Citations

Abstract Background The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) introduced an approach for malnutrition diagnosis in 2019 that comprised screening followed by assessment of three phenotypic criteria (weight loss, low body mass index [BMI], and low muscle mass) and two etiologic criteria (reduced food intake/assimilation and inflammation/disease burden). This planned update reconsiders the GLIM framework based on published knowledge and experience over the past 5 years. Methods A working group ( n = 43 members) conducted a literature search spanning 2019–2024 using the keywords “Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition or GLIM.” Prior GLIM guidance activities for using the criteria on muscle mass and inflammation were reviewed. Successive rounds of revision and review were used to achieve consensus. Results More than 400 scientific reports were published in peer‐reviewed journals, forming the basis of 10 systematic reviews, some including meta‐analyses of GLIM validity that indicate strong construct and predictive validity. Limitations and future priorities are discussed. Working group findings suggest that assessment of low muscle mass should be guided by experience and available technological resources. Clinical judgment may suffice to evaluate the inflammation/disease burden etiologic criterion. No revisions of the weight loss, low BMI, or reduced food intake/assimilation criteria are suggested. After two rounds of review and revision, the working group secured 100% agreement with the conclusions reported in the 5‐year update. Conclusion Ongoing initiatives target priorities that include malnutrition risk screening procedures, GLIM adaptation to the intensive care setting, assessment in support of the reduced food intake/assimilation criterion, and determination of malnutrition in obesity.

Abstract Background The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) approach to malnutrition diagnosis is based on assessment of three phenotypic (weight loss, low body mass index, and reduced skeletal muscle mass) and two etiologic (reduced food intake/assimilation and disease burden/inflammation) criteria, with diagnosis confirmed by fulfillment of any combination of at least one phenotypic and at least one etiologic criterion. The original GLIM description provided limited guidance regarding assessment of inflammation, and this has been a factor impeding further implementation of the GLIM criteria. We now seek to provide practical guidance for assessment of inflammation. Methods A GLIM‐constituted working group with 36 participants developed consensus‐based guidance through a modified Delphi review. A multiround review and revision process served to develop seven guidance statements. Results The final round of review was highly favorable, with 99% overall “agree” or “strongly agree” responses. The presence of acute or chronic disease, infection, or injury that is usually associated with inflammatory activity may be used to fulfill the GLIM disease burden/inflammation criterion, without the need for laboratory confirmation. However, we recommend that recognition of underlying medical conditions commonly associated with inflammation be supported by C‐reactive protein (CRP) measurements when the contribution of inflammatory components is uncertain. Interpretation of CRP requires that consideration be given to the method, reference values, and units (milligrams per deciliter or milligram per liter) for the clinical laboratory that is being used. Conclusion Confirmation of inflammation should be guided by clinical judgment based on underlying diagnosis or condition, clinical signs, or CRP.

Background: Data on the occurrence of syncope and presyncope with hemodynamic instability during graded exercise test (GXT) are limited. Methods: We reviewed the Mayo Integrated Stress Center database for non-imaging GXTs performed between January 2006 and December 2010 and registered syncopic/presyncopic episodes. Electronic medical records were reviewed for clinical information, outcomes, and mortality. SAS was used to provide background statistics. Results: During the study period, a total of 40,715 GXTs were performed on 33,885 unique patients, including 16,306 (40.0%) GXTs on patients with known cardiovascular disease (CVD). High risk for cardiac syncope is defined as prior cardiac arrest/ventricular tachycardia, ischemic cardiomyopathy, implanted defibrillator, history of atrial fibrillation, sotalol, amiodarone, LQTS, HOCM, aortic stenosis was identified in 3263 patients (6.0%), while risk factors for non-cardiac syncope (POTS, history of dizziness/spells/syncope, rest SBP < 100 mmHg, age ≥ 80 years, female age < 30 years, beta blocker use) were found in 15,925 patients (39.1%). Despite the presence of so many patients at risk, only 8 episodes of syncope occurred (0.020% per test; 0.023% per individual patient). Another 5 episodes of near-syncope with documented hypotension were aborted by the quick action of the testing staff (0.012% per test; 0.015% per individual patient). Only 1 patient (a 71yo M with severeCAD) required electrical cardioversion for ventricular fibrillation. None of the other patients, including all 6 women, presented with tachyarrhythmias. There were no deaths and no significant musculoskeletal trauma. Conclusion: Despite many patients with risk factors for cardiac and non-cardiac syncope in the cohort, syncope, and near-syncope with hemodynamic instability were very rare findings on guideline-directed GXTs.

Introduction: Breathing efficiency (V E /VCO 2 slope or nadir) predicts mortality in heart failure (HF). The usual pattern of V E /VCO 2 vs. exercise intensity is a characteristic “shallow bowl” configuration allowing estimate of a V E vs. VCO 2 slope both in normal controls (C) and HF patients. Slope or nadir in HF is generally > 33 vs. 25-30 in C. This pattern of V E /VCO 2 may not be true for other CV diseases. Objective: Compare V E /VCO 2 versus exercise time curves in patients with history of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension type 4 (PHT4) to HF and C referred for dyspnea on exertion. Methods: We identified 40 consecutive cases of PHT4 versus 40 HF and 40 C over the same age range retrospectively selected from our cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPX) database. V E /VCO 2 was plotted against exercise time (minutes of exercise ≈ METs), and groups were compared statistically for V E /VCO 2 and peak VO 2 by ANOVA followed with Tukey test, with significance set at P < .05. Results: Figure shows higher V E /VCO 2 in PHT4 vs. HF and C with a different pattern vs. exercise intensity. In severe cases (example shown) V E /VCO 2 may increase continuously without plateau reaching peak values > 80. There was statistically significant difference between peak VO 2 between C group vs HF and PHT4, but not among HF and PHT4, although V E /VCO 2 was significant different among the three groups. Age and sex was not different among them. Conclusion: V E /VCO 2 was elevated in PHT4 compared to HF and C. We interpret continuously increasing V E /VCO 2 as a marker of progressively worsening ventilation: perfusion mismatch. Interpretation of V E /VCO 2 in PHT4 cannot be based simply on nadir or slope as in HF, but a plot of the data should be visually examined to gain full understanding of the ventilatory abnormality.

AbstractWe present a novel description of Bezold–Jarisch Reflex (BJR) during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in three young female patients with Group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). These three cases presented within 26 months, representing only 0.8% of 11,387 tests on patients with PAH undergoing CPET during this time frame.

Introduction and Hypothesis: In patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), ventricular tachycardia (VT) is associated with adverse prognosis. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is part of the standard clinical evaluation in HCM. However, limited data are available on the incidence of VT and other adverse events during CPET in HCM. Methods: We reviewed the Mayo Clinic’s Integrated Stress Center Database for CPETs performed on HCM patients between January 2011 and July 2016. Patients were referred for clinical CPET by a physician, and medications were continued for the test. Electronic medical records were reviewed for clinical information and CPET data. Results: A total of 1,208 CPETs were performed on 976 HCM patients during the study period. Most tests were symptom-limited (94.6%), most common symptom was dyspnea (55%). Despite the relatively high number of patients with a history of VT (10.4%) and/or cardiac arrest (1.6%), there was a low rate of adverse events. Non-sustained VT occurred in 6 patients, most frequently during active recovery (3/6), and 2 of these 6 patients had prior history of VT. A 34 year-old female patient experienced sustained VT degenerating into ventricular fibrillation terminated by ICD shock. One patient had syncope during the test but no arrhythmia. Importantly, none of the patients died within 48 hours of the exercise test. Conclusions: In a large cohort of HCM patients, the incidence of VT or other adverse events was a rare finding during symptom-limited CPET.