Citations

In 2024, the Journal of Wound Care ( JWC ) published best-practice guidance on wound debridement. This introduced the concept of integral debridement, defined as the combined use of complementary debridement methods on the same wound to optimise healing outcomes. This typically involves combining less invasive approaches, such as autolytic debridement, with more active adjunctive methods, including mechanical and/or sharp debridement. In 2026, JWC convened an expert panel to explore how this concept can be effectively implemented in non-specialist settings. The panel concluded that debridement is most effective when applied repeatedly throughout the healing process and introduced the concept of continuous integral debridement (CID), a cyclical four-step approach comprising cleanse, debride, cleanse and dress (CDCD). The panel propose that, when performed regularly, this will help disrupt microbial and non-microbial barriers to healing and maintain a clean wound environment. The panel consider that CID is compatible with established frameworks, such as TIME/TIMERS and the International Wound Infection Institute wound infection continuum, and complements antibiofilm strategies, including Wound Hygiene. This document provides practical guidance for integrating CID into routine wound care across all clinical settings, including recommendations on cleansing solutions, debridement methods and dressing selection, with the aim of supporting evidence-based practice and improving patient outcomes.

Background With improved cardiac surgical outcomes, attention has shifted to patient-centred outcomes, including cosmetic appearances of surgical scars. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) is often promoted for its cosmetic benefits, yet empirical evidence remains limited. This study aimed to systematically evaluate scar-specific outcomes comparing MICS to conventional full median sternotomy (FMS) in adult cardiac surgery. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Central, and Scopus were searched from inception to August 2025. Studies comparing MICS to FMS, reporting scar-related patient-reported outcomes, wound complications, or cosmetic satisfaction, were included. The primary outcome was scar assessment using validated instruments. Random-effects models calculated standardised mean differences (SMD) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals. Results Twenty-two studies comprising 3131 patients (1459 MICS, 1672 FMS) met inclusion criteria. MICS demonstrated significantly better scar assessment scores (SMD −0.74, 95% CI −1.27 to −0.22; p < 0.01; I 2 = 88%, six studies), higher patient satisfaction rates (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.21–1.66; p < 0.001; I 2 = 84%, 12 studies), and reduced wound complications (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.20–0.47; p < 0.001; I 2 = 0%, nine studies). Only six studies reported validated scar assessment scores, highlighting limited integration of these measures. Substantial heterogeneity was observed due to diverse assessment tools and surgical techniques. Conclusions MICS can offer significant advantages in scar-specific outcomes compared to FMS in carefully selected patient populations. Cosmetic outcomes should be interpreted within the context of overall effectiveness and may support shared decision making only when clinical outcomes between surgical approaches are comparable. The lack of standardised scar assessment protocols and limited reporting of cosmetic outcomes represent critical gaps. Future research should prioritise standardised scar evaluation tools and expand cosmetic outcome reporting across all cardiac surgical procedures.

Abstract Exposure to asbestos is the primary cause of mesothelioma, however the processes underpinning its initiation and evolutionary trajectory remain elusive. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted whole exome sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of 277 mesotheliomas. Using multidimensional Dirichlet process clustering we inferred phylogenies, uncovering mutation order dominated by early 13q,1p, 8p, 6q and 22q somatic copy number alterations. Mesotheliomas exhibit a spectrum of genomic intra-tumor heterogeneity spanning linear (L) to highly branched (B) tree topologies, quantifiable by the Weighted Shannon Entropy (WSE). Somatic copy number alterations emerge earlier than single nucleotide variants (SNVs), and at a much faster relative rate in L-mesotheliomas. BAP1 is the only positively selected driver in L-mesotheliomas, whereas, B-mesotheliomas harbor multiple positively selected drivers and an aggressive phenotype, including a bias of loss of RPL5, and MTAP deletion linked to breakpoint enriched with long interspersed nuclear elements. L-trees had lower WSE, but greater T-cell inflammation and tertiary lymphoid structures, despite having a lower neoantigen burden. WSE is higher in larger volume, immunologically cold mesotheliomas, and is associated with shorter survival. In summary, progressive genomic heterogeneity is a defining feature of more aggressive mesothelioma yet illuminates opportunities for precision therapeutic intervention.

Abstract Introduction Down-sized inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) cylinders are used in challenging penile fibrosis scenarios, such as after priapism or prior implant infection. Their role in primary penile prosthesis surgery, however, is not well studied. Objective This study aims to identify factors associated with the use of down-sized cylinders in men undergoing primary IPP placement. Methods We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study on men undergoing primary IPP surgery, categorizing them into a down-sized cylinder group (AMS 700 CXR and Coloplast NB) and a standard cylinder group (AMS 700 CX, AMS 700 LGX, and Coloplast Titan). We collected demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative variables and performed a multivariable analysis. Results 4,389 men were included in the study with a mean age of 62.3±10.3 years. Overall, 1,485 (34%) men had diabetes, and 2,131 (49%) had hypertension. Down-sized cylinders were placed in 406 men (174 CXRs, 232 NBs), while standard cylinders were placed in 3,983. Multivariable analysis indicated that down-sized cylinders were more commonly used in men with diabetes (OR 2.6 [1.9, 3.7], p&lt;0.001) and less frequently in men with hypertension (OR 0.5 [0.4, 0.7], p&lt;0.001). A history of priapism did not significantly impact the use of down-sized cylinders (p≥0.152). Sequential dilation was performed more often with the use of down-sized cylinders (OR 4.0 [2.8, 5.7], p&lt;0.001). Down-sized cylinders were associated with an increased rate of non-infectious complications (OR 1.9 [1.3, 2.9], p&lt;0.001), however, there was no significant association with implant infection (OR 2.1 [0.9, 4.6], p=0.07). Non-infectious complications occurred in 44 (25%) men with down-sized cylinders. In the down-sized group, hematomas occurred in 10 (2.5%) men and wound-related complications occurred in 7 (1.7%) men (Table 1). Cylinder-related complications occurred in 7 (1.7%) men with down-sized cylinders. Device-related malfunctions were seen in 8 (2%) men. Conclusions This study demonstrates that down-sized cylinders are more frequently used in men with diabetes and surgeons should be prepared to place down-sized cylinders in these men. Prosthetic urologists are also more likely to use down-sized cylinders in men requiring sequential dilation likely due to fibrosis or more challenging dilations. Down-sized cylinders are associated with a low overall complication rate. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Intuitive Surgical, Fidelis, Urofill, Boston Scientific, Coloplast, Cynosure, Antares Pharma, Clarus Pharmaceuticals, Acerus Pharma; Endo Pharma.

LBA7000 Background: ~40% of DLBCL pts are not cured with first-line (1L) R-CHOP, underscoring a significant unmet need for more effective 1L regimens. Tafa (anti-CD19 mAb) + Len-R-CHOP in the phase 1b First-MIND study demonstrated safety and efficacy in pts with newly diagnosed disease. frontMIND, a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, compared Tafa-Len-R-CHOP vs R-CHOP in pts with high-risk aggressive BCLs. Methods: Pts aged 18–80 y with newly diagnosed, high-intermediate/high-risk DLBCL or HGBL (IPI 3–5, aaIPI 2–3 if ≤60 y) and ECOG PS 0–2 were randomized 1:1 to Tafa-Len-R-CHOP or R-CHOP. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS; secondary endpoints included: EFS, OS, CR, ORR, safety. Results: At primary analysis (data cutoff Oct 20, 2025), 899 pts were randomized to Tafa-Len-R-CHOP (n=448) or R-CHOP (n=451); baseline characteristics were similar between arms. With a median follow-up of 35.2 mo, Tafa-Len-R-CHOP achieved a statistically significant improvement in PFS vs R-CHOP (HR 0.75 [95% CI: 0.59, 0.96]; P =0.019) in the overall population; in pts with centrally confirmed lymphoma subtypes (n=773), PFS HR was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.52, 0.88) and 24-mo PFS was 72.7% vs 62.2%. PFS benefit was observed with Tafa-Len-R-CHOP in both molecular COO subtypes, ABC and GCB (data will be presented). Tafa-Len-R-CHOP significantly improved EFS vs R-CHOP; CR and ORR were similar between arms and HR for OS was 0.85 (final OS planned at 5y) (Table). Any-grade TEAEs were similar in treatment arms (98.6% vs 97.1%); more grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred with Tafa-Len-R-CHOP vs R-CHOP (86.7% vs 76.1%). Discontinuations due to TEAEs occurred in 25.7% vs 17.9% and deaths due to TEAEs in 5.9% vs 3.8% of pts for Tafa-Len-R-CHOP vs R-CHOP. Overall, there were fewer deaths with Tafa-Len-R-CHOP vs R-CHOP (18.5% vs 21.7%). Conclusions: The primary endpoint of frontMIND was met; Tafa-Len-R-CHOP resulted in a significant 25% reduction in risk of disease progression or death compared with R-CHOP, with an 8.2% difference in 24-month PFS rate in the overall population and 10.5% difference in pts with centrally confirmed lymphoma subtypes. TEAEs were manageable and consistent with the expected safety profile. Tafa-Len-R-CHOP represents a potential new 1L standard of care for pts with both COO subtypes of high-risk DLBCL or HGBL. Clinical trial information: NCT04824092 . Efficacy outcomes by treatment arm.* Variable Tafa-Len-R-CHOP(n=448) R-CHOP(n=451) HR or OR(95% CI) P value PFS, # events (%) † 121 (27.0) 155 (34.4) 0.75 (0.59, 0.96) 0.019 PFS rate at 24 mo, % 71.1 62.9 − − PFS rate at 36 mo, % 67.3 60.7 − − EFS, # events (%) 154 (34.4) 191 (42.4) 0.79 (0.64, 0.97) 0.026 OS, # events (%) 82 (18.3) 95 (21.1) 0.85 (0.63, 1.14) 0.270 CR at EOT, n (%) 292 (65.2) 294 (65.2) 0.998 (0.76, 1.31) 0.987 ‡ ORR at EOT, n (%) 360 (80.4) 343 (76.1) 1.290 (0.94, 1.78) 0.120 ‡ *Investigator-assessed. † Progressive disease or death from any cause. ‡ Nominal P value.

Abstract Background Distal (ileal) metabolic bariatric surgeries (DMBS) have gained increasing adoption due to their enhanced metabolic effects. However, the absence of standardized definitions, classification, and clinical indications limits their consistent application. This consensus aimed to establish an international consensus on the definition, classification, indications, and postoperative management of DMBS. Methods A three-round modified Delphi study was conducted including international expert surgeons from 16 countries. A total of 98 statements were developed across three domains: procedural characteristics, patient selection, and postoperative follow-up. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement. Statements not reaching consensus were revised and resubmitted. Results Consensus was achieved on 81 statements. DMBS were defined as procedures involving gastro-ileal or duodeno-ileal bypass, emphasizing ileal stimulation as a key metabolic mechanism. Procedures with a common channel ≤350 cm, including single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal with SG (SADI-S), single anastomosis sleeve-ileal transit bipartition (SASI), sleeve gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y transit bipartition (SG+TB), and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS), as well as one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) with biliopancreatic limb > 50% of total small bowel length were classified as DMBS. Routine measurement of total small bowel length was strongly recommended. DMBS were considered appropriate as primary procedures in patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m² with comorbidities, a BMI ≥50–60 kg/m², irrespective of the presence of comorbidities, and as revisional options for suboptimal clinical response (SoCR), recurrent weight gain (RWG), or persistent metabolic disease. Comprehensive preoperative and multidisciplinary evaluation was deemed mandatory, and liver cirrhosis, heart failure, end-stage kidney disease, and inflammatory bowel disease were considered contraindications. Postoperative care requires lifelong multidisciplinary follow-up, with increased attention to nutritional deficiencies and supplementation. Conclusions This consensus provides a standardized framework for DMBS, supporting harmonization of practice and improved patient safety.

Abstract Objective Pediatric epilepsy surgery is well established, but contemporary global data on referral and presurgical evaluation practices are lacking. This International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery Task Force study provides an updated overview of current trends and regional differences. Methods Group‐level data were collected from 61 epilepsy surgery programs (49 pediatric‐only) across 29 countries and six continents, identified through ILAE networks, and included all children and adolescents treated in 2023 who underwent presurgical evaluation/epilepsy surgery. Results Group‐level data were available for 2427 patients. Mean age at surgery was 9.1 ± 4.9 years; mean epilepsy duration was 5.3. At surgery, 3.2% were <1 year old (highest in Oceania: 5.1%), and 6.1% were nonpharmacoresistant (highest in Europe: 15.0%). Prior neurosurgery was reported in 14.2% (highest in North America: 28.8%), including 8.0% resections (6.1% for epilepsy, 1.5% for tumors; highest in Oceania: 16.5%), 2.3% disconnections (1.3% corpus callosotomy; highest in South America: 4.7%), and 4.2% neuromodulation (3.7% vagal nerve stimulation, .2% responsive neurostimulation, one deep brain stimulation; highest in North America: 12.2%). Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) at surgery included Lennox–Gastaut syndrome (7.4%), infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (5.1%), and DEE with spike–wave activation in sleep (1.5%). Presurgical investigations included fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (52.6%; highest in Oceania: 79.7%), genetic testing (46.8%; highest in Asia: 54.3%), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) postprocessing (32.4%; highest in South America: 53.0%), functional MRI (fMRI; 15.2%; highest in North America: 40.3%), magnetoencephalography (11.9%; highest in North America: 39.3%), single photon emission computed tomography (9.6%; highest in North America: 22.2%), high‐density electroencephalography (EEG; 1.9%; highest in Europe: 4.7%), source localization (1.6%; highest in Oceania: 7.6%), Wada test (1.2%; highest in North America: 3.5%), and EEG‐fMRI (.5%; highest in Europe: 1.1%). Significance Despite some early surgeries, including in infancy and before pharmacoresistance, mean epilepsy duration before surgery remains >5 years. Reoperations are common, with resection more frequent than neuromodulation. Genetic testing in nearly half of patients reflects its growing relevance, and the high rate of DEEs underscores the complexity of surgical candidates.