Citations

AbstractBackgroundUnderstanding mortality risk across the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) clinical stages is essential for resource planning and estimating the value of disease modifying therapies (DMTs), which may slow progression. Such studies are lacking.MethodThe study used the Uniform Data Set of the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center (NACC) from September 1, 2005 to March 1, 2021 to assess mortality risk across the AD clinical stages. It included 12,414 participants aged ≥ 50 years, who contributed to the following stages: cognitively unimpaired (CU n = 11,458), incident prodromal AD (n = 937), and AD dementia (n = 745). AD etiology and stage were established based on clinical evaluation and cognitive, behavioral, and functional scores. Study centers report mortality for actively followed participants. Participants contributed observation time until all‐cause death, disease progression, discontinuation, loss to follow‐up, data cutoff or the last visit before a longer than 36‐month gap in visits or recorded scores.Hazard ratios for each AD stage versus CU were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator facilitated final predictor selection.ResultParticipants’ mean age (SD) at study entry was 71.0 years (SD 9.2) (34.9% males). Participants with incident mild, moderate, and severe AD had increased mortality risk relative to CU after controlling for age, sex, education, apolipoprotein E ε4 genotype status, BMI, and residence type. Relative all‐cause mortality risk by AD stage decreased with increasing age; the HRs (95% CI) for mortality at 65 years of age were 6.7 (2.7‐16.9), 14.8 (8.8‐24.8), and 30.1 (16.7‐56.8) for mild, moderate and severe AD respectively; at 80 years of age, the corresponding HR (95% CI) were 2.4 (1.7‐3.3), 3.1 (2.4‐3.9), and 6.6 (4.8‐9.1). Male sex (HR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.52‐2.04) and residing in an institution (vs. private residence; HR = 3.11, 95% CI 2.28‐4.25) significantly increased relative all‐cause mortality risk.ConclusionRelative all‐cause mortality risk increases with AD severity, and more so at younger ages. Despite data limitations, findings are significant as efforts to delay disease, for instance with DMTs, could not only improve patient and caregiver quality of life and reduce costs, but also extend the lives of patients with AD.NIA/NIH Grant U24 AG072122 funds the NACC database.

TPS3159 Background: ELU001 is a novel first-in-class nanoparticle drug conjugate that consists of ~13 folic acid targeting moieties and a payload of ~22 molecules of the topoisomerase-1 inhibitor, exatecan. Folic acid and exatecan are covalently bound by non-cleavable and cathepsin-B cleavable linkers, respectively, to short polyethylene glycol chains which surround the C’Dot’s silica core. CDCs are very small (~6 nm), allowing for more efficient penetration into solid tumors compared to ADCs and a rapid elimination by the kidneys, which is expected to lead to less toxicity than ADCs that have a longer half-life in circulation. ELU001’s high avidity is designed to promote binding to FRα on the surface of cancer cells that express any level of antigen (low to high). ELU001 then internalizes into the tumor cell and traffics to the lysosome where enzymatic cleavage releases the exatecan payload. ELU001 has demonstrated efficacy in preclinical models with low, moderate and high levels of FRα. The first-in-human trial, ELU-FRα-1, is currently recruiting patients with ovarian, endometrial, colorectal, gastric, gastroesophageal junction, triple negative breast, or non-small cell lung cancers, or cholangiocarcinoma cancers, and, in the opinion of the Investigator, have no meaningful life-prolonging therapy option available. Methods: This is a Phase 1 / 2 multicenter, open label clinical trial with two parts: Part 1 Dose Escalation and Part 2 Tumor Group Expansion Cohort(s). In Part 1, patients with cancer types with a high likelihood of having FRα overexpressing tumors, (ovarian, endometrial, colorectal, gastric, gastroesophageal junction, triple negative breast, or non-small cell lung cancers, or cholangiocarcinoma) will be enrolled. FRα expression is determined retrospectively. ELU001 is administered either weekly (QW) (once a week for 3 weeks, 1 week rest), every other week (Q2W, with no rest between cycles), or every three weeks (Q3W). Initial Part 2 expansion cohorts are planned in ovarian cancer with high FRα expression, ovarian cancer with moderate or low FRα expression, and endometrial cancer with any positive FRα expression. Here, FRα will be prospectively determined. Other cancer types may be assessed in the future. The primary objective for Part 1 is to identify the MTD/RP2D. The primary objective for Part 2 is to determine the ORR. Secondary objectives include DOR, PFS, TFST, PFS2, OS, frequency, severity and tolerability of adverse events, PK, ADA, and FRα expression assessments. Part 1 Dose Escalation will recruit about 2-5 patients at each dose for each regimen (QW; Q2W; Q3W). Part 2 Stage 1 will recruit about 15 patients per tumor group expansion cohort and is expected to begin recruitment in the second half of 2023. The study is enrolling in Part 1 Q2W Cohort 301 and Q3W Cohort A in the US. Clinical trial information: NCT05001282 .

AbstractSomatic mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) genes occur frequently in adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and less commonly in pediatric AML. The objective of this study was to describe the prevalence, mutational profile, and prognostic significance of IDH mutations in AML across age. Our cohort included 3141 patients aged between <1 month and 88 years treated on Children’s Cancer Group/Children’s Oncology Group (n = 1872), Southwest Oncology Group (n = 359), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (n = 397) trials, and in Beat AML (n = 333) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (n = 180) genomic characterization cohorts. We retrospectively analyzed patients in 4 age groups (age range, n): pediatric (0-17, 1744), adolescent/young adult (18-39, 444), intermediate-age (40-59, 640), older (≥60, 309). IDH mutations (IDHmut) were identified in 9.2% of the total cohort (n = 288; IDH1 [n = 123, 42.7%]; IDH2 [n = 165, 57.3%]) and were strongly correlated with increased age: 3.4% pediatric vs 21% older, P < .001. Outcomes were similar in IDHmut and IDH-wildtype (IDHWT) AML (event-free survival [EFS]: 35.6% vs 40.0%, P = .368; overall survival [OS]: 50.3% vs 55.4%, P = .196). IDH mutations frequently occurred with NPM1 (47.2%), DNMT3A (29.3%), and FLT3-internal tandem duplication (ITD) (22.4%) mutations. Patients with IDHmut AML with NPM1 mutation (IDHmut/NPM1mut) had significantly improved survival compared with the poor outcomes experienced by patients without (IDHmut/NPM1WT) (EFS: 55.1% vs 17.0%, P < .001; OS: 66.5% vs 35.2%, P < .001). DNTM3A or FLT3-ITD mutations in otherwise favorable IDHmut/NPM1mut AML led to inferior outcomes. Age group analysis demonstrated that IDH mutations did not abrogate the favorable prognostic impact of NPM1mut in patients aged <60 years; older patients had poor outcomes regardless of NPM1 status. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00070174, #NCT00372593, #NCT01371981, #NCT00049517, and #NCT00085709.

AbstractIntraneuronal accumulation of misfolded α-synuclein is the pathological hallmark of Parkinson’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies, often co-occurring with variable degrees of Alzheimer’s disease related neuropathology. Genetic association studies have successfully identified common variants associated with disease risk and phenotypic traits in Lewy body disease, yet little is known about the genetic contribution to neuropathological heterogeneity.Using summary statistics from Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease genome-wide association studies, we calculated polygenic risk scores and investigated the relationship with Lewy, amyloid-β and tau pathology. Associations were nominated in neuropathologically defined samples with Lewy body disease from the Netherlands Brain Bank (n = 217) and followed up in an independent sample series from the Mayo Clinic Brain Bank (n = 394). We also generated stratified polygenic risk scores based on single-nucleotide polymorphisms annotated to eight functional pathways or cell types previously implicated in Parkinson’s disease and assessed for association with Lewy pathology in subgroups with and without significant Alzheimer’s disease co-pathology.In an ordinal logistic regression model, the Alzheimer’s disease polygenic risk score was associated with concomitant amyloid-β and tau pathology in both cohorts. Moreover, both cohorts showed a significant association between lysosomal pathway polygenic risk and Lewy pathology, which was more consistent than the association with a general Parkinson’s disease risk score and specific to the subset of samples without significant concomitant Alzheimer’s disease related neuropathology.Our findings provide proof of principle that the specific risk alleles a patient carries for Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease also influence key aspects of the underlying neuropathology in Lewy body disease. The interrelations between genetic architecture and neuropathology are complex, as our results implicate lysosomal risk loci specifically in the subset of samples without Alzheimer’s disease co-pathology. Our findings hold promise that genetic profiling may help predict the vulnerability to specific neuropathologies in Lewy body disease, with potential relevance for the further development of precision medicine in these disorders.

ABSTRACT Glomerulonephritis (GN) is a diverse group of immune-mediated disorders. Currently, GN is classified largely by histological patterns that are difficult to understand and teach, and most importantly, do not indicate treatment choices. Indeed, altered systemic immunity is the primary pathogenic process and the key therapeutic target in GN. Here, we apply a conceptual framework of immune-mediated disorders to GN guided by immunopathogenesis and hence immunophenotyping: (i) infection-related GN require pathogen identification and control; (ii) autoimmunity-related GN, defined by presence of autoantibodies and (iii) alloimmunity-related GN in transplant recipients both require the suppression of adaptive immunity in lymphoid organs and bone marrow; (iv) autoinflammation-related GN, e.g. inborn errors of immunity diagnosed by genetic testing, requires suppression of single cytokine or complement pathways; and (v) Monoclonal gammopathy-related GN requires B or plasma cell clone-directed therapy. A new GN classification should include disease category, immunological activity to tailor the use of the increasing number of immunomodulatory drugs, and chronicity to trigger standard chronic kidney disease care including the evolving spectrum of cardio-renoprotective drugs. Certain biomarkers allow diagnosis and the assessment of immunological activity and disease chronicity without kidney biopsy. The use of these five GN categories and a therapy-focused GN classification is likely to overcome some of the existing hurdles in GN research, management and teaching by reflecting disease pathogenesis and guiding the therapeutic approach.

ABSTRACT Updated guidelines on the management of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) were released in 2021 by the American College of Rheumatology jointly with the Vasculitis Foundation and, subsequently, in 2022 by the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology. In addition, in 2021, the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes had released updated recommendations on the treatment of AAV with glomerulonephritis (AAV-GN). Kidney involvement is particularly relevant in microscopic polyangiitis and granulomatosis with polyangiitis, but is less frequent in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. The management of AAV-GN has been a focus for drug development and change over the past 10 years. Avoidance of progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) or kidney failure is one of the main unmet needs in the management of AAV, with ESKD having a major impact on morbidity, health costs and mortality risk. Relevant changes in AAV-GN management are related to remission-induction treatment of patients with severe kidney disease, the use of glucocorticoids and avacopan, and remission-maintenance treatment. All the documents provide guidance in accordance with the evidence-based standard of care available at the time of their release. With our work we aim to (i) show the progress made and identify the differences between guidelines and recommendations, (ii) discuss the supporting rationale for those, and (iii) identify gaps in knowledge that could benefit from additional research and should be revised in subsequent updates.

Abstract Background: ELU001 is a novel, first-in-class, new molecular entity described as a C’Dot Drug Conjugate (CDC). ELU001 consists of ~13 folic acid targeting moieties and a payload of ~22 molecules of the topoisomerase-1 inhibitor, exatecan. Folic acid and exatecan are covalently bound by non-cleavable and cathepsin-B cleavable linkers, respectively, to short polyethylene glycol chains which surround the C’Dot’s silica core. CDCs are very small (~6 nm), allowing greater ability to penetrate more efficiently into solid tumors compared to ADCs. CDCs are rapidly eliminated by the kidneys, which is expected to lead to less toxicity than ADCs that have a longer half-life in circulation. ELU001’s high avidity is designed to promote binding to FRα on the surface on FRα overexpressing cancer cells with a wide range of antigen expression including high, moderate and low expressing tumor cells. Following antigen binding, ELU001 internalizes into the tumor cell, and traffics to the lysosome where enzymatic cleavage releases the exatecan payload. The first-in-human trial, ELU-FRα-1, is currently recruiting patients that have advanced, recurrent or refractory tumors associated with indications that are known to potentially overexpress FRα and have been shown to be topoisomerase 1 inhibitor-sensitive, and, in the opinion of the Investigator, have no satisfactory therapeutic options available. Methods: This is a Phase 1/2 multicenter, open label clinical trial with two parts: Part 1 Dose Escalation and Part 2 Tumor Group Expansion Cohort(s). Part 1 is a basket trial enrolling patients with cancer types with a high likelihood of having FRα overexpressing tumors, (specifically, ovarian, endometrial, colorectal, gastric, gastroesophageal junction, triple negative breast, or non-small cell lung cancers, or cholangiocarcinoma). Patients are receiving ELU001 weekly (QW) (once a week for 3 weeks, 1 week rest), every other week (Q2W, with no rest between cycles), or every three weeks (Q3W). Analysis of FRα expression will be retrospectively determined. Part 2 will use Simon’s Two-Stage design to evaluate 4-6 Expansion Cohorts, comprised of tumor histologies anticipated to have greatest activity to ELU001 treatment. FRα will be prospectively determined. The primary objective for Part 1 is to identify the MTD/RP2D. The primary objective for Part 2 is to determine the ORR. Secondary objectives include DOR, PFS, TFST, PFS2, OS, frequency, severity and tolerability of adverse events, PK, ADA, and FRα expression assessments. Part 1 Dose Escalation will recruit about 25 patients per dose regimen (QW; Q2W; Q3W). The first stage of Part 2 (Dose Expansion) will recruit about 15 patients per tumor group expansion cohort. The study is actively enrolling in the US and currently recruiting in Q2W Cohort 201 and Q3W Cohort A. QW Cohorts 1-3 and Q2W Cohort 101 are complete. Clinical trial information: NCT05001282. Citation Format: Wen Wee Ma, Anthony Tolcher, Cesar A. Perez, Douglass Orr, Erika Hamilton, Yujie Zhao, Yonina Murciano-Goroff, Carey Anders, Gregory P. Adams, Catherine W. Reddick, Eliel Bayever. ELU-FRα-1: a study to evaluate ELU001 in patients with solid tumors that overexpress folate receptor alpha (FRα) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT255.

AbstractWhile most benign lesions of the adrenal glands represent either an adrenocortical adenoma or a myelolipoma, the advent and frequent use of high-resolution radiological investigations have led to relatively increased incidental discovery of rare adrenal lesions, specifically benign adrenal cysts, adrenal ganglioneuromas, adrenal schwannomas, adrenal hemorrhage, and adrenal calcifications. Radiological characteristics of the different rare benign adrenal lesions could vary from distinct to indeterminate. Though typically nonfunctional, these rare lesions require evaluation for adrenal hormone excess, as they may phenotypically appear similar to pheochromocytoma or adrenocortical carcinoma and could sometimes be associated with or conceal an underlying functional adrenal tumor. In this review, we discuss the various rare benign adrenal lesions, emphasizing a practical perspective.

PURPOSE Monoclonal antibodies directed against insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) have shown activity in patients with relapsed Ewing sarcoma. The primary objective of Children's Oncology Group trial AEWS1221 was to determine if the addition of the IGF-1R monoclonal antibody ganitumab to interval-compressed chemotherapy improves event-free survival (EFS) in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic Ewing sarcoma. METHODS Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 at enrollment to standard arm (interval-compressed vincristine/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide alternating once every 2 weeks with ifosfamide/etoposide = VDC/IE) or to experimental arm (VDC/IE with ganitumab at cycle starts and as monotherapy once every 3 weeks for 6 months after conventional therapy). A planned sample size of 300 patients was projected to provide 81% power to detect an EFS hazard ratio of 0.67 or smaller for the experimental arm compared with the standard arm with a one-sided α of .025. RESULTS Two hundred ninety-eight eligible patients enrolled (148 in standard arm; 150 in experimental arm). The 3-year EFS estimates were 37.4% (95% CI, 29.3 to 45.5) for the standard arm and 39.1% (95% CI, 31.3 to 46.7) for the experimental arm (stratified EFS-event hazard ratio for experimental arm 1.00; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.33; 1-sided, P = .50). The 3-year overall survival estimates were 59.5% (95% CI, 50.8 to 67.3) for the standard arm and 56.7% (95% CI, 48.3 to 64.2) for the experimental arm. More cases of pneumonitis after radiation involving thoracic fields and nominally higher rates of febrile neutropenia and ALT elevation were reported on the experimental arm. CONCLUSION Ganitumab added to interval-compressed chemotherapy did not significantly reduce the risk of EFS event in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic Ewing sarcoma, with outcomes similar to prior trials without IGF-1R inhibition or interval compression. The addition of ganitumab may be associated with increased toxicity.

Effective decision-making in crisis events is challenging due to time pressure, uncertainty, and dynamic decisional environments. We conducted a systematic literature review in PubMed and PsycINFO, identifying 32 empiric research papers that examine how trained professionals make naturalistic decisions under pressure. We used structured qualitative analysis methods to extract key themes. The studies explored different aspects of decision-making across multiple domains. The majority (19) focused on healthcare; military, fire and rescue, oil installation, and aviation domains were also represented. We found appreciable variability in research focus, methodology, and decision-making descriptions. We identified five main themes: (1) decision-making strategy, (2) time pressure, (3) stress, (4) uncertainty, and (5) errors. Recognition-primed decision-making (RPD) strategies were reported in all studies that analyzed this aspect. Analytical strategies were also prominent, appearing more frequently in contexts with less time pressure and explicit training to generate multiple explanations. Practitioner experience, time pressure, stress, and uncertainty were major influencing factors. Professionals must adapt to the time available, types of uncertainty, and individual skills when making decisions in high-risk situations. Improved understanding of these decisional factors can inform evidence-based enhancements to training, technology, and process design.