Citations

Abstract Objective This study aimed to evaluate how differences in case complexity affect information-processing burden, as measured by eye-tracking, as well as the efficiency of electronic health record (EHR) use among healthcare providers in the intensive care unit. Materials and Methods This cross-sectional study recruited providers from 4 U.S. medical centers that use 2 prominent EHR systems (Epic and Oracle). After reporting demographic information, participants reviewed 2 complex cases and 2 standard cases in their institution’s EHR system and then responded to 5 questions about each case, yielding a performance score. Information-processing burden was assessed by measuring the number of eye fixations via eye-tracking software. The efficiency of EHR use was assessed by measuring the task completion time, number of mouse clicks per minute, number of EHR screens viewed, and performance score. Results Eighty-one providers were included for analysis. Providers exhibited significantly more eye fixations (P < .001) and longer task completion times (P < .001) for complex cases than for standard cases. There were also significantly fewer mouse clicks per minute during complex cases (P < .001). Reviewing a complex case first led to significantly more eye fixations (P = .015) and longer task completion times (P < .01) than when a standard case was presented first. Case complexity did not significantly affect performance scores or the number of EHR screens viewed. Discussion Higher case complexity was shown to be associated with greater information-processing burden and less efficient EHR use. These findings have implications for enhancing the efficiency of EHR use, thereby leading to improved clinical decision-making and patient safety. Furthermore, reviewing complex cases first led to a greater information-processing burden, suggesting that providers could benefit from “warming up” with standard cases before reviewing complex cases.

ABSTRACT Introduction Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a life‐saving intervention for refractory cardiopulmonary failure. Despite advancements reducing complications, ECMO remains associated with acute kidney injury (AKI), often requiring kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Studies report up to 45% of ECMO patients needing KRT, significantly increasing mortality. A prior meta‐analysis suggested a declining mortality trend in recent years. Methodology Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched (2000–2024) for randomized and observational studies on adult ECMO patients requiring KRT. Data extraction covered study characteristics, patient demographics, ECMO type, KRT timing, and clinical outcomes. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4.1 under a random‐effects model, with mortality as the primary outcome. Result A total of 24 studies (6347 patients) met the inclusion criteria, including 23 observational studies and one RCT. The mean age of ECMO + KRT patients was 51 years in observational studies and 61.2 years in the RCT, with cardiogenic shock as the most common ECMO indication. Meta‐analysis showed a significantly higher mortality in ECMO + KRT patients (RR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.63–2.12, p < 0.001), with infections and bleeding as key contributors. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant survival difference based on KRT timing, while Veno‐arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA‐ECMO) was associated with worse outcomes than Veno‐venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV‐ECMO). The RCT reported 61.9% mortality at 30 days in ECMO + KRT patients. Conclusion KRT during ECMO is associated with increased mortality, likely due to the severity of illness and complications like infections and bleeding. The optimal timing of KRT initiation remains unclear, and no significant survival benefit was found for early KRT. Further large‐scale RCTs are needed to optimize management strategies.

Abstract Background Stigma associated with tuberculosis (TB) and TB diagnosis is a major social factor in delay of diagnosis and non-adherence to TB treatment among Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) populations. Main sources of stigma include misconceptions regarding TB transmission and lack of knowledge about symptoms or treatment.Figure 1.Respondent demographicsBreakdown of respondent demographics by age, gender, and AAPI subgroup.Figure 2.Demographic breakdown of TB awarenessTB awareness by AAPI subgroup, age, and gender. Methods A cross-sectional survey of 666 AAPI individuals analyzed TB symptom recognition, transmission misconceptions, and awareness in two AAPI community centers. Data were segmented by AAPI subgroup, metropolitan area (Seattle/Tacoma vs. Las Vegas), age, and gender.Figure 3.TB transmission beliefs.Figure 4.TB treatment, curability, and latent TB infection awareness. Results Overall, 76.6% of respondents reported TB awareness, varying by AAPI subgroup. Awareness was highest among Korean (95%) and Filipino (91%) participants, and lowest among Vietnamese (52%) and Cambodian (50%) respondents. Regionally, TB awareness was similar between Tacoma (76%) and Las Vegas (79%). Age and gender significantly impacted awareness. Respondents under 18 had the lowest TB awareness (59%), while those aged 18-34 had the highest (84%). Females reported higher TB awareness (79%) and symptom recognition (61%) than males (74% and 46%, respectively). Symptom knowledge varied. 55% were aware of TB symptoms, but only 16% were able to recognize five common TB symptoms. Misconceptions about transmission also persisted broadly. Out of the 71% of respondents who were aware that TB is transmissible, many incorrectly believed TB spread via shaking hands (35%), sharing food/drinks (50%), or touching items in public areas (37%). The 45-64 and 65+ age groups were most prone to misconceptions about transmission. While 72% of respondents were aware that TB could be treated, only 57% knew TB could be cured. 30% of respondents were aware of latent TB infection. Conclusion Significant disparities in TB awareness exist in AAPI communities. Females demonstrated greater TB awareness perhaps due to cultural differences (“caretaker role”), while TB transmission misconceptions were prevalent among older individuals. Limited knowledge on LTBI and TB treatment represent significant barriers to effective TB control. Tailored educational efforts will be required to improve TB awareness and reduce misconceptions within AAPI communities. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Abstract Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) causes severe recurrent epistaxis, chronic gastrointestinal bleeding, solid organ arteriovenous malformations, and significant anemia. Although it is the second most common inherited bleeding disorder worldwide, no approved therapies exist. The multicenter, US randomized, controlled PATH-HHT trial demonstrated efficacy of short-term pomalidomide treatment of epistaxis in HHT. However, questions regarding long-term safety, effectiveness, and utility for HHT-associated gastrointestinal bleeding remain. The PATH-HHT ATLAS (after trial longitudinal assessment study) was a multicenter US longitudinal observational study evaluating patients enrolled in PATH-HHT who continued pomalidomide after PATH-HHT through a poststudy drug access program, with ongoing close monitoring per PATH-HHT protocol and as mandated by the US Food and Drug Administration. Sixty-two patients treated with pomalidomide for HHT for up to 4.4 years were included. Significant, durable improvements in mean epistaxis severity score (5.55 points [baseline] to 2.80 points [month 12]; P&lt; .0001) and mean hematologic support score (9.11 red cell unit equivalents [RUEs] during 6 months pretreatment to 5.73 RUEs [months 7-12]; P = .0056) were observed. Pomalidomide was less effective for gastrointestinal bleeding than for epistaxis, particularly in patients with high red blood cell transfusion requirements. Thirty-one patients (50%) underwent dose reduction from 4 mg daily, primarily due to neutropenia, but most maintained effectiveness at 2 or 3 mg daily. Over 105.2 patient-years of pomalidomide treatment, 0 patients developed peripheral neuropathy, 1 developed venous thromboembolism, and 5 developed serious infections. In conclusion, pomalidomide was effective for HHT-associated epistaxis over extended durations, albeit with nontrivial potential toxicities, and may be considered for certain patients with HHT. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT07018401.

Abstract Introduction: CAR T-cell therapy represents a pivotal treatment for individuals with relapsed or refractory (R/R) MM. Currently, two CAR T-cell therapeutics have received regulatory approval: Abecma (idecabtagene vicleucel, ide-cel) and Carvykti (ciltacabtagene autoleucel, cilta-cel). Although direct comparative investigations delineating the efficacy of these modalities are absent, clinical trials have shown significant disparities in response and remission rates between these therapies. Both agents are implicated in the manifestation of CRS and ICANS; however, variations in the frequency and severity of these adverse effects have been observed. We harnessed data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to gain a deeper understanding of the incidence of different adverse events associated with both CAR T products in MM. Method: In this retrospective study, the 2022 NIS database was used to identify hospitalizations with MM and those who received ide-cel or cilta-cel using appropriate ICD-10-CM diagnostic and ICD-10-PCS procedure codes. Data on CRS, ICANS, infections, and adverse cardiac events were extracted using relevant ICD-10-CM codes. These outcomes were compared between the two CAR-T products using Pearson's chi-square analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was also performed, adjusting for demographics, hospital-specific characteristics, and comorbidities. Results: We identified 805 patients with MM who received CAR T-cell therapy, among whom 530 patients (60.4% male; 67% Caucasian, 14.6% African American and 17.5% other ethnicities) received ide-cel and 275 patients (70.9% male; 79.6% Caucasian, 14.3% African American and 6.1% other ethnicities) received cilta-cel. The incidence of CRS was 72.6% for ide-cel and 56.4% for cilta-cel, and the difference was almost statistically significant by chi-square analysis (p = 0.051). This difference was not statistically significant after multivariate analysis [Adjusted Odds ratio (OR) = 0.5, CI 0.2 to 1.3, p=0.154]. The incidence of ICANS was 19.8% for ide-cel and 18.2% for cilta-cel, and it was not statistically significant by chi-square analysis (p = 0.825). Among cardiovascular events, there was no significant difference in the incidence of cardiogenic shock (ide-cel vs cilta-cel, 0.9% vs 0%, p = 0.497), stroke (0.9% vs 1.8%, p = 0.661) and arrhythmias (22.6% vs 21.8%, p = 0.892) between these CAR T-cell therapies. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the incidence of infectious complications, including pneumonia (1.9% vs 0%, p = 0.334), sepsis (0.9% vs 3.6%, p = 0.247), or septic shock (0.9% vs 0%, p = 0.430) between these CAR T-cell therapies. There was no significant difference in all-cause in-hospital mortality between these therapies (1.9% vs 5.5%, p = 0.181). Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the occurrence of CRS and ICANS between ide-cel and cilta-cel in our study. Both CAR T-cell therapies have the potential to cause infections and cardiovascular issues, necessitating careful monitoring, early detection, and timely treatment. When choosing between these CAR T-cell therapies, several factors should be considered, including the patient's previous treatment history, manufacturing time, cost, availability, and potential short-term and long-term side effects. Our study has some limitations, including its retrospective design, dependence on ICD-10 codes for identifying patients with adverse events, and the lack of long-term longitudinal data on adverse effects. However, this study provides important insights for hematologists regarding the rates of specific adverse events associated with both the CAR T-cell products in a real-world setting.

Aerosol viral transmission monitoring enables early, noninvasive detection of infectious disease spread by identifying airborne viral particles in shared environments. Integrating sampling, sensing, and data analysis, this perspective outlines an integrated framework for transforming epidemic responses from reactive testing to proactive surveillance. It synthesizes current technological advances and deployment experiences to identify key challenges in detection efficiency, data management, and societal trust. This marks a shift from clinical diagnosis to environmental surveillance, transforming epidemic responses from testing individuals to monitoring shared air. By enabling earlier interventions, these systems help reduce transmission, protect vulnerable groups, and limit disruptions to daily life and the economy.

Abstract Background: Luspatercept, an erythroid maturation agent, has shown efficacy in improving anemia in both β-thalassemia and lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). In the BELIEVE trial, which led to its approval in transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia, thromboembolic events were notably higher in patients with risk factors such as splenectomy. More recently, the COMMANDS trial demonstrated superior transfusion independence with luspatercept over erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in ESA-naive, lower-risk MDS patients. However, limited data exist regarding comparative thrombotic risk in real-world MDS populations. We conducted a multicenter, real-world study to evaluate thrombotic event rates associated with luspatercept versus ESAs in MDS patients without prior venous thromboembolism (VTE). Methods: We queried the TriNetX Research Network, a federated real-time electronic health record (EHR) database covering over 100 million patients across major healthcare organizations. Adults (≥18 years) with a diagnosis of MDS (ICD-10-CM code D46) and no prior history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) were included. Patients were stratified based on treatment with luspatercept or ESAs (epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa). Propensity score matching (PSM) using a 1:1 nearest-neighbor algorithm without replacement was performed to balance demographics and clinical covariates. Primary outcomes included the incidence of DVT, PE, and composite VTE events within 12 months of therapy initiation. Results: A total of 6,448 patients with MDS and no prior VTE were identified: 5,698 received ESAs and 750 received luspatercept. The overall mean age was 72.5 ± 13.5 years, with 48.1% male. After PSM, 741 patients were included in each treatment arm. The matched cohort had a mean age of 76.7 ± 10.7 years, and 41.3% were female. In the ESA group, 58/741 (7.8%) developed DVT compared to 27/741 (3.6%) in the luspatercept group (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.4; 95% CI, 0.9–2.3). PE occurred in 27 ESA-treated patients (3.6%) versus 13 luspatercept-treated patients (1.8%) (HR 1.3; 95% CI, 0.6–2.7; p=0.941). The overall composite VTE rate was 10.0% (74/741) in the ESA group and 4.9% (36/741) in the luspatercept group (HR 1.3; 95% CI, 0.9–2.0; p=0.732). Conclusion: In this large, multicenter real-world analysis, we observed a numerically lower incidence of thrombotic events with luspatercept compared to erythropoietin-based agents in patients with MDS, though differences did not reach statistical significance. These findings support the thrombotic safety profile of luspatercept observed in clinical trials and warrant further prospective validation.

Abstract Introduction: Autologous CD19 CART therapies have been utilized across a wide range of B cell driven autoimmune diseases (AD), including systemic lupus erythematous (SLE), idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), systemic sclerosis (SSc), & myasthenia gravis (MG). To date, a number of autologous CD19-CART therapies have delivered durable drug free responses in AD patients. However, the safety profile of autologous CD19-CART therapies across different AD has yet to be fully explored. This is especially true for CRS & ICANS. Here, we provide novel insight into the mechanism underlying the safety profile of resecabtagene autoleucel (rese-cel) an autologous CD19 41BBz CART therapy across four separate Phase I/II clinical trials in SLE, IIM, SSc, & MG. Objectives: The primary objective of each trial is safety & tolerability of rese-cel at Day 29. Key secondary objectives include changes in clinical scores & use of immunomodulatory agents. Key translational assessments include CART cell pharmacokinetics (PK), impact on peripheral B cell populations (pharmacodynamics), & serum cytokine levels. Methods: 19 Patients (data cutoff: 6/2/2025 SLE; 5/6/2025 IIM, SSc, and MG), with active disease refractory to standard of care have been treated across 4 Phase I/II clinical trials in SLE (8 patients; NCT06121297), IIM (8 patients; NCT06154252), SSc (2 patients; NCT06328777), & MG (1 patient; NCT06359041). All patients were treated with a single weight-based infusion of rese-cel at a dose of 1 x 106 cells/kg following lymphodepletion (flu 25 mg/m2/d on Days -5, -4, & -3, & cy 1,000 mg/m2/d on Day -3). All non-glucocorticoid immunomodulatory agents were stopped prior to lymphodepletion. Glucocorticoids were tapered post-infusion. Patients were not given prophylactic tocilizumab pre-infusion. Translational assessments were determined as follows: CART PK was evaluated by flow cytometry & dPCR; B-cell enumeration & phenotyping were evaluated by flow cytometry; & serum cytokines were evaluated via immunoassay. Results: Across all indications (19 patients), 7 episodes of CRS were observed (7/19). 6 of 7 patients experienced a Grade 1 CRS, & 1 patient had a Grade 2 CRS. 2 patients developed ICANS; 1 patient had a Grade 4 (previously presented at ACR Convergence 2024), & the other patient had a Grade 3. Both ICANS events were rapidly resolved without sequelae using standard therapy. These CRS and ICANS events differed across indications. In IIM, 4 of 8 patients experienced Grade 1 CRS and no patients experienced ICANs. In SLE, 2 patients experienced Grade 1 CRS and one developed Grade 4 ICANs. In SSC, 1 of 2 patients experienced Grade 2 CRS & the other experienced Grade 3 ICANS. In MG, no CRS or ICANS was observed. Rese-cel infusion products were ~ 66% transduced, with a mean CD4:CD8 ratio of 6. Post-infusion, peak CART expansion was observed on day 12 & the mean peak expansion was 89 cells/µL (SD +/- 214). B cells were rapidly depleted from peripheral blood post-infusion, with nadir occurring at 13 days & repopulation beginning at 62 days post-infusion on average. Re-emergent B cells were largely of the CD24+CD38+ transitional naïve phenotype. Commensurate with B cell depletion, serum BAFF induction was observed, with a mean fold induction of 16 & mean peak level of 56,404 pg/µL (SD: +/- 45,547). Serum cytokines associated with CRS & ICANS; IFNg, IL6, & IL8 reached peak elevation on days 10, 9, & 10 respectively post-infusion. The mean peak elevation for IFNg, IL6, & IL8 were 232 pg/ µL (SD: +/- 320), 44 pg/ µL (SD: +/- 60), & 80 pg/ µL (SD +/- 73), respectively. Conclusion: Rese-cel appears to be well tolerated in autoimmune patients with rates of CRS & ICANS of 37% & 11% across all autoimmune indications, respectively (SLE patients had a 25% CRS rate & 12.5% ICANS rate, IIM patients had a 50% CRS rate & 0% ICANS rate, SSC patients had a 50% CRS & 50% ICANS rate, & MG patients had a 0% CRS & ICANS rate). Notably, the frequency & severity of CRS appears to be low, with no CRS in 63% of patients (12/19) & most CRS events (6/7) being Grade 1. The lower frequency & severity of both CRS & ICANS events are likely correlated with the relatively modest induction of serum IFNg, IL6, & IL8 found in autoimmune patients post rese-cel weight-adjusted dose infusion. High BAFF levels reflect deep systemic B cell depletion. Together, these data support further support late-stage clinical development of rese-cel in autoimmune disease.

Abstract Introduction: CAR T-cell therapy is an important treatment option for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) DLBCL. Three CAR T-cell products have received approval: axicabtagene ciloleucel (Yescarta), lisocabtagene maraleucel (Breyanzi), and tisagenlecleucel (Kymriah). Although direct head-to-head studies comparing the three therapies do not exist, clinical trials have revealed notable differences in response rates and remission rates among them. All three products induce CRS and ICANS; however, variations in the incidence and severity of these adverse effects have been observed. We utilized data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to gain further insights into the incidence of various adverse events associated with different CAR-T products in DLBCL. Method: In this retrospective study, the 2022 NIS database was used to identify hospitalizations with DLBCL and those who received Yescarta, Breyanzi, or Kymriah using appropriate ICD-10-CM diagnostic and ICD-10-PCS procedure codes. Data on CRS, ICANS, infections, and adverse cardiac events were extracted using relevant ICD-10-CM codes. These outcomes were compared across different CAR-T products using Pearson's chi-square analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was also performed, adjusting for demographics, hospital-specific characteristics, and comorbidities. Results: We identified 1440 patients with DLBCL. Among these, 1100 patients (64.6% male; 70.7% Caucasian, 8.8% African American, 20.5% other ethnicities) received Yescarta, 90 patients (66.7% male; 82.4% Caucasian, 0% African American, 17.7% other ethnicities) received Kymriah and 250 patients (64% male; 82.6% Caucasian, 10.9% African American, 6.5% other ethnicities) received Breyanzi. The incidence of CRS was 52% for Breyanzi, 44.4% for Kymriah and 68.6% for Yescarta, and the difference was statistically significant by chi-square analysis (p = 0.03). This difference remained statistically significant for Kymriah after multivariate analysis [Adjusted Odds ratio (OR) = 0.3, CI 0.1 to 0.9, p=0.032], but not for Breyanzi (Adjusted OR = 0.3, CI 0.1 to 0.9, p=0.032) in comparison to Yescarta. The incidence of ICANS was 16% for Breyanzi, 22.2% for Kymriah, and 33.2% for Yescarta, with a statistically significant difference observed by chi-square analysis (p = 0.05). This difference remained statistically significant for Breyanzi after multivariate analysis [Adjusted OR = 0.3, CI 0.1 to 0.6, p=0.002], but not for Kymriah (Adjusted OR = 0.6, CI 0.1 to 2.9, p=0.551) in comparison to Yescarta. Among cardiovascular events, there was no significant difference in the incidence of acute myocardial infarction (Yescarta vs Kymriah vs Breyanzi, 0.5% vs 0% vs 0.2%, p = 0.487), stroke (0.5% vs 5.6% vs 2%, p = 0.07), cardiogenic shock (0.5% vs 0% vs 0%, p = 0.880), and arrhythmias (20.9% vs 27.8% vs 32%, p = 0.258) among these CAR T-cell therapies. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the incidence of infectious complications, including pneumonia (5.9% vs 5.6% vs 2%, p = 0.510), sepsis (5% vs 5.6% vs 6%, p = 0.962), or septic shock (2.3% vs 0% vs 0%, p = 0.535) among these CAR T-cell therapies. There was no difference in all-cause in-hospital mortality across these therapies (2.3% vs 5.6% vs 2%, p = 0.692). Conclusion: Kymriah showed lower CRS rates and Breyanzi showed lower ICANS rates in comparison to Yescarta in our study. All CAR T-cell therapies have the potential to cause infections and cardiac events, which require monitoring, early identification and prompt treatment. When selecting among various CAR T-cell products, several factors must be considered, including the patient's lymphoma type, prior treatment history, manufacturing turnaround time, cost, availability, and potential short-term and long-term side effects. The limitations of our study include its retrospective nature, reliance on ICD-10 codes to identify patients with adverse events, and the absence of longitudinal data on long-term adverse events. Nevertheless, this study provides essential insights for hematologists regarding the incidence of specific adverse events associated with different CAR T-cell products within the real-world population.