Citations

Importance Molecular analyses of biospecimens collected from study participants are essential for identifying biomarkers that can tailor treatments to specific subsets of patients who are most likely to benefit. Sharing of data and biospecimens from clinical trials enables personalized, patient-centric use of cancer therapies and accelerates the development of new treatments. Objective To describe obstacles to sharing data and biospecimens and to propose strategies to enhance access and collaboration. Evidence Review This is a Special Communication authored by 53 academic investigators and patient representatives from the breast cancer community with extensive experience in conducting clinical and translational research. The article also evaluates the impact of biomarker research on specifying responsive subpopulations in the 29 registrational clinical trials that have led to approval of a new drug for treatment of breast cancer between 2017 and 2024. Findings Clinical trial participants are increasingly asked to provide tissue and/or body fluid biospecimens for biomarker research that is typically controlled by the sponsoring pharmaceutical company, but published biomarker studies are rare. Among 29 breast cancer registrational studies reported in the past 8 years, none resulted in biomarker research that restricted a drug’s approved indication. Herein, strategies to maximize the value of clinical data and biospecimens contributed by participants are proposed, thereby supporting the shared goals of the pharmaceutical industry and academia to improve patient care. These strategies include (1) establishing coleadership structures involving academia and patients in clinical trial design and conduct, (2) ensuring that informed consent forms state that data and biospecimens will be shared with academia for future research, (3) requiring the sharing of clinical data as a condition for regulatory approval, and (4) enabling access to biospecimens and translational research data for independent studies on biomarkers that may indicate drug efficacy and toxicity. Conclusions and Relevance Data and biospecimen sharing from registrational trials has been suboptimal. Improving clinical data, biospecimens, and biospecimens’ related data sharing requires concrete actions and a multidimensional stakeholder approach to accelerate the impact of clinical cancer research on the quality of patient care.

Abstract Introduction Breast cancer is uncommon in men. Almost all male breast cancers are hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, although the pathogenesis is not always attributable to an endocrine condition. A few studies have compared biological characteristics or molecular signatures with breast cancers in women. We sought to evaluate whether hormone receptor-related gene expression is different in cancers from men compared to equivalent cancers from women. SET2,3 index measures non-proliferative hormone receptor-related transcriptional activity in the cancer (SET-ER/PR index) and adjusts this for a Baseline Prognosis Index (BPI) that combines the measurements of tumor and nodal stage with a 4-gene molecular subtype (ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and AURKA). Methods We received aliquots of total RNA from male patients with breast cancer included in the retrospective cohort study of the EORTC 10085/BCG/TBCRC/BIG/NCTN International Male Breast Cancer Program (NCT01101425). SET2,3 assay was performed using the QuantiGene assay (Thermo Fisher) using bead-based hybridization and laser spectroscopy (Luminex). The statistical analyses were performed by the EORTC statistician. The primary objective of the study was the assessment of the prognostic value of the SET2,3 index score in patients with early-stage hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative male breast cancer, treated with endocrine therapy. Clinical outcomes (recurrence-free survival – RFS; overall survival – OS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves and secondarily compared using multivariable Cox models adjusted for continuous SET2,3 index, tumor size, nodal status, age, and chemotherapy and radiotherapy use. An exploratory analysis to compare the SET2,3 index scores distribution in female and male breast cancer patients was also performed using results from the same assay performed on cancers from women selected on the same inclusion criteria. Due to the low numbers of male patients treated with neoadjuvant treatment (N=6), this analysis was restricted to patients treated with adjuvant treatment (n=315 male and 660 female). Results Of the 321 male patients with breast cancer analyzed, treated between 1990 and 2010, 211 (65.7%) were categorized as high SET2,3 index score, reflecting a high endocrine activity in the cancer and low risk of recurrence, and 110 patients (34.3%) categorized as being low score, reflecting low endocrine activity and high risk of recurrence. At 5 years, the RFS was 75.0% (95% CI, 67.4-81.1) in the high SET2,3 group versus 60.7% (95% CI, 49.1-70.5) in the low SET2,3 group (HR univariate, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.34-0.70; P< 0.0001). The 5-year OS rate among patients with a high SET2,3 index was 84.3% (95% CI, 45.5-73.8), in contrast of 67.8% (95% CI, 56.6-76.7) in the low SET2,3 group (HR univariate, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.30-0.65; P< 0.0001). SET2,3 was independently prognostic for OS, but not RFS in multivariable Cox models. In patients classified as low SET2,3, the addition of neo/adjuvant chemotherapy to adjuvant endocrine therapy was associated with 5-year OS of 76.0% (95% CI, 59.5-86.4) and in patients who received endocrine therapy alone the 5-year OS was 61.3% (95% CI, 45.5-73.8), an absolute difference of 14.7 percentage points. Overall, we did not observe a difference in the distributions (median, interquartile range) of SET2,3 index between men (2.4, 1.9–2.6) and women (2.3, 2.0–2.7). Conclusion SET2,3 index measurements of endocrine-related transcriptional activity in male patients with breast cancer were not different from measurements in female patients with breast cancer. SET2,3 was prognostic in male breast cancer and our exploratory analysis suggests that chemotherapy might improve the poor prognosis for men with breast cancer that has low SET2,3 index. This study was funded by the Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF). Citation Format: Danielle B. Zakon, Coralie Poncet, Fatima Cardoso, Neven Anouk, Vicente Valero, Stefan Aebi, Kim Benstead, Oliver Bogler, Lissandra Dal Lago, Judith Fraser, Carmela Caballero, Ingrid A. Hedenfalk, Larissa A. Korde, Barbro Linderholm, John WM Martens, Lavinia P. Middleton, Melissa Murray, Catherine M. Kelly, Cecilia Nilsson, Monika Nowaczyk, Stephanie Peeters, Melanie Beauvois, Peggy Porter, Carolien P. Schroder, Isabel T. Rubio, Kathryn Ruddy, Christi van Asperen, Danielle Van Den Weyngaert, Carolien HM van Deurzen, Elise van Leeuwen-Stok, Joanna M. Vermeij, John MS Bartlett, Antonio C. Wolff, Sharon H. Giordano, W. Fraser Symmans. PD6-11 Evaluation of the Sensitivity to Endocrine Therapy Index (SET2,3) in Early Male Breast Cancer: Results from an analysis in the EORTC 10085/TBCRC/BIG/NCTN International Male Breast Cancer Program [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-11.