Citations

ABSTRACTBackgroundCerebellar ataxia is an exclusion criterion for the clinical diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy, but a variant with predominant cerebellar ataxia has been reported. The aims of this study were to estimate the frequency of progressive supranuclear palsy with predominant cerebellar ataxia in an autopsy series from the United States and to compare clinical, pathologic, and genetic differences between progressive supranuclear palsy with and without predominant cerebellar ataxia.MethodWe selected 100 consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed progressive supranuclear palsy who had been evaluated at the Mayo Clinic (referred to as the Mayo Clinic patient series) from our brain bank database (N = 1085). We next enriched in cases likely to have cerebellar ataxia by searching the remaining 985 cases for (1) an antemortem diagnosis of multiple system atrophy or (2) neuropathologic evidence of prominent degeneration of the cerebellum or cerebellar afferent nuclei. Subsequently, clinical, pathologic, and genetic features were compared between the two groups.ResultsOne patient in the Mayo Clinic patient series (1%) met criteria for progressive supranuclear palsy with predominant cerebellar ataxia and had both cerebellar and mild midbrain atrophy on MRI. Four patients were identified with the targeted search. Four of the five patients were clinically misdiagnosed as multiple system atrophy. The severity of tau‐related pathology and cerebellar degeneration were not different between the two groups. No differences were detected in tau genotypes.ConclusionAlthough our data cannot provide definitive information about how to make an accurate clinical diagnosis, they should serve to raise awareness of progressive supranuclear palsy with predominant cerebellar ataxia in the differential diagnosis of multiple system atrophy. © 2016 Movement Disorder Society

Abstract We have developed the use of reovirus as a systemically delivered oncolytic agent in both pre-clinical models and in Phase I and II clinical trials. Reovirus has direct oncolytic activity against many human/murine tumor cells, partly because of disruption of the PKR-mediated anti-viral response in malignant cells. In addition however, we have shown that anti-tumor therapy is directly associated with immune activation by virus replication in tumors. The immune mechanisms of therapy include both innate immune activation against virally infected tumor cells, as well as the generation of adaptive anti tumor immune responses as a result of in vivo priming against tumor associated antigens released during that killing. Therefore, to exploit the immune components of reovirus anti-tumor therapy, we tested the combination of oncolytic therapy with systemic checkpoint inhibition. To do this, we used our murine, immune-competent, model and a protocol in which injection of reovirus into subcutaneous (s.c.) B16 melanomas generates moderate therapy following intra-tumoral injection of reovirus into 5d established subcutaneous B16 melanomas growing in C57Bl/6 mice. In this model, provision of systemic anti-PD-1 antibody along with i.t. reovirus, significantly enhanced survival compared to i.t. reovirus alone (p<0.01) and led to >40% of mice being cured long term. Immune analysis suggests that the enhanced therapeutic benefit of reovirus plus checkpoint inhibition is contributed by at least two factors. Thus, blockade of PD-1 significantly enhanced the ability of NK cells to recognize (TNF-α secretion), and kill, reovirus-infected target tumor cells. Second, antiPD-1 antibody led to a significant reduction in Treg activity in reovirus-treated mice, with the overall effect of increasing the adaptive CD8+ anti tumor T cell response. We also showed that timing of the checkpoint inhibitor antibody was significant in balancing toxicity with anti tumor therapy. These data suggest that combination of checkpoint inhibition therapy with reovirus oncolytic/immunotherapy represents a readily translatable method to enhance the therapeutic value of either alone. Citation Format: Shane Zaidi, Kevin Shim, Karishma Rajani, Rosa Diaz, Elizabeth Ilett, Timothy Kottke, Jill Thompson, Peter Selby, Kevin Harrington, Hardev Pandha, Alan Melcher, Matt Coffey, Richard Vile. Combination therapy of reovirus and checkpoint inhibition. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy: A New Chapter; December 1-4, 2014; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2015;3(10 Suppl):Abstract nr B88.

Abstract We have developed the use of reovirus as a systemically delivered oncolytic agent in both pre-clinical models and in early Phase clinical trials. Reovirus has direct oncolytic activity against many human/murine tumor cells, partly because of disruption of the PKR-mediated anti-viral response in malignant cells. In addition however, we have shown that anti-tumor therapy is directly associated with immune activation by virus replication in tumors. The immune mechanisms of therapy include both innate immune activation against virally infected tumor cells, as well as the generation of adaptive anti tumor immune responses as a result of in vivo priming against tumor associated antigens released during that killing. Therefore, to exploit the immune components of reovirus anti-tumor therapy, we hypothesized that the combination of reovirus therapy with systemic checkpoint inhibition would augment therapeutic efficacy. To test the hypothesis, we used C57Bl/6 mice, an immune-competent murine model, with established subcutaneous (s.c.) B16 melanomas. In this model, intra-tumoral injection of reovirus into s.c. tumors generated moderate therapy. Provision of systemic anti-PD-1 antibody along with i.t. reovirus, significantly enhanced survival compared to i.t. reovirus alone (p<0.01) and led to >40% of mice being cured long term. Immune analysis suggested that the enhanced therapeutic benefit of reovirus plus checkpoint inhibition is contributed by at least two factors. First, blockade of PD-1 significantly enhanced the ability of NK cells to recognize (TNF-α secretion), and kill, reovirus-infected target tumor cells. Second, anti PD-1 antibody led to a significant reduction in Treg activity in reovirus-treated mice, with the overall effect of increasing the adaptive CD8+ anti-tumor T cell response. Furthermore, in vivo depletion studies demonstrated that NK cells had a dramatic effect in reducing the therapeutic efficacy of reovirus plus anti-PD-1 therapy. Overall, the results indicate that combination therapy of reovirus with PD-1 blockade confers significant survival benefit, by augmenting tumor-specific NK responses and specifically attenuating tumor-specific immunosuppression. These data also suggest that combination of PD-1 inhibition therapy with reovirus oncolytic/immunotherapy represents a readily translatable method to enhance the therapeutic efficacy. Citation Format: Karishma Rajani, Christopher Parrish, Kevin Shim, Liz Ilett, Fiona Errington-Mais, Jill Thompson, Tim Kottke, Rosa Maria-Diaz, Peter Selby, Hardev Pandha, Kevin Harrington, Alan Melcher, Matt Coffey, Shane Zaidi, Richard Vile. Combination therapy of reovirus and PD-1 blockade effectively establishes tumor control via innate and adaptive immune responses. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 1360. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-1360