Citations

Abstract Background: Achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR) has been shown on the patient level to predict excellent long-term event-free survival outcomes. Residual cancer burden (RCB) quantifies the extent of residual disease for patients who did not achieve pCR. A high proportion of metastatic events to the central nervous system (CNS), a known chemotherapy sanctuary site, was previously observed among the small number of relapses in patients achieving a pCR (Symmans et al 2017), raising the possibility that these CNS events may be independent of response in the breast. I-SPY2 is an adaptively randomized, phase II, platform trial that evaluates new drugs and combinations in the neoadjuvant setting for women with high-risk primary breast cancer. In this study, we evaluated the type and sites of recurrences by RCB classes in the I-SPY 2 TRIAL. Methods: I-SPY 2 patients enrolled prior to 11/2016 across 9 experimental and control arms, with available RCB and event-free survival (EFS) data were included in this analysis. The median follow-up is 3.8 years. We summarized the EFS event type, further sub-dividing the distant recurrence events by their site of relapse (CNS-only, CNS and other sites, Non-CNS). We estimated the overall and site-specific distant recurrence incidence in each RCB class at 3 years using a competing risk (Fine-Gray) model. In addition, we assessed the association between RCB and distant recurrence free survival including all distant recurrences (DRFS), as well as excluding the CNS-only recurrences (non-CNS DRFS) using a Cox model. Our statistics do not adjust for multiplicities beyond variables evaluated in this study. Results: Among 938 subjects, there were 180 EFS events, including 28 (16%) local recurrences (without distant recurrence and/or death) and 152 DRFS events. Among the DRFS events, 25 patients died without a distant recurrence. 127 experienced distant recurrences, including 22 (17.3%) with CNS-only, 16 (12.6%) with CNS and other sites, 87 (68.5%) with non-CNS distant recurrence; 2 (1.6%) patients had missing recurrence site information. Incidence of CNS-only recurrences are low and are similar across RCB classes (pCR/RCB-0 (n=338): 1%, RCB-I (n=129): 3%, RCB-II (n=328): 2%, RCB-III (n=143): 2% at 3 years). In contrast, the incidence of non-CNS recurrences increase with increasing RCB (RCB-0: 2%, RCB-I: 4%, RCB-II: 11%, RCB-III: 19% at 3 years). DRFS of RCB-I patients do not significantly differ from those achieving a pCR/RCB-0 (DRFS at 3 years: 92% vs. 95%, hazard ratio: 1.77 (0.87-3.63)); the small numerical difference is further reduced when the CNS-only recurrences are excluded (non-CNS DRFS at 3 years: 95% vs. 96%, hazard ratio: 1.48 (0.61-3.58)). CNS recurrences among DRFS events are proportionally higher within the pCR (5/16 (31%)) and RCB-I (5/12 (42%)) than in the RCB-II (8/57 (14%)) and RCB-III (4/42 (9%)) groups largely because of the relative low frequency of non-CNS recurrence events. Conclusions: In our high-risk I-SPY 2 cohort, CNS-only recurrences are uncommon but appear similar across RCB groups, independent of response, suggesting that the CNS is a treatment sanctuary site. In contrast, non-CNS recurrence rates increase as RCB increases. These findings, if confirmed, support the use of RCB to identify patients with excellent outcomes beyond those achieving a pCR; and suggest that inclusion of CNS only recurrences as an outcome event may impact the association between neoadjuvant therapy response and long-term outcome. Citation Format: Christina Yau, Angela DeMichele, W. Fraser Symmans, Lajos Pusztai, Douglas Yee, Amy S. Clark, Christos Hatzis, Jeffrey B. Matthews, Jodi Carter, Yunn-Yi Chen, Kimberly Cole, Laila Khazai, Molly Klein, Dina Kokh, Gregor Krings, Sunati Sahoo, Kathy S. Albain, A. Jo Chien, Kirsten K. Edmiston, Anthony D. Elias, Erin D. Ellis, David M. Euhus, Heather S. Han, Claudine Isaacs, Qamar J. Khan, Julie E. Lang, Janice Lu, Jane L. Meisel, Zaha Mitri, Rita Nanda, Donald W. Northfelt, Tara Sanft, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Rebecca K. Viscusi, Anne M. Wallace, Rachel Yung, Nola M. Hylton, Judy C. Boughey, Michelle E. Melisko, Jane Perlmutter, Hope S. Rugo, Richard Schwab, Laura J. van' t Veer, Donald A. Berry, Laura J. Esserman. Site of recurrence after neoadjuvant therapy: Clues to biology and impact on endpoints [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-20-02.

Abstract Background: CRA is a surrogate for ovarian toxicity and associated risk of infertility and long-term menopausal symptoms. Therefore, it is important to assess and report the rate of CRA when we study a new neoadjuvant treatment regimen. In the Adjuvant Paclitaxel and Tratuzumab (APT) trial, we found that CRA rate associated with adjuvant TH (12 weeks of paclitaxel and a year of trastuzumab) for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer was lower than historically seen with cyclophosphamide-based regimens. The ATEMPT trial allowed a direct comparison of the CRA rate associated with TDM1 and TH. Methods: The ATEMPT trial randomized patients (pts) with Stage I HER2+ breast cancer 3:1 to T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks (w) x17 vs. T 80 mg/m2 IV with H qw x 12 (4 mg/kg load →2 mg/kg), followed by H (6 mg/kg q3w x 13). Participants who reported that they were premenopausal at enrollment were asked to complete menstrual surveys at baseline and every 6-12 months throughout a 36 month follow-up period. For this analysis, CRA was defined as report of no menstruation within the prior six months on a survey completed 18 months after enrollment. Results: Of 512 ATEMPT enrollees, 497 began protocol therapy, 130 (26%) were premenopausal at enrollment and answered baseline menstrual questions, 42 of these 130 were excluded from the current analyses because they did not complete the 18-month survey, and 7 of the remaining 88 had received gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist before 18 months, leaving 81 for analysis. None had undergone hysterectomy or oophorectomy. Median age was 44 (range 23-53) among the TH patients (n=20), and 46 (range 34-54) among the T-DM1 patients (n=61). On the 18-month survey, 45% of women treated with TH reported at least one one episode of menses during the prior 6 months compared to 75% of women in the T-DM1 arm (p=0.011). Among those ≤ 40 years old, 50% of TH patients and 100% of T-DM1 patients reported menstruation at that timepoint. Please see Table for additional data in subgroups. Conclusions: In this relatively small sample, CRA at 18 months was less common after adjuvant T-DM1 than after TH (though even with TH, nearly half of women did menstruate after chemotherapy, even in the subset aged 41+). This will be reassuring to young patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who seek to maintain ovarian function. Larger studies are needed to confirm this finding and to assess a possible differential impact of these drugs on subgroups based on age, endocrine therapy, and body mass index. Additional research should also focus on menopausal symptoms and actual fertility after receipt of T-DM1. Menstruation in 61 T-DM1 arm patients with informative surveys at 18 monthsMenstruation in 20 TH arm patients with informative surveys at 18 monthsAge at study entry95% CI95% CI≤4012/12 (100%)74-100%4/8 (50%)16-84%41+34/49 (69%)55-82%5/12 (42%)15-72%BMI<3040/52 (77%)63-87%6/16 (38%)15-65%30+6/9 (67%)30-93%3/4 (75%)19-99%Endocrine therapy currentlyYes27/39 (69%)52-83%2/12 (17%)2-48%No19/22 (86%)65-97%7/9 (78%)40-97% Citation Format: Kathryn J. Ruddy, Lorenzo Trippa, Jiani Hu, William T. Barry, Chau T. Dang, Denise A. Yardley, Steven J. Isakoff, Vincente V. Valero, Meredith G. Faggen, Therese M. Mulvey, Ron Bose, Douglas J. Weckstein, Antonio C. Wolff, Katherine E. Reeder-Hayes, Hope S. Rugo, Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy, Dan S. Zuckerman, Lowell L. Hart, Vijayakrishna K. Gadi, Michael Constantine, Kit L. Cheng, Frederick M. Briccetti, Bryan P. Schneider, A. Merrill Garrett, P. Kelly Marcom, Kathy S. Albain, Patricia A. DeFusco, Nadine M. Tung, Blair M. Ardman, Rita Nanda, Rachel C. Jankowitz, Michelle K. DeMeo, Harold J. Burstein, Eric P. Winer, Ian E. Krop, Ann H. Partridge, Sara M. Tolaney. Chemotherapy-related amenorrhea (CRA) after adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) compared to paclitaxel in combination with trastuzumab (TH) (TBCRC033: ATEMPT trial) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-02.

Abstract Background: Chest wall recurrence can occur as a complication of breast cancer. This type of breast cancer is difficult to treat with short-lived responses to therapy, and associated with the development of distant metastases. Better therapies are needed in this setting. Immune checkpoint inhibition is being explored in breast cancer, with an immunotherapy agent currently approved for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We hypothesize that pembrolizumab, an anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibody, may be effective in treating chest wall recurrence of breast cancer given the inflammatory nature of this disease and high expression of PD-1 seen in tumors with lymphovascular invasion that may predispose patients to chest wall recurrence. Platinum chemotherapy may augment anti-tumor immunity, with the combination of pembrolizumab and carboplatin shown to be effective in advanced lung cancer. This study is evaluating the efficacy of pembrolizumab and carboplatin for breast cancer patients with chest wall disease. Methods: In this phase II study, 84 patients are being randomized 2:1 to treatment with pembrolizumab in combination with carboplatin (Arm A) versus carboplatin alone (Arm B) with an option to cross over to pembrolizumab alone (Arm Bx) on progression. Pembrolizumab is dosed at 200 mg IV every 3 weeks, and carboplatin is dosed at AUC 5 IV every 3 weeks. Patients may have TNBC, hormone receptor positive (HR)+/HER2- breast cancer that has progressed on 2 prior lines of hormone therapy, or refractory HER2+ breast cancer (may continue herceptin). Patients may have distant metastases, but must have surgically unresectable disease. Prior chest wall radiation is allowed. The primary endpoint is to determine the disease control rate (chest wall and distant sites) at 18 weeks of treatment. Patients undergo chest wall assessments with photography of skin lesions with every cycle of treatment, and imaging (CT chest, abdomen, and pelvis, and bone scan) every 2 cycles to evaluate for progression. The study is powered to determine a 20% difference in disease control rates between arms A and B (hazard ratio of 0.52, α= 0.10, β= 0.20). Secondary endpoints include response stratified by tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, progression free survival, response by irRECIST, and toxicity. The study incorporates many translational studies using chest wall biopsy tissue collected at baseline and after 2 cycles of treatment, as well as correlative blood tests, including assessing changes in tumor and blood PD-L1 expression, circulating cell-free DNA, circulating tumor cells, soluble PD-L1 expression, and changes in the expression of MYC, an oncogene that may upregulate the expression of PD-1. Patients are currently being enrolled at 7 sites in the TBCRC. As of July 2019, 30 patients are enrolled. This study is supported by Merck and the TBCRC. (NCT03095352). Citation Format: Neelima Vidula, Rita Nanda, Kathy Miller, Vandana Abramson, Paula Pohlmann, Adam Brufsky, Ben Park, Minetta Liu, Andrei Goga, Hope S. Rugo. Pembrolizumab in combination with carboplatin versus carboplatin alone in breast cancer patients with chest wall disease: Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (TBCRC) 44 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-04-05.

Abstract Importance: It is essential to refine the populations most likely to benefit from targeted chemotherapy combinations. Background: MINDACT showed that molecularly low risk patients, as assessed by the Amsterdam 70-gene profile MammaPrint® (Agendia) (MP), did not benefit from chemotherapy. In the I-SPY2 trial, MP low risk Hormone Receptor (HR) positive/HER2 negative patients are not eligible; however, HR negative or HER2 positive patients were considered high risk and included for treatment with chemotherapy plus novel agents. The neoadjuvant setting provides an opportunity to evaluate whether molecularly low risk HER2 positive patients are good candidates for neoadjuvant chemo/anti-HER2 therapy, where pathologic complete response (pCR) and 3-year outcomes are measured. Objective: To evaluate and further characterize the fraction of and outcomes for patients molecular low-risk disease in the I-SPY2 trial. Methods: The I-SPY2 platform trial is an ongoing multicenter phase 2 multi-arm study utilizing adaptive design and evaluating efficacy and tolerability of investigational agents in combination with standard-of-care chemotherapy for patients with high-risk anatomic stage II/III breast cancer. Patients with HR+HER2- MP low-risk tumors are not eligible. All enrolled patients undergo pretreatment biopsy for genomic evaluation of early recurrence risk with MP for risk stratification and with the 80-gene BluePrint® (Agendia) test for intrinsic subtype classification. Primary endpoint of the study is pCR in breast and lymph nodes (ypT0/is, ypN0). Secondary outcomes included event-free survival (EFS) and distant-recurrence free survival (DRFS). Following standard neoadjuvant treatment with or without a concomitant investigational agent, patients are followed for long-term outcomes. EFS and DRFS at 3 and 5 years in the pCR vs non-pCR groups within histologic and molecular subtypes are determined using the Kaplan Meier method. Results: Of the 1038 enrolled patients by November 2016, 24 patients (3.2%) had molecular low-risk disease as determined by MP. Of these, 21 (87.5%) had HR+HER2+, 1 (4.2%) had HR-HER2+, and 2 (8.4%) had HR-HER2-. BluePrint expression subtyping classified 17 as luminal-type, 6 HER2 enriched-type and 1 basal type. One patient withdrew consent for follow-up. Of the 23 remaining, none achieved pCR and only one (HR+/HER2+) had an EFS event (with median follow-up of 4.3 years). Overall, EFS and DRFS data were available for 950 of the 1038 patients (as of February 2019), with median follow-up of 3.8 years. Of the 173 HR+HER2+ in this cohort, 20 (11.6%) had molecular low-risk tumors. The EFS and DRFS for the 173 HER2+HR+ pCR group is 97% and 98% (non-pCR group 89% and 94%), respectively at 3 years. Removing the molecular low-risk HER2+ patients from the denominator reveals the worse outcome for patients with non pCR: EFS 86% and DRFS 92% at 3 years. The difference is more apparent at 5 years, changing from 74% to 66% for EFS and from 81% to 75% for DRFS. Intrinsic subtypes vary and do not predict early risk. Conclusions: I-SPY2 focuses on women with high clinical risk with only 3.2% of enrolled patients having low molecular risk tumors. However, 12% of HER+ breast cancer enrolled patients had molecular low risk tumors of which 95% were also HR+. In this group, early recurrence is very low despite absence of pCR and irrespective of intrinsic subtype. Refining the population using molecular high-risk classification of patients reveals a greater difference between the pCR and non-pCR groups within the HR+HER2+ subtype in the EFS and DRFS analysis. Clinical trial designs could address the opportunity to find more targeted and less toxic treatments for the HER2+ low molecular risk patient population. Citation Format: Paula R Pohlmann, Christina Yau, Angela DeMichele, Claudine Isaacs, Judy C Boughey, Nola Hylton, Michelle E Melisko, Jane Perlmutter, Hope S Rugo, W. Fraser Symmans, I-SPY 2 TRIAL Consortium, Donald A Berry, Laura Esserman. Amsterdam 70-gene profile (MammaPrint) low risk, even in the HER2 positive subset, identifies a population of women with lower early risk for recurrence despite low response rates to chemotherapy and to HER2 targeted therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-10-06.

9581 Background: Previous metastatic breast cancer trials have shown lower overall survival among African American (AA) women. Studies have also shown links between higher comorbidities and lower levels of social support and survival. Whether these factors differ by race and ethnicity is not known. Methods: Breast cancer patients enrolling in a phase III cooperative group metastatic breast cancer trial completed a self-administered survey measuring psychosocial and socio-demographic factors and comorbidities. Results were analyzed by self-identified race/ethnicity and evaluated by other measured variables. Results: 703 out of 799 patients completed the survey (88%). Questions were answered by greater than 95% of participants. The table shows differences broken down by Race/Ethnicity. AA and Hispanic (H) patients were more likely to have trouble paying for medications and have incomes less than 15K per year. AA were less likely to be married, and had lower levels of social support. Differences in income did not mediate these social support differences. Marital status did not mediate lower social support for AA (p=0.79) but did so for whites (p<0.001) Conclusions: Compliance with the questionnaire was quite high. Differences in social support by race were apparent and were mediated by different factors according to race. Future efforts will analyze the impact of these factors on survival and as mediators for potential racial and ethnic differences in survival. [Table: see text]

1052 Background: TIG, an agonistic anti-DR5 monoclonal antibody, triggers apoptosis in DR5+ human tumor cells without the aid of crosslinking. TIG has shown strong in vitro and in vivo activity against basal-like breast cancer cells that is enhanced by chemotherapy like paclitaxel. Methods: Randomized 2:1 phase II trial of nab-PAC with/without TIG in TNBC patients. Patients stratified by prior exposure to chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. Patients received nab-PAC weekly x 3 and TIG every other week, every 28 days. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary objectives were safety, progression free survival (PFS), TIG immunogenicity, and PK. Biopsies and circulating tumor cells were collected. The trial was not powered to compare arms but allowed early stopping for futility and was sized to estimate ORR with 95% CI. Results: 64 patients enrolled, 60 treated; 39 in the combination arm and 21 in the nab-PAC arm. Of the 39 in the combination arm, there were 2 CR, 9 PR (1 near CR, 96% tumor reduction), 11 SD and 17 PD; ORR 28% (95% CI 14%-42%). Of the 21 in the single agent arm, there were no CR, 8 PR, 4 SD and 9 PD; ORR 38% (95% CI 17%-59%). Higher ORRs were seen in the chemotherapy naïve patients (58% vs. 15% combination and 42% vs. 35% single agent). 2 patients with CR, 1 near CR, and 1 PR in the combination arm are still on therapy (602+, 531+, 466+, 460+ days). PFS was similar in both groups (3.6 months); higher in chemotherapy naïve patients. Combination was well tolerated (most toxicities grade 1/2); the most common AEs were fatigue, alopecia, peripheral sensory neuropathy, anemia, neutropenia, nausea, thrombocytopenia, anorexia, diarrhea, and vomiting. No grade 4 or 5 toxicity. No apparent added toxicity with TIG was seen. Conclusions: Combination therapy with nab-PAC + TIG was well tolerated, without apparent improvement in ORR relative to nab-PAC alone; however, 4 subjects treated as first-line had prolonged clinical benefit with the combination, and correlative studies will investigate markers that might predict clinical outcome (Next-Gen genomic analysis). Clinical trial information: F101004001.

1006 Background: Patients (pts) with ER-/PR- MBC do not benefit from endocrine treatment (tx). Doane et al (Oncogene 2006;25:3994) described a subset of ER-/PR- BC with a gene expression profile similar to ER+ BC but characterized by AR expression and AR-dependent growth in vitro. Hence, we conducted a multicenter phase II trial (NCT00468715) of the AR antagonist, bicalutamide (B) for pts with AR+ ER-/PR- MBC. Methods: Pts with ER-/PR- (IHC <10%) MBC were consented to AR testing, confirmed centrally at MSKCC. If AR+ (DAKO IHC ≥10%), pts were eligible for tx if ECOG performance status (PS) <2 and normal organ function. No limit on prior tx except prior trastuzumab required if HER2+. Eligible AR+ pts who consented to tx received B 150mg orally daily in 28-day cycles (C). Toxicity assessed q4wks, response q12wks. Primary endpoint = clinical benefit rate (CBR): CR + PR + stable disease (ds) >6mo (SD). B would be considered worthy of further study if ≥4/28 pts have clinical benefit. Results: As of 12/21/11,436 pts consented for AR testing. 24 were ineligible, 12 await testing. 47/400 tested were AR+ (12%). 26 received tx with B (6 ineligible for tx, 15 are eligible for tx with B at progression (POD) if clinically appropriate and study slots remains). Two AR+ pts treated with B were ER+ and removed from study. Three have received tx <12wks. Treated pt characteristics (n=24): median(med)age 64 (41-83), PS 0 (0-1), HER2+ 1, visceral metastases 17. Prior chemotherapy: neo/adjuvant 16; med # regimens for MBC 1 (0-8). Med C# 3 (2-49+). Best response: (21 evaluable pts): CBR 19% (95% CI 5-42%), SD>6mo 4, CR/PR 0, SD<6mo 3, POD 14. Conclusions: ~12% of ER-/PR- MBC pts are AR+. For these pts, AR-inhibition with B is feasible, well tolerated, and has activity based on pre-specified criteria. This study has closed to accrual for AR testing as of 1/2012. These results of the primary endpoint are not expected to change by accrual of the 2 remaining pts. Supported by TBCRC/Breast Cancer Alliance/AstraZeneca. [Table: see text]

TPS1140^ Background: NKTR-102 is a topoisomerase I inhibitor-polymer conjugate that hydrolyzes to provide continuous exposure to SN-38. A phase 2 trial of single-agent NKTR-102 was conducted in pts with 3rd-line MBC; 2 schedules (q14d; q21d) investigated a dose of 145 mg/m2. ORR was 29% (including 3% CR) with the prior ATC subset demonstrating an ORR of 31%. Dosing q21d was better tolerated; in this arm, median PFS and OS equaled 5.3m and 13.1m, respectively. Trial Design: Pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive single-agent NKTR-102 or TPC in an open-label, randomized, multicenter phase 3 study in pts with advanced breast cancer. Key Entry Criteria: Adult females, with ECOG 0 or 1 with adequate liver, kidney and marrow function. All pts must have received prior therapy with ATC (these drugs can be administered in the neo/adjuvant or locally advanced/metastatic setting). Prior A is not mandated if contraindicated. Prior toxicities must have resolved to ≤ Grade 1 (except sensory neuropathy ≤ Grade 2; complete resolution of prior diarrhea). Pts with brain metastases may be eligible, if lesions are stable for prior 3 weeks without steroids. Methods: Primary efficacy endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include: ORR by RECIST v1.1, clinical benefit rate (ORR+SD > 6 months), PFS and QoL. NKTR-102 is given IV at 145 mg/m2 over 90-min every 21 days without premedications. Pts randomized to TPC receive 1 of the following: eribulin, ixabepilone, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, docetaxel or nab-paclitaxel (the agent must be available at the treating institution). Pts are stratified by region, prior eribulin and receptor status (TNBC, Her2+ or Other). Target Accrual: ~840 pts will be required for sufficient events to occur in the planned follow-up time; OS will be compared using a two-sided log-rank test; 1 interim analysis will occur when 50% of the deaths are reported. PK sampling is performed in a subset of pts. CTCs (isolated by Apocell ApoStream technology) are serially assessed for potential predictive markers of response and toxicity. Enrollment is expected to remain open until late 2013.

1087 Background: EP is a unique topoisomerase 1 inhibitor that provides continuous exposure to SN38. EP demonstrated a 29% overall response rate in patients with mBC, leading to a phase III global BEACON study in patients with mBC. CTCs in patient blood samples provide a minimally invasive approach to detect PD markers of drug activity. We developed quantitative multiplex immunofluorescent assays to measure target-specific PD biomarkers for EP in CTCs isolated pre- and post-treatment. Methods: Assays for Top1, Top2, g-H2Ax, Rad51, ABCG2, and Ki-67 were developed using control (0.1% DMSO) and drug-treated (SN38, 10 uM) tumor cell lines (HCT116, MCF7, A549, SKBr3) and PBMCs from healthy donors. The optimal antibody for each biomarker was then multiplexed in a panel with antibodies against cytokeratin, CD45 and DAPI for phenotypic identification of CTCs. For analysis of BEACON pts, serial 7.5 mL whole blood samples were drawn and shipped ambient to Apocell (Houston, TX) for further processing. PBMCs were separated and CTCs were isolated using ApoStream technology. CTCs were stained for PD markers and analyzed using an iCys laser scanning cytometer equipped with image analysis software. Results: Antibodies bound to tumor cells showed staining confined to the nucleus (Top1, Top2, g-H2AX, Ki-67) or membrane (ABCG2), exhibited defined peak separation from their isotype controls, and signal strength correlated with cellular expression of high and low levels of markers. To date, ~ 80% of BEACON pts consent to participate in the CTC sub-study. As of 30 Oct 2012, data from 167 pre-dose blood samples from BEACON pts were available. 99% of blood samples were successfully processed. 93% had detectable CTCs, yielding a median of 216 CTCs (range: 7.5-14816). Staining was positive for Top1, Top2, g-H2Ax, Rad51, ABCG2, and Ki-67 in 82%, 89%, 16%, 53%, 31%, 52% of samples, respectively. Conclusions: EP target-specific pharmacodynamic biomarkers can be reliably measured in CTCs isolated from patients participating in BEACON. Sample collection and analysis of pre- and post-treatment samples is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT01492101.

CRA1002 The full, final text of this abstract will be available at abstract.asco.org at 12:01 AM (EDT) on Monday, June 4, 2012, and in the Annual Meeting Proceedings online supplement to the June 20, 2012, issue of Journal of Clinical Oncology. Onsite at the Meeting, this abstract will be printed in the Monday edition of ASCO Daily News.