Citations

Our group has reported that transient CD19 antigen masking of leukemic cells with the CD19 monoclonal antibody (mAb), tafasitamab, resulted in reduction of CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART19) apoptosis, enhanced CAR T proliferation, improved anti-tumor activity, diminished tumor pyroptosis, and reduced severity of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in preclinical models. In this report, we aimed to study the mAb characteristics responsible for these observations. Specifically, we hypothesized that binding affinity of CD19 mAbs might affect the subsequent activation and apoptosis of CART19 as well as tumor cell pyroptosis in preclinical models. To test our hypothesis, we first determined the affinities of the CD19-targeting antibodies tafasitamab, HD37 and FMC63 to recombinant human CD19 protein. Tafasitamab demonstrated the strongest binding affinity among the three tested antibodies [tafasitamab ( K D: 1.0±0.2 nM), HD37 ( K D: 4.1±0.3 nM), FMC63 ( K D: 3.4±1.2 nM)]. Next, we studied CART19 apoptosis in the presence of these CD19 mAbs with different binding affinities. Here, we co-cultured CART19, CD19 + mantle cell lymphoma JeKo, and 400 μg/mL of CD19 mAb for 1 hour and measured CD3 + 7-AAD - Annexin V + T cells with flow cytometry. The number of apoptotic CART19 cells was significantly reduced by tafasitamab co-treatment compared to HD37, FMC63, or control IgG [control IgG (mean = 19.1, standard deviation (SD) = 0.8), tafasitamab (mean = 13.1, SD = 2.9), HD37 (mean = 17.8, SD = 0.8), FMC63 (mean = 18.4, SD = 1.0)]. We also performed an in vitro high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) assay to assess if different affinities of the CD19 mAbs affect tumor cell pyroptosis triggered by CART19. Here, we co-cultured CART19, CD19 + JeKo, and 400 μg/mL of CD19 mAb for 24 hours and assessed HMGB1 on JeKo. In analogy to the apoptosis data, tafasitamab was the only mAb that prevented tumor cell pyroptosis, indicated by reduced HMGB1 expression (Fig 1A). Given these results, we aimed to study the impact of CD19 occupancy with different CD19 mAbs prior to CART19 infusion on tumor pyroptosis in vivo. We utilized a mouse model that mimics CAR T toxicities. Immunocompromised NSG mice were inoculated via tail vein with 5x10 6 leukemic cells derived from patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Two weeks later (day -7), tumor burden was assessed by peripheral blood sampling. Leukemic cells were defined as murine CD45 -, human CD45 + CD19 + CD20 + via flow cytometry, and volumetric absolute number was calculated. Mice were then randomized according to tumor burden to receive IgG control [Group 1 (G1)], tafasitamab (G2), HD37 (G3), or FMC63 (G4) (5 mg/kg, ip) at day -7. CRS was determined by weight loss, development of motor weakness, poor body posture, and elevated serum cytokine levels. At day 0, all mice received 3x10 6 luciferase + CART19 via tail vein. Mice were monitored with daily bioluminescent imaging (BLI) to track and quantify CART19 expansion and physical assessment to detect toxicity. BLI on day 4 revealed that CART19 expansion in the tafasitamab-treated group (G2, mean = 1x10 7, SD = 2.3x10 7) was significantly lower than in the control group (mean = 3.5x10 7, SD = 9.3x10 7), the HD37-treated group (G3, mean = 4x10 7, SD = 6.6x10 7), and the FMC63-treated group (G4, mean = 2x10 7, SD = 3.59x10 7), [G1 vs G2: 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.5x10 7 to 1.1x10 8, p <0.0001, G1 vs G3: 95% CI -7.5x10 7 to -1.1x10 8, p=0.005, G1 vs G4: 95% CI -4.5x10 7 to 1.9x10 7, p=0.71] indicating that tafasitamab pretreatment significantly reduced early activation of CART19 compared to IgG control and HD37 in this model. Mice were bled on day 4 to analyze plasma cytokine. Tafasitamab-treated mice (G2) secreted significantly less IFNγ (Fig 1B), IL10 (Mean G1: 78, G2: 2.52, G3: 12.2, G4: 13.9 pg/mL), MDC (Mean G1: 4072, G2: 445, G3: 921, G4: 1364 pg/mL), and MIP1β (Mean G1: 283, G2: 59.1, G3: 148, G4: 123 pg/mL) compared to G1, G3, and G4. Satellite mice were euthanized on day 1 and spleens were harvested. Western blot analysis of splenocytes revealed that G1, 3, and 4 showed significantly lower expression of apoptosis-inducing protein gasdermin E on leukemic cells compared to G2, indicating reduced tumor pyroptosis in G2. In summary, application of the high affinity mAb tafasitamab prior to CART19 resulted in reduced CAR T apoptosis, diminished tumor cell pyroptosis, and reduction of CRS compared to lower affinity CD19 mAbs in preclinical models.

CONCLUSION The most widely used multiple myeloma (MM) staging system, the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS), is based on lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), albumin, high-risk genetic markers by FISH, and beta-2 microglobulin (B2M). However, it does not account for additional risk impacted by multiple genetic abnormalities, or the risk imparted by presence of gain of chromosome 1q, and most patients are staged as R-ISS Stage 2. Two new staging systems, the Mayo Additive Staging System (MASS), and the Second Revision of the International Staging System (R2-ISS) have been recently proposed. A comparison of the performance of these two systems has not previously been done. We aimed to externally demonstrate the application of these staging systems and compare their performances in a large, contemporary cohort of patients in the United States. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record (EHR)-derived de-identified database, comprising de-identified patient-level structured and unstructured data, curated via technology-enabled abstraction and originating from approximately 280 US cancer clinics (~800 sites of care). The study included newly diagnosed MM patients initiating treatment between January 1, 2016 and October 1, 2022. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to evaluate real-world overall survival (rwOS) and patients were followed from first-line treatment initiation (index date) until the first of death, end of the study period or last recorded activity. The log-rank test to compare survival curves across derived stages. Multivariable analysis was conducted using stratified Cox models to account for non-proportional hazards by age with covariate adjustment for race/ethnicity, sex, practice type (academic or community) and diagnosis year (2016-2019 vs 2020-2022). Discrimination and calibration were evaluated in crude models using Harrell's c-index and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, respectively. There were 497 patients with MM included. Patient characteristics are listed in Panel A. The distribution of patients across R-ISS stages were as follows, 24%, 63% and 13% for Stage 1, 2 and 3 respectively. rwOS differed across R-ISS stage (log-rank p = 0.0006) and the median OS (OS) was not reached (NR), 63, and 37 months for R-ISS stage 1, 2, and 3, respectively. 34%, 35% and 31% for MASS 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The corresponding survival curves were significantly different (p < 0.0001), with associated mOS of 77, 61 and 45 months for MASS stages 1, 2, and 3, respectively. R2-ISS includes four risk categories (stages I-IV) and in our cohort, 20% (n = 100) were stage I (low), 126 (25%) were stage II (low-intermediate), 229 (46%) were stage III (intermediate), and 42 (9%) were stage IV (high). Survival across stages were significantly different (p<0.0001), though the survival curves for low and low-intermediate, and intermediate-high and high, were clustered, suggesting comparable outcomes in stages I-II and stages III-IV. mOS for R2-ISS stages I, II, III, and IV was NR, 69, 50 and 51 months respectively (Panel B). In fully adjusted analyses, as compared to MASS I, the hazards of death were 2.0 (95% CI 1.3-3.2) for MASS II and 2.7 (1.7-4.2) for MASS III. The hazards of death were similar for R2-ISS low and low-int (HR for low-int vs low: 1.2 [0.7, 2.3]). As compared to R2-ISS low, the hazards of death were similarly higher for int-high and high (HRs: 2.4 [1.4, 4.1] and 2.6 [1.3, 5.2], respectively). Discrimination and calibration were similar across all staging systems (c = 0.6, and Hosmer-Lemeshow p>0.05 for all three staging systems). Application of contemporary MM staging systems in a large cohort of US patients shows that they are prognostic for OS in MM. MASS demonstrated a greater separation for OS across stages, whereas R2-ISS intermediate-high and high were largely overlapping. Although our results demonstrate similar accuracy and reliability of MASS and R2-ISS, the discrimination of patients across different stages seen with the newer staging systems, as opposed to R-ISS, calls for greater use of these newer staging systems in routine clinical practice.

Abstract Background Post-discharge culture and susceptibility review has been described in emergency department and urgent care settings, but there is a lack of published literature describing culture review after acute care hospitalizations. Awaiting microbiology results can impede timely patient discharge. However, discharging patients while microbiology results are pending may result in suboptimal therapy or lost opportunity for additional testing/follow up. We implemented an antimicrobial stewardship effort to identify microbiology tests that result post-discharge utilizing a custom report in the electronic medical record (EMR). Methods. This retrospective descriptive study included adult patients ( >18 years of age) at 4 sites within Mayo Clinic from 1/1/2019 to 2/28/2023. Eligible patients had a hospitalization with an ID consult and an abnormal culture that was reviewed by an antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist after discharge. Urine cultures were excluded. The details of pharmacist-initiated antimicrobial stewardship interventions based on the culture review were identified by an EMR based research report. Results A total of 6803 patient encounters with at least 1 microbiology result reviewed post-discharge were identified. Patients were 40% female with a median age of 62 years. Patient race was 89.8% white, 4% black/African American, 1.5% Asian, and < 1% other. Of these patients, 1983 (29%) had at least one pharmacist intervention. A total of 169 (2.5%) of these patients had multiple interventions. Interventions included modification of antimicrobial therapy, addition of susceptibility testing, or additional follow up (labs, imaging, or patient visits). Median time from culture update to pharmacist review was 27.2 hours. Median length of hospital stay was 5 days and discharge disposition was home with self care (65%), home with home health or hospice (22.7%), or discharge to another acute care or skilled nursing facility (12.3%). Conclusion Outpatient review of post-discharge culture updates utilizing EMR reporting led to substantial interventions impacting antimicrobial treatments. Disclosures Christina G. Rivera (O'Connor), Pharm.D, Gilead Sciences: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead Sciences: Board Member|Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support|Gilead Sciences: Honoraria

Abstract Background Two independent placebo-controlled clinical trials conducted prior to SARS-CoV-2 Omicron demonstrated that sotrovimab and remdesivir reduced hospitalization among high-risk outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19. However, their effectiveness have not been directly compared. Methods This retrospective study examined all high-risk outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19 who received either remdesivir or sotrovimab at Mayo Clinic during the Omicron BA.1 surge from January to March 2022. COVID-19-related hospitalization or death within 28 days were compared between the two treatment groups. Results Among 3,257 patients, 2,158 received sotrovimab and 1,099 received remdesivir. Patients treated with sotrovimab were younger (median age, 60 vs. 69 years) and had lower comorbidity (Monoclonal Antibody Screening Score, 5 vs. 6; Charlson Comorbidity Index, 3 vs. 4), but were more likely to be immunocompromised (47.3% vs. 30.2%) than remdesivir-treated patients. The majority (89%) had received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine (median, 3 doses [IQR 2-3] for both groups). COVID-19-related hospitalization (1.5% and 1.0% in remdesivir and sotrovimab groups, respectively, p=.15) and mortality within 28 days (0.4% in both groups, p=.82) were similarly low. A propensity score weighted analysis demonstrated no significant difference in the rates of COVID-related hospitalization and death within 28 days between the two groups. Conclusion This study demonstrated favorable outcomes that were not significantly different between patients treated with remdesivir or sotrovimab. As sotrovimab is no longer authorized, these results support the continued use of remdesivir for treating high-risk patients with COVID-19 during the current Omicron-predominant epoch. Disclosures Christina G. Rivera (O'Connor), Pharm.D, Gilead Sciences: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead Sciences: Board Member|Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support|Gilead Sciences: Honoraria Maria Gonzalez Suarez, M.D., Ph.D., Gilead: Grant/Research Support Ravindra Ganesh, M.B.B.S., M.D., Alpaca Health: Advisor/Consultant Raymund R. Razonable, MD, Allovir: Endpoint Adjudication Committee|American Society of Transplantation: Board Member|Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Novartis: DSMB|Regeneron: Grant/Research Support|Roche: Grant/Research Support

Abstract Background Remdesivir is FDA-approved for the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19. Many patients improve clinically to allow for hospital dismissal before completing the 5-day course. In prior work, those who continued remdesivir in an outpatient setting had better outcomes. Here, we assessed patients’ perspectives and the economic impact of this outpatient practice. Methods During a one-year period, 3,029 patients received remdesivir for COVID-19 in the hospital; of them, 542 were dismissed to continue remdesivir in the outpatient setting and were surveyed. The cost of care was compared between those who remained in the hospital vs. those who were dismissed. Results 470 of 542 patients were surveyed, and 93 (19.8%) responded. Responders were older than non-responders (median, 63 vs. 58 years). The majority (70.5%) had symptoms resolved by the time of the survey. Ten patients (11.4%) had persistent symptoms attributed to long COVID-19, including fatigue (30.1%), brain fog (23.7%), and insomnia (18.3%). 73.8% were excited to learn about the outpatient remdesivir program. The majority (81.0%) felt that receiving therapy at home was the right decision; 79.5% had support and felt the benefits of completing treatment at home. The majority were satisfied with communication before (75.6%) and during (80.5%) the outpatient appointment, information on benefits (80.3%) and risks (58.5%), time spent at the infusion center (88.6%), quality of care (82.3%) and overall experience (76.0%). The benefits of treatment were high-value (82.6%), while the infusions' cost, inconvenience, and discomfort were unimportant for most responders. After adjusting for gender, comorbidity score, and WHO scale, the predicted costs for the groups were $16,544 (inpatient) and $9,097 (outpatient) per patient (difference of $7,447; p< .01). During this study, we estimated a total of 1,077 hospital room-days were made available to other patients. Conclusion An outpatient remdesivir program that allowed for early dismissal was perceived favorably by patients hospitalized for COVID-19. The program resulted in significant cost and resource savings, the latter in terms of the availability of hospital rooms for other patients needing critical services. Disclosures Christina G. Rivera (O'Connor), Pharm.D, Gilead Sciences: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead Sciences: Board Member|Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support|Gilead Sciences: Honoraria Bijan J. Borah, Ph.D., Boehringer Ingelheim: Advisor/Consultant|Exact Sciences: Advisor/Consultant Ravindra Ganesh, M.B.B.S., M.D., Alpaca Health: Advisor/Consultant Raymund R. Razonable, MD, Allovir: Endpoint Adjudication Committee|American Society of Transplantation: Board Member|Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Novartis: DSMB|Regeneron: Grant/Research Support|Roche: Grant/Research Support

Abstract Background Implementing effective antimicrobial stewardship interventions is an important component of antimicrobial stewardship programs. Recently, stewardship research has shown that clinician characteristics may have an impact on antimicrobial stewardship intervention methods and acceptance rates. Methods A multisite health system antimicrobial stewardship prospective audit and feedback program interventions performed by stewardship staff using a standardized electronic medical record (EMR) tool were compared by stewardship clinician profession (pharmacist, physician, or advanced practice provider, APP) from 7/1/2017 to 6/30/2022. Outcomes assessed were intervention rates, communication methods, and intervention acceptance by patient age and intensive care unit (ICU) status of patient. Generalized estimating equations utilizing logistic regression were used to assess for associations between staff. Associations were assessed both univariately and after adjusting for other factors. Results Of 69,503 prospective audit and feedback EMR based rules, there were 14,699 rules associated with an intervention. The majority of rules were reviewed by pharmacists (90.7%) followed by physician (9.2%) and APP (< 1%). Of 9,034 interventions with an outcome documented, 7326 (85.5%) pharmacist interventions were accepted and 360 (77.3%) physician interventions were accepted (adjusted p=0.047). Pharmacists intervened by direct action (ie, adjust a medication order) in 6.6% of interventions; whereas, physicians did so rarely (0.4%). Pharmacists were more likely to use synchronous communication than physicians in the adjusted model (pharmacist vs. physician: 63.8% vs 52.5%; p=0.004). Patients in the ICU had a significantly lower intervention acceptance rate (non-ICU vs. ICU: 86.6% vs. 78.0%; adjusted OR 0.57 [95% CI 0.46-0.70], p< 0.001).Table 1.Intervention Rate by Baseline Demographics of Stewardship Clinicians and Patients. *% are reported as row % **Multivariable model was also adjusted for day of week and time of day APP-Advanced practice provider; ICU-intensive care unitTable 2.Intervention Acceptance. *% are reported as row % **Multivariable model was also adjusted for day of week and time of day APP-Advanced practice provider; ICU-intensive care unit Conclusion Antimicrobial stewardship pharmacists and physicians are both effective at prospective audit and feedback but used different intervention styles. Advanced practice providers were vastly underrepresented. Patients in the ICU may benefit from tailored ASP efforts. Disclosures Sara Ausman, PharmD, Gilead: Honoraria Caitlin Brown, PharmD, Alexion: Grant/Research Support|Trevena: Advisor/Consultant Christina G. Rivera (O'Connor), Pharm.D, Gilead Sciences: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead Sciences: Board Member|Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support|Gilead Sciences: Honoraria

Abstract Background Due to extensive protein binding, use of ceftriaxone in the setting of hypoalbuminemia may result in suboptimal drug exposure via higher concentrations of unbound drug resulting in increased volume of distribution and increased drug clearance. We aimed to evaluate the impact of hypoalbuminemia on clinical success among hospitalized adults with obesity who were treated with ceftriaxone for a bacterial infection. Methods This retrospective review included adult inpatients with weight > 100 kg or body mass index (BMI) > 40 who received ceftriaxone 2 grams intravenously every 12 hours for at least 72 hours for one of the following indications: bloodstream infection, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, non-enterococcal endocarditis, skin and soft tissue infection, or bone and joint infection. The primary outcome was clinical success, a composite of clinical cure and microbiologic cure. Clinical cure was defined as resolution of signs and symptoms compatible with active infection without need to change or extend antibiotic therapy due to inadequate effect of ceftriaxone. Microbiologic cure was defined as negative repeat sterile site cultures, if applicable. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, mortality, and 30-day readmission. Outcomes were analyzed with Mann-Whitney U tests, Pearson’s chi-squared tests, and Fisher’s exact tests (α level = 0.05). Results 137 patients were included, 34 of whom had a serum albumin ≤ 2.5 g/dL. Patients were predominantly white (94.2%) and male (69.3%) with a median BMI of 48.6 (Table 1). Clinical success, a composite of clinical and microbiologic cure, was achieved in 76.5% and 92.2% (p = 0.013) of those with and without hypoalbuminemia, respectively. Clinical cure was significantly more common among those without hypoalbuminemia (93.2%) as compared to those with hypoalbuminemia (76.5%) (p = 0.007). Death during hospitalization was more common (14.7% vs. 0%, p < 0.001) and median length of stay was longer (14 vs. 9 days, p = 0.009) in the hypoalbuminemia group. No difference was seen in 30-day readmission (23.5% vs. 11.7%, p = 0.089). Conclusion Hypoalbuminemia was associated with a lower rate of clinical success among patients with obesity who were treated with ceftriaxone 2 grams every 12 hours. Disclosures Christina G. Rivera (O'Connor), Pharm.D, Gilead Sciences: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead Sciences: Board Member|Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support|Gilead Sciences: Honoraria

Abstract Background Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication following joint replacement, associated with morbidity and mortality. Here, we established a clinically representative murine model of knee arthroplasty and determined the ideal bacterial inoculum that would result in PJI without causing significant limb compromise.Figure 1.An example of an uninfected titanium prosthesis osseointegrated into the tibia of a mouse. Methods A titanium tibial prosthesis designed for the murine knee was 3D printed and surgically implanted into the proximal tibia (Figure 1) of 38 C57BL/6 mice. The prosthesis is designed to osseointegrate into the tibia and has a smooth articular surface to allow for immediate weight bearing and range of motion. At the time of surgery, the arthroplasty was inoculated with five inocula of Staphylococcus aureus Xen36, ranging from 29 to 14,000 colony forming units (CFU) (Table 1). Mice were sacrificed at 3 weeks, or earlier if necessary due to infectious sequelae, and the joint tissue, tibia, femur, and prosthesis quantitatively cultured. Results All mice inoculated with 181 to 14,000 CFU developed PJI as did 90% inoculated with 29 CFU. Bacterial loads from joint tissues and tibial prostheses are shown in Table 1. All mice inoculated with 14,000 and 760 CFU had overt findings of infection (abscesses, sinus tracts, significant limb dysfunction) requiring early euthanasia (Table 2). Mice inoculated with 640 CFU had swelling, redness, and small sores in first 3 days, and 1 death, but otherwise appeared well; only 2/9 had a visible abscess at 3-week sacrifice. 2/10 mice receiving 181 CFU had small sores that resolved in the first week; all limbs functioned well prior to sacrifice. Mice receiving 29 CFU had no external evidence of infection, however 9/10 had purulence within the joint at sacrifice. Conclusion This study demonstrates that inoculum size directly impacts clinical manifestations of infection in a murine model of S. aureus PJI. An inoculum of 181 CFU resulted in universal infection without significantly compromising the limb. The ability of this model to create PJI without overt infectious sequela will allow for evaluation of therapeutics, including those locally delivered. Disclosures Robin Patel, MD, Abbott Laboratories: Advisor/Consultant|Adaptive Phage Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Adaptive Phage Therapeutics: Mayo Clinic has a royalty-bearing know-how agreement and equity in Adaptive Phage Therapeutics.|BIOFIRE: Grant/Research Support|CARB-X: Advisor/Consultant|ContraFect: Grant/Research Support|Day Zero Diagnostics: Advisor/Consultant|HealthTrackRx: Advisor/Consultant|Mammoth Biosciences: Advisor/Consultant|Netflix: Advisor/Consultant|Oxford Nanopore Technologies: Advisor/Consultant|PhAST: Advisor/Consultant|See details: Patent on Bordetella pertussis/parapertussis PCR issued, a patent on a device/method for sonication with royalties paid by Samsung to Mayo Clinic|See details: continued, patent on an anti-biofilm substance issued|TenNor Therapeutics Limited: Grant/Research Support|Torus Biosystems: Advisor/Consultant|Trellis Bioscience, Inc.: Advisor/Consultant Nicholas Bedard, MD, Stryker: Advisor/Consultant

Abstract Background Non-diphtheriae Corynebacterium spp. are important human pathogens responsible for a broad spectrum of clinical syndromes. Data on species-specific susceptibility patterns is limited. In this study we aim to study these susceptibility patterns over time and summarize the species-specific resistance profile that could be used by clinicians to guide therapeutic decisions. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of all the Non-diphtheriae Corynebacterium isolates that were submitted for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) between January-2012 and February of 2023 to our reference lab. Results A total of 1925 Corynebacterium isolates were submitted for susceptibility testing over the study period. The most commonly identified species was C. striatum (35.6%) followed by C. amycolatum (24.4%). Figure-1 outlines the species distribution. Temporal analysis showed decreasing susceptibility rates over the study period from 47.5% to 20.6% for penicillin & from 50% to 7.6% for clindamycin. Linezolid and vancomycin were universally active against all species (Table-1). Daptomycin non-susceptibility was reported in 25% of C. jeikeium isolates (MIC=2). High level resistance to daptomycin with MIC >256 were noted in seven C. striatum and single C. amycolatum isolate. Doxycycline has the highest susceptibility rates among the tested oral agents after linezolid for the non-striatum species. Significant variation in species-specific susceptibility pattern was noted and summarized in Table 1. C. striatum was associated with concerning resistance rates to beta-lactams, tetracyclines, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole & fluoroquinolones with limited reliable oral treatment options beside linezolid. C. kroppenstedtii (associated with granulomatous mastitis) showed high susceptibility rate to tetracyclines and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole despite prevalent penicillin resistance. Conclusion Non-diphtheriae Corynebacterium spp are commonly isolated from clinical specimens and are associated with various clinical syndromes. Significant variation in resistance profile exists between different species. Prevalent resistance among the most common species such as C. Striatum is associated with therapeutic challenges. Disclosures Christina G. Rivera (O'Connor), Pharm.D, Gilead Sciences: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead Sciences: Board Member|Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support|Gilead Sciences: Honoraria Audrey N. Schuetz, MD, Merck: Advisor/Consultant

Abstract Background Critically ill patients, particularly those treated with extracorporeal devices or at extremes of weight, experience pharmacokinetic variability which can compromise beta-lactam (BL) antibiotic target attainment and treatment response. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for BL antibiotics can improve precision pharmacotherapy but has had limited implementation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency of BL target attainment among adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients who underwent TDM. Methods This observational study evaluated adults treated with cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam or meropenem in ICUs at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota who underwent TDM from June-September 2022. During the study timeframe, multidisciplinary teams were encouraged to perform BL TDM on patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, continuous kidney replacement therapy, or at an extreme of body weight (weight < 40 kg or >120 kg or BMI < 18 kg/m2 or > 40 kg/m2). Percentage of patients with initial serum trough concentrations within the therapeutic range was calculated (Table 1). Results During the study timeframe, 59 trough concentrations were performed on critically ill patients, of which 5 were excluded due to uninterpretable results. Of the remaining 54 BL trough concentrations analyzed, 49 (91%) were initial troughs during the antibiotic course, and 5 (9%) were repeat troughs. Thirty-six (73%) of the initial trough concentrations were within the therapeutic range. Among the trough concentrations outside the therapeutic range, 10 (77%) were too high, and 3 (23%) were too low (Table 2). Dose adjustment occurred in 19 (39%) of initial trough evaluations, including 6 which were adjusted despite a level within the therapeutic range. All of the repeat trough concentrations drawn during the same antibiotic course were within the therapeutic range (n = 5/5; 100%). Conclusion One-fourth of initial BL trough concentrations were outside of the therapeutic range. BL levels outside the therapeutic range prompted dose adjustment to improve the potential for effectiveness or limit the potential for toxicity. BL TDM appears to be a promising strategy to enhance precision pharmacotherapy in the critically ill. Disclosures Sara Ausman, PharmD, Gilead: Honoraria Christina G. Rivera (O'Connor), Pharm.D, Gilead Sciences: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead Sciences: Board Member|Gilead Sciences: Grant/Research Support|Gilead Sciences: Honoraria