Citations

6592 Background: Sex, age and ECOG performance status (PS) may affect immune response and the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We did a meta-analysis to assess the potential sex, age and ECOG PS differences of immunotherapy efficacy in advanced cancer. Methods: PubMed was searched up to January 15, 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced cancer treated with ICI immunotherapy vs control therapy (without ICI). For sex difference analysis, pooled hazard ratio (HR) of death for men and women was calculated separately, and the heterogeneity between the two estimates was assessed using an interaction test by pooling study-specific interaction HR. Age ( < 65 vs ≥65) and ECOG PS (0 vs ≥1) difference was analyzed similarly. Subgroup analysis by cancer type and line of therapy (frontline vs subsequent) was explored. All analyses were done in Comprehensive Meta Analysis (v2) with random effects models. Results: Thirty phase 2/3 RCTs involving 17,728 patients were included. An OS benefit of immunotherapy was found for both men (HR 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-0.81, P < 0.01) and women (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.90, P < 0.01); for both younger ( < 65; HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.68-0.83, P < 0.01) and older (≥65; HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.69-0.83, P < 0.01) patients; and for both ECOG PS 0 (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.69-0.89, P < 0.01) and PS ≥1 (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.84, P < 0.01) patients. No significant difference of relative benefit from immunotherapy over control therapy was found in patients with different sex ( P = 0.283), age ( P = 0.906) or ECOG PS ( P = 0.783). In melanoma RCTs, compared with women (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64-0.94, P < 0.01), men (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.42-0.76, P < 0.01) had more OS benefit from immunotherapy ( P = 0.037). No significant difference was found in other subgroup analyses by cancer types or line of therapy. Conclusions: Overall we found no evidence of association of sex, age, or ECOG PS with cancer immunotherapy efficacy. However, in melanoma, men might benefit more from immunotherapy than women.

e15799 Background: Lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) has been described as a prognostic factor in many solid tumors including colorectal adenocarcinoma. LMR has not been investigated as a prognostic factor in small bowel cancers. In this study, we aimed to evaluate prognostic factors in resected small bowel adenocarcinoma including LMR. Methods: Two hundred forty-one patients who underwent resection for stage I-III small bowel adenocarcinoma were retrospectively identified utilizing the pathology database at a single tertiary referral institution from 1994 to 2015. All patients had complete follow up data and were included in the survival analysis. One hundred sixty-nine patients had preoperative peripheral blood counts available for analysis. Plot of martingale residuals against LMR were used to establish best cutoff points for LMR. A training set for LMR included consecutively identified patients from 2006 to 2015, and a validation cohort including patients identified from 1994 to 2005 was used. Overall survival was performed utilizing Kaplan-Meier method, and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical comparisons. Cox proportional hazards were performed and all tests were two sided. P value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Median overall survival for the entire group was 54.5 months (95% CI: 37.2-81.2 months) with 5- and 10-year overall survival of 48% and 35%. The training set for LMR included 81 patients, and the validation set included 88 patients. The cutoff of 1.56 was chosen based on most significant p value (p = 0.002). When combined, the overall area under the curve (AUC) for LMR was 0.63, p < 0.01, (specificity 37.3%, sensitivity 90.1%, positive predictive value 33.1%, and negative predictive value 92.2%). There were 126 patients with LMR > 1.56 and 43 patients with LMR < 1.56 in the entire cohort. In multivariate analysis, LMR under 1.56 was a negative prognostic factor, HR = 2.20 (95% CI: 1.27-3.84, p < 0.01). In addition to LMR, age > 60 years and advanced T stage were independently negative predictors of overall survival in all patients. Conclusions: Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio < 1.56 is a validated negative prognostic factor in resected small bowel adenocarcinoma.

e15688 Background: PNETs are marked by histological heterogeneity and variable clinical outcomes. Other than Ki67 index, reliable circulating or tissue biomarkers for prognosis do not exist. Methods: PubMed was searched through 01/31/2017. Inclusion criteria were: 1) prospective/retrospective cohort with defined source population, boundary dates, and justifications for exclusions; 2) assay of primary tumors; 3) clear descriptions of methods including techniques and controls; 4) use of multivariate proportional hazards modeling adjusted for prognostic factors including but not limited to stage or grade; and 5) reporting adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95 % confidence intervals and P values. Studies with < 50 % PNETs were excluded. PNET-specific data was summarized in the table. Results: A total of 2958 manuscripts were identified and 462 manuscripts were reviewed. Only 23 multivariate studies met all inclusion criteria. These altogether analyzed 24 unique targets and 14 were associated with survival. Conclusions: This meta-analysis identified 14 markers associated with survival of PNET patients. Future studies should adhere to the REMARK criteria and incorporate the 2017 WHO grading system for multivariate analysis. 1. I-immunohistochemistry, F-fluorescence in situ hybridization, E-enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, M- methylation specific PCR, P-polymerase chain reaction; 2. O-overall survival, F-disease free survival, S-disease specific survival, P- progression free survival.[Table: see text]

322 Background: The role of perioperative systemic therapy (PST) is unclear in the management of localized pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET). We aim to evaluate the benefit of PST compared to surgical resection alone in localized pNET. Methods: We identified patients with stage I–III pNET who underwent curative-intent surgical resection in National Cancer Database from 2006 to 2014. Patients who underwent PST and surgical resection were matched with patients who received surgery alone by propensity score at 1:1 ratio with nearest neighbor method. Factors predicting the use of PST were identified from logistic regression. Survival was estimated with Kaplan-Meier method and compared with Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: 4919 patients were included in this study with median age of 60 years. 1397 (28%) patients had pNET at the head of pancreas. 2708 (55%) patients had pNET at pancreas body and tail. 334 (6.8%) patients received PST. Factors associated with significant more use of PST compared to surgery alone were age < 65 years, low income, community medical facilities, grade 3/4 tumor, tumor at the head of pancreas, T3-4 tumor and N1 tumor. 310 patients in PST group were matched with 310 patients in surgery alone group, with no significant difference for all covariates after match. For those in PST group, 64 (21%) patients received neoadjuvant systemic therapy, 173 (56%) patients received adjuvant systemic therapy, 7 (2.3%) patients received both, and 66 (21%) patients received PST without clear sequence. In the matched cohort, PST group had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) compared to surgery alone group (median OS 91.1 months versus not reached, p = 0.04). This finding was confirmed by multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression in unmatched cohort with HR 1.5 (95% CI 1.2 – 1.9, p = 0.002). Subgroup analysis in patients with grade 3/4 tumor demonstrated PST group has a trend of shorter OS compared to surgery alone group (median OS 34.1 versus 54.4 months, p = 0.1). Conclusions: PST compared to surgery alone is associated with worse OS in patients with localized pNET. This finding suggests that we may use PST in localized pNET with caution in the absence of solid clinical trial data.

321 Background: G3 NENs are aggressive, and optimal systemic treatment is unclear. Temozolomide (TEM)-based regimens have been used to treat grade 1-2 NETs, but their efficacy in G3 NENs (Ki-67 > 20%) remains undetermined. Aims: To assess the clinical efficacy of TEM-containing regimens in advanced grade III gastroenteropancreatic NENs (GEPNENs). Methods: A multicentre retrospective review (2008-2017) of patients with metastatic/unresectable G3 GEPNENs who received a TEM-containing regimen. The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF). Radiologic response was extracted from local reports without formal RECIST criteria. Results: 118 patients in six centers were included (median age 55, 65% male, 15% functional, 75% pancreatic NEN). 57% were well-differentiated, 35% poorly-differentiated, and 18% unknown based on local pathology reports. The regimen used was CAPTEM in 93% and TEM in 7%. Best radiological responses were: complete response (1%), partial response (39%), stable disease (22%), progressive disease (31%), unknown (7%) not by RECIST. Median TTF was 150 days and median overall survival (OS) 18.0 months. Fifteen patients (14%) required dose reductions/discontinuation due to adverse events. TTF was shorter for patients on TEM alone (p = 0.02, Table 1). Well-differentiated NENs had better response rate (52% vs 26%, p = 0.02) and overall survival (30.1 vs 12.0 mo, p = 0.008) compared to poorly-differentiated NEN. Conclusions: This is the largest TEM treatment series in G3 NEN, involving collaboration of several major North American NET centers. 40% of patients showed some degree of response, and treatment was generally well-tolerated. TEM-based regimens should be considered a viable treatment option in this setting. Prospective confirmatory trials (such as EA2142) may face difficulties in accrual due to disease rarity. [Table: see text]

131 Background: Trimodality therapy is the standard of care for patients with resectable cancer of the esophagus. However, patients ≥75 years have been underrepresented or excluded from landmark clinical trials to date. We investigated the feasibility and safety of treatment of esophageal cancer with trimodality therapy in patients’ ≥ 75 years. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all patients ≥75 years who received trimodality therapy for esophageal cancer in 3 high volume tertiary cancer institutions from June 2007 to June 2013. All patients received neoadjuvant radiation with concomitant chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy. Toxicities and clinical outcomes were abstracted from the electronic medical record and partially from a prospectively maintained database. Overall and disease-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Five hundred seventy patients were treated with trimodality therapy for esophageal cancer from 2007-2013. Of these, 38 patients (7%) were 75 or older at the time of diagnosis. At diagnosis, comorbidities included coronary artery disease (32%), atrial fibrillation (11%) and COPD (13%). The majority of patients (87%) received 50.4Gy/28 fractions. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/cisplatin was the most common chemotherapy regimen (37%), followed by 5-FU/docetaxel (24%). A total of 13 patients (34%) developed acute grade ≥3 toxicity associated with neoadjuvant therapy. The most common acute grade 3 toxicities were haematological (10%), nausea (8%), esophagitis (5%) and fatigue (5%). Significant postoperative complications included respiratory (empyema, ARDS, pleural effusion) (39%), arrhythmia (32%), anastomotic leak (5%), and ileus (5%). There were 2 deaths (5%) within 90 days of surgery: one was secondary to empyema, the other developed DIC and sepsis. Median overall survival and disease free survival were 4.4 and 2.3 years respectively. Conclusions: Trimodality treatment is a reasonable approach for management of carefully selected elderly patients with esophageal cancer, with similar rates of cancer outcomes, and treatment related morbidity and mortality as compared to younger patients.