Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

1441 citation(s) found for "Wu, Wilson".

Abstract CT136: Evaluation of talazoparib in combination with irinotecan in early stage, high-risk HER2 negative breast cancer: Results from the I-SPY 2 TRIAL
Schwab, Richard B. , Clark, Amy S. , Hylton, Nola, Wolfe, Denise, Chien, A. Jo , Forero‐Torres, Andres , Stringer-Reasor, Erica , Nanda, Rita , Jaskowiak, Nora , Haddad, Tufia C. , Han, Heather, Albain, Kathy S. , Ellis, Erin D. , Shah, Payal , Lu, Janice , Tripathy, Debasish , Kemmer, Kathleen, Haley, Barbara , Majure, Melanie, Roesch, Erin , Ewing, Cheryl, Perlmutter, Jane , Melisko, Michelle , Wilson, Amy , Singhrao, Ruby , Veer, Laura van ‘t , Asare, Smita , Berry, Don, Yau, Christina , Li, Wen , Wallace, Anne M. , Boughey, Judy C. , Lee, Catherine A. A. , Isaacs, Claudine , Elias, Anthony , Lang, Julie E. , Yee, Douglas , Vaklavas, Christos , Ewing, Cheryl A. , Helsten, Teresa L. , Symmans, W. Fraser , Rugo, Hope S. , Veer, Laura J. van’t , DeMichele, Angela , Berry, Donald A. , Esserman, Laura J.

Cancer Research | August 7, 2019 | Volume: 79 | Issue: 13_Supplement | Pages: CT136-CT136

10.1158/1538-7445.am2019-ct136 Get It

Abstract Background: I-SPY2 is a multicenter, Phase II trial using response-adaptive randomization within biomarker subtypes to evaluate novel agents as neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk at least T2N0 breast cancer. The primary endpoint is pathologic complete response (pCR) at surgery. The goal is to identify regimens that have ≥ 85% Bayesian predictive probability of success in a 300-patient phase 3 neoadjuvant trial defined by hormone-receptor (HR) and HER2 status, and MammaPrint (MP). Regimens may leave the trial for futility (< 10% probability of success), maximum sample size accrual (with probability of success ≥ 10% and < 85%), or as recommended by the independent DSMB. For HER2- subjects the control arm is weekly paclitaxel x12 then doxorubicin & cyclophosphamide (AC) q2-3 weeks x4. For this arm, paclitaxel was omitted and replaced with maximum tolerated dose PARPi talazoparib with synergy dosed irinotecan (25mg/m2). Paclitaxel could be given adjuvantly for these subjects and non-responding subjects could be taken off of experimental therapy. Methods: Women with tumors ≥ 2.5cm were eligible for screening. MP low/HR+ tumors were ineligible. MRI scans (baseline, 3 cycles after start of therapy, prior to AC, and prior to surgery) were used in a longitudinal statistical model to predict pCR for individual patients. Talazoparib was given at 1mg daily with 25mg/m2 irinotecan q2wks. Analysis was intention to treat. Subjects who switched to non-protocol therapy count as non-pCR. Subjects on experimental therapy at time of arm closure are non-evaluable. Talazoparib/irinotecan (TI) was open only to HER2- tumors and eligible for graduation in 3 of 10 pre-defined signatures: HER2-, HR+HER2- and HR-/HER2-. Results: TI did not meet criteria for graduation and was stopped at the recommendation of the DSMB based on expectations of limited activity beyond that seen with standard treatment. Maximum sample size had been reached at the time of this recommendation and subjects currently receiving TI were allowed to continue or change to standard therapy. Exploratory “as treated” analysis for response in gBRCA mutation carriers showed 6/10 gBRCA carriers attained a pCR in the TI arm. Except for 1 patient these gBRCA pCR subjects had >90% tumor reduction by MRI after TI and prior to AC (range: 68-96%). In the TI arm pCR rates were also higher in subjects with a PARPi7-High/MP2 gene expression signature (0.344 vs 0.146). Expected differences in toxicity were seen between arms including g3/4 peripheral neuropathy on control therapy which included paclitaxel (2.6% vs none) and g3/4 neutropenia with TI (30.2% vs 8.2%). Notably gBRCA mutation carriers receiving TI had higher rates of g3/4 neutropenia (60% vs 25.9%). Conclusion: The I-SPY2 study finds the probability that investigational regimens will be successful in a Phase III neoadjuvant trial; TI did not reach the efficacy threshold of 85% probability of success in Phase III in any of the 3 signatures. However by adding talazoparib with synergy dosed irinotecan we were able to omit paclitaxel and observe similar estimated pCR rates. This informs current work to evolve the I-SPY2 trial design to reduce toxicity without compromising outcomes and develop successful combinations targeted to biology, including DNA repair deficiency. Citation Format: Richard Schwab, Amy S. Clark, Christina Yau, Nola Hylton, Wen Li, Denise Wolfe, A Jo Chien, Anne M. Wallace, Andres Forero-Torres, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Rita Nanda, Nora Jaskowiak, Judy Boughey, Tufia Haddad, Heather S. Han, Catherine Lee, Kathy Albain, Claudine Isaacs, Anthony D. Elias, Erin D. Ellis, Payal Shah, Julie E. Lang, Janice Lu, Debasish Tripathy, Kathleen Kemmer, Douglas Yee, Barbara Haley, Melanie Majure, Erin Roesch, Christos Vaklavas, Cheryl Ewing, Teresa Helsten, W Fraser Symmans, Jane Perlmutter, Hope S. Rugo, Michelle Melisko, Amy Wilson, Ruby Singhrao, Laura van 't Veer, Angela DeMichele, Smita Asare, Don Berry, Laura J. Esserman. Evaluation of talazoparib in combination with irinotecan in early stage, high-risk HER2 negative breast cancer: Results from the I-SPY 2 TRIAL [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT136.
Abstract 4176: Familial lung cancer exhibits multiple novel linked haplotypes within pedigrees
Sun, Haiming , Moiz, Bilal A., Pikielny, Claudio W. , Mandal, Diptasri , Gaba, Colette , Yang, Ping , Li, Yafang , You, Ming , Wilson, Richard K., Kupert, Elena, Anderson, Marshall W., Schwartz, Ann G. , Musolf, Anthony M. , Sun, Haiming, Andrade, Mariza de , Pinney, Susan M. , Amos, Christopher I. , Govindan, Ramaswamy , Bailey‐Wilson, Joan E.

Cancer Research | August 7, 2019 | Volume: 79 | Issue: 13_Supplement | Pages: 4176-4176

10.1158/1538-7445.am2019-4176 Get It

Abstract Lung cancer (LC) kills more people in the United States each year than any other cancer. While it is well known that a variety of environmental factors (particularly tobacco smoke) strongly increase the risk of LC, there are multiple associated genetic variants with small contributions to risk. High aggregation of LC within rare individual families suggest that there are high-risk genetic variants as well. However, these genetic risk factors for LC are under studied due to the rapid fatality of LC. We studied 28 highly aggregated extended high-risk familial lung cancer (HRFLC) families collected from eight different sites across the US. Whole exome sequencing was performed on 290 individuals from these families to identify potential risk variants for HRFLC using genetic linkage analysis. Quality control was performed on the sequence data, filtering on parameters such as read depth, genotype quality, missingness, and Mendelian inconsistencies. Identity-by-descent (IBD) values were also calculated to verify correct familial relationships. Quality control procedures left approximately 400,000 SNVs and indels for analysis.Parametric two-point linkage analysis was performed assuming an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance. Disease allele frequency was set to 1% with a penetrance of 80% for carriers and 1% phenocopy rate. While we did not identify any genome-wide significant variants across the 28 families, multiple suggestive variants were identified. The largest cluster of suggestive variants was located at 14q32 in the CATSPERB gene. Given the likely locus heterogeneity in LC (combined with the lack of power in some families), it is not surprising that none of the variants were significant across the families; looking at the individual family results proved more informative. Long haplotypes linked to LC risk were identified in multiple families. These long runs of positive linkages, which have little to no negative linkage evidence across them, are characteristic of true linkage signals in these types of analysis. Two of the most interesting linked regions were at 7p36.1 and 4q21.23-28.23. The 7p signal (observed in a single family) was genome-wide suggestive and located within the SSPO gene. SSPO has been implicated in breast and skin cancer (melanoma); it is a novel lung cancer signal. The 4q linkage (again observed in a single family) covers a large chunk of 4q and contains multiple potential candidate genes, however, the best candidate gene is PTPN13, a gene implicated in lung cancer but never in familial lung cancer. We are currently evaluating the individual family results of several other pedigrees and plan to perform additional analyses to confirm these linkages. Citation Format: Anthony Musolf, Haiming Sun, Bilal A. Moiz, Claudio W. Pikielny, Mariza de Andrade, Diptasri Mandal, Colette Gaba, Ping Yang, Yafang Li, Ming You, Richard K. Wilson, Elena Y. Kupert, Marshall W. Anderson, Ann G. Schwartz, Susan M. Pinney, Christopher I. Amos, Ramaswamy Govindan, Joan E. Bailey-Wilson. Familial lung cancer exhibits multiple novel linked haplotypes within pedigrees [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4176.
End-of-Life Decision-Making for ICU Patients With Limited English Proficiency: A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Team Insights
Barwise, Amelia , Nyquist, Christina A., Jaramillo, Carolina, Wilson, Michael E. , Barwise, Amelia K, Espinoza Suarez, Nataly R, Thorsteinsdottir, Bjorg , Barwise, Amelia K , Suárez, Nataly R. Espinoza , Gajic, Ognjen

Critical Care Medicine | August 6, 2019 | Volume: 47 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1380-1387

10.1097/ccm.0000000000003920 | PMID 31389838 Get It

Objectives: Research indicates that the increasing population of over 25 million people in the United States who have limited English proficiency experience differences in decision-making and subsequent care at end of life in the ICU when compared with the general population. The objective of this study was to assess the perceptions of healthcare team members about the factors that influence discussions and decision-making about end of life for patients and family members with limited English proficiency in the ICU. Design: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews with ICU physicians, nurses, and interpreters. Setting: Three ICUs at Mayo Clinic Rochester. Subjects: Sixteen ICU physicians, 12 ICU nurses, and 12 interpreters. Intervention: None. Measurements and Main Results: We conducted 40 semistructured interviews. We identified six key differences in end-of-life decision-making for patients with limited English proficiency compared with patients without limited English proficiency: 1) clinician communication is modified and less frequent; 2) clinician ability to assess patient and family understanding is impaired; 3) relationship building is impaired; 4) patient and family understanding of decision-making concepts (e.g., palliative care) is impaired; 5) treatment limitations are often perceived to be unacceptable due to faith-based and cultural beliefs; and 6) patient and family decision-making styles are different. Facilitators of high-quality decision-making in patients with limited English proficiency included: 1) premeeting between clinician and interpreter; 2) interpretation that communicates empathy and caring; 3) bidirectional communication of cultural perspectives; 4) interpretation that improves messaging including appropriate word choice; and 5) clinician cultural humility. Conclusions: End-of-life decision-making is significantly different for ICU patients with limited English proficiency. Participants identified several barriers and facilitators to high-quality end-of-life decision-making for ICU patients and families with limited English proficiency. Awareness of these factors can facilitate interventions to improve high-quality, compassionate, and culturally sensitive decision-making for patients and families with limited English proficiency.
Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus. Management Considerations within High-resourced Settings
Wilson, John , Nilsen, Diana , Marks, Suzanne M.

Annals of the American Thoracic Society | July 31, 2019 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 16-23

10.1513/annalsats.201902-185cme | PMID 31365831 Get It

Abstract The management of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB) is notably complex among patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). TB treatment recommendations typically include very little information specific to HIV and MDR TB, which often is derived from clinical trials conducted in low-resource settings. Mortality rates among patients with HIV and MDR TB remain high. We reviewed the published literature and recommendations to synthesize possible patient management approaches demonstrated to improve treatment outcomes in high-resourced countries for patients with MDR TB and HIV. Approaches to diagnostic testing, impact and timing of antiretroviral therapy on mortality, anti–MDR TB and antiretroviral drug interactions, and the potential role for short-course MDR TB therapy are examined. The combination of antiretroviral therapy with expanded TB drug therapy, along with the management of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome, other potential HIV-associated opportunistic diseases, and drug toxicities, necessitate an integrated multidisciplinary patient care approach using public health case management and provider expertise in drug-resistant TB and HIV management.
Endovascular treatment decision in acute stroke: does physician gender matter? Insights from UNMASK EVT, an international, multidisciplinary survey
Ospel, Johanna M. , Kashani, Nima , Wilson, Alexis , Fischer, Urs , Sylaja, Pillai N., Turjman, Francis , Mitchell, Peter , Kim, Byung Moon , Cherian, Mathew , Heo, Ji Hoe , Baxter, Blaise, Podlasek, Anna , Foss, M , Menon, Bijoy K. , Hill, Michael D. , Saposnik, Gustavo , Ospel, Johanna Maria , Almekhlafi, Mohammed A , Hill, Michael D , Fischer, Urs , Campbell, Bruce , Yoshimura, Shinichi , Rabinstein, Alejandro A. , Almekhlafi, Mohammed , Demchuk, Andrew M. , Goyal, Mayank

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery | July 30, 2019 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 256-259

10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015003 | PMID 31363043 Get It

Background and purpose Differences in the treatment practice of female and male physicians have been shown in several medical subspecialties. It is currently not known whether this also applies to endovascular stroke treatment. The purpose of this study was to explore whether there are differences in endovascular treatment decisions made by female and male stroke physicians and neurointerventionalists. Methods In an international survey, stroke physicians and neurointerventionalists were randomly assigned 10 case scenarios and asked how they would treat the patient: (A) assuming there were no external constraints and (B) given their local working conditions. Descriptive statistics were used to describe baseline demographics, and the adjusted OR for physician gender as a predictor of endovascular treatment decision was calculated using logistic regression. Results 607 physicians (97 women, 508 men, 2 who did not wish to declare) participated in this survey. Physician gender was neither a significant predictor for endovascular treatment decision under assumed ideal conditions (endovascular therapy was favored by 77.0% of female and 79.3% of male physicians, adjusted OR 1.03, P=0.806) nor under current local resources (endovascular therapy was favored by 69.1% of female and 76.9% of male physicians, adjusted OR 1.03, P=0.814). Conclusion Endovascular therapy decision making between male and female physicians did not differ under assumed ideal conditions or under current local resources.
Prediction of Risk of Death for Patients Starting Dialysis
Anderson, Ryan T. , Cleek, Hailey, Pajouhi, Atieh, Bellolio, Fernanda , Mayukha, Ananya, Hickson, LaTonya J. , Feely, Molly A., Wilson, Michael E. , Connolly, Ryan M. Giddings, Erwin, Patricia J., Majzoub, Abdul M., Tangri, Navdeep , Hickson, LaTonya J , Bellolio, M Fernanda , Anderson, Ryan T., Hart, Allyson , Thorsteinsdottir, Bjorg

Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology | July 30, 2019 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1213-1227

10.2215/cjn.00050119 | PMID 31362990 Get It

Background and objectives Dialysis is a preference-sensitive decision where prognosis may play an important role. Although patients desire risk prediction, nephrologists are wary of sharing this information. We reviewed the performance of prognostic indices for patients starting dialysis to facilitate bedside translation. Design, setting, participants, & measurements Systematic review and meta-analysis following the PRISMA guidelines. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus for eligible studies of patients starting dialysis published from inception to December 31, 2018. Selection Criteria: Articles describing validated prognostic indices predicting mortality at the start of dialysis. We excluded studies limited to prevalent dialysis patients, AKI and studies excluding mortality in the first 1–3 months. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts, performed full text assessment of inclusion criteria and extracted: study design, setting, population demographics, index performance and risk of bias. Pre-planned random effects meta-analysis was performed stratified by index and predictive window to reduce heterogeneity. Results Of 12,132 articles screened and 214 reviewed in full text, 36 studies were included describing 32 prognostic indices. Predictive windows ranged from 3 months to 10 years, cohort sizes from 46 to 52,796. Meta-analysis showed discrimination area under the curve (AUC) of 0.71 (95% confidence interval, 0.69 to 073) with high heterogeneity ( I 2 =99.12). Meta-analysis by index showed highest AUC for The Obi, Ivory, and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI)=0.74, also CCI was the most commonly used (ten studies). Other commonly used indices were Kahn-Wright index (eight studies, AUC 0.68), Hemmelgarn modification of the CCI (six studies, AUC 0.66) and REIN index (five studies, AUC 0.69). Of the indices, ten have been validated externally, 16 internally and nine were pre-existing validated indices. Limitations include heterogeneity and exclusion of large cohort studies in prevalent patients. Conclusions Several well validated indices with good discrimination are available for predicting survival at dialysis start.
Factors Associated With the Decision-Making on Endovascular Thrombectomy for the Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke
Saposnik, Gustavo , Menon, Bijoy K. , Kashani, Nima , Wilson, Alexis , Baxter, Blaise, Turjman, Francis , Fischer, Urs , Mitchell, Peter , Sylaja, Pillai N., Cherian, Mathew , Kim, Byung Moon , Heo, Ji Hoe , Podlasek, Anna , Foss, M , Hill, Michael D. , Hill, Michael D , Fischer, Urs , Yoshimura, Shinichi , Campbell, Bruce , Rabinstein, Alejandro A. , Ospel, Johanna M. , Almekhlafi, Mohammed , Demchuk, Andrew M. , Goyal, Mayank

Stroke | July 22, 2019 | Volume: 50 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 2441-2447

10.1161/strokeaha.119.025631 | PMID 31327314 Get It

Background and Purpose— Little is known about the real-life factors that clinicians use in selection of patients that would receive endovascular treatment (EVT) in the real world. We sought to determine patient, practitioner, and health system factors associated with therapeutic decisions around endovascular treatment. Methods— We conducted a multinational cross-sectional web-based study comprising of 607 clinicians and interventionalists from 38 countries who are directly involved in acute stroke care. Participants were randomly allocated to 10 from a pool of 22 acute stroke case scenarios. Each case was classified as either Class I, Class II, or unknown evidence according to the current guidelines. We used logistic regression analysis applying weight of evidence approach. Main outcome measures were multilevel factors associated with EVT, adherence to current EVT guidelines, and practice gaps between current and ideal practice settings. Results— Of the 1330 invited participants, 607 (45.6%) participants completed the study (53.7% neurologists, 28.5% neurointerventional radiologists, 17.8% other clinicians). The weighed evidence approach revealed that National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (34.9%), level of evidence (30.2%), ASPECTS (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score) or ischemic core volume (22.4%), patient’s age (21.6%), and clinicians’ experience in EVT use (19.3%) are the most important factors for EVT decision. Of 2208 responses that met Class I evidence for EVT, 1917 (86.8%) were in favor of EVT. In case scenarios with no available guidelines, 1070 of 1380 (77.5%) responses favored EVT. Comparison between current and ideal practice settings revealed a small practice gap (941 of 6070 responses, 15.5%). Conclusions— In this large multinational survey, stroke severity, guideline-based level of evidence, baseline brain imaging, patients’ age and physicians’ experience were the most relevant factors for EVT decision-making. The high agreement between responses and Class I guideline recommendations and high EVT use even when guidelines were not available reflect the real-world acceptance of EVT as standard of care in patients with disabling acute ischemic stroke.
Standardizing Febrile Neutropenia Management: Antimicrobial Stewardship in the Hematologic Malignancy Population
Marcelin, Jasmine R , Saleh, Omar Abu , Barwise, Amelia , Odean, Patricia M., Rivera, Christina G. , Tande, Aaron J. , Wilson, John , Osmon, Douglas R. , Tosh, Pritish K. , O'Horo, John C, Abu Saleh, Omar M, Barwise, Amelia K, Tande, Aaron , Marcelin, Jasmine , Barwise, Amelia K , Rivera, Christina G , O’Horo, John C.

Journal of Oncology Practice | July 19, 2019 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 9 | Pages: e843-e848

10.1200/jop.18.00775 | PMID 31322989 Get It

Patients with febrile neutropenia (FN) often are subject to antibiotic and diagnostic test overuse. We sought to improve appropriate use of antimicrobials and diagnostic tests for patients with FN. We used a blended quality approach with Lean Six Sigma tools and iterative improvement of a clinical decision aid to guide providers through empirical antimicrobial selection and diagnostic evaluation of patients with FN during a yearlong period. We evaluated the incidence of nonadherence to best practice before, during, and after rollout of a clinical decision aid in conjunction with an educational initiative. At baseline, 71% of patients with FN had at least one critical deviation from best practice. During the project, the percentage decreased to 27.3%; 4 months after the project was completed, the percentage was 33.3% ( P = .04). A clinical decision aid can improve adherence to best practices for the empirical management of FN.
Ten‐year survivors in AL amyloidosis: characteristics and treatment pattern
Muchtar, Eli , Gertz, Morie A. , Lacy, Martha Q. , Dingli, David , Grogan, Martha , AbouEzzeddine, Omar F. , Hayman, Suzanne R. , Kapoor, Prashant , Fonder, Amie , Hobbs, Miriam, Hwa, Yi L. , Warsame, Rahma , Kourelis, Taxiarchis , Russell, Stephen J. , Lust, John A., Lin, Yi , Zeldenrust, Steven R., Kyle, Robert A. , Kumar, Shaji , Hwa, Yi Lisa, Gonsalves, Wilson , Kourelis, Taxiarchis V, Russell, Stephen, Zeldenrust, Steven, Kumar, Shaji K , Dispenzieri, Angela , Gertz, Morie A , Muchtar, E , Russell, Stephen J , Dingli, David , Lin, Yi , Go, Ronald S. , Buadi, Francis K. , Leung, Nelson , Gonsalves, Wilson I. , Rajkumar, S. Vincent , Dispenzieri, Angela , AbouEzzeddine, Omar F

British Journal of Haematology | July 12, 2019 | Volume: 187 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 588-594

10.1111/bjh.16096 | PMID 31298751 Get It

Summary Improvement in survival in Light chain (AL) amyloidosis has been seen over recent decades, enabling more patients to achieve long‐term survival. Patients with AL amyloidosis who survived ≥10 years from time of diagnosis ( n = 186) were the subject of this study. Ten‐year survivors represented 22% of the total population. These patients were characterized by favourable patient, organ and plasma cell features. Of note, trisomies were less common among 10‐year survivors compared to those who did not survive to 10 years. All‐time best haematological response was complete response in 67%, very good partial response in 30%, partial response in 2% and no response in 1%, with 11% having received a consolidative strategy for inadequate response to first line therapy. The overall organ response rate to first‐line therapy was 76%, which increased to 86% when considering subsequent line(s) of therapy. Forty‐seven percent of the 10‐year survivors did not require a second‐line therapy. The median treatment‐free survival (TFS) among the 10‐year survivors was 10·5 years (interquartile range 7·4‐12·2). On multivariate analysis independent predictors for TFS were the achievement of complete haematological response and lack of cardiac involvement. Long‐term survivors are increasingly seen in AL amyloidosis and present distinct patient, organ and clonal disease features.