Citations

Insulin and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) are structurally related peptides capable of stimulating a variety of metabolic and mitogenic processes. In this study, we investigated the interaction between these peptides and their receptor-mediated pathways in an untransformed cell line. Cultured bovine fibroblasts specifically bound IGF-I and insulin, and each peptide could stimulate DNA synthesis and cell replication through its own receptor. Preincubation of bovine fibroblasts with concentrations of insulin that did not bind to the IGF-I receptor resulted in complete but reversible cellular desensitization to IGF-I-stimulated mitogenesis. Preincubation with as little as 0.1 nM insulin was sufficient to inhibit subsequent IGF-I action. Various insulin analogs produced desensitization in direct relation to the affinity of the insulin for the insulin receptor. Desensitization required > 4 h of cell exposure to insulin and was blocked in the presence of cycloheximide. Neither serum-stimulated mitogenesis nor IGF-I-stimulated glucose uptake were affected by insulin pretreatment. 125I-labeled IGF-I affinity cross-linking experiments indicated that preincubation with insulin did not affect labeling of the 130,000-Mr α-subunit of the IGF-I receptor, but was associated with the loss of IGF-I– and insulin-inhibitive bands at Mr = 100,000, 85,000, 58,000, and 34,000. These studies suggest that insulin, via interaction with insulin receptors on bovine fibroblasts, regulates IGF-I action at a step distal to IGF-I receptor binding and are consistent with desensitization occurring at an intracellular step in the mitogenic pathway shared by insulin and IGF-I.

Amyloid deposits that characteristically form in the pancreatic islets of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and in insulinomas are both derived from islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP). Evidence from previous studies has suggested that deposition of IAPP-derived amyloid is related to inherent amyloidogenic sequences present within normal human IAPP, together with an increased production and local concentration of IAPP. However, whether the aggregation of IAPP to form amyloid fibrils is primarily an intra- or extracellular event is not clear. To address this question, we studied 20 human insulinomas by light and electron microscopy. By light microscopy, amyloid deposits were demonstrated in 13 of 20 (65%) human insulinomas. Furthermore, evaluation of Congo red-stained tumor sections showed small, globular or irregular, congophilic amyloid deposits within the cytoplasm of many tumor cells in 10 of 13 (77%) amyloid-containing insulinomas. Dense, punctate areas of IAPP immunoreactivity within tumor cells corresponded with the congophilic intracellular deposits. Ubiquitin immunoreactivity also was observed as punctate intracellular labeling and within large extracellular amyloid deposits. Among the 10 insulinomas available for electron microscopic evaluation, pathological IAPP-immunoreactive (immunogold) deposits were found in 3 of 5 insulinomas in which amyloid was demonstrated by light microscopy and in none of 5 tumors found negative for amyloid by light microscopy. Morphology of IAPP-immunoreactive deposits varied from those with the classical distinct 7- to 10-nm diameter nonbranching fibrils to those with distinct but faint fibrillarity to those without discernable fibrils. In each of the 3 tumors with ultrastructurally demonstrable amyloid deposits, intracellular aggregates of IAPP-immunoreactive amyloid fibrils were observed either free in the cytoplasmic matrix or in membrane-bound structures. Intracellular IAPP-immunoreactive deposits were up to 10 urn in the greatest dimension. Free intracellular aggregates of amyloid fibrils sometimes contained degenerating secretory vesicles and fragments of membranous organelles. These observations suggest that IAPP-derived amyloid deposits are initially formed intracellularly and are subsequently released to the extracellular space by exocytosis of the membrane-bound structures and/or after necrosis of the tumor cells. Our observations raise the possibility that IAPP-derived islet amyloid deposits (characteristically present in NIODM patients) also may be initially formed within the cytoplasm of β-cells, thus leading to β-cell necrosis and a reduction of β-cell mass as seen in NIDDM.

Both glucose and insulin are important regulators of glucose uptake and hepatic glucose release. Because insulin concentrations rarely if ever increase under daily living conditions, unless glucose concentrations also increase, we sought to determine whether hepatic and extrahepatic responses to changes in insulin and glucose concentration are impaired in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). To address this question, glucose metabolism was measured in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. A computer-driven infusion system was used to produce a nondiabetic postprandial insulin profile in both groups while sufficient exogenous glucose was infused to mimic nondiabetic postprandial glucose concentrations. Although NIDDM was associated with greater (P < 0.05) hepatic glucose release both before and during the prandial insulin infusion, suppression did not differ in the diabetic and nondiabetic subjects (−1.06 ± 0.20 vs. −0.86 ± 0.15 mmol/kg every 4 h). In contrast, stimulation of both glucose disappearance (0.77 ± 0.27 vs. 1.68 ± 0.27 mmol/kg every 4 h) and forearm glucose uptake (187 ± 81 vs. 550 ± 149 μmol/dl every 4 h) was lower (P < 0.05) in diabetic than in nondiabetic subjects. Thus, despite increased basal rates of glucose production, obese individuals with NIDDM had decreased stimulation of glucose disappearance but normal suppression of hepatic glucose release in response to nondiabetic prandial glucose and insulin concentrations. These data indicate that the increase in glucose that occurs with carbohydrate ingestion is likely to compensate for hepatic but not extrahepatic insulin resistance.

We previously reported the presence of endoneurial hypoxia, ischemia, impairment of the blood-nerve barrier, and reduction of norepinephrine and 6-ketoprostaglandin F1α in chronic streptozocin-induced diabetic neuropathy (SDN) and interpreted these findings as suggesting the involvement of oxygen free radicals (OFRs) but did not directly measure indices of OFR activity. In this study, we report on sciatic nerve conjugated dienes, hydroperoxides, norepinephrine, and malondialdehyde in SDN at 1, 4, and 12 mo in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Severe hyperglycemia was present throughout in diabetic rats. Conjugated dienes were consistently increased at all time points, hydroperoxides were consistently reduced, and malondialdehyde was not significantly different in diabetes compared with controls. These findings are consistent with increased OFR activity in experimental diabetes. It is necessary to monitor several indices of OFR activity in a metabolically active tissue such as the peripheral nerve.

Excessive amounts of glucose enter the systemic circulation when patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) eat a carbohydrate-containing meal. To determine the contribution of hepatic glucose cycling (defined as the net effect of glucose/glucose-6-phosphate cycling and uptake and release of glucose from hepatic glycogen) to postprandial hyperglycemia, diabetic, glucose-intolerant, and nondiabetic subjects were fed mixed meals. The meal contained both [2-3H]glucose (an isotope that is extensively detritiated during hepatic glucose cycling) and [6-3H]glucose (an isotope that is not detritiated during hepatic glucose cycling). Of the 50 g of carbohydrate contained in the meal, ∼4–8 g underwent hepatic glucose cycling. Although total cycling of ingested glucose did not differ between diabetic, glucose-intolerant, and nondiabetic subjects (361 ± 67 vs. 494 ± 106 vs. 322 ± 44 μmol · kg−1 · 5 h−1, respectively), the data suggested that hepatic cycling was increased in the diabetic and glucose-intolerant individuals but not in the nondiabetic subjects during the first 2 h after eating. Hepatic cycling during the first 2 h after eating was correlated with the prevailing glucagon concentration (r = 0.6, P < 0.01) and increased (P < 0.05) as hepatic glucose release increased. Hepatic glucose cycling had a marked effect on the measurement of so-called initial splanchnic glucose uptake. Nevertheless, however measured, initial splanchnic glucose uptake was not decreased and, if anything, was increased in diabetic and glucose-intolerant patients. Integrated postprandial hepatic glucose release increased (r < 0.01) with the severity of fasting hyperglycemia. These results indicate that postprandial hyperglycemia in diabetic and glucose-intolerant patients is not due to enhanced hepatic glucose cycling or a lack of uptake of ingested glucose by the splanchnic bed but rather to excessive release of glucose by the liver coupled with a failure of extrahepatic tissues to appropriately increase glucose disposal.

Human growth hormone (hGH) and prednisone cause insulin resistance and glucose intolerance. However, it is unknown whether hGH and prednisone antagonize insulin action on protein, fat, and carbohydrate metabolism by a common or independent mechanism. Therefore, protein, fat, and carbohydrate metabolism was assessed simultaneously in four groups of eight subjects each after 7 days of placebo, recombinant DNA hGH (rhGH; 0.1 mg · kg−1 · day−1), prednisone (0.8 mg · kg−1 · day−1), or rhGH and prednisone administration after an 18-h fast and during gut infusion of glucose and amino acids (fed state). Fasting plasma glucose concentrations were similar during placebo and rhGH but elevated (P < 0.001) during combined treatment, whereas plasma insulin concentrations were higher (237 ± 57 pmol/ml, P < 0.001) during combined than during placebo, rhGH, or prednisone treatment (34, 52, and 91 pM, respectively). In the fed state, plasma glucose concentrations were elevated only during combined treatment (11.3 ± 2.1 mM, P < 0.001). Plasma insulin concentrations were elevated during therapy with prednisone alone and rhGH alone (667 ± 72 and 564 ± 65 pmol/ml, respectively, P < 0.001) compared with placebo (226 ± 44 pmol/ml) but lower than with the combined rhGH and prednisone treatment (1249 ± 54 pmol/ml, P < 0.01). Protein oxidation ([14C]leucine) increased (P < 0.001) with prednisone therapy, decreased (P < 0.001) with rhGH treatment, and was normal during the combined treatment. By indirect calorimetry, glucose oxidation was similar in all groups; fasting fat oxidation was decreased by prednisone (P < 0.001) and increased by rhGH, although only significantly in the fed state (P < 0.01). In summary, insulin antagonism of rhGH and prednisone are probably caused by independent mechanisms in which rhGH and prednisone may reciprocally regulate the oxidation of protein and fat while decreasing the efficiency of glucose disposal.

It is well established that patients with non-insulindependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) are resistant to insulin. However, the contribution of hepatic and extrahepatic tissues to insulin resistance remains controversial. The uncertainty may be at least in part due to errors introduced by the unknowing use in previous studies of impure isotopes to measure glucose turnover. To determine hepatic and extrahepatic responses to insulin in the absence of these errors, steady-state glucose turnover was measured simultaneously with [6-3H]- and [6-14C]glucose during sequential 5- and 4-h infusions of insulin at rates of 0.4 and 10 mil · kg−1 · min−1 in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. At low insulin concentrations, [6-3H]- and [6-14C]glucose gave similar estimates of glucose turnover. Hepatic glucose release was equal to but not below zero in the nondiabetic subjects, but persistent glucose release (P < 0.001) and decreased glucose uptake (P < 0.001) was observed in the diabetic patients. At high insulin concentrations, both isotopes underestimated glucose turnover during the 1st h after initiation of the highdose insulin infusion. More time (P < 0.05) was required to reachieve steady state in NIDDM than nondiabetic subjects. At steady state, [6-3H] but not [6-14C]glucose systematically underestimated (P < 0.05) glucose turnover in both groups due to the presence of a tritiated nonglucose contaminant. The percentage of radioactivity in plasma due to tritiated contaminants was linearly related to turnover. When plasma [6-3H]glucose specific activity was corrected for the presence of the contaminant in each subject, both [6-3H]- and [6-14C]glucose indicated that diabetic patients had hepatic and extrahepatic insulin resistance. We conclude that in these experiments, although the presence of a low percentage of tritiated nonglucose contaminant in the tracer may alter estimates of the severity of hepatic and extrahepatic insulin resistance in patients with NIDDM, it does not obscure their presence

The importance of portal insulin delivery in the regulation of postprandial carbohydrate metabolism is uncertain. To address this question, three groups of dogs were studied: one group in which pancreatic venous drainage was transected and reanastomosed (portal insulin delivery), one in which the pancreatic drainage was transected and anastomosed to the inferior vena cava (peripheral insulin delivery), and one that received only a sham operation. Plasma insulin was greater (P < 0.05) during peripheral insulin delivery than in either the portal or sham groups, respectively, before and after meal ingestion. On the other hand, C-peptide concentrations did not differ between groups, resulting in a higher (P < 0.001) insulin to C-peptide ratio in the peripheral group. This indicated that the hyperinsulinemia in the peripheral group was due to decreased insulin clearance rather than increased insulin secretion. Isotopically determined splanchnic uptake of ingested glucose, postprandial suppression of hepatic glucose release, incorporation of CO2 into glucose (a qualitative measure of gluconeogenesis), and total-body glucose uptake were virtually identical in all groups. Similarly, plasma lipid, β-hydroxybutyrate, and lactate concentrations did not differ between groups. Our data indicate that, despite differences in systemic insulin concentration, portal and peripheral insulin delivery comparably regulate hepatic and extrahepatic carbohydrate metabolism after meal ingestion.

Insulin-stimulated glucose oxidation is decreased in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). It is not known whether this decrease is due to a primary defect in the oxidative pathway or is secondary to impaired glucose transport and/or phosphorylation. To address this issue, glucose oxidation was measured under steady-state conditions at low (∼270 pmol) and high (∼17 μmol) insulin concentrations in seven patients with NIDDM and seven healthy nondiabetic subjects matched for sex, age, and obesity. Glucose oxidation was measured simultaneously by indirect calorimetry and the isotopedilution technique. Although glucose oxidation and nonoxidative storage were lower (P < 0.05) in diabetic than nondiabetic subjects during the low- and highdose insulin infusions, oxidation of intracellularly derived glucose, estimated by subtracting the rate of oxidation measured isotopically (i.e., glucose oxidation derived from the extracellular space) from that measured by indirect calorimetry (i.e., total glucose oxidation), did not differ in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects during the low-dose insulin infusion (3.3 ± 0.1 vs. 3.0 ± 0.1 μmol · kg−1 · min−1). Both techniques provided identical estimates of glucose oxidation during the high-dose insulin infusion. Impaired oxidation of extracellularly but not intracellularly derived glucose strongly suggests that the cause of decreased glucose oxidation in patients with NIDDM is secondary to impaired glucose transport and/or phosphorylation rather than a primary abnormality in the oxidative pathway.

Insulinlike growth factor binding protein 1 (IGFBP-1) has been shown to modulate the metabolic and mitogenic actions of the growth hormone (GH)- dependent peptide insulinlike growth factor I. Previous studies showed that levels of IGFBP-1 are regulated by insulin. The relative role of GH in the regulation of IGFBP-1 levels is less well defined and was examined in our study with a contiguous two-part protocol. Overnight (part A) and pre- and post-morning meal (part B) blood samples were obtained from eight healthy adults during a constant infusion of saline (SAL) or 4 μg · kg−1 · min−1 GH. Five of eight subjects were restudied with glucose (GLUC) infused during part B (SAL + GLUC) to match glucose and insulin to levels observed during GH infusion. During SAL infusion, IGFBP-1 levels measured by specific radioimmunoassay showed a marked immediate decline after the evening meal in part A, with a subsequent nocturnal rise of 2.4- to 17.3-fold. GH infusion resulted in a similar meal-induced fall in IGFBP-1 levels but led to a delayed nocturnal rise in IGFBP-1, which was associated with elevated postprandial insulin concentrations. During part B, changes in plasma IGFBP-1 levels showed a similar pattern, with a delayed postprandial increase observed during both GH and SAL + GLUC infusions. The half-life of IGFBP-1 disappearance was calculated at ∼2 h for all three infusion groups. Comparison of venous and arterialized blood samples showed no consistent pattern of difference, arguing against peripheral tissue clearance or compartmentalization as the mechanism for the rapid rise and fall in IGFBP-1 levels. Our studies, the first to measure GH, insulin, and glucose in concurrent sampling and under controlled physiological conditions, support previous investigations suggesting that insulin (not GH or glucose) is the primary regulator of plasma IGFBP-1 levels. Furthermore, we postulate that the observed fluctuations in plasma levels are caused by a direct insulin effect on hepatic IGFBP-1 production.