Citations

Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is defined as a non-traumatic separation of the epicardial coronary artery walls that creates a false lumen. SCAD poses a difficult challenge in management, as decisions regarding revascularization and medical management seem to be tailored to the individual patient. We evaluated and compared outcomes based on cardiogenic shock in patients with SCAD utilizing Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) between January 1, 2016, to December 30, 2020. Methods: We utilized the NRD 2016–2019 to carry out this study. We evaluated demographics (e.g., age, gender), conventional risk factors, comorbidities present on the index admission, and in-hospital outcomes using their specific ICD-10-CM codes. The primary outcomes were In-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission, and the secondary outcome was to compare the complications in SCAD patient with cardiogenic shock (CS) compared to those without CS. Results: We analyzed 2473 individuals with SCAD, 2199 of these individuals did not have cardiogenic shock whereas 274 of these individuals did have cardiogenic shock. When comparing SCAD with cardiogenic shock to SCAD without cardiogenic shock, there was a statistically significant increased odds ratio (OR) for death (propensity matched OR 24.93 (7.49–83.05), use of mechanical circulatory support (propensity matched OR 15.30 (6.87–34.04), ventricular tachycardia (propensity matched OR 4.45 (1.92–10.34), utilization of blood transfusions (propensity matched OR 3.82 (1.86–7.87), acute kidney injury (propensity matched OR 4.02 (1.45–11.13), need for mechanical ventilation (propensity matched OR 8.87 (3.53–22.31), and respiratory failure (propensity matched OR 4.95 (1.83–13.41)))))))). There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day readmission rates between the two groups. Conclusions: SCAD is a unique condition that can lead to many complications. In our analysis, we showed that SCAD associated with cardiogenic shock compared to SCAD not associated with cardiogenic shock results in greater odds of complications including death, use of mechanical circulatory support, need for blood transfusions, ventricular tachycardia, acute kidney injury, use of mechanical ventilation, and respiratory failure. SCAD with cardiogenic shock represents a significantly critical clinical scenario that requires a multi-disciplinary approach to prevent the many potential complications associated with this disease process.

Introduction: The safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) remain unknown in patients with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m 2 . We aim to evaluate the risk of recurrent VTE and major bleeding in patients with a BMI ≥ 40 when started on DOACs versus VKAs. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search according to PRISMA guidelines to identify studies using the terms: “venous thromboembolism”, “Vitamin K antagonists” and “direct oral anticoagulants”. After the screening, We extracted the data till May 2023 in a data extraction sheet. Our inclusion criteria were: adult patients, morbidly obese (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m 2 ), who were on DOACs or VKAs for VTE or atrial fibrillation. We used a variance-weighted random-effects model to analyze data on DOACs vs. VKAs, estimating event rates and odds ratios while assessing heterogeneity. Data were analyzed using the ‘meta’ package in R. Results: Our analysis included a total of 16 studies (n= 62704 patients). Obese patients on DOACs had a significant reduction in the risk of recurrent VTEs compared to VKAs OR 0.72 (95% CI: 0.59 - 0.88, I2 :19%). Also, DOACs were associated with a lower risk of major bleeding compared to VKAs in morbidly obese patients (OR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.58 - 0.74, I2 :0%). For non-major bleeding, although the statistical significance was not reached, a consistent trend favoring DOACs was observed (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.47-1.21). (Figure1) Conclusions: Among morbidly obese patients (BMI ≥ 40), DOACs are associated with a significantly lower risk of recurrent VTEs, and major bleeding compared to VKA. For non-major bleeding, there was a trend favoring DOACs over VKA. Increased recruitment of obese patients in clinical trials is needed to provide us with robust data for informed clinical decision-making.

A growing body of research has begun to link exposure to environmental contaminants, such as heavy metals, with a variety of negative health outcomes. In this paper, we sought to review the current research describing the impact of certain common contaminant metals on cardiovascular (CV) health. We reviewed ten metals: lead, barium, nickel, chromium, cadmium, arsenic, mercury, selenium, zinc, and copper. After a literature review, we briefly summarized the routes of environmental exposure, pathophysiological mechanisms, CV health impacts, and exposure prevention and/or mitigation strategies for each metal. The resulting article discloses a broad spectrum of pathological significance, from relatively benign substances with little to no described effects on CV health, such as chromium and selenium, to substances with a wide-ranging and relatively severe spectrum of CV pathologies, such as arsenic, cadmium, and lead. It is our hope that this article will provide clinicians with a practical overview of the impact of these common environmental contaminants on CV health as well as highlight areas that require further investigation to better understand how these metals impact the incidence and progression of CV diseases.

Bifurcation lesions account for 20% of all percutaneous coronary interventions and represent a complex subset which are associated with lower procedural success and higher rates of restenosis [...]