Back to Authors

Barratt, Jonathan

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9063-7229

Mayo Clinic

University of Leicester

Citations 4

Alveolar Hemorrhage in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody–Associated Vasculitis: Results of an International Randomized Controlled Trial (PEXIVAS)
Fussner, Lynn A. , Flores-Suárez, Luis Felipe , Cartin‐Ceba, Rodrigo , Specks, Ulrich , Cox, Gerard , Jayne, David , Merkel, Peter A. , Walsh, Michael , Moreland, Larry W. , Little, Mark A. , Johnson, David W. , Nachman, Patrick H. , Barratt, Jonathan , Bech, Jesper Nørgaard , Badve, Sunil V. , Jones, Rachel , Pavenski, Katerina , Cox, P Gerard , Jayne, David , Moreland, Larry W , Johnson, David W , Specks, Ulrich , Merkel, Peter A , Barratt, Jonathan , Birn, Henrik

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine | February 12, 2024 | Volume: 209 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1141-1151

10.1164/rccm.202308-1426oc Get It

Abstract Rationale Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH) is a life-threatening manifestation of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–associated vasculitis (AAV). The PEXIVAS (Plasma Exchange and Glucocorticoids in Severe Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody–Associated Vasculitis) (NCT00987389) trial was the largest in AAV and the first to enroll participants with DAH requiring mechanical ventilation. Objectives Evaluate characteristics, treatment effects, and outcomes for patients with AAV with and without DAH. Methods PEXIVAS randomized 704 participants to plasma exchange (PLEX) or no-PLEX and reduced or standard-dose glucocorticoids (GC). DAH status was defined at enrollment as no-DAH, nonsevere, or severe (room air oxygen saturation of ≤ 85% as measured by pulse oximetry, or use of mechanical ventilation). Measurements and Main Results At enrollment, 191 (27.1%) participants had DAH (61 severe, including 29 ventilated) and were younger, more frequently relapsing, PR3 (proteinase 3)-ANCA positive, and had lower serum creatinine but were more frequently dialyzed than participants without DAH (n = 513; 72.9%). Among those with DAH, 8/95 (8.4%) receiving PLEX died within 1 year versus 15/96 (15.6%) with no-PLEX (hazard ratio, 0.52; confidence interval [CI], 0.21–1.24), whereas 13/96 (13.5%) receiving reduced GC died versus 10/95 (10.5%) with standard GC (hazard ratio, 1.33; CI, 0.57–3.13). When ventilated, ventilator-free days were similar with PLEX versus no-PLEX (medians, 25; interquartile range [IQR], 22–26 vs. 22–27) and fewer with reduced GC (median, 23; IQR, 20–25) versus standard GC (median, 26; IQR, 25–28). Treatment effects on mortality did not vary by presence or severity of DAH. Overall, 23/191 (12.0%) with DAH died within 1 year versus 34/513 (6.6%) without DAH. End-stage kidney disease and serious infections did not differ by DAH status or treatments. Conclusions Patients with AAV and DAH differ from those without DAH in multiple ways. Further data are required to confirm or refute a benefit of PLEX or GC dosing on mortality. Original clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00987389).
A Core Outcome Set for Trials in Glomerular Disease
Carter, Simon , Cattran, D C, Bagga, Arvind , Barbour, Sean J. , Barratt, Jonathan , Boletis, John , Caster, Dawn J. , Floege, Jürgen , Hogan, Jonathan J., Lafayette, Richard , Malvar, Ana , Scholes‐Robertson, Nicole , Trimarchi, Hernán, Zhang, Hong , Anumudu, Samaya J. , Gutman, Talia , O’Lone, Emma, Viecelli, Andrea K. , Au, Eric , Dunn, Louese, Howell, Martin , Ju, Angela, Logeman, Charlotte , Nataatmadja, Melissa, Craig, Jonathan C. , Floege, Jürgen , Carter, Simon A , Barratt, Jonathan , Kitching, A Richard , Scholes-Robertson, Nicole , Gutman, Talia , Au, Eric , Nataatmadja, Melissa , Howell, Martin , Lightstone, Liz , Tong, Allison , Coppo, Rosanna , Fervenza, Fernando C. , Hladunewich, Michelle , Hogan, Jonathan J. , Kitching, A. Richard , Malvar, Ana , Radhakrishnan, Jai , Rovin, Brad H. , Trimarchi, Hernán , Cho, Yeoungjee , Ažukaitis, Karolis , Baumgart, Amanda , Bernier-Jean, Amélie , Sautenet, Bénédicte , Sharma, Ankit

Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology | December 30, 2021 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 53-64

10.2215/cjn.07840621 Get It

Background and objectives Outcomes reported in trials in adults with glomerular disease are often selected with minimal patient input, are heterogeneous, and may not be relevant for clinical decision making. The Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology–Glomerular Disease (SONG-GD) initiative aimed to establish a core outcome set to help ensure that outcomes of critical importance to patients, care partners, and clinicians are consistently reported. Design, setting, participants, and measurements We convened two 1.5-hour workshops in Melbourne, Australia, and Washington, DC, United States. Attendees were identified purposively with 50 patients/care partners and 88 health professionals from 19 countries; 51% were female. Patients and care partners were from the United States, Australia, and Canada, and had experience of a glomerular disease with systemic features ( n =9), kidney-limited nephrotic disease ( n =9), or other kidney-limited glomerular disease ( n =8). Attendees reviewed the results of the SONG-GD Delphi survey and aims of the workshop and then discussed potential core outcomes and their implementation in trials among moderated breakout groups of eight to 12 people from diverse backgrounds. Transcripts of discussions were analyzed thematically. Results Three themes were identified that supported the proposed core outcomes: limiting disease progression, stability and control, and ensuring universal relevance ( i.e. , applicable across diverse populations and settings). The fourth theme, preparedness for implementation, included engaging with funders and regulators, establishing reliable and validated measures, and leveraging existing endorsements for patient-reported outcomes. Conclusions Workshop themes demonstrated support for kidney function, disease activity, death, life participation, and cardiovascular disease, and these were established as the core outcomes for trials in adults with glomerular disease. Future work is needed to establish the core measures for each domain, with funders and regulators central to the uptake of the core outcome set in trials.
Identifying Outcomes Important to Patients with Glomerular Disease and Their Caregivers
Carter, Simon , Gutman, Talia , Logeman, Charlotte , Cattran, D C, Lightstone, Liz , Bagga, Arvind , Barbour, Sean J. , Barratt, Jonathan , Boletis, John , Caster, Dawn J. , Floege, Jürgen , Hogan, Jonathan J., Lafayette, Richard , Malvar, Ana , Scholes‐Robertson, Nicole , Trimarchi, Hernán, Zhang, Hong , Ažukaitis, Karolis , Viecelli, Andrea K. , Dunn, Louese, Harris, David C.H. , Johnson, David W. , Laboi, Paul, Ryan, Jessica , Ruiz, Lorena , Wang, Angela Yee‐Moon , Lee, Achilles Hoi Kan, Fung, Samuel , Tong, M.K.H. , Teixeira‐Pinto, Armando , Alexander, Stephen I. , Craig, Jonathan C. , Investigators, on behalf of the SONG-GD, Floege, Jürgen , Kitching, A Richard , Johnson, David W , Wang, Angela Yee-Moon , Wilkie, Martin , Carter, Simon A , Barratt, Jonathan , Scholes-Robertson, Nicole , Coppo, Rosanna , Fervenza, Fernando C. , Hladunewich, Michelle , Hogan, Jonathan J. , Kitching, A. Richard , Malvar, Ana , Radhakrishnan, Jai , Rovin, Brad H. , Trimarchi, Hernán , Cho, Yeoungjee , Kerr, Peter G. , Shen, Jenny I. , Tong, Allison , Investigators, on behalf of the SONG-GD

Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology | April 30, 2020 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 673-684

10.2215/cjn.13101019 Get It

Background and objectives Shared decision making in patients with glomerular disease remains challenging because outcomes important to patients remain largely unknown. We aimed to identify and prioritize outcomes important to patients and caregivers and to describe reasons for their choices. Design, setting, participants, & measurements We purposively sampled adult patients with glomerular disease and their caregivers from Australia, Hong Kong, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Participants identified, discussed, and ranked outcomes in focus groups using the nominal group technique; a relative importance score (between zero and one) was calculated. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Results Across 16 focus groups, 134 participants (range, 19–85 years old; 51% women), including 101 patients and 33 caregivers, identified 58 outcomes. The ten highest-ranked outcomes were kidney function (importance score of 0.42), mortality (0.29), need for dialysis or transplant (0.22), life participation (0.18), fatigue (0.17), anxiety (0.13), family impact (0.12), infection and immunity (0.12), ability to work (0.11), and BP (0.11). Three themes explained the reasons for these rankings: constraining day-to-day experience, impaired agency and control over health, and threats to future health and family. Conclusions Patients with glomerular disease and their caregivers highly prioritize kidney health and survival, but they also prioritize life participation, fatigue, anxiety, and family impact.