Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

2 citation(s) found for "Fung, Samuel".

Integrated high‐resolution copy number and histomolecular analysis of diffuse hemispheric glioma, H3 G34 ‐mutant reveals universal TP53 abnormalities
Trejo-Lopez, Jorge, Mendoza, Cinthya Zepeda, Kollmeyer, T. M., Decker, P. A., Hardcastle, Jayson, Smoley, Stephanie A., Isaacson, Matthew , Gandham, Mallika , Dasari, Surendra, Raghunathan, Aditya, Giannini, Caterina, Zheng, Gang, Wagner, Aaron S., Lopes, M Beatriz, Fung, K Samuel, Peterson, JoElle, Rivera, Andreana L., Rossi, Christopher , Walsh, Meggen, Abdullaev, Zied , Aldape, Kenneth, Quezado, Martha, Cimino, Patrick Joseph, Jenkins, Robert B, Trejo‐Lopez, Jorge , Trejo-Lopez, Jorge A , Zepeda-Mendoza, Cinthya J , Kollmeyer, Thomas M. , Pazdernik, Vanessa M, Praska, Corinne E, Smoley, Stephanie , Lopes, M Beatriz , Ida, Cristiane M , Zepeda‐Mendoza, Cinthya , Drucker, Kristen , Pazdernik, Vanessa , Praska, Corinne , Dasari, Surendra, Raghunathan, Aditya , Giannini, Caterina , Lopes, M. Beatriz S. , Quezado, Martha , Pratt, Drew , Cimino, Patrick J. , Ida, Cristiane M.

Brain Pathology | February 6, 2026 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/bpa.70076 | PMID 41649072 Get It

Abstract Diffuse hemispheric glioma, H3 G34‐mutant (DHG‐H3 G34) has been primarily molecularly characterized by methylation profiling and sequencing studies. We describe an integrated histomolecular evaluation including high‐resolution copy number profiling of a series of 60 DHG‐H3 G34 to further our understanding of the spectrum of genetic changes associated with this tumor type. Cases were clinically tested using an 187‐gene mutation and fusion targeted neuro‐oncology next‐generation sequencing panel ( n = 60) and Oncoscan chromosomal microarray ( n = 26) by a single laboratory (2018–2022). A subset of cases had immunohistochemical results for OLIG2 ( n = 42), p53 ( n = 48), and ATRX ( n = 46), and methylation array data ( n = 8). Median age at testing was 21 years (range, 12–50). No significant difference was noted in clinical, histopathological, and mutational profile between pediatric and adult patients. H3‐3A G34 mutations included G34R ( n = 56; 94%), G34V ( n = 3), and a non‐canonical G34E ( n = 1). Concurrent mutations most often involved TP53 ( n = 55; 92%), ATRX ( n = 50; 83%), and PDGFRA ( n = 34; 57%). A reportedly primary tumor was confirmed to be hypermutant and had a PMS2 mutation. A single case also showed an FGFR3::FAM184B fusion. All cases with available chromosomal microarray data had unbalanced genomes, which were often complex (14/26; 54%). The most frequent recurrent copy number abnormalities were losses involving 3q, 4q, 10q, 13q, and 18q, and 17p copy‐neutral loss of heterozygosity (cnLOH) encompassing TP53 . This copy number profile was reminiscent of that seen in Grade 4 IDH‐mutant astrocytomas. Collectively, a TP53 abnormality at copy number (12/26, all cnLOH), sequence (55/60) and protein expression (46/48) level was detected in all 60 cases. In conclusion, integrated high‐resolution copy number and histomolecular analysis expanded the spectrum of genetic changes associated with DHG‐H3 G34, including the presence of universal TP53 abnormalities with frequent cnLOH—a copy number abnormality that has been largely unrecognized—for this new 2021 World Health Organization central nervous system tumor type.
Identifying Outcomes Important to Patients with Glomerular Disease and Their Caregivers
Carter, Simon , Gutman, Talia , Logeman, Charlotte , Cattran, D C, Lightstone, Liz , Bagga, Arvind , Barbour, Sean J. , Barratt, Jonathan , Boletis, John , Caster, Dawn J. , Floege, Jürgen , Hogan, Jonathan J., Lafayette, Richard , Malvar, Ana , Scholes‐Robertson, Nicole , Trimarchi, Hernán, Zhang, Hong , Ažukaitis, Karolis , Viecelli, Andrea K. , Dunn, Louese, Harris, David C.H. , Johnson, David W. , Laboi, Paul, Ryan, Jessica , Ruiz, Lorena , Wang, Angela Yee‐Moon , Lee, Achilles Hoi Kan, Fung, Samuel , Tong, M.K.H. , Teixeira‐Pinto, Armando , Alexander, Stephen I. , Craig, Jonathan C. , Investigators, on behalf of the SONG-GD, Floege, Jürgen , Kitching, A Richard , Johnson, David W , Wang, Angela Yee-Moon , Wilkie, Martin , Carter, Simon A , Barratt, Jonathan , Scholes-Robertson, Nicole , Coppo, Rosanna , Fervenza, Fernando C. , Hladunewich, Michelle , Hogan, Jonathan J. , Kitching, A. Richard , Malvar, Ana , Radhakrishnan, Jai , Rovin, Brad H. , Trimarchi, Hernán , Cho, Yeoungjee , Kerr, Peter G. , Shen, Jenny I. , Tong, Allison , Investigators, on behalf of the SONG-GD

Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology | April 30, 2020 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 673-684

10.2215/cjn.13101019 | PMID 32354728 Get It

Background and objectives Shared decision making in patients with glomerular disease remains challenging because outcomes important to patients remain largely unknown. We aimed to identify and prioritize outcomes important to patients and caregivers and to describe reasons for their choices. Design, setting, participants, & measurements We purposively sampled adult patients with glomerular disease and their caregivers from Australia, Hong Kong, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Participants identified, discussed, and ranked outcomes in focus groups using the nominal group technique; a relative importance score (between zero and one) was calculated. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Results Across 16 focus groups, 134 participants (range, 19–85 years old; 51% women), including 101 patients and 33 caregivers, identified 58 outcomes. The ten highest-ranked outcomes were kidney function (importance score of 0.42), mortality (0.29), need for dialysis or transplant (0.22), life participation (0.18), fatigue (0.17), anxiety (0.13), family impact (0.12), infection and immunity (0.12), ability to work (0.11), and BP (0.11). Three themes explained the reasons for these rankings: constraining day-to-day experience, impaired agency and control over health, and threats to future health and family. Conclusions Patients with glomerular disease and their caregivers highly prioritize kidney health and survival, but they also prioritize life participation, fatigue, anxiety, and family impact.