Citations

Introduction: Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) is a prevalent condition associated with considerable morbidity and mortality, a burden that is further intensified by the frequent co-occurrence of hypertension. The coexistence of these conditions not only amplifies cardiovascular risks but also complicates clinical management, thereby contributing to elevated mortality rates. Although their correlation is well understood, mortality trends in United States have not been studied. Methods: This study utilized International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes to extract age-adjusted mortality data for individuals with PAD and hypertension from the CDC WONDER (Center for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research) cohort. The overall sample and subgroups defined by demographics (age, sex, race/ethnicity) and region (state, census and urban-rural status) were analyzed. Trends in mortality were quantified by computing associated annual percentage changes (APC) using Joinpoint Regression Program Version 4.9.0.0 trend analysis software. Results: A total of 540954 deaths were observed, of which 260517 were men (48.2%). Overall, the age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) exhibited a sharp increase from 1999 to 2001 (APC:25.3; 95% CI: -0.36,56.2), followed by a sustained decrease until 2017 (APC: -2.16; 95% CI: -11.1, -1.52), after which a notable upward trend was observed (APC:9.38; 95% CI: -0.38,24.1). A similar AAMR trend was seen on gender-based subgroup analysis with male patients showing the highest AAMR 13.5 (95% CI: 13.1,13.7) in 2020. Amongst all racial groups, Black or African American showed the highest 14.9 (95% CI: 14.8-15) while Asian or Pacific Islander showed the lowest 5.8 (95% CI: 5.7-5.9) AAMR over 2 decades. The West region had the highest overall age-adjusted mortality rate (AAMR) of 10.2 (95% CI: 10.2-10.3). Among individual states, Vermont displayed the highest AAMR, reaching 15.8 (95% CI: 15.1-16.5). Conclusion: Healthcare disparities are evident. The unprecedented recent increase in mortality rates, following years of successful decline, necessitates a thorough evaluation of healthcare policies and PAD treatment advancements to identify the causative factors behind this trend reversal.

4558 Background: In the past 7 years, 4 immuno-oncology (IO) based combinations have been approved for mRCC. However, QOL data on these combinations are limited to trials in which collection and reporting was not standardized, which further limits cross trial comparisons. Real-world QOL data with multiple treatment regimens are needed to understand how these regimens are tolerated in practice. Methods: ODYSSEY is a multi-site, prospective observational study of 500 US pts with mRCC. Pts must have mRCC (any histology), no prior ST, and follow up at a PCORnet study site. Exclusion criteria include treatment for cancer except mRCC. The primary objective is to determine patterns of change in QOL and symptom burden of pts with mRCC. Minimally important differences (MID) are 3 points for FKSI-19 total score, 1 point for the FKSI-Disease Related Symptoms (DRS) subscale and 7 points for FACT-G. Results: As of 1/6/25, 392 pts were enrolled of whom 299 were managed with ST. Of pts on ST, 114 were treated with IO-IO, 108 with IO-TKI, 33 with IO alone, 27 with Other, and 18 with TKI alone. Median follow up for all pts is 8.8 months (IQR 2.9, 16.2). IO-IO pts are median age 64 yrs, 81% male, 84% white, 56% prior nephrectomy, 84% clear cell; IO-TKI pts median age 66 yrs, 76% male, 92% white, 43% prior nephrectomy, 66% clear cell; IMDC risk profiles are similar. IO-IO pts are more likely to be KPS 100; whereas, IO-TKI pts have a higher median number of metastatic sites and are more likely to have bone or liver metastasis. With median follow-up of 6.0 (IQR 1.8, 14.9) and 8.8 months (4.5, 17.8) in the IO-IO and IO-TKI cohorts, 17 (15%) and 21 (19%) pts had died with a median time to death of 5.4 (2.5, 6.4) and 5.7 months (4.4, 12.8), respectively. 20 (18%) and 16 (15%) pts on IO-IO and IO-TKI had discontinued therapy at a median of 3.0 (IQR 2.0, 4.0) and 6.4 months (2.4, 13.0), respectively. Rates of discontinuation for disease progression and toxicity are similar. Baseline PROs for pts on ST are shown in the Table (higher score indicates better QOL), with RCT data for reference (NA, not assessed). Conclusions: In our prospective multi-center ODYSSEY study, we demonstrate that real world pts treated with contemporary ST have worse baseline QOL than those enrolled on pivotal RCTs. One-third of IO-IO and IO-TKI pts died or discontinued therapy within 6 months of initiation. Our data on real world vs RCT differences in baseline QOL may partially explain the limitations of current IO combination regimens in practice and support development of alternative treatment approaches. Instrument, Mean (SD) ODYSSEYIO-IO(N=114) CheckMate214(N=425) ODYSSEYIO-TKI(N=108) KEYNOTE426(N=402) CheckMate9ER(N=323) CLEAR(N=351) FKSI-19 total 56.0 (12.5) 60.1 (9.8) 53.8 (11.8) NA 58.7 (10.6) NA FKSI-DRS 27.5 (6.3) 30.7 (4.5) 27.0 (5.8) 32 (4.2) 30.2 (5.2) 31.3 (4.4) FACT-G 82.4 (16.7) 82.6 (15.0) 78.5 (16.0) NA NA NA

4553 Background: AS is a recognized strategy in select pts with mRCC to maximize QOL and delay potential toxicity of systemic therapy (ST); however, only 2 prospective studies of AS in mRCC have been published: only 1 with patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and none in the IO-TKI era. Methods: ODYSSEY is a prospective observational study of 500 US pts with mRCC. Eligible pts must have mRCC (any histology), no prior ST, age ≥19. Pts were excluded if treated for non-mRCC cancers or if not followed at a PCORnet study site. Pts completed QOL surveys at baseline, by phone every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months until end of follow up. The primary objective is to determine patterns of change in QOL and symptom burden of pts with mRCC. Minimally important differences (MID) are 3 points for FKSI-19 total score, 1 point for the FKSI-Disease Related Symptoms (DRS) subscale and 7 points for FACT-G. Here we report baseline pt characteristics in AS pts compared to ST pts, and baseline QOL differences between these cohorts. Results: As of 1/6/25, 392 pts were enrolled of whom 299 were managed with ST, and 93 pts deferred ST; of these, 53 pts (57%) were classified as AS. Pts on AS are median age 68 yrs, 66% male, 94% white, 81% clear cell, 50% favorable risk, 44% intermediate risk. Compared with ST pts, AS pts were more likely to have undergone nephrectomy (91% vs 53%), favorable risk profile (50% vs 15%), pancreatic metastasis (15% vs 5%), and longer time since RCC diagnosis (median 58 vs 3.3 months); and less likely to have bone, brain, or liver metastasis. After median 8.8 months follow-up (IQR 2.9, 16.2), 2 pts (4%) on AS had died compared with 45 pts (15%) on ST. One pt (2%) on AS started first-line therapy and 45 pts (15%) discontinued ST. Mean baseline QOL (FKSI-19 total, DRS and FACT-G) for AS and ST ODYSSEY pts is shown in the Table (higher score indicates better QOL), with RCT data for reference (NA, not assessed). ODYSSEY pts on AS had higher QOL for all measures compared with ODYSSEY pts on ST. FSKI-DRS was the same or lower for pts on AS compared to the pivotal trials, while ODYSSEY pts on ST had both lower FKSI-19 total and DRS. Conclusions: In our large prospective cohort from ODYSSEY, pts on AS had higher median QOL scores than pts on ST, but similar to those included in RCTs. These results suggest that some RCT pts could have benefitted from AS. Further follow up is needed to determine long term outcomes in pts on AS and how they respond to deferred ST. Clinical trial information: NCT04919122 . Instrument, Mean (SD) ODYSSEY AS (N=53) ODYSSEY ST (N=299) ODYSSEY Difference, AS vs ST (95% CI) CheckMate 214 (N=425) KEYNOTE 426 (N=402) CheckMate 9ER (N=323) CLEAR (N=351) FKSI-19 total 63.4 (9.2) 56.3 (12.5) 7.0(4.0, 10.1) 60.1 (9.8) NA 58.7 (10.6) NA FKSI-DRS 30.8 (4.2) 27.9 (6.0) 2.9(1.5, 4.7) 30.7 (4.5) 32 (4.2) 30.2 (5.2) 31.3 (4.4) FACT-G 87.9 (14.0) 82.4 (16.7) 5.6(1.1, 10.0) 82.6 (15.0) NA NA NA

Introduction: Pregnancy is considered a hypercoagulable state, with levels of multiple coagulation factors including Factor VIII (FVIII) and von Willebrand Factor (VWF), progressively increasing throughout, reaching their peak levels during the third trimester. However, in women with von Willebrand disease (VWD), these changes are variable and could be blunted or absent due to the wide heterogeneity of phenotypes and pathophysiological mechanisms linked to this disorder, posing a significant clinical challenge. This study aims to describe the trend in the VWF profile in women with VWD during each trimester of pregnancy and in the postpartum period. Methods: This is a retrospective single-center study that included adult pregnant women diagnosed with VWD, who were followed at Henry Ford Health between 03/2012 and 11/2022. Patients with other bleeding disorders were excluded from the study. Data on baseline characteristics, including age, race, age at childbirth, and parity were collected. Additional data collected included VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) level, FVIII activity level, and VWF ristocetin cofactor (VWF:Rco) activity during the first, second, and third trimesters, as well as in the postpartum period. Results: A total of 33 cases were included in our study. At baseline, the mean VWF:Ag level in our patients was 50.5% (reference range 50%-150%). Compared to baseline, the VWF:Ag level increased by 48.71% in the first trimester, 80.59% in the second trimester, and 168.71% in the third trimester. Postpartum, the VWF:Ag level decreased by 51.29% compared to the third trimester; however, it remained 30.89% higher than baseline levels. While the FVIII level (reference range 50%-150%) was an average of 64.8% at baseline, it increased by 21.91% in the first trimester, 74.23% in the second trimester, and 143.67% in the third trimester, compared to baseline. Postpartum, the FVIII level decreased by 48.45% from the third trimester but remained 25.62% higher than baseline. Additionally, the VWF:Rco level was an average of 44.3% (reference range 51%-215%) at baseline. Compared to baseline, the VWF:Rco level increased by 61.85% in the first trimester, 90.52% in the second trimester, and 142.66% in the third trimester. It decreased by 49.12% postpartum compared to the third trimester but remained 23.48% higher than baseline. Conclusion: In women with VWD, VWF:Ag level, FVIII level, and VWF:Rco levels steadily increase during pregnancy, reaching their maximum levels during the third trimester. All three levels decreased in the postpartum period; however, they remain higher compared to baseline at a median follow up of 105 days after delivery.

TPS3161 Background: The p53 pathway has been implicated in antitumor immunity, including antigen presentation and T-cell proliferation. Loss of p53 function can increase resistance to immunotherapy across many tumor types. Eprenetapopt (eprenet) is a small molecule that stabilizes the folded structure of p53, resulting in activation of mutant p53 and stabilization of wild-type (WT) p53. It also targets the cellular redox homeostasis, resulting in induction of apoptosis in tumor cells. In vivo, mice carrying supernumerary copies of the TP53 gene harbor a pro-inflammatory tumor microenvironment, an effect recapitulated in TP53 normal-copy mice treated with eprenetapopt. Combining eprenetapopt and anti-PD1 or anti-CTLA4 therapy resulted in enhanced tumor growth inhibition and improved survival in TP53 WT mice inoculated with B16 melanoma and MC38 colon adenocarcinoma cells . Based on these results, we hypothesized that eprenet-induced p53 stabilization may augment response to immunotherapy. To test this hypothesis, we are conducting a phase 1b/2 study of eprenet in combination with pembrolizumab (eprenet+pembro) in pts with solid tumors. Methods: The primary objectives are to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and to assess the safety and tolerability of eprenet+pembro in pts with advanced solid tumors. The secondary objectives are to estimate the anti-tumor activity and to describe the pharmacokinetics of the combination. Exploratory objectives include assessing predictive and pharmacodynamic markers of response. The study includes a safety lead-in with a 3+3 dose de-escalation design for pts with advanced solid tumors with known tumor TP53 mutation status ( TP53 WT is acceptable) (max 18 pts), followed by expansion cohorts in pts with NSCLC, gastric/GEJ and urothelial cancer (max 100 pts). In expansion, pts with urothelial and gastric cancers must be naïve to anti-PD-1/ L1 therapy. Eprenet is given IV once daily on Days 1–4 while pembro is administered on Day 3 of each 21-day cycle. The RP2D of eprenet+pembro is considered the dose at which ≤ 1 of 6 pts in a cohort has a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Primary endpoints are occurrence of DLTs, adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs with eprenet+pembro. Key secondary endpoints are best objective response, progression free survival and overall survival. Exploratory endpoints include gene mutations by next generation sequencing (including TP53), mRNA expression, multiplex immunohistochemistry and transcriptomics, multiplex flow cytometry on peripheral blood mononuclear cells and cytokines in serum. Continuous monitoring of toxicity will be conducted. The trial opened in May 2020 and is actively enrolling patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04383938.