Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

12578 citation(s) found for "Ma, John".

The Next Chapter in Health Care Interoperability
Tripathi, Micky, Halamka, John

New England Journal of Medicine | February 7, 2026 | Volume: 394 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 628-630

10.1056/nejmp2511798 | PMID 41700680 Get It

Energy and fluid balance during a 214-km winter ultraendurance race: a case study
Wehmanen, Kyle W., Ruby, Brent C. , Shriver, Timothy C. , Kipp, Shalaya , McDaniel, John, Elmer, Steven J. , Kipp, Shalaya , McDaniel, John , Elmer, Steven J , Ravelli, Michele Novaes , Petushek, Erich J.

Journal of Applied Physiology | February 7, 2026 | Volume: 140 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 927-934

10.1152/japplphysiol.01162.2025 | PMID 41651468 Get It

In this short report, we detail new data on the upper limits of human energy expenditure (9.6 times basal metabolic rate) and water turnover (10.5 L·12 h −1 ) during continuous single-day exercise in the cold. Our results indicated elevated energy use, and impressively, water turnover comparable to exercise in warmer conditions. These findings have implications for training and endurance performance of strenuous exercise in cold weather environments.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of losmapimod in patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: Results of the REACH study
Voermans, Nicol C, Statland, J., Hayward, Lawrence J. , Rosenbohm, Angela , Munain, Adolfo López de, Sacconi, Sabrina, Leung, D., Vissing, John, Schoser, Benedikt, Lochmüller, H., Bugiardini, E., Wang, Leo H. , Maggi, Lorenzo, Ragole, Thomas , Pestronk, Alan , Hamel, Johanna , Goyal, Namita A, Korngut, Lawrence, Naddaf, Elie, Harper, A., Shieh, Perry, Kornblum, Cornelia , Sansone, Valeria, Genge, A., Tasca, G., Jiang, John , Jouvin, Marie‐Hélène , Tawil, Rabi , Investigators, on behalf of the REACH, Leung, Doris G , Muelas, Nuria , Wang, Leo H , Pestronk, Alan , Goyal, Namita A , Harper, Amy , Tasca, Giorgio , Tawil, Rabi , Voermans, Nicol Cornelia , Statland, Jeffrey M., Munaín, Adolfo López de , Sacconi, Sabrina , Badrising, Umesh A. , Vissing, John , Schoser, Benedikt , Bugiardini, Enrico , Maggi, Lorenzo , Korngut, Lawrence , Naddaf, Elie , Shieh, Perry B. , Sansone, Valeria , Genge, Angela

Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases | February 6, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/22143602261419558 | PMID 41649965 Get It

Background: Losmapimod is an orally administered small molecule and selective p38α/β mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitor able to reduce aberrant expression of DUX4 in vitro and thereby potentially slowing disease progression in patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD). Objective: This global, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 study in patients with FSHD1 and FSHD2 examined the efficacy and safety of losmapimod over a 48-week treatment period compared to placebo (NCT05397470, EUDRACT 2022-000389-16). Methods: The primary endpoint was change in quantification of reachable workspace (RWS) expressed as relative surface area (RSA). Other endpoints included measures of muscle composition (fat content and lean muscle) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), muscle strength using quantitative dynamometry, and quality of life measures. Results: 130 participants received losmapimod and 130 participants received placebo, with 252 participants completing the 48-week treatment period. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in change in RSA and all secondary efficacy endpoints from baseline to Week 48. Losmapimod treatment was well-tolerated, and most adverse events were mild. Conclusions: Losmapimod was generally well tolerated with a favorable safety profile at a dose of 15 mg twice daily. Although none of the efficacy endpoints were met, study design and data from the study may inform future studies of FSHD therapies.
Nurse practitioner and physician assistant collaborative staffing innovations to improve a cardiovascular surgery practice
Weimer, John W. , Newcome, Marci D., Ehman, Jeffrey R., Jacobson, Marcus P., Newcome, Marci

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners | February 5, 2026 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 108-115

10.1097/jxx.0000000000001220 | PMID 41643133 Get It

ABSTRACT Background: Successful use of nurse practitioner (NP) and physician assistant (PA) care models is vital to delivering optimal patient care, maintaining financial stability, and reducing staff burnout and turnover. Local Problem: A large cardiovascular surgery practice experienced substantial growth, leading to an obsolete NP and PA care model. Consequently, workplace satisfaction scores were reduced, and the NP and PA turnover rate in 2018 was unacceptably high. Methods: A multidisciplinary redesign team was formed to address gaps in the care model through a quality-improvement initiative. The team analyzed current workflows, collected external and internal survey data, conducted patient tracers, and observed staff. Seventeen collaborative care models were proposed by frontline staff members and presented to their peers for feedback. This feedback was used to select the best aspects of the proposed models to create a new model. Interventions: The updated care model consisted of several key changes, which included reducing NP- and PA-to-patient ratios, eliminating redundant tasks, shifting from location-based to surgical team–based coverage, ensuring top-of-scope practice, developing specialty service lines, and separating inpatient and outpatient practices. Results: After implementation of the new care model, NP and PA turnover rates decreased from baseline by an average of approximately 74% per year. Departmental work culture scores concomitantly increased from 68% to 85% after implementation of the new care model. Conclusions: Adapting care models in conjunction with departmental growth is crucial to enhancing staff satisfaction and reducing burnout.
Cervical spine chordomas: surgical outcome assessment in a multicenter cohort from the Primary Tumor Research and Outcomes Network
Zaldivar-Jolissaint, Julien F, Fisher, Charles G, Rhines, Laurence D. , Gasbarrini, A., Wei, Feng, Gokaslan, Ziya L, Bettegowda, Chetan, Sciubba, Daniel M, Kawahara, Norio , Barzilai, Ori, Rampersaud, Y Raja, Disch, Alexander C. , Chou, Dean, Shin, John H., Laufer, Ilya , Sahgal, Arjun, Verlaan, Jorrit-Jan, Dea, Nicolas, Reynolds, Jeremy , Reynolds, Jeremy , Zaldivar‐Jolissaint, Julien Francisco , Kwan, William Chu , Fisher, Charles G. , Boriani, Stefano , Gasbarrini, Alessandro , Luzzati, Alessandro , Wei, Feng , Gokaslan, Ziya L, Bettegowda, Chetan , Sciubba, Daniel M. , Lazáry, Áron , Clarke, Michelle J. , Rampersaud, Y. Raja , Chou, Dean , Hornicek, Francis J. , Sahgal, Arjun, Verlaan, Jorrit‐Jan , Reynolds, Jeremy, Dea, Nicolas

Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine | February 5, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 607-617

10.3171/2025.9.spine25785 | PMID 41616303 Get It

OBJECTIVE Chordomas are rare, locally aggressive primary neoplasms. Resection with negative margins is the primary recommended therapeutic approach, while adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy can also play a role in their treatment in certain situations, including lesions with positive margins or those that are poorly differentiated or dedifferentiated. Cervical spine chordomas pose significant surgical challenges given their proximity to critical anatomical structures and the mechanical constraints of the cervical spine. In the current case series, authors aimed to explore the clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of the surgical treatment of cervical chordomas in a large multicenter cohort. METHODS This multicenter case series analysis utilized data from the prospectively collected Primary Tumor Research and Outcomes Network (PTRON) registry, from its inception (May 16, 2016) to data extraction (February 29, 2024). The study population was restricted to patients with histologically confirmed cervical chordomas involving levels C0–7, who underwent surgical treatment at one of the participating centers, and for whom both the initially planned and postoperatively pathologically confirmed surgical margins were documented. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical and adjuvant treatments, local recurrence–free survival (LRFS), overall survival (OS), and perioperative adverse events were retrieved. PROs included the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire version 2.0 (SOSGOQ2.0), EQ-5D, and SF-36 version 2.0 (SF-36v2). RESULTS Thirty-eight patients were identified, 12 of whom underwent true en bloc resection (EBR), 18 of whom underwent deliberate intralesional resection, and 8 of whom underwent EBR after intralesional surgery or in whom EBR failed. True EBR led to better LRFS (92% vs 83% vs 63%, respectively) and OS (83% vs 39% vs 50%, respectively). Surgical adverse events within 1 year were more frequent with true EBR (100% vs 39% vs 75%, respectively). EQ-5D, SOSGOQ2.0, and SF-36v2 showed improvement with true EBR, whereas the trends for PROs from the other groups were more variable. CONCLUSIONS This multicenter case series analysis provides critical insights into the clinical outcomes and PROs in the largest cohort of surgically treated cervical spine chordomas described to date. It underscores the importance and challenges of wide resection for oncological control. It establishes the associated morbidity and provides an overview of PROs following surgery. These findings contribute valuable evidence to inform shared decision-making and optimize patient care.
Rilonacept as monotherapy for long-term recurrent pericarditis management: sustained disease control over three years
Lotan, D., Imazio, M, Klein, A L, Brucato, A, Abbate, Antonio, Arad, Ariela , Cremer, P C, Luis, S A, Wang, S, Curtis, Allison , Clair, JoAnn , Paolini, J F, Cremer, Paul , Cremer, Paul C , Lotan, Dor , Imazio, Massimo , Brucato, Antonio , Abbate, Antonio , Arad, A, Paolini, John Frank

European Heart Journal | February 5, 2026 | Volume: 46 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.2783 Get It

Abstract Background Recurrent pericarditis (RP) predominantly shows features consistent with IL-1-mediated chronic autoinflammatory disease (1-4). A recent analysis suggested that supplementing anakinra with colchicine incrementally reduced pericarditis recurrence vs. anakinra alone (5). Rilonacept (a weekly IL-1α and IL-1β cytokine trap with 6-week washout) prevents engagement with IL-1 receptor, inhibiting both IL-1α and IL-1β activity (6). The Phase 3 trial RHAPSODY demonstrated rilonacept efficacy in two independent analyses: Randomized Withdrawal (RW) and Long-Term Extension (LTE) periods (7,8). Purpose Assess long-term recurrence-free persistence with rilonacept as monotherapy in pts with RP during the combined RW and LTE periods of RHAPSODY. Methods Post-hoc analysis. Freedom from recurrence on rilonacept monotherapy was quantified using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method from RW start (if randomized to rilonacept) or from initiation of bailout rilonacept (if randomized to placebo) until the end of treatment. Prespecified recurrence adjudication criteria were pericarditis pain (numerical rating scale [NRS]) ≥4 plus C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥1 mg/dL. Per RHAPSODY protocol, background therapies were discontinued during the Run-In Period before randomization. In pts treated with rilonacept, concomitant colchicine was not added during the RW period. In the LTE, 6.8% (5/74) of pts added colchicine: one for 2 days of chest pain without CRP elevation, 4 in the absence of chest pain, CRP elevation, or recurrence; these 5 pts were censored in the KM curve at 6 days after last rilonacept dose or at colchicine initiation (whichever was first). One additional pt added colchicine prophylactically before an intentional rilonacept treatment interruption for elective cardiac surgery and experienced a recurrence after this interruption; this pt was not censored from the recurrence-free persistence analysis at colchicine initiation in order to capture this event. Results 74 pts (mean [SD] age 43.9 [15.7] years, 83.8% idiopathic pericarditis, mean [SD] disease duration 2.5 [3.2] years) were analyzed over three years. Rilonacept was well tolerated. Recurrence-free persistence was 95.9% (n=71/74) while receiving rilonacept as monotherapy (Figure 1). The three observed adjudicated recurrences were each associated with temporary interruptions of 1-3 doses of rilonacept. Conclusions Rilonacept as monotherapy provided recurrence-free persistence over the three-year trial duration when used continuously without interruption; pericarditis recurrences occurred only after interruptions. These findings support evidence-based use of rilonacept as monotherapy, minimizing the need for adjunctive treatments and reducing polypharmacy in long-term RP management. Further investigations are warranted to address how to assess pts as candidates for long-term treatment with rilonacept and when to cease rilonacept treatment.
Rilonacept reduces pericarditis recurrence risk: clinical outcomes from the RESONANCE patient registry
Cremer, P C, Garshick, Michael , Luis, S A, Raisinghani, Ajit, Weber, B., Rahme, S J, Salik, J R, Ryan, J J, Parameswaran, Vidhya , Clair, JoAnn , Curtis, Allison , Klein, A L, Paolini, J F, Cremer, Paul , Cremer, Paul C , Salik, Jonathan R. , Ryan, J.J., Paolini, John Frank

European Heart Journal | February 5, 2026 | Volume: 46 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.2784 Get It

Abstract Background Recurrent pericarditis (RP) is an IL-1-mediated chronic autoinflammatory disease (1,2). The phase 3 trial RHAPSODY demonstrated that rilonacept (IL-1α and IL-1β cytokine trap), the first and only FDA-approved treatment for RP, was effective in treating RP not only as a third-line agent (3L; after corticosteroids) but also as a second-line agent (2L; instead of corticosteroids) and reduced recurrence risk as monotherapy (3). The REgiStry Of the NAtural history of recurreNt periCarditis in pEdiatric and adult patients (RESONANCE) has been collecting long-term combined prospective and retrospective data from US-based pericardial-disease-dedicated programs since 2020 (4). Purpose To assess the efficacy of rilonacept in RP in a real-world setting, extending the clinical trial findings of RHAPSODY. Methods Database cut-off (DCO) was 05 February 2025. Data on RP management were collected and analyzed from pts with ≥2 years of observation in RESONANCE. Disease duration at DCO was defined as time from RP diagnosis to either disease resolution (no disease flares while off all RP treatments for ≥6 months before DCO) or last follow-up (for pts with ongoing treatment at DCO). Pericarditis recurrences (investigator-assessed) were confirmed based on RP symptom data and/or objective findings. Annualized recurrence rates were calculated per RP treatment regimen as total pericarditis recurrences divided by total patient-years (PY) while receiving that treatment. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was utilized to analyze the significance in change of annualized recurrence rates before and after rilonacept initiation. Results At DCO, 81 pts had ≥2 years of follow-up data in RESONANCE; mean (SD) age was 51.0 (16.8) years; most (66.7%) were female; 84% had idiopathic etiology; median (Q1-Q3) disease duration was 3.1 (2.6-3.7) years; and median observation was 2.93 (2.54-3.38) years. Patient-year treatment exposures per treatment were: NSAIDS ± colchicine (n=79; 187.8 PY), corticosteroids (n=30; 61.1 PY), anakinra (n=1; 1.2 PY) and rilonacept (n=35; 72.8 PY). Of the 35 pts treated with rilonacept for any duration (median observation: 3.2 years; median time on rilonacept: 2.08 years), the most common reason for rilonacept initiation was chest pain/recurrence on prior treatment (n=28). The annualized recurrence rate while receiving rilonacept was significantly lower versus all combined prior lines of treatment (4.00 vs. 0.02 events per PY; p=0.002); this outcome was consistent across line of treatment for rilonacept use (2L: 3.73 vs. 0.06 events per PY, p=0.02; 3L: 4.14 vs. 0 events per PY, p<0.001; Table 1). Conclusions This first report of real-world outcomes from RESONANCE shows that rilonacept-containing regimens for RP as 1st, 2nd, or 3rd line therapy reduced recurrence risk over long- term (>2 year) treatment, supporting prolonged management during RP natural history.
Prevalence of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias in patients with titin truncating variants across the ventricular morphofunctional phenotypic spectrum
Coderre, Roxanne, Castrichini, M, Neves, R Almeida Lopes, Ackerman, M J, Pereira, Naveen, Giudicessi, J R, Castrichini, Matteo , Garmany, Ramin , Neves, R Almeida Lopes, Ackerman, Michael J. , Giudicessi, John R.

European Heart Journal | February 5, 2026 | Volume: 46 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.2656 Get It

Abstract Background Loss-of-function variants in TTN-encoded titin are the most common genetic cause of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). In addition, titin truncating variants (TTNtvs) are over-represented in early-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) and unexplained sudden cardiac arrest/death (SCA/SCD) suggesting that in rare circumstances TTNtvs may cause arrhythmias in a pre-cardiomyopathic electrical phase. Purpose To compare the prevalence of AF, sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and SCA/SCD between TTNtv-positive patients with genotype-positive but phenotype-negative (G+/P-) disease, non-dilated left ventricular cardiomyopathy (NDLVC) and DCM. Methods Retrospective review of 1,229 patients in our Arrhythmogenic/Dilated Cardiomyopathy Registry was used to identify those with TTNtvs in high proportion spliced-in (>90%) exons classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic according to current American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics variant classification guidelines. Demographic, electrocardiographic, imaging and outcome data were extracted from the electronic record. After exclusion of those without satisfactory imaging data, each TTNtv-positive patient was classified as having G+/P- disease, NDLVC, or DCM according to the 2023 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. The prevalence of AF, non-SCA major VA events (sustained VT and appropriate VT/VF-terminating ICD therapies), and SCA/SCD was then compared between the three left ventricular morphofunctional subgroups. Results Overall, 232 TTNtv-positive patients (mean age of 44 ± 17 years; 57% male) were included (average LVEF of 39 ± 17%; 32% with a history of AF; 23% with a history of non-SCA VA event and 6% with a history of SCA). Forty-nine (21%) were G+/P-, 45 (19%) had NDLVC, and 138 (59%) had DCM at the time of their most recent clinical evaluation. As expected, the prevalence of AF was higher in TTNtv-DCM patients when compared to both TTNtv-NDLVC [56/138 (41%) vs. 11/45 (24%); p=0.04] and G+/P- disease [56/138 (41%) vs. 5/49 (10%); p<0.001]. Similarly, the number of patients who experienced a non-SCA major VA event was higher in TTNtv-DCM than either TTNtv-NDLVC [44/138 (32%) vs. 6/45 (9%); p=0.01] or G+/P- disease [44/138 (31%) vs. 4/49 (8%); p<0.001]. Interestingly, no difference in the number of TTNtv-positive patients who experienced a SCA/SCD was observed across subgroups [2/49 (4%) for G+/P-; 2/45 (4%) for NDLVC; and 8/138 (6%) for DCM; p=ns for all comparisons]. Conclusion In patients with TTNtv substrates who were evaluated at a quaternary medical center, the prevalence of AF and major VA events correlates with left ventricular morphology/function with the greatest risk observed in those with DCM. However, the prevalence of AF and major VA events, including SCA, in TTNtv-positive patients with G+/P- and NDLVC disease is not trivial and highlights the ability of TTNtvs to present in a pre-cardiomyopathic electrical phase.
Participation of women in cardiovascular trials from 2017 to 2023: a systematic review
Gulati, M, Rivera, F B, Magalong, John Vincent , Bantayan, N R B, Tesoro, Nicole Ann , Milan, M J, Purewal, Vikramjit , Pine, P L S, Navar, A M, Januzzi, James L, Gibson, M, Lala-Trindade, A, Cheng, Suzanne, Guerrero, M, Gulati, Martha , Bantayan, Nathan Ross B. , Milan, Mark Jason D. C. , Pine, Polyn Luz S, Návar, Ann Marie , Mulvagh, Sharon L. , Januzzi, James Louis , Gibson, Michael C., Lala-Trindade, Anuradha, Guerrero, Mayra

European Heart Journal | February 5, 2026 | Volume: 46 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.3980 Get It

Abstract Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death globally for both men and women, yet women remain historically underrepresented in cardiovascular clinical trials (CV trials), despite facing a disproportionately high burden of morbidity and mortality in many forms of CVD. Purpose We aim to determine the representation of women across a broad range of CV trials. Methods The participation of women in CV trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov from 2017 to 2023 was systematically determined through the extraction of publicly available information. Data was extracted to identify the country of study, disease type, trial size, clinical intervention and age of the participants. We calculated the proportion of women and the ratio of number of females to male participants (F:M ratio) for each trial. The female participation to prevalence ratio (PPR) was estimated for each trial based on the relative prevalence of the disease by sex in the specified region. Results We identified 1,079 registered CV trials, which included 1,396,104 participants, of whom 571,641 (41.0%) were women. The median F:M ratio was significantly lower for studies on arrhythmia (0.5), coronary heart disease (CHD) (0.39), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (0.32) and heart failure (HF) (0.51), but was higher for obesity (1.44) and pulmonary hypertension (PH) (2.86) CV trials. F:M ratio was higher for trials on lifestyle intervention (1.51) than for drug trials. PPRs were low for clinical trials on CHD (0.66), ACS (0.79), and stroke (0.74). There was a trend to increasing PPR from 2017 to 2023, p=0.056. Conclusion Representation of women in CV trials varies by disease state, region, intervention, and sponsor type. Better understanding of reasons for these differences may enable more tailored interventions to improve representation of women globally and across therapeutic areas.Figure 1 Figure 2