Citations

62 Background: We have previously reported that mutations in SPOP promote bromodomain and extra-terminal motif (BET) protein upregulation and BET inhibitor resistance in prostate cancer (Zhang et al., Nature Medicine 23(9):1055-1062, 2017). Other studies indicate that histone acetyltransferases (HATs) such as P300 are also upregulated in SPOP-mutated prostate cancer (Blattner et al., Cancer Cell 31: 436-451, 2017). Methods: We examined the anti-cancer effect of NEO2734 (Epigene Therapeutics Inc), a novel dual inhibitor of both BET and CBP-P300, in prostate cancer using cell line, organoid and patient-derived xenografts (PDX) as working models. We examined the anti-cancer effect of NEO2734 (Epigene Therapeutics Inc), a novel dual inhibitor of both BET and CBP-P300, in prostate cancer using cell line, organoid and patient-derived xenografts (PDX) as working models. Results: We demonstrated that while prostate cancer cell lines expressing F133V, the most frequent SPOP mutant, are very resistant to both BET inhibitor JQ1 and CBP/P300 inhibitor CPI-637, they are very sensitive to simultaneous cotreatment with JQ1 and CPI-637. Similarly, we demonstrated that F133V mutant cells are also very sensitive to NEO2734. We established PDX and organoid models from a patient with prostate cancer expressing a novel SPOP mutation Q165P. Computer simulation analysis reveals that the Q165P mutation causes larger conformational fluctuation, indicating that the structure of Q165P is less stable than that of wild type SPOP. Accordingly, co-immunoprecipitation assay showed that Q165P mutation impaired the dimerization ability of SPOP. We further showed that the Q165P mutant organoid was very sensitive to NEO2734 in vitro and the Q165P mutant PDX was very sensitive to NEO2734 in mice. Conclusions: These PDX-based pre-clinical studies indicate that the inhibition of both BET and CBP-P300, either by co-administration of two agents, or by treatment with the dual inhibitor, NEO2734, is effective in SPOP-mutated prostate cancer. These data provide a strong rationale for the inclusion of patients with SPOP-mutated prostate cancer in clinical studies of NEO2734.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is triggered mainly by mutations in genes encoding sarcomeric proteins, but a significant proportion of patients lack a genetic diagnosis. We identified a potentially novel mutation in ryanodine receptor 2, RyR2-P1124L, in a patient from a genotype-negative HCM cohort. The aim of this study was to determine whether RyR2-P1124L triggers functional and structural alterations in isolated RyR2 channels and whole hearts. We found that P1124L induces significant conformational changes in the SPRY2 domain of RyR2. Recombinant RyR2-P1124L channels displayed a cytosolic loss-of-function phenotype, which contrasted with a higher sensitivity to luminal [Ca 2+ ], indicating a luminal gain of function. Homozygous mice for RyR2-P1124L showed mild cardiac hypertrophy, similar to the human patient. This phenotype, evident at 1 year of age, was accompanied by an increase in the expression of calmodulin (CaM). P1124L mice also showed higher susceptibility to arrhythmia at 8 months of age, before the onset of hypertrophy. RyR2-P1124L has a distinct cytosolic loss-of-function and a luminal gain-of-function phenotype. This bifunctionally divergent behavior triggers arrhythmias and structural cardiac remodeling, and it involves overexpression of CaM as a potential hypertrophic mediator. This study is relevant to continue elucidating the possible causes of genotype-negative HCM and the role of RyR2 in cardiac hypertrophy.

AbstractIntroductionFour less well‐studied but promising “emerging” cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are elevated in late‐onset Alzheimer disease (AD): neurogranin, synaptosomal‐associated protein‐25 (SNAP‐25), visinin‐like protein 1 (VILIP‐1), and chitinase‐3‐like protein 1 (YKL‐40).MethodsCSF neurogranin, SNAP‐25, VILIP‐1, and YKL‐40 were measured in families carrying autosomal‐dominant AD mutations.ResultsThe four emerging CSF biomarkers were significantly elevated in the mutation carriers (n = 235) versus noncarriers (n = 145). CSF SNAP‐25, VILIP‐1, and YKL‐40 were altered very early in the AD time course, approximately 15–19 years before estimated symptom onset. All CSF biomarkers predicted important AD‐related outcomes including performance on a cognitive composite, brain amyloid burden as measured by amyloid positron emission tomography, and the estimated years from symptom onset.DiscussionEarly abnormalities in CSF tTau, pTau, SNAP‐25, VILIP‐1, and YKL‐40 suggest that synaptic damage, neuronal injury, and neuroinflammation begin shortly after the commencement of brain amyloid accumulation.

Abstract BACKGROUND Interindividual variability in blood pressure (BP) response to antihypertensives has been reported. Although plasma renin activity (PRA) is a potential biomarker for personalizing antihypertensive therapy in European American (EA) and African American (AA) hypertensives, clinical utility of PRA-guided prescribing is incompletely understood. METHODS Using systematic-phased approach, PRA’s clinical utility was assessed. After categorizing by baseline PRA, clinic systolic BP (SBP) responses to metoprolol and chlorthalidone were compared in 134 EAs and 102 AAs enrolled in the Pharmacogenomics Evaluation of Antihypertensive Responses-2 (PEAR-2) trial. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted in EAs. Data from PEAR-2 AAs were used to estimate an optimal PRA cut point using multivariable linear regression models. The derived cut point in AAs was tested in a meta-analysis of 2 independent AA cohorts, and its sensitivity and specificity were assessed. RESULTS EAs with PRA < 0.65 ng/ml/hour had a greater decrease in SBP to chlorthalidone than metoprolol (by –15.9 mm Hg, adjusted P < 0.0001), whereas those with PRA ≥ 0.65 ng/ml/hour had a greater decrease in SBP to metoprolol than chlorthalidone (by 3.3 mm Hg, adjusted P = 0.04). Area under ROC curve (0.69, P = 0.0001) showed that PRA can predict SBP response among EAs. However, we observed no association between PRA and SBP response in PEAR-2 AAs. Among independent AA cohorts, those with PRA ≥ 1.3 ng/ml/hour (PEAR-2-derived cut point) responded better to atenolol/candesartan than hydrochlorothiazide (meta-analysis P = 0.01). However, sensitivity of the derived cut point was 10%. CONCLUSIONS PRA at the previously established 0.60–0.65 ng/ml/hour cut point is an effective predictive biomarker of BP response in EAs. However, we were unable to identify PRA cut point that could be used to guide antihypertensive selection in AAs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01203852, NCT00246519, NCT00005520.

Abstract Background: Clinical management of metastatic melanoma (MM) after PD-1 blockade failure remains a challenge and lacks a standard of care. Immunotherapy or chemotherapy alone provides limited benefit in this setting. Chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) combinations have demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety profiles in lung cancer patients. Our preclinical study in MM has shown that the addition of chemotherapy to PD-1 blockade can reshape a subset of therapy-responsive CD8+ T-cells with resultant enhanced antitumor activities, suggesting the potential clinical benefits of CIT in MM patients whose disease have progressed after anti-PD-1 therapy. Further understanding of the clinical benefits and immunoregulatory mechanisms of CIT in this setting is crucial for the development of optimal combinatorial chemo-immunotherapeutic strategies to improve clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer. Methods: MM patients (n=22) who have failed PD-1 blockade therapy were subsequently treated with CIT (paclitaxel and carboplatin in combination with pembrolizumab). The overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), time-to-next therapy (TTNT), and toxicities were assessed. Using peripheral blood (PB) from MM patients, the phenotypic and functional changes induced by chemotherapy in therapy-responsive T-cells, in the setting of anti-PD1 therapy, were examined. The immunoregulatory effects of CIT were also examined in melanoma mouse model. Results: MM patients who have received subsequent CIT had a median OS of 5 years (95% CI: 2-NR) (median follow up of 3.9 years), with ORR of 61% (CR of 23%). The median TTNT was 8 months (95% CI: 6-15). No additional toxicities were identified. CX3CR1+CD8+ therapy-responsive T-cells are low in MM patients who have failed to respond to anti-PD-1 monotherapy. However, in MM patients who responded to subsequent CIT, this subset of therapy-responsive T-cells survived the chemotherapy with increased frequency and enhanced function. The clinical benefit of CIT is only observed in CX3CR1 wild type mice, not in KO mice, and ongoing PD-1 blockade is necessary to improve its anti-tumor activities. Conclusion: In MM patients who have failed anti-PD-1 therapy, the chemo-immunotherapy combination showed favorable clinical outcomes and an acceptable toxicity profile. CX3CR1+ CD8+ effector T-cells are responsible for the clinical benefit of CIT. This novel therapy-responsive population underlies the key cellular and molecular immunoregulatory mechanisms of chemotherapy. It serves as a meaningful marker to measure these collaborative effects and to develop the optimal chemo-immunotherapy strategy to improve clinical responses to current immune checkpoint blocking agents. Citation Format: Yiyi Yan, Haidong Dong, Roxana Dronca, Svetomir Markovic. CX3CR1+CD8+ T-cells are responsible to the clinical benefit of chemoimmunotherapy in metastatic melanoma patients after disease progression on PD-1 blockade [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fourth CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; Sept 30-Oct 3, 2018; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2019;7(2 Suppl):Abstract nr PR11.