Citations

PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcomes may be associated with cancer outcomes. We evaluated clinically significant fatigue (CSF), overall survival, adverse events (AEs), and quality of life (QOL) during cancer treatment. METHODS: We compared outcomes in four phase II or III chemotherapy trials, two advanced non–small-cell lung cancer and two advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer, with or without baseline CSF. CSF was defined as a rating of two or greater on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy fatigue question or a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire—Core 30 fatigue symptom score of 50% or greater. Survival was compared according to CSF using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression models. Differences in AE rates by CSF were assessed via chi-squared tests, and QOL changes from baseline to 3 months via linear regression. RESULTS: Of 1,994 participants, 1,907 (median age 69 years, range: 32-91) had complete baseline QOL survey data, with 52% reporting CSF at baseline. For the two hormone-refractory prostate cancer studies, baseline CSF was associated with higher mortality rates, with adjusted hazard ratios of (95% CI, P value) 1.32 (1.13 to 1.55, P < .001) and 1.31 (1.02 to 1.67, P = .03) and with increased incidence of grade 3-5 constitutional (16.5% v 9.4%, P = .002; 13.9% v 6.3%, P = .002) and neurologic (11.7% v 6.1%, P = .006; 9.0% v 3.9%, P = .01) AEs, respectively. Baseline CSF was associated with a higher mortality rate in one non–small-cell lung cancer study: hazard ratio 1.44 and 1.04 to 2.00, P = .03. CONCLUSION: Oncology trial participants with baseline CSF had poorer survival and experienced more AEs than participants without CSF. This indicates fatigue as an important baseline prognostic factor in oncology treatment trials.

BACKGROUND The United States (US)‐Mexico border is a socioeconomically underserved area. We sought to investigate whether stroke‐related mortality varies between the US border and nonborder counties. METHODS AND RESULTS We used death certificates from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide‐Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database to examine stroke‐related mortality in border versus nonborder counties in California, Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona. We measured average annual percent changes (AAPCs) in age‐adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 100 000 between 1999 and 2018. Overall, AAMRs were higher for nonborder counties, older adults, men, and non‐Hispanic Black adults than their counterparts. Between 1999 and 2018, AAMRs reduced from 55.8 per 100 000 to 34.4 per 100 000 in the border counties (AAPC, −2.70) and 64.5 per 100 000 to 37.6 per 100 000 in nonborder counties (AAPC, −2.92). The annual percent change in AAMR initially decreased, followed by stagnation in both border and nonborder counties since 2012. The AAPC in AAMR decreased in all 4 states; however, AAMR increased in California’s border counties since 2012 (annual percent change, 3.9). The annual percent change in AAMR decreased for older adults between 1999 and 2012 for the border (−5.10) and nonborder counties (−5.01), followed by a rise in border counties and stalling in nonborder counties. Although the AAPC in AAMR decreased for both sexes, the AAPC in AAMR differed significantly for non‐Hispanic White adults in border (−2.69) and nonborder counties (−2.86). The mortality decreased consistently for all other ethnicities/races in both border and nonborder counties. CONCLUSIONS Stroke‐related mortality varied between the border and nonborder counties. Given the substantial public health implications, targeted interventions aimed at vulnerable populations are required to improve stroke‐related outcomes in the US‐Mexico border area.

Introduction: Risk stratification of the pregnant population is critical to improving outcomes associated with pregnancy-related Acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: Pregnancy-related hospitalizations (antepartum as well as postpartum) and AMI were identified using appropriate International classification of disease-Ninth revision (ICD-9) codes from nationwide inpatient sample database (2005-2014). Simple logistic regression was used to calculate predictors of AMI during pregnancy. Results: We identified 3,786 cases of AMI from a total of 43,437,621 pregnancy related hospitalization during study period. Compared to pregnant women <20-year, we noted more than 10-fold risk of AMI among patients ≥ 40 years (OR 10.1, 95% CI 5.3-19.0, p<0.001). Other significant predictors of AMI during pregnancy were black race compared to white ( OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3-1.9, p<0.001), co-existing comorbidities such as hypertension (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.5-2.5, p<0.001),, thrombophilia (OR 4.8, 95% CI 2.7-8.5, p<0.001), diabetes milletus (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.0-1.9, p<0.027),hyperlipidemia (OR 13.2, 95% CI 9.9-17.6, p<0.001),smoking (OR 3.3, 95% CI 2.3-4.6, p<0.001), substance abuse (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.6, p=0.007), congestive heart failure (OR 26.0, 95% CI 20.3-33.2 p<0.001), deep venous thrombosis (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.3-6.2, p=0.010) as well as obstetric condition including postpartum hemorrhage (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.4, p<0.001),, transfusion during pregnancy (OR 3.2, 95% CI 2.4-4.2, p<0.001), postpartum infection (OR 2,7, 95% CI 1.9-3.9, p<0.001),, fluid and electrolyte imbalance (OR 5.2, 95% CI 4.2- 6.6, p<0.001), and postpartum depression (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.9 p=0.013). Conclusions: We identified certain patient-level characteristics which correlated to high risk of AMI. This information can be utilized to decide resource allocation and the introduction of early multidisciplinary intervention among high-risk population

Introduction: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during pregnancy is a rare but fatal complication. Recent trends in incidence of pregnancy-related AMI and associated outcomes are unclear. Methods: Nationwide inpatient sample (NIS) database was utilized for years 2005-2014. International classification of disease-Ninth revision (ICD-9) was used to identify pregnancy-related (antepartum as well as postpartum) admissions and acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The primary outcome was incidence and trend of AMI related to pregnancy during the study period. Secondary outcomes were trends in mortality and resource utilization. P-values for trends were generated by Cochrane-Armitage test for categorical variables and simple linear regression for continuous variables. Results: We identified a total of 43,437,621 pregnancy-related hospitalization and 3,786 cases of AMI (86% antepartum and 14% post-partum) were noted during the study period. The incidence of AMI during the study period was 8.7 per 100,000 pregnancies with an overall increase in incidence during study period (relative increase of 18.9%, p <0.001) and concomitant decrease in mortality (relative decrease of 40.05%, p <0.001), cost of care (relative decrease of 8.70%, p<0.001) and length of stay (relative decrease of 13.53%, p<0.001). Conclusions: Incidence of AMI during the period is on the rise in recent years with concomitant improvement in mortality and resource utilization. This reflects improved diagnostic capability and a better understanding of non-atherosclerotic mechanisms of AMI during pregnancy such as spontaneous coronary artery dissection, coronary spasm, and coronary thrombus.

Introduction: Recent trials have suggested potential benefits of performing multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (MVPCI) on non-infarct related artery (non-IRA) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease. Methods: National Readmissions Database (NRD) 2010-14 was utilized to select study cohort. Appropriate International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9-CM) diagnostic and procedural codes were utilized to identify STEMI patients undergoing multivessel PCI and infarct-related artery only PCI (IRA-PCI). Propensity score matched cohorts using greedy matching algorithm were generated for comparison of outcomes. Results: We identified 116592 IRA-PCI (83.97%) and 22257 MVPCI (16.03%) cases. With 1:3 propensity matched cohorts accounting for confounders such as age, gender, race and comorbidities, in comparison to IRA-PCI, MVPCI patients have higher 30-day readmission rate (10.40% vs 9.40%, p=0.001), in-hospital mortality (1.96% vs 1.57%,p<0.001), mechanical circulatory support utilization (4.27 vs 2.44%,p<0.001) as well as higher complication including vascular (0.51% vs 0.28%, p<0.001), cardiac (5.97% vs 3.97%, p<0.001), respiratory (4.89% vs 4.02%,p<0.001), neurologic complications (0.77% vs 0.58%,p=0.003), major bleeding (1.01% vs 0.79%, p=0.002) and cardiac arrest(3.48% vs 3.17%, p=0.027). We also noted higher cost of care ($27100 vs $20900, p<0.001) and length of stay (3.8 days vs 3.4 days, p<0.001) in MVPCI group compared to IRA-PCI group. Conclusions: We noted higher 30- day readmission rate, in-hospital mortality, complications and resource utilization with MVPCI compared to IRA-PCI approach among STEMI patients which further demands large-scale randomized control trials to determine the utility of MVPCI in the “real world”.

AbstractBackgroundRepresentation trends of women, older adults, and ethnic/racial minorities in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of atrial fibrillation (AF) are uncertain.MethodsWe systematically reviewed 134 AF related RCTs (phase II and III) encompassing 149,162 participants using Medline and ClinicalTrials.gov through April 2019 to determine representation trends of women, older patients (≥75 years), and ethnic/racial minorities. Weighted data on the prevalence of AF from epidemiological studies were used to compare the representation of the studied groups of interest in AF RCTs to their expected burden of the disease.ResultsOnly 18.7% of the RCTs reported proportion of older patients, and 12.7% RCTs reported ethnic/racial minorities. The proportions of women in RCTs versus general population were 35.2% and 35.1%, of Hispanics were 11.9% and 5.2%, of Blacks were 1.2% and 5.7%, of American Indian/Alaskans were 0.2% and 0.2%, of Asians were 14.2% and 2.4%, of native Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders were 0.05% and 0.1% and of non‐Whites were 19.5% and 22.5%, respectively. The weighted mean age (SD) across the trials was 65.3 (3.2) years which was less than the corresponding weighted mean age of 71.1 (4.5) years in the comparative epidemiological data.ConclusionThe reporting of older patients and ethnic/racial minorities was poor in RCTs of AF. The representation of women and American Indian/Alaskan natives matched their expected population share of disease burden. Hispanics and Asians were over‐represented and Blacks, native Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders and non‐Whites were under‐represented in RCTs of AF.