Citations

Study Design: Retrospective. Objective: To examine the long-term perioperative changes in lumbar bone quality, paraspinal muscle size and fat content, and facet degeneration after hemipelvectomy (HP) and hip disarticulation (HD). Summary of Background Data: Emerging evidence shows that transfemoral (TFA) and transtibial (TTA) amputations may accelerate lumbar modic changes and precipitate axial back pain. TFA and TTA amputation studies demonstrate that the severity of postamputation lower back pain is associated with the amputation type (TFA > TTA) and the degree of alteration in lumbopelvic kinematics. Methods: All patients who underwent HP or HD for malignancy or infection at an academic center between 2003 and 2022 were retrospectively identified. Preoperative to postoperative changes in multifidus, erector spinae, quadratus lumborum, and psoas cross-sectional area (CSA), and Hounsfield units (HU) were calculated on CT for the amputated and contralateral side at the level of the L3–4 disc space. Paired univariate analysis was utilized to compare preoperative and postoperative outcomes. Results: A total of 16 patients (8 HP, 8 HD) met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The preoperative to postoperative changes in HUs in the L1, L3, and L5 vertebral bodies were −27.0 ( P =0.004), −51.5 ( P =0.002), and −48.1 ( P =0.001), respectively. The decrease in L1 HU was greater for prosthesis nonusers (user: −16.50, nonuser: −51.32, P =0.021). L5–S1 segment facet degeneration increased postoperatively ( P =0.030, n=7 progressed). There were significant preoperative to postoperative changes in psoas CSA (preop: 1063.4, postop: 586.5, P =0.005) and psoas HU (preop: 50.95, postop: 33.55, P <0.001) on the amputated but not the contralateral side. Conclusion: Hind-quarter amputations were associated with decreased lumbar bone quality, progression of facet degeneration, and loss of amputated side psoas muscle tone. Daily prosthesis use was moderately protective for lumbar bone quality following amputation. HP but not HD was associated with postoperative loss of amputated side quadratus lumborum tone. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Study Design: Retrospective analyses of the center of rotation (COR) in asymptomatic volunteers and symptomatic patients. Objective: Document (i) level-specific COR position at radiographically normal levels in asymptomatic volunteers, (ii) preoperative COR abnormalities in symptomatic patients, and (iii) correlations between COR and other intervertebral motion metrics. Summary of Background Data: The COR has been discussed in many prior publications; however, our understanding of the normal position of the COR, the types and prevalence of COR abnormalities in patients, and the association between COR and other more common measures of intervertebral motion remains limited. Methods: Using automated, FDA-cleared software, we quantified COR and standard motion/alignment metrics from cervical flexion-extension radiographs of 341 asymptomatic volunteers and 1263 symptomatic preoperative patients. Level-specific 95% reference ellipses were derived from volunteers. Abnormality was defined as COR outside the level-matched ellipse. Associations between COR (cranial-caudal and anteroposterior) and rotation, translation, sagittal plane offset, disc height change, and standardized instability indices were evaluated. Results: In volunteers, COR was level-dependent and well summarized by 95% reference ellipses. The cranial-caudal position of COR was chiefly determined by rotation and translation, whereas the anteroposterior position related to sagittal plane offset and disc height change. COR also correlated with translational (TI-Index) and vertical (AVI/PVI) instability metrics. In symptomatic patients, most levels fell within reference ellipses; when deviations occurred, they were infrequent and multidirectional. Conclusions: COR can be automatically derived from flexion-extension radiographs. Deviations from level-specific reference ellipses provide an intuitive visualization of abnormal kinematics, complementing established motion metrics and linking cranial-caudal and anteroposterior shifts to specific patterns of translation, alignment, and instability.

Study Design: Retrospective cohort. Objective: This study aims to assess the effects of CT-based subsidence on lumbar sagittal alignment and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), and to determine if subsidence and cage properties are independent predictors of postoperative changes in regional lordosis. Summary of Background Data: Subsidence is a well-known complication following interbody fusion and has previously been associated with recurrence of preoperative symptoms and higher reoperation rates. There is incomplete evidence to characterize the effects of subsidence on lumbar alignment and PROMs following TLIF. Methods: All adult patients who underwent 1- or 2-level TLIF at a multi-institutional academic center between 2017 and 2019 were retrospectively identified. Interbody subsidence at the superior and inferior endplate of each TLIF level was directly measured on both coronal and sagittal CT scans obtained between 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Patients were grouped based on the maximum subsidence at each operative level: mild-moderate (<4 mm) or severe (≥4 mm). Preoperative, immediate (<3 mo), and intermediate (>6 mo) postoperative radiographic outcomes (local and global lumbar alignment) and PROMs (VAS Back, Oswestry Disability Index, PROMIS Physical Function and Mood) were collected. Univariate and multivariate analysis compared patient demographics, surgical factors, and changes in radiographic measures and PROMs across subsidence groups. Multiple linear regression analyzed independent effects of subsidence and cage characteristics on alignment. Results: Sixty-seven patients with 85 unique fusion levels were included (55 with mild-moderate subsidence, 30 with severe subsidence). Levels with severe subsidence demonstrated significantly less regional lordosis at final follow-up than nonseverely subsided levels (6.4 vs. 9.1 degrees, P =0.032). No PROM significantly differed between severe and nonsevere subsidence subgroups. Linear regression analysis revealed that severe subsidence was a strong independent predictor of regional lordosis ( P =0.029) at final follow-up. Conclusions: Severe subsidence negates perioperative improvements in regional lordosis following TLIF, while changes in regional alignment are maintained in the absence of severe subsidence. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Study Design: Retrospective cohort analysis. Objective: To determine the effect of long-segment posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) on perioperative changes in vertebral Hounsfield Units (HUs) and the impact of these changes on radiographic outcomes and fusion status. Summary of Background Data: Low preoperative CT HUs have been associated with adverse outcomes after spinal fusion, including hardware complications and reoperation. No existing studies have investigated the preoperative to postoperative change in HUs after cervical spinal fusion. Stress shielding may decrease bone quality within the fusion construct. Whereas, altered junctional loading and increased segmental mobility may precipitate bony hypertrophy in the terminal and adjacent levels. Methods: All adult patients who underwent C2-T2 PCDF for myelopathy/ myeloradiculopathy at an academic center between 2013 and 2020 were retrospectively identified. Preoperative and postoperative HUs were assessed on axial CT images in the cranial, middle, and caudal C2, C6, T2, and T3 vertebral bodies, outside of the region of instrumentation and artifact by 2 independent reviewers. Paired t test compared preoperative to postoperative changes in HUs. Preoperative and long-term postoperative cervical alignment, fusion, and revision rates were assessed. Univariate and regression analysis compared patient factors and outcomes between groups with perioperative increase versus decrease in vertebral HUs. Results: One hundred patients were included. The average preoperative to postoperative change in HUs in the C2, C6, T2, and T3 vertebral bodies were −19.80 (P=0.008), −52.63 (P<0.001), 15.15 (P=0.014), and 9.41 (P=0.346), respectively. Perioperative increase in C2 HUs was predictive of increased postoperative distal junctional angle (β=3.41, P=0.048) and increased T1–T4 kyphosis (β=6.50, P=0.003). Perioperative increase in C6 HU predicted pseudoarthrosis (fusion odds ratio: 0.19, P=0.007). Conclusions: Significant perioperative decreases in C6 HUs within a long-fused construct may demonstrate stress shielding. The significant association between greater distal kyphosis and an increase in C2 HUs may be attributed to a stress riser effect. Level of Evidence: Level III.

OBJECTIVE The present investigation aimed to 1) develop a new CT-based assessment of endplate bone density (endplate Hounsfield unit [EP-HU]) and 2) analyze if EP-HU was a better predictor than vertebral Hounsfield unit (HU) for subsidence after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS All adult patients who underwent one- to three-level ACDF with a titanium interbody for radiculopathy and/or myelopathy at an academic center between 2018 and 2020 were retrospectively identified. Based on preoperative sagittal CT scans (left, right, and middle cuts), 2-mm superior and inferior endplate regions were circumscribed with the free draw tool to account for endplate surface undulations. The average of the superior and inferior EP-HUs on all CT cuts was used to calculate EP-HU. Cervical vertebral HUs were determined from the average of axial CT cranial, middle, and caudal cuts circumscribing only trabecular bone. The interbody subsidence of the cranial and caudal endplates of each ACDF level was directly measured on the endplate-facing surface of both coronal and sagittal cuts of postoperative CT scans (at 1 year) to determine the maximum subsidence (subsidence defined as ≥ 2 mm). Univariate and stepwise logistic regression analyses were used to compare subsidence based on CT bone metrics. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to determine the probability of subsidence based on EP-HUs and vertebral HUs. RESULTS A total of 35 patients were included. Subsidence occurred at 32 of 67 unique fusion levels. Subsidence was associated with older age (p = 0.008), diabetes diagnosis (p = 0.015), and decreased interbody length (p = 0.019). EP-HUs exhibited moderate correlation with cervical vertebral HUs (Pearson’s ρ = 0.63). Subsidence was significantly associated with decreased total EP-HUs (subsidence: 475 HU, no subsidence: 543 HU; p = 0.019) and decreased lumbar vertebral HUs (subsidence: 296 HU, no subsidence: 341 HU; p = 0.011). ROC curve analysis identified an optimal EP-HU cutoff of 512.30 (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.701) to predict subsidence. The AUC of the vertebral HUs with respect to subsidence was 0.662. EP-HUs < 512.30 predicted subsidence (OR 6.67, p = 0.001) independent of significant demographic and surgical factors. CONCLUSIONS CT cervical EP-HUs rather than vertebral cervical trabecular HUs may be more efficacious in predicting subsidence after ACDF.

Study Design Retrospective cohort analysis. Objective (1) Develop a novel computed tomography (CT)-based assessment of endplate bone density (EP-HU), (2) Determine if EP-HU was a stronger predictor than trabecular HU for subsidence after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Methods All adult patients who underwent single-level TLIF for lumbar degenerative conditions at an academic center between 2017-2022 were retrospectively identified. EP-HU was calculated from a 2 mm superior and inferior endplate region on the preoperative mid sagittal CT scans, accounting for surface undulations. Lumbar vertebral HUs (trabecular region) were determined in a standard fashion on axial CT. EP-HU + vertebral HU served as an aggregate bone quality metric. Interbody subsidence (≥2 mm threshold) was directly measured on the endplate-facing surface of 1 year CT scans. Univariate and multivariate analysis compared subsidence based on CT bone metrics. Results A total of 114 patients met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in fusion or reoperation rate based on subsidence occurrence. Both vertebral HU ( P = .012) and EP-HU ( P < .001) were associated with subsidence. In receiver operating curves, EP-HU was more optimal for subsidence prediction than vertebral HU, but the aggregate metric further optimized the specificity and total area under the curve. In a predictive logistic regression model EP-HU + vertebral HU (aggregate HU < 515 odds ratio: 7.82, P < .001) was a strong independent predictor of subsidence. Conclusion Preoperative calculation of EP-HUs in addition to vertebral HUs may enhance prediction of TLIF subsidence where aggregate endplate and vertebral HU < 515 can be used to identify high risk patients.

Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Objective: To evaluate for areas of consensus and divergence of opinion within the spine community regarding the management of cervical spondylotic conditions and acute traumatic central cord syndrome (ATCCS) and the influence of the patient's age, disease severity, and myelomalacia. Summary of Background Data: There is ongoing disagreement regarding the indications for, and urgency of, operative intervention in patients with mild degenerative myelopathy, moderate to severe radiculopathy, isolated axial symptomatology with evidence of spinal cord compression, and ATCCS without myelomalacia. Methods: A survey request was sent to 330 attendees of the Cervical Spine Research Society (CSRS) 2021 Annual Meeting to assess practice patterns regarding the treatment of cervical stenosis, myelopathy, radiculopathy, and ATCCS in 16 unique clinical vignettes with associated MRIs. Operative versus nonoperative treatment consensus was defined by a management option selected by >80% of survey participants. Results: Overall, 116 meeting attendees completed the survey. Consensus supported nonoperative management for elderly patients with axial neck pain and adults with axial neck pain without myelomalacia. Operative management was indicated for adult patients with mild myelopathy and myelomalacia, adult patients with severe radiculopathy, elderly patients with severe radiculopathy and myelomalacia, and elderly ATCCS patients with pre-existing myelopathic symptoms. Treatment discrepancy in favor of nonoperative management was found for adult patients with isolated axial symptomatology and myelomalacia. Treatment discrepancy favored operative management for elderly patients with mild myelopathy, adult patients with mild myelopathy without myelomalacia, elderly patients with severe radiculopathy without myelomalacia, and elderly ATCCS patients without preceding symptoms. Conclusions: Although there is uncertainty regarding the treatment of mild myelopathy, operative intervention was favored for nonelderly patients with evidence of myelomalacia or radiculopathy and for elderly patients with ATCCS, especially if pre-injury myelopathic symptoms were present. Level of Evidence: Level V.

OBJECTIVE The aims of this study were to 1) define the incidence of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) interbody subsidence; 2) determine the relative importance of preoperative and intraoperative patient- and instrumentation-specific risk factors predictive of postoperative subsidence using CT-based assessment; and 3) determine the impact of TLIF subsidence on postoperative complications and fusion rates. METHODS All adult patients who underwent one- or two-level TLIF for lumbar degenerative conditions at a multi-institutional academic center between 2017 and 2019 were retrospectively identified. Patients with traumatic injury, infection, malignancy, previous fusion at the index level, combined anterior-posterior procedures, surgery with greater than two TLIF levels, or incomplete follow-up were excluded. Interbody subsidence at the superior and inferior endplates of each TLIF level was directly measured on the endplate-facing surface of both coronal and sagittal CT scans obtained greater than 6 months postoperatively. Patients were grouped based on the maximum subsidence at each operative level classified as mild, moderate, or severe based on previously documented < 2-mm, 2- to 4-mm, and ≥ 4-mm thresholds, respectively. Univariate and regression analyses compared patient demographics, medical comorbidities, preoperative bone quality, surgical factors including interbody cage parameters, and fusion and complication rates across subsidence groups. RESULTS A total of 67 patients with 85 unique fusion levels met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Overall, 28% of levels exhibited moderate subsidence and 35% showed severe subsidence after TLIF with no significant difference in the superior and inferior endplate subsidence. Moderate (≥ 2-mm) and severe (≥ 4-mm) subsidence were significantly associated with decreases in cage surface area and Taillard index as well as interbody cages with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) material and sawtooth surface geometry. Severe subsidence was also significantly associated with taller preoperative disc spaces, decreased vertebral Hounsfield units (HU), the absence of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) use, and smooth cage surfaces. Regression analysis revealed decreases in Taillard index, cage surface area, and HU, and the absence of BMP use predicted subsidence. Severe subsidence was found to be a predictor of pseudarthrosis but was not significantly associated with revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS Patient-level risk factors for TLIF subsidence included decreased HU and increased preoperative disc height. Intraoperative risk factors for TLIF subsidence were decreased cage surface area, PEEK cage material, bullet cages, posterior cage positioning, smooth cage surfaces, and sawtooth surface designs. Severe subsidence predicted TLIF pseudarthrosis; however, the causality of this relationship remains unclear.

Study Design: Retrospective cohort analysis. Objective: To determine whether the C2 exposure technique was a predictor of change in cervical alignment and patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) after posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) for degenerative indications. Background: In PCDF handling of the C2 posterior paraspinal musculature during the operative approach varies by surgeon technique. To date, no studies have investigated whether maintenance of the upper cervical semispinalis cervicis attachments as compared with complete reflection of upper cervical paraspinal musculature from the posterior bony elements is associated with superior radiographic and clinical outcomes after PCDF. Patients and Methods: All adult patients who underwent C2–T2 PCDF for myelopathy or myeloradiculopathy at multi-institutional academic centers between 2013 and 2020 were retrospectively identified. Patients were dichotomized by the C2 exposure technique into semispinalis preservation or midline muscular reflection groups. Preoperative and short and long-term postoperative radiographic outcomes (upper cervical alignment, global alignment, and fusion status) and PROMs (Visual Analog Scale–Neck, Neck Disability Index, and Short Form-12) were collected. Univariate analysis compared patient factors, radiographic measures, and PROMs across C2 exposure groups. Results: A total of 129 patients met the inclusion/exclusion criteria (73 muscle preservation and 56 muscle reflection). Patients in the muscular preservation group were on average younger (P = 0.005) and more likely to have bone morphogenic protein (P < 0.001) and C2 pars screws (P = 0.006) used during surgery. Preoperative to postoperative changes in C2 slope, C2 tilt, C2–C3 segmental lordosis, C2–C3 listhesis, C0–C2 Cobb angle, proximal junctional kyphosis, ADI, C1 lamina-occiput distance, C2 sagittal vertical axis, C2–C7 lordosis, and PROMs at all follow-up intervals did not vary significantly by C2 exposure technique. Likewise, there were no significant differences in fusion status, C2–C3 pseudoarthrosis, C2 screw loosening, and complication and revision rates between C2 exposure groups. Conclusions: Preservation of C2 semispinalis attachments versus muscular reflection did not significantly impact cervical alignment, clinical outcomes, or proximal junction complications in long-segment PCDF. Level of Evidence: Level III.