Citations

Abstract Medical imaging is undergoing a transformation driven by the advent of new, highly effective, machine learning techniques paired with increases in computational capabilities (Cheng et al. 2021; Gilson et al. 2023; Almeida et al. 2024; Krishna et al. 2024). These advanced algorithms have the potential to improve disease detection, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment outcomes. However, the complexity of machine learning models, the large amounts of curated and annotated data required by some methods, and the potential for bias and error make it challenging for individuals to safely and effectively leverage these methods (Lin et al. 2024; Guo et al. 2024; Xu et al. 2024; Linguraru et al. 2024; Wood et al. 2019). To address these challenges, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM), American College of Radiology (ACR), Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), and Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine (SIIM) have worked together to develop a syllabus detailing a recommended set of competencies for medical imaging professionals interacting with these systems. This guide is aimed at four different personas: users of AI systems, purchasers of AI systems, individuals who provide clinical expertise during the development of AI systems (“clinical collaborators”), and developers of AI systems.1 This is a syllabus, not a curriculum, and is intentional in this scope. Recognizing that individuals may benefit from different presentations of the same material, this work enumerates a series of relevant competencies but does not prescribe, nor offer, a method of instruction (Schuur, Rezazade Mehrizi, and Ranschaert 2021; Garin et al. 2023). By addressing the task‐specific demands of each role, this guide will enable medical imaging professionals to utilize machine learning systems more safely and effectively, ultimately improving patient care and outcomes.

When encountering diseases of the anterior vitreous and peripheral retina (ie, the “middle segment” of the eye), vitreoretinal (VR) surgeons are specifically trained in surgical techniques for managing the vitreous and visualizing the peripheral retina during anterior vitrectomy, and therefore, they are well equipped to address the complications of surgery involving the anterior vitreous space. This clinical update reviews and compares the current literature discussing techniques and patient outcomes related to complete pars plana vitrectomy versus incomplete, subtotal pars plana vitrectomy, and addresses the proposition of developing an abridged training curriculum for non-VR surgeons to acquire the knowledge and skills required to perform these procedures. Recent studies confirmed that operating in the anterior vitreous carries potential risk of retinal tear, retinal detachment, and other adverse events that may cause vision loss. To mitigate these risks, studies suggest that the use of dedicated visualization equipment and illumination instruments is necessary for surgeons to safely perform anterior vitrectomy and recognize complications, should any occur. Performing VR surgery in the absence of wide-angle viewing systems, endoillumination, careful peripheral examinations, modern vitrectomy platforms, and appropriate training may lead to outcomes that are detrimental to patient safety.

AbstractTo review research on the effectiveness of computer-based auditory training (CBAT) in new adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients.Studies by the primary author on auditory training in new adult CI recipients were reviewed, focusing on a database of auditory training data in >100 patients followed over their first-year post-activation.CBAT, as used in a standard outpatient setting, affords benefits compared to other commonly employed exercises/programs. In new adult CI users, CBAT was associated with greater improvement in CNC words, AzBio sentences, and Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-35 (CIQOL-35) Profile scores at 3 months post-activation compared to CI recipients who did not train or used other resources. By 12 months, patients showed similar improvement in speech recognition scores, regardless of training modality; however, patients who used CBAT continued to show significantly greater improvement in CIQOL global and all domain scores compared to CBAT nonusers. This benefit was noted regardless of whether CBAT was started before or after 3 months post-activation. No demographic/lifestyle factors, audiological measures, or pre-CI CIQOL/CIQOL-Expectations scores were associated with CBAT use.CBAT during the first-year post-activation may contribute to early gains in CI speech recognition and to persistent improvements in functional abilities, as measured via the CIQOL-35 profile, in new implant recipients. Consideration of specific recommendations for the use of CBAT resources may be valuable, given the minimal risk, ease of access, and affordability of these programs.

Background: The impact of multiple substance use on the risk of pancreatitis remains underexplored. Objective: To systematically review peer-reviewed observational studies assessing the association of multiple substance use with the risk of acute pancreatitis (AP) or chronic pancreatitis (CP) in adults. Design: We conducted a systematic review informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guideline. Data sources and methods: EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO were searched up to March 2024. Reference lists of included studies were reviewed. From 5205 records identified, 181 relevant records were evaluated in full text. Studies evaluating the association of ⩾2 substances, including tobacco, alcohol, cannabis, and illicit substances, with AP or CP were included. Data were extracted by one reviewer, with quality control by a second reviewer. Quality assessments were independently conducted by two reviewers, with differences resolved by a third. Results: Of 11 included studies, 6 investigated AP as the outcome and 5 examined CP. Among AP studies, 5 comparing smoking and alcohol to alcohol-only use showed high heterogeneity ( I 2 = 90.9%), with relative risks (RRs) from 1.40 to 11.40. One study examining cannabis and alcohol versus alcohol found a lower risk of AP in cannabis users. Among CP studies, four comparing smoking and alcohol to alcohol-only use were heterogeneous ( I 2 = 81%) with odds ratios 1.21–31.50. Where examined, smoking increases the risk of AP and CP in a dose-dependent fashion. Heavy alcohol users demonstrated a significant increase in CP risk across all smoking categories in one study. Conclusion: Combined alcohol and tobacco use increases pancreatitis risk compared to single substance use, despite heterogeneity in RRs and exposure definitions. Evidence suggests a dose-dependent impact of smoking on pancreatitis risk when added to alcohol. Studies on the impact of a combination of other substance use on pancreatitis risk are needed. Trial registration (PROSPERO): CRD42024503677.

AbstractDocumentation burden contributes to health professional burnout and negatively impacts health professional well-being and patient care quality. Yet, there is a gap in the literature regarding an effective measure to assess the perceived documentation burden of health professionals in a wide range of care settings over time.We developed and administered a pulse survey to trend, with subsequent administrations, the perceived documentation burden of health professionals in all care settings in the United States over time.A multimethods approach was used which included conducting a scoping review of the literature to identify and then curate a set of potential survey items based on scoping review results. Next, a modified Delphi approach was used with clinical informatics experts for consensus-driven item selection and pulse survey development. Finally, we administered the pulse survey nationally using snowball sampling through professional listservs and networks of organizations.The scoping review helped to identify constructs and items to include on the pulse survey. After four iterations of the modified Delphi approach, consensus was reached on five final items for the pulse survey, labeled “TrendBurden.” The first administration of “TrendBurden” was completed by 1,253 healthcare professionals in April 2024. Most respondents (73.26%) disagreed that the time and effort spent documenting patient care is appropriate, with 77.42% reporting finishing work later or needing to work from home due to excessive documentation tasks. Seventy-four point three-eight percent agreed that the effort or time required to complete documentation tasks impedes patient care, and less than one-third (31.76%) agreed that the EHR is easy to use.The “TrendBurden” Pulse Survey was developed through a scoping review of the literature and expert consensus. The resulting five-question pulse survey was administered nationally and provided insight into current perceptions of documentation burden among healthcare professionals.

BACKGROUND: To reduce technical variation in cancer surgery, the Commission on Cancer (CoC) recently implemented 6 operative standards as part of its national cancer center accreditation process. CoC sites are evaluated for compliance with these standards through scheduled visits conducted by trained site reviewers. We characterized site reviewers’ perspectives on the implementation of the operative standards. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty interviews were conducted with CoC site reviewers using a semistructured interview guide based on the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework. Themes were identified using thematic analysis mapped to the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. RESULTS: Site reviewers viewed the operative standards as an effective starting point for improving technical quality and were optimistic the standards would lead to positive change. Compliance was associated with supportive site leadership, effective interdisciplinary communication, and the availability of adequate personnel and institutional resources. In contrast, resistance from surgeons was identified as a key barrier. CoC site reviewers interpret their role as extending beyond assessing compliance, viewing themselves as advocates, educators, and partners to the sites. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, CoC site reviewers perceive the operative standards favorably. To enhance implementation of the operative standards, efforts should focus on modifiable institutional and individual-level factors, such as leadership support and surgeon engagement. Additionally, the multifaceted role of the site reviewers presents a valuable opportunity to improve compliance by formalizing the supportive relationship between reviewers and sites.

Features of new bleeding on conventional imaging in cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) often disappear after several weeks, yet the risk of rebleeding persists long thereafter. Increases in mean lesional quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) ≥ 6% on MRI during 1 year of prospective surveillance have been associated with new symptomatic hemorrhage (SH) during that period. The authors hypothesized that QSM at a single time point reflects features of hemorrhage in the prior year or potential bleeding in the subsequent year. Twenty-eight features were extracted from 265 QSM acquisitions in 120 patients enrolled in a prospective trial readiness project, and machine learning methods examined associations with SH and biomarker bleed (QSM increase ≥ 6%) in prior and subsequent years. QSM features including sum variance, variance, and correlation had lower average values in lesions with SH in the prior year (p < 0.05, false discovery rate corrected). A support-vector machine classifier recurrently selected sum average, mean lesional QSM, sphericity, and margin sharpness features to distinguish biomarker bleeds in the prior year (area under the curve = 0.61, 95% CI 0.52–0.70; p = 0.02). No QSM features were associated with a subsequent bleed. These results provide proof of concept that machine learning may derive features of QSM reflecting prior hemorrhagic activity, meriting further investigation. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT03652181 ( ClinicalTrials.gov )