Citations

The intestinal epithelium is exposed to diverse combinations of microbiota-derived compounds; however, the mechanisms by which the host integrates these signals remain poorly defined. Studying two highly abundant microbial metabolites, we identified the purine metabolite hypoxanthine as an effector metabolite that directly drives signaling and the short-chain fatty acid butyrate as a regulatory metabolite that conditions host responsiveness. Specifically, hypoxanthine activates the adenosine A1 receptor–TRPC4 axis in enterochromaffin (EC) cells, triggering calcium influx and serotonin release resulting in accelerated gastrointestinal transit locally and increased platelet activation systemically. In contrast, butyrate epigenetically upregulates specific G protein–coupled receptors and ion channels to enhance response to hypoxanthine and the neurotransmitters norepinephrine and dopamine. These findings define a cooperative signaling framework and highlight the role of EC cells as a distinct epithelial signaling hub that senses and integrates microbial metabolite signals to drive physiological responses. Our findings provide a mechanistic foundation for therapeutic strategies that leverage combinatorial microbial signaling.

Introduction: Inflammatory bowel disease is characterized by remitting and relapsing bouts of intestinal inflammation accompanied by sensory and motor dysfunction that persists beyond the active periods of inflammation. Evidence suggests that neural pathways of the Gut-Brain Axis, particularly the sensory and sympathetic nervous system, are involved in pathophysiology, but until recently technical restrictions have limited our understanding of the underlying neural circuit mechanisms. In this study, we examined how sensory-sympathetic circuits are modified by colitis and how these alterations contribute to dysfunction during both active inflammation and post-inflammatory recovery. Methods: E2a-GCaMP mice were treated with vehicle or 3% dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) for 5 days to induce experimental colitis and switched to normal drinking water. Mice were assessed at two time points: Day 7 (two days after ending DSS treatment), representing active inflammation, and Day 21 to represent recovery. Inflammation and mucosal damage were evaluated using disease activity index scores and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Colon motility was assessed in vivo via colonic bead expulsion and ex vivo using whole-colon preparations. We performed Ca 2+ imaging of sympathetic motor neurons in prevertebral ganglia (PVG) and sensory neurons in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons in ex vivo preparations that preserve extrinsic neural circuitry with the colon (intestinofugal-sympathetic and spinal cord-sympathetic pathways). Results: Histological analysis confirmed hallmark features of colitis, including colon shortening, immune infiltration, and mucosal damage at 7 days post-DSS (p< 0.05, n=3–4), which resolved after recovery. During active inflammation, in vivo colon transit time was significantly faster, and this persisted after recovery (p< 0.05, n=7-9). Ex vivo motility assays in isolated colons also revealed DSS-induced dysmotility during active inflammation, but the irregular colon motor complexes became normal after recovery (p< 0.05, n=7-9), suggesting that extrinsic neural pathways contribute to prolonged dysmotility. In preparations without the spinal cord, PVG neurons exhibited increased activity and increased responses to distension during active inflammation but returned to baseline after recovery (p< 0.05, n=3-4), suggesting alternative sensory-PVG pathways contribute to persistent dysmotility. In preparations with spinal circuits intact, thoracolumbar (TL), but not lumbosacral (LS), DRG sensory neurons were hypersensitive to colonic distension during inflammation (p< 0.05, n=8-9). Furthermore, TL spinal stimulation evoked more responses in PVG neurons during active inflammation, but this was associated with decreased inhibition of ENS motor circuits (p< 0.05, n=6-7) and increased Ca 2+ signaling in the epithelium (p< 0.05, n=5), suggesting shifts in TL spinal-sympathetic motor output. Preliminary studies show an increase in spontaneous activity of TL DRG neurons in recovery that does not occur at LS levels (p< 0.05, n=3-6), which suggests that thoracolumbar spinal pathways remain hyperexcitable after recovery.Conclusions: Our findings indicate that TL spinal pathways associated with sympathetic motor outflow contribute to pain and dysmotility during active inflammation and may contribute to the post-inflammatory recovery processes that seem to go awry in IBD patients with relapsing inflammation. This abstract was presented at the American Physiology Summit 2026 and is only available in HTML format. There is no downloadable file or PDF version. The Physiology editorial board was not involved in the peer review process.

This investigation examined listener transcriptions of phrases produced by speakers with mild to severe hypokinetic dysarthria to examine individual strategies for the identification of word boundaries in connected speech. It was hypothesized that the most efficient listeners would use syllabic strength information to guide their parsing of the continuous acoustic stream. Six-hundred transcribed phrases (10 listeners ×60 phrases) were coded independently by two judges to identify (1) correct word transcriptions, (2) evidence of accurate lexical parsing, regardless of exact word identification, and (3) the proportions of accurate parsing of strong and weak syllable word onsets. Linear regression analysis of the group data revealed that correct segmentation of strong syllable word onsets predicted listener performance on segmenting weak syllable word onsets [R=0.805, F(1,29)=51.440, p&lt;0.001]. Despite a wide range of listener performance on ``words correct,'' individual strategies for perceptual segmentation were evident only in the transcriptions for the most severe speaker. In this case, the poorest listeners exhibited disproportionate difficulty with the segmentation weak syllable word onsets. Results suggest that a listener's ability to use syllabic strength information in lexical parsing determines, in part, their ability to recognize word onsets. [Work supported by NIDCD, NIH.]

This investigation evaluated a possible source of reduced intelligibility in hypokinetic dysarthric speech, namely the mismatch between listeners’ perceptual strategies and the acoustic information available in the dysarthric speech signal. A paradigm of error analysis was adopted in which listener transcriptions of phrases were coded for the presence and type of word boundary errors. Seventy listeners heard 60 phrases produced by speakers with hypokinetic dysarthria. The six-syllable phrases alternated strong and weak syllables and ranged in length from three to five words. Lexical boundary violations were defined as erroneous insertions or deletions of lexical boundaries that occurred either before strong or before weak syllables. A total of 1596 lexical boundary errors in the listeners’ transcriptions was identified unanimously by three independent judges. The pattern of errors generally conformed with the predictions of the Metrical Segmentation Strategy hypothesis [Cutler and Norris, J. Exp. Psychol. 14, 113–121 (1988)] which posits that listeners attend to strong syllables to identify word onsets. However, the strength of adherence to this pattern varied across speakers. Comparison of acoustic evidence of syllabic strength to lexical boundary error patterns revealed a source of intelligibility deficit associated with this particular type of dysarthric speech pattern.

This investigation is the second in a series to examine a potential source of reduced intelligibility in dysarthric speech, namely the mismatch between listeners’ perceptual strategies and the acoustic information available in the dysarthric speech signal. Lexical boundary error (LBE) analysis was conducted on listener transcripts from phrases produced by speakers with hypokinetic dysarthria, ataxic dysarthria, and normal controls. By design, the hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthric tapes elicited similar intelligibility (words-correct) scores. However, they elicited different numbers and patterns of lexical boundary errors. The nature of the error pattern differences can be traced to the listeners’ use of available syllabic strength information to segment the acoustic stream. Specifically, although both dysarthric speech samples elicited numerous lexical boundary errors, those for the hypokinetic speech generally conformed to predictions offered from studies of degraded normal speech. Those for the ataxic speech did not conform strongly to such predictions. It appears that the prosodic deficits of the ataxic speech (tendency toward syllabic isochrony, excessive loudness variation, and reduced vowel working space consequent to reductions in vowel strength) posed more of a problem for listeners than did the prosodic deficits of the hypokinetic speech (rapid rate, monotony, reduced vowel working space).