Citations

447 Background: Components of the peripheral blood counts (PBC) are associated with poor prognosis in patients diagnosed with non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Related to this, higher tumor expression of programmed death ligand one (PDL1) is also associated with poor ccRCC prognosis. Herein, we utilize a large cohort of patients undergoing nephrectomy for localized ccRCC to evaluate the association of PBC with tumor expression of PDL1. Secondarily, we examine the association of PBC and relapse free survival (RFS) after adjusting for age and PDL1 expression. Methods: Through chart review, we obtained PBC values at time of nephrectomy for patients enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Renal Registry from 1990-2009 who were treated for localized (M0) ccRCC including the following: hemoglobin (HGB), white blood cell (WBC), absolute neutrophil count (ANC), absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), absolute eosinophil count (AEC), absolute monocyte count (AMC), and platelets (PLT). We determined tumor PDL1 expression as a continuous variable (% of positive PDL1 tumor cells) using the 5H1 antibody on archived tissues. We analyzed the correlation of PBC values with PDL1 expression as a continuous variable using a linear estimate. To evaluate the association of PBC values with RFS after adjusting for PDL1 expression, we employed multivariate Cox regression models. Results: A total of 706 ccRCC patients had available PDL1 expression and PBC. PDL1 expression was inversely associated with HGB (linear estimate of -0.02, p<0.001) and positively associated with platelets (linear estimate 1.73, p<0.001) whereas there was no association with PDL1 with WBC, ANC, AEC, or AMC. After adjusting for age and PDL1 expression, a higher HGB (HR=0.87, p<0.001), higher ALC (HR 0.68, p=0.003), and higher AEC (HR 0.12, p=0.002) were all associated with improved relapse free survival. Conversely, higher PLT was associated with decreased RFS (HR 1.002, p<0.001). Conclusions: PDL1 expression is associated with decreased HGB and increased PLT at the time of nephrectomy. After adjusting for PDL1 expression and age, higher HGB, ALC, and AEC are associated with improved RFS, while higher platelets are associated with decreased RFS.

255 Background: The purpose of this study was to identify site-specific recurrence patterns for patients (pts) with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after prostatectomy (RP) using C-11 Choline PET/CT (C11Ch) and 3T pelvic MRI with endorectal coil (pMRI). Methods: Between 2008 and 2006, 2,466 men underwent C11Ch and pMRI for BCR after RP. From this cohort, we identified 261 pts who received no adjuvant or salvage therapy (androgen deprivation or radiation). Suspected radiographic relapse was confirmed by biopsy (46%) or progression/response to treatment in concordance with subsequent rise/decline in PSA (54%). Results: Of the 261 men evaluated, 202 (75%) had positive pMRI, C11Ch or both. Seventy nine (39%), 105 (52%) and 18 (9%) pts had high, intermediate, and low risk CaP, respectively at RP. Median PSA at the time of positive scan was 2.3 ng/mL, with a median time from BCR to radiographic disease identification of 15 months. Of these 202 men, 67 (33%) harbored prostate fossa recurrence only, 44 (22%) had a combination of local and metastatic disease and 91 (45%) had metastatic disease without local recurrence. Forty (20%) pts had pelvic nodal recurrence only and 18 (9%) had perirectal nodal involvement. Median PSA for pts with local only recurrence, distant metastases only, and local + distant disease was 2.3, 2.7 and 2.2 ng/mL, respectively, with a median interval from BCR to positive scan of 16.7, 7.9 and 11 months. Imaging revealed that 33% to 66% of our cohort would have all sites of disease treated by salvage RT depending on the extent of the treatment field Conclusions: C11Ch and pMRI were used to identify recurrence patterns in pts with BCR after RP only. At median PSA of 2.3 ng/ml, our study demonstrates a low rate of local-only recurrence, higher than anticipated frequency of metastatic recurrence with peak frequency within the pelvic lymph nodes, and substantial perirectal recurrences. Despite the high rates of distant recurrences, 2/3 of our cohort had their disease limited to the pelvis and could be potential candidates for local therapies, including salvage radiation.

213 Background: Daily oral prednisone (P) has been employed for the therapy of mCRPC, alone or in combination regimens. Despite palliative benefits and PSA responses, the overall clinical impact of P is unknown and it may foster resistance mechanisms. We performed a pooled analysis of control arms of randomized trials which either did or did not administer single agent P to evaluate its impact on overall survival (OS) and toxicities. Methods: Individual patient data from control arms ofrandomized trials of post-docetaxel men receiving placebo or P + placebo were eligible for analysis. Patient demographics, survival, and toxicity data were collected. The impact of P on OS and toxicities was investigated in Cox regression models adjusted for known clinical and laboratory prognostic factors. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value < 0.05 and all tests were two-sided. Results: The control arms of 2 randomized phase III trials were available totaling 794 men: the COU-AA-301 trial (n = 394) administered P plus placebo and the CA184-043 trial (n = 400) administered placebo alone. P plus placebo was not significantly associated with OS compared to placebo alone in a multivariable analysis (HR = 0.89 [95% CI 0.72-1.10], p = 0.27). Other factors associated with poor OS were Eastern Cooperative Oncology group (ECOG)-performance status (PS) ≥ 1, Gleason Score ≥ 8, liver metastasis, high PSA, hypoalbuminemia, and elevated LDH.In contrast, CTCAE grade ≥ 3 therapy-related toxicities were significantly increased with P plus placebo compared to placebo alone (HR = 1.48 (1.03-2.13), p = 0.034) in a multivariable analysis. Other baseline factors significantly associated with a higher risk of grade ≥ 3 toxicities were ECOG-PS ≥ 1, hypoalbuminemia and elevated LDH. Conclusions: P plus placebo compared with placebo alone for post-docetaxel men with mCRPC was not associated with extension of OS, but was associated with higher grade ≥ 3 toxicities. With the exception of the use of P in combination with abiraterone, P alone or in combination regimens should be questioned given its unclear palliative benefits and association with increased toxicities.

Purpose Ipilimumab increases antitumor T-cell responses by binding to cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4. We evaluated treatment with ipilimumab in asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer without visceral metastases. Patients and Methods In this multicenter, double-blind, phase III trial, patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo every 3 weeks for up to four doses. Ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo maintenance therapy was administered to nonprogressing patients every 3 months. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Results Four hundred patients were randomly assigned to ipilimumab and 202 to placebo; 399 were treated with ipilimumab and 199 with placebo. Median OS was 28.7 months (95% CI, 24.5 to 32.5 months) in the ipilimumab arm versus 29.7 months (95% CI, 26.1 to 34.2 months) in the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95.87% CI, 0.88 to 1.39; P = .3667). Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months in the ipilimumab arm versus 3.8 with placebo arm (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95.87% CI, 0.55 to 0.81). Exploratory analyses showed a higher prostate-specific antigen response rate with ipilimumab (23%) than with placebo (8%). Diarrhea (15%) was the only grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse event (AE) reported in ≥ 10% of ipilimumab-treated patients. Nine (2%) deaths occurred in the ipilimumab arm due to treatment-related AEs; no deaths occurred in the placebo arm. Immune-related grade 3 to 4 AEs occurred in 31% and 2% of patients, respectively. Conclusion Ipilimumab did not improve OS in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The observed increases in progression-free survival and prostate-specific antigen response rates suggest antitumor activity in a patient subset.

Abstract Introduction: Efforts to improve clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) mortality have focused primarily on evaluating prognostic biomarkers in primary tumors in order to identify indicators of response to treatment and targets for novel therapies. To date little attention has been paid to the status of these biomarkers in the more therapeutically-relevant metastatic tumor. Thus, we evaluated concordance of expression of four key prognostic ccRCC biomarkers (BAP1, PBRM1, Ki-67 and TOPOIIa) in a large cohort of patient-matched primary ccRCC and metastatic tumors. Methods: We identified 114 patients treated surgically for ccRCC between 1990 and 2005 who had synchronous (M1) or metachronous (M0) metastases, underwent metastasectomy for at least one metastatic lesion and had archived tissue available from the primary and at least one metastatic tumor. We performed IHC on all primary and metastatic tumors for BAP1, PBRM1, Ki-67, and TOPOIIa using previously-published protocols. BAP1 and PBRM1 expression was categorized as positive or negative and Ki-67 and TOPOIIa was quantified as the number of positive cells per mm2. For BAP1 and PBRM1, we calculated the concordance between patient-matched primary and metastatic tumors as the percentage of pairs where the primary and metastatic tumor had the same designation (i.e., positive or negative). For TOPOIIa and Ki-67, we assessed concordance using Spearman correlation coefficient. Analysis of variance was used to evaluate if concordance between primary-metastatic tumor pairs for TOPOIIa and Ki-67 was associated with metastatic site, metastatic timing (M0/M1), metastatic tumor grade, metastatic tumor necrosis, and metastatic tumor sarcomatoid differentiation. Results: There were a total of 161 patient-matched metastatic tumors available for the 114 patients: 78 patients had only a single metastasis while 36 patients had two or more metastases. While sites of metastases varied, pulmonary metastases were the most common (44% of all metastases). Loss of BAP1 expression was observed in19% of the primary ccRCC and 98.6% of the tumor pairs had concordant BAP1 status between the paired primary and metastatic tumors. Loss of PBRM1 was observed in 56% of the primary ccRCC tumors and 89.3% of tumor pairs showed concordant PBRM1 status. By comparison, median expression of Ki-67 was 65.0mm2 in the primary ccRCC tumors and the Pearson correlation with the patient-matched metastatic tumors was 0.43. The difference in Ki-67 expression between primary-metastatic tumor pairs was associated with necrosis in the metastatic tumor (p=0.014). Median expression of TOPOIIa was 2.6mm2 in the primary ccRCC tumors and the Pearson correlation with the patient-matched metastatic tumors was 0.25. The difference in TOPOIIa expression between primary-metastatic tumor pairs was associated with metastatic site (p=0.0006) and metastases to the heart were significantly different than pulmonary metastases (p&lt;0.0001). Additionally, synchronous metastases had larger differences from their patient-matched primary tumors in comparison to metachronous metastases (p=0.012), as did necrotic metastases (p=0.028). Conclusion: We observed high concordance for loss of BAP1 and PBRM1 expression between primary ccRCC and metastatic tumors in the same patient. Conversely, we noted high discordance in protein expression of Ki-67 and TOPOIIa between patient-matched primary-metastatic tumor pairs. Moreover, this discordance varied by key pathological features. Our results suggest that using the status of a biomarker in primary ccRCC as a guide for the status in metastatic tumors is not always appropriate and needs to be evaluated on a marker-by-marker basis. Citation Format: Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow, Daniel J. Serie, John C. Cheville, Thai H. Ho, Sue M. Harrington, Tracy Hilton, Christine Lohse, Amanda Shreders, Payal Kapur, James Brugarolas, R Houston Thompson, Bradley C. Leibovich, Eugene D. Kwon, Richard W. Joseph, Alexander S. Parker. Concordance of BAP1, PBRM1, Ki-67, and TOPOIIa protein expression in primary clear cell renal cell carcinoma tumors and patient-matched metastatic tumors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Precision Medicine Series: Integrating Clinical Genomics and Cancer Therapy; Jun 13-16, 2015; Salt Lake City, UT. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2016;22(1_Suppl):Abstract nr 10.

Abstract Purpose: Immunotherapeutic strategies to treat patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) offer new opportunities for disease management. Further improvements to immunotherapy will require additional understanding of the host response to RCC development. Experimental Design: Using a novel approach to understanding the immune status of cancer patients, we previously showed that patients with a certain immune profile had decreased overall survival. Here, we examine in more detail the phenotypic changes in peripheral blood and the potential consequences of these changes in RCC patients. Results: We found that CD14+HLA-DRlo/neg monocytes were the most predominant phenotypic change in peripheral blood of RCC patients, elevated nearly 5-fold above the average levels measured in healthy volunteers. Intratumoral and peritumoral presence of CD14 cells was an independent prognostic factor for decreased survival in a cohort of 375 RCC patients. The amount of peripheral blood CD14+HLA-DRlo/neg monocytes was found to correlate with the intensity of CD14 staining in tumors, suggesting that the measurement of these cells in blood may be a suitable surrogate for monitoring patient prognosis. The interaction of monocytes and tumor cells triggers changes in both cell types with a loss of HLA-DR expression in monocytes, increases of monocyte survival factors such as GM-CSF in tumors, and increased production of angiogenic factors, including FGF2. Conclusions: Our results suggest a model of mutually beneficial interactions between tumor cells and monocytes that adversely affect patient outcome. Clin Cancer Res; 21(18); 4224–33. ©2015 AACR.