Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

864 citation(s) found for "Jackson, D J".

A Gene Implicated in Activation of Retinoic Acid Receptor Targets Is a Novel Renal Agenesis Gene in Humans
Brophy, Patrick D. , Rasmussen, Maria , Parida, Mrutyunjaya , Bonde, Greg , Darbro, Benjamin W. , Hong, Xiaojing , Clarke, Jason, Peterson, Kevin A. , Denegre, James M., Sussman, Caroline R. , Sunde, Lone , Lildballe, Dorte L. , Hertz, Jens Michael , Cornell, Robert A. , Murray, Stephen A. , Manak, J. Robert , Schneider, Michael C. , Sunde, Lone , Sussman, Caroline R.

Genetics | July 25, 2017 | Volume: 207 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 215-228

10.1534/genetics.117.1125 | PMID 28739660 Get It

AbstractRenal agenesis is a devastating birth defect, and although genes encoding retinoic acid signaling components have been shown to be important for renal...Renal agenesis (RA) is one of the more extreme examples of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT). Bilateral renal agenesis is almost invariably fatal at birth, and unilateral renal agenesis can lead to future health issues including end-stage renal disease. Genetic investigations have identified several gene variants that cause RA, including EYA1, LHX1, and WT1. However, whereas compound null mutations of genes encoding α and γ retinoic acid receptors (RARs) cause RA in mice, to date there have been no reports of variants in RAR genes causing RA in humans. In this study, we carried out whole exome sequence analysis of two families showing inheritance of an RA phenotype, and in both identified a single candidate gene, GREB1L. Analysis of a zebrafish greb1l loss-of-function mutant revealed defects in the pronephric kidney just prior to death, and F0 CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis of Greb1l in the mouse revealed kidney agenesis phenotypes, implicating Greb1l in this disorder. GREB1L resides in a chromatin complex with RAR members, and our data implicate GREB1L as a coactivator for RARs. This study is the first to associate a component of the RAR pathway with renal agenesis in humans.
Effects of Intensive BP Control in CKD
CHEUNG, ALFRED K., Rahman, Mahboob, Reboussin, David M. , Craven, Timothy E., Greene, Tom, Pl, Kimmel, Hawfield, Amret , Johnson, Karen , Lewis, Cora E., Oparil, S, Rocco, Michael V., Sink, Kaycee M. , Pk, Whelton, Wright, Jackson T., Jn, Basile, Bhatt, Udayan, Chertow, Glenn M., Chonchol, M, Freedman, Barry I., Haley, William, Ix, J H, Katz, Lois A., Killeen, Anthony A. , Ricardo, Ana C., Servilla, Karen, Wall, Barry, Wolfgram, Dawn, Yee, Jerry , Chertow, Glenn M. , Greene, Tom , Rocco, Michael V. , Rahman, Mahboob , Craven, Tim, Cushman, William C. , Lewis, Cora E. , Beddhu, Srinivasan , Bhatt, Udayan, Chang, Tara I. , Chonchol, Michel , Freedman, Barry I. , Haley, William E. , Ix, Joachim H. , Katz, Lois Anne , Papademetriou, Vasilios , Servilla, Karen S. , Wolfgram, Dawn F. , Greene, Tom , Rocco, Michael V

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology | June 22, 2017 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 2812-2823

10.1681/asn.2017020148 | PMID 28642330 Get It

The appropriate target for BP in patients with CKD and hypertension remains uncertain. We report prespecified subgroup analyses of outcomes in participants with baseline CKD in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial. We randomly assigned participants to a systolic BP target of <120 mm Hg (intensive group; n =1330) or <140 mm Hg (standard group; n =1316). After a median follow-up of 3.3 years, the primary composite cardiovascular outcome occurred in 112 intensive group and 131 standard group CKD participants (hazard ratio [HR], 0.81; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.63 to 1.05). The intensive group also had a lower rate of all-cause death (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.99). Treatment effects did not differ between participants with and without CKD ( P values for interactions ≥0.30). The prespecified main kidney outcome, defined as the composite of ≥50% decrease in eGFR from baseline or ESRD, occurred in 15 intensive group and 16 standard group participants (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.44 to 1.83). After the initial 6 months, the intensive group had a slightly higher rate of change in eGFR (−0.47 versus −0.32 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 per year; P <0.03). The overall rate of serious adverse events did not differ between treatment groups, although some specific adverse events occurred more often in the intensive group. Thus, among patients with CKD and hypertension without diabetes, targeting an SBP<120 mm Hg compared with <140 mm Hg reduced rates of major cardiovascular events and all-cause death without evidence of effect modifications by CKD or deleterious effect on the main kidney outcome.
Erratum to: Development of a Unifying Target and Consensus Indicators for Global Surgical Systems Strengthening: Proposed by the Global Alliance for Surgery, Obstetric, Trauma, and Anaesthesia Care (The G4 Alliance)
Haider, Adil H. , Scott, John W. , Gause, Colin D., Meheš, Mira, Hsiung, Grace, Prelvukaj, Albulena, Yanocha, Dana, Baumann, Lauren M., Ahmed, Faheem , Ahmed, Naeem , Anderson, Sara, Angaté, Hervé, Arfaa, Lisa, Asbun, Horacio J. , Ashengo, Tigistu Adamu , Asuman, Kisembo, Bickler, Stephen W. , Billingsley, Saul, Bird, Peter, Botman, Matthijs , Butler, Marilyn, Buyske, Jo, Capozzi, Angelo, Casey, Kathleen , Clayton, Charles, Cobey, James C., Cotton, Michael , Deckelbaum, Dan, Derbew, Miliard , deVries, Catherine R. , Dillner, Jeanne, Downham, Max, Draisin, Natalie, Echinard, David, Elneil, Sohier , ElSayed, Ahmed , Estelle, Abigail, Finley, G. Allen , Frenkel, Erica, Frykman, Philip K., Gheorghe, Florin, Gore‐Booth, Julian, Henker, Richard , Henry, Jaymie , Henry, Orion, Hoemeke, Laura , Ibanga, Iko, Jackson, Eric V., Jani, Pankaj , Johnson, Walter D. , Jones, Andrew , Kassem, Zeina, Kocan, Abbey, Krishnaswami, Sanjay , Lane, Robert H. , Latif, Asad , Levy, Barbara , Linos, Dimitrios , Linz, Peter E., Listwa, Louis A., Magee, Declan, Makasa, Emmanuel , Marin, Michael L. , Martin, Claude , McQueen, Kelly, Morgan, Jamie , Moser, Richard , Neighbor, Robert, Novick, William M. , Ogendo, Stephen, Omigbodun, Akinyinka , Onajin‐Obembe, Bisola , Parsan, Neil, Philip, Beverly K., Price, Raymond R. , Rasheed, Shahnawaz, Ratel, M, Reynolds, Cheri, Roser, Steven M. , Rowles, Jackie , Samad, Lubna , Sampson, John , Sanghvi, Harshadkumar, Sellers, Marchelle L., Sigalet, David L. , Steffes, Bruce C., Stieber, Erin, Swaroop, Mamta , Tarpley, John L. , Varghese, Asha , Varughese, Julie, Wagner, Richard, Warf, Benjamin C. , Wetzig, Neil , Williamson, Susan , Wood, Joshua, Zeidan, Anne, Zirkle, Lewis G. , Allen, Brendan, Abdullah, Fizan , Asbun, Horacio, Ayala, Ruben , Butler, Marilyn, Gheorghe, Florin, Hoffman, David C. , Lane, Robert, Varughese, Julie

World Journal of Surgery | June 22, 2017 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 2423-2425

10.1007/s00268-017-4067-7 | PMID 28642965 Get It

Development of a Unifying Target and Consensus Indicators for Global Surgical Systems Strengthening: Proposed by the Global Alliance for Surgery, Obstetric, Trauma, and Anaesthesia Care (The G4 Alliance)
Haider, Adil H. , Scott, John W. , Gause, Colin D., Meheš, Mira, Hsiung, Grace, Prelvukaj, Albulena, Yanocha, Dana, Baumann, Lauren M., Ahmed, Faheem , Ahmed, Naeem , Anderson, Sara, Angaté, Hervé, Arfaa, Lisa, Asbun, Horacio J. , Ashengo, Tigistu Adamu , Asuman, Kisembo, Ayala, Ruben , Bickler, Stephen W. , Billingsley, Saul, Bird, Peter, Botman, Matthijs , Butler, Marilyn, Buyske, Jo, Capozzi, Angelo, Casey, Kathleen , Clayton, Charles, Cobey, James C., Cotton, Michael , Deckelbaum, Dan, Derbew, Miliard , deVries, Catherine R. , Dillner, Jeanne, Downham, Max, Draisin, Natalie, Echinard, David, Elneil, Sohier , ElSayed, Ahmed , Estelle, Abigail, Finley, G. Allen , Frenkel, Erica, Frykman, Philip K., Gheorghe, Florin, Gore‐Booth, Julian, Henker, Richard , Henry, Jaymie , Henry, Orion, Hoemeke, Laura , Ibanga, Iko, Jackson, Eric V., Jani, Pankaj , Johnson, Walter D. , Jones, Andrew , Kassem, Zeina, Kocan, Abbey, Krishnaswami, Sanjay , Lane, Robert H. , Latif, Asad , Levy, Barbara , Linos, Dimitrios , Linz, Peter E., Listwa, Louis A., Magee, Declan, Makasa, Emmanuel , Marin, Michael L. , Martin, Claude , McQueen, Kelly, Morgan, Jamie , Moser, Richard , Neighbor, Robert, Novick, William M. , Ogendo, Stephen, Omigbodun, Akinyinka , Onajin‐Obembe, Bisola , Parsan, Neil, Philip, Beverly K., Price, Raymond R. , Rasheed, Shahnawaz, Ratel, M, Reynolds, Cheri, Roser, Steven M. , Rowles, Jackie , Samad, Lubna , Sampson, John , Sanghvi, Harshadkumar, Sellers, Marchelle L., Sigalet, David L. , Steffes, Bruce C., Stieber, Erin, Swaroop, Mamta , Tarpley, John L. , Varghese, Asha , Varughese, Julie, Wagner, Richard, Warf, Benjamin C. , Wetzig, Neil , Williamson, Susan , Wood, Joshua, Zeidan, Anne, Zirkle, Lewis G. , Allen, Brendan, Abdullah, Fizan , Asbun, Horacio, Butler, Marilyn, Gheorghe, Florin, Hoffman, David C. , Lane, Robert, Varughese, Julie

World Journal of Surgery | May 15, 2017 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 2426-2434

10.1007/s00268-017-4028-1 | PMID 28508237 Get It

AbstractAfter decades on the margins of primary health care, surgical and anaesthesia care is gaining increasing priority within the global development arena. The 2015 publications of the Disease Control Priorities third edition on Essential Surgery and the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery created a compelling evidenced‐based argument for the fundamental role of surgery and anaesthesia within cost‐effective health systems strengthening global strategy. The launch of the Global Alliance for Surgical, Obstetric, Trauma, and Anaesthesia Care in 2015 has further coordinated efforts to build priority for surgical care and anaesthesia. These combined efforts culminated in the approval of a World Health Assembly resolution recognizing the role of surgical care and anaesthesia as part of universal health coverage. Momentum gained from these milestones highlights the need to identify consensus goals, targets and indicators to guide policy implementation and track progress at the national level. Through an open consultative process that incorporated input from stakeholders from around the globe, a global target calling for safe surgical and anaesthesia care for 80% of the world by 2030 was proposed. In order to achieve this target, we also propose 15 consensus indicators that build on existing surgical systems metrics and expand the ability to prioritize surgical systems strengthening around the world.
Whole exome sequencing of a patient with suspected mitochondrial myopathy reveals novel compound heterozygous variants in RYR 1
Blackburn, Patrick R. , Selcen, Duygu , Gass, Jennifer , Jackson, Jessica L. , Macklin, Sarah , Cousin, Margot A. , Boczek, Nicole J. , Klee, Eric W. , Dimberg, Elliot L., Kennelly, Kathleen D., Gass, Jennifer M , Atwal, Paldeep S , Cousin, Margot A

Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine | March 31, 2017 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 295-302

10.1002/mgg3.280 | PMID 28547000 Get It

Abstract Background Pathogenic variants in ryanodine receptor 1 ( RYR 1, MIM # 180901) are the cause of congenital myopathy with fiber‐type disproportion, malignant hyperthermia susceptibility type 1, central core disease of muscle, multiminicore disease and other congenital myopathies. Methods We present a patient with global developmental delay, hypotonia, myopathy, joint hypermobility, and multiple other systemic complaints that were noted early in life. Later she was found to have multiple bone deformities involving her spine, with severe scoliosis that was corrected surgically. She was also diagnosed with ophthalmoplegia, chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure, and hypertension. At 22 years of age she presented to the genetics clinic with a diagnosis of mitochondrial myopathy and underwent whole exome sequencing ( WES ). Results Whole exome sequencing revealed two novel compound heterozygous variants in RYR 1 (c.7060_7062del, p.Val2354del and c.4485_4500del, p.Tyr1495X). Conclusion Review of her clinical, pathologic, and genetic findings pointed to a diagnosis of a congenital myopathy with fiber‐type disproportion.
Comparative effectiveness of tumor response assessment methods: Standard-of-care versus computer-assisted response evaluation.
Florez, Edward , Sirous, Reza , Lirette, Seth T. , Griswold, Michael , Wang, Zhen J. , Bieszczad, Jacob, Cox, Kelly , Goenka, Ajit H. , Howard-Claudio, Candace M, Sanyal, Rupan , Henagen, J. Clark, Storrs, Judd , Allen, Brian C. , Remer, Erick M. , Howard, Candace M. , Kang, HyunSeon Christine , Nandwana, Sadhna B. , Shinagare, Atul Bhanudas , Davenport, Matthew S. , Rini, Brian I. , Smith, Andrew D. , Storrs, Judd M , Lirette, Seth

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 29, 2017 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 6_suppl | Pages: 432-432

10.1200/jco.2017.35.6_suppl.432 Get It

432 Background: In clinical trials and clinical practice, tumor response assessment with computed tomography (CT) defines critical end points in patients with metastatic disease treated with systemic agents. Methods to reduce errors and improve efficiency in tumor response assessment could improve patient care. Methods: Eleven readers from 10 different institutions independently categorized tumor response according to three different therapeutic response criteria using paired baseline and initial post-therapy CT studies from 20 randomly selected patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib as part of a completed phase III multi-institutional study. Images were evaluated with a manual tumor response evaluation method (standard-of-care) and with computer-assisted response evaluation (CARE) that included stepwise guidance, interactive error-identification and correction methods, automated tumor metric extraction, calculations, response categorization, and data/image archival. A cross-over design, patient randomization, and two-week washout period were used to reduce recall bias. Comparative effectiveness metrics included error rate and mean patient evaluation time. Results: The standard-of-care method was on average associated with one or more errors in 30.5% (6.1/20) of patients while CARE had a 0.0% (0.0/20) error rate (p<0.001). The most common errors were related to data transfer and arithmetic calculation. In patients with errors, the median number of error types was 1 (range 1-3). Mean patient evaluation time with CARE was twice as fast as the standard-of-care method (6.4 vs. 13.1 minutes, p<0.001). Conclusions: Computer-assisted tumor response evaluation reduced errors and time of evaluation, indicating better overall effectiveness than manual tumor response evaluation methods that are the current standard-of-care.
Randomized, open-label trial of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (G/NP) ± pamrevlumab (P) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC).
Picozzi, Vincent J. , Rocha, Flavio G. , Helton, Scott , Pishvaian, Michael J. , Jackson, Patrick G. , Mody, Kabir , Asbun, Horacio J. , Carney, Mairead, Etheridge, Tina, Neff, Thomas B., Porter, Seth, Valone, Frank H., Kouchakji, Elias, Imperial, Joanne C. , Carrier, Ewa , Zhong, Ming

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 21, 2017 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 365-365

10.1200/jco.2017.35.4_suppl.365 Get It

365 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by dense stroma and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) overexpression. Although prolonged overall survival (OS) can be achieved through resection, only approximately 15% to 20% of patients are treated with surgery. Previously, pamrevlumab (P), a fully human monoclonal antibody blocking CTGF, was combined with gemcitabine/erlotinib (G/E) in a study of advanced PDAC. P plasma levels of > 150 μg/mL and low baseline CTGF levels resulted in prolonged OS. We hypothesize that neoadjuvant (NA) treatment of LAPC with P + G/nab-paclitaxel (NP) may alter LAPC’s stroma, increase R0 resectability, and improve OS similar to that of patients resectable at presentation. Methods: LAPC subjects, confirmed by NCCN criteria and staging laparoscopy, were randomized 2:1 to G/NP ± P for 6-cycle/24-week treatment. Safety and efficacy (resection rate, OS, progression-free survival, tumor response) were assessed. Resection was performed in subjects who met protocol-defined criteria with no contraindications. Results: As of 26 Sep 2016, 25 subjects were enrolled. Of 14 subjects in Arm A (G/NP + P), 7 completed, 2 discontinued. Of 11 subjects in Arm B (G/NP), 4 completed, 4 discontinued. 6 subjects (43%) in Arm A and 4 (36%) in Arm B experienced SAEs; no P-related SAEs were reported. Out of 7 eligible Arm A subjects, 3 were not resected. Successful resection was achieved in 4 Arm A subjects (3 R0, 1 R1) and 1 Arm B subject (R0) (Table). Conclusions: The combination of G/NP + P is feasible and well-tolerated with no incremental safety signals in this study. The addition of P suggests a trend toward increased resectability among LAPC subjects. Clinical trial information: NCT02210559. [Table: see text]
Adiposity, Change in Adiposity, and Cognitive Decline in Mid‐ and Late Life
West, Nancy A., Lirette, Seth T. , Cannon, Victoria , Windham, B. Gwen , Turner, Stephen T. , Mosley, Thomas H. , Lirette, Seth

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | March 1, 2017 | Volume: 65 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1282-1288

10.1111/jgs.14786 | PMID 28248413 Get It

Objectives To examine associations between adiposity and adiposity change (loss, stable, gain) and subsequent longitudinal cognitive performance in African Americans in mid and late life. Design Cohort study using linear mixed models. Setting Genetic Epidemiology Network of Arteriopathy. Participants African‐American sibships with hypertension in Jackson, Mississippi (N = 1,108). Measurements Waist circumference and body mass index ( BMI ) were measured at two examinations 5 years apart. Stable adiposity was defined as values within 5% of the first measure. A composite cognitive Z ‐score was derived from individual cognitive test Z ‐scores at two study visits 6 years apart. Results Larger waist circumference was associated with greater rate of cognitive decline during follow‐up (beta = −0.0009 per year, P = .001); BMI , change in waist circumference, and change in BMI were not associated with rate of decline. Loss of adiposity in midlife was associated with higher cognitive Z ‐scores in middle‐aged individuals, and loss of adiposity in late life was associated with lower Z ‐scores in older adults ( P = .01 for interaction between waist circumference and age; P = .04 for interaction between BMI and age). Simultaneous inclusion of waist circumference and BMI in the cross‐sectional model suggested an association between larger waist circumference and poorer cognitive performance (beta = −0.009, P = .006) and between higher BMI and better cognitive performance (beta = 0.014, P = .06). Conclusion The results suggested a differential pattern of the relationship between adiposity and cognition according to age (mid‐ or late life) and regional distribution of adiposity.
The varied distribution and impact of RAS codon and other key DNA alterations across the translocation cyclin D subgroups in multiple myeloma
Stein, Caleb K., Pawlyn, Charlotte , Chavan, Shweta S. , Rasche, Leo , Weinhold, Niels , Corken, Adam , Buros, Amy, Sonneveld, Pieter , Jackson, Graham , Mughal, Tariq I. , He, Jie , Barlogie, Bart , Bergsagel, P. Leif , Davies, Faith E. , Walker, Brian A. , Morgan, Gareth J. , Epstein, Joshua , Bergsagel, P. Leif , Stein, Caleb K., Landgren, Ola , Davies, Faith E , Walker, Brian A , Morgan, Gareth J , Pawlyn, Charlotte

Oncotarget | February 27, 2017 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 17 | Pages: 27854-27867

10.18632/oncotarget.15718 | PMID 28427158 Get It

Randomized, open-label trial of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (G/NP) ±FG-3019 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC).
Picozzi, Vincent J. , Rocha, Flavio G. , Helton, Scott , Mody, Kabir , Asbun, Horacio J. , Pishvaian, Michael J. , Jackson, Patrick G. , Etheridge, Tina, Carney, Mairead, Neff, Thomas B., Porter, Seth, Crans, Gerald , Valone, Frank H., Shi, Wen

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 24, 2017 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 457-457

10.1200/jco.2016.34.4_suppl.457 Get It

457 Background: Curative therapy for PDAC is currently achievable through resection only, but ≤ 15% of patients are candidates for surgery. FG-3019, a recombinant human mAb to connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), plus gemcitabine (G) significantly reduced tumor growth, increased apoptosis and improved survival vs G alone in the KPC mouse model. Higher FG-3019 exposure and lower baseline (BL) CTGF were independently and significantly associated with improved overall median and 1-year survival (OS) in a Ph2a trial with G and erlotinib in stage 3 or 4 PDAC. Neoadjuvant treatment of LAPC with FG-3019 combined with multidrug therapy may change the fibrotic character of LAPC and thus may make it amenable to surgical resection and potentially improve OS. Methods: Patients with unresectable LAPC (confirmed by laparoscopy) are randomized to G/NP ±FG-3019 for 6-cycle/24-week treatment. Safety, efficacy, PK and changes in CT, PET, & CA19.9 from BL through end of treatment (EOT) are assessed. Up to 4 endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided core biopsies are collected at BL. Protein microarrays of pre- and post-treatment biopsies are prepared from tumor and stromal cells isolated by laser capture microdissection. Surgical exploration is performed in subjects who achieved the protocol-defined criteria for possible resection. Results: To date, 11 subjects were enrolled with 5 randomized to +FG-3019 arm. There were no complications from laparoscopy or EUS core biopsies that were clinically significant or delayed dosing. Per investigator assessment, no FG-3019-related SAEs were reported, nor any identified toxicity suspected from combination of FG-3019 with chemotherapy. Overall, CA19.9 mean change from BL was −62.7% at Week 8 (n = 8), and target lesions were reduced by 20.6% (n = 6) at Week 16. Three out of 4 subjects had PET SUVmax reductions of ≥ 30% at EOT. Additional data from protein microarrays will be presented. Conclusions: Based on the limited data collected so far, this trial design is feasible and the G/NP +FG-3019 combination is well-tolerated and appears to be active. Summary results on surgical exploration of subjects will be provided later. Clinical trial information: NCT02210559.