis. Results 106 BrM patients were included, comprising 29 breast, 37 GI, 33 lung, and 7 melanoma primary sources. Mean age at surgery was 59.2 years, 31.1%(n = 33) were male, 67.9%(n = 72) had WBRT, 23.6%(n = 25) had a subtotal resection, and 30.2%(n = 32) had postoperative chemotherapy. Overall, 34.0%(n = 36) patients had LR. Patients with breast BrMs had median RSI 0.70(IQR:0.55-0.75, 10.3% radiosensitive) with 48.3% LR(n = 14); gastrointestinal BrMs had median RSI 0.43(IQR: 0.35-0.46, 29.7% radiosensitive) and 24.3% LR(n = 9); lung BrMs had median RSI of 0.67(IQR:0.66-0.71, 9% radiosensitive) and 33.3% LR(n = 11); melanoma BrMs had median RSI of 0.72(IQR:0.53-0.92, 0% radiosensitive) and 28.6% LR(n = 2). After adjusting for demographics, primary organ, radiotherapy, resection extent, among others, RSI did not predict LR(p = 0.56) or OS(p = 0.61). Discussion RSI did not predict either LR or OS in patients with surgically resected BrMs status post radiotherapy, further establishing the need for improved predictive scores in this population.