Citations

67 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality among men and women combined in the United States (US). Although the national screening rate has increased over the years, it remains below the target of 80% recommended by the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable for improved CRC outcomes. In most recent years, and particularly during COVID-19, screening-eligible individuals preferred at-home, non-invasive screening options over invasive tests such as colonoscopy due to convenience and accessibility. The objective of this study was to understand the CRC screening trends over the last two decades, and the impact of various screening modalities on the overall CRC screening rate. Methods: Using National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data from 2005 onwards, we examined CRC screening (colonoscopy, mt-sDNA, FIT/FOBT, and sigmoidoscopy) rates among adults aged 50-75 years. A pseudo-time-series cross-sectional (pseudo TSCS) analysis was conducted including random effects Generalized Least Square (GLS) regression model to estimate the relative impact of each modality on the overall increase in CRC rates from 2018 to 2021. Results: Among 50-75 years old individuals, the estimated CRC screening use increased by 32% from 2005 to 2021 (47.7% to 69.9%). Between 2018 to 2021, the rates increased from 64% to 70%, driven largely by increased use of mt-sDNA, a 62.1% increase from 2018 to 2021 (2.5% to 6.6%). During this time period, colonoscopy utilization increased by 4.4% (61.2% to 64.0%), while FOBT/FIT utilization increased by 3.6% (5.3% to 5.5%). A pseudo-TSCS analysis showed that mt-sDNA contributed substantially to the overall CRC screening rate increase during years 2018-2021 (77.3%; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: While CRC screening rates are increasing, they remain below the national goal of 80%. Mt-sDNA as a home-based, non-invasive screening, recommended at a 3-year interval, has been leveraged to improve overall CRC screening rates, particularly to address the screening backlog created during the COVID-19 pandemic. A collaborative approach between healthcare providers and screening-eligible individuals is needed to empower patients with choice for their CRC screening modality to achieve the national goal.

Septal Myectomy (SM) and Alcohol Septal Ablation (ASA) improve symptoms in patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy with outflow tract obstruction (oHCM). However, outcomes data in this population is predominantly from specialized centers. The National Inpatient Database was queried from 2011 to 2019 for relevant international classification of diseases (ICD)-9 and -10 diagnostic and procedural codes. We compared baseline characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients with oHCM who underwent SM vs ASA. A p-value < 0.001 was considered statistically significant. We identified 15,119 patients with oHCM who underwent septal reduction therapies, of whom 57.4% underwent SM, and 42.6% underwent ASA. Patients who underwent SM had higher all-cause mortality (OR: 1.8 (1.3–2.5)), post-procedure ischemic stroke (OR: 2.3 (1.7–3.2)), acute kidney injury (OR: 1.4 (1.2–1.7)), vascular complications (OR: 3.6 (2.3–5.3)), ventricular septal defect (OR: 4.4 (3.2–6.1)), cardiogenic shock (OR: 1.7 (1.3–2.3)), sepsis (OR: 3.2 (1.9–5.4)), and left bundle branch block (OR: 3.5 (3–4)), compared to ASA. Patients who underwent ASA had higher post-procedure complete heart block (OR: 1.3 (1.1–1.4)), right bundle branch block (OR: 6.3 (5–7.7)), ventricular tachycardia (OR: 2.2 (1.9–2.6)), supraventricular tachycardia (OR: 1.6 (1.4–2)), and more commonly required pacemaker insertion (OR: 1.4 (1.3–1.7)) (p < 0.001 for all) compared to SM. This nationwide analysis evidenced that patients undergoing SM had higher in-hospital mortality and periprocedural complications than ASA; however, those undergoing ASA had more post-procedure conduction abnormalities and pacemaker implantation. The implications of these findings warrant further investigation regarding patient selection strategies for these therapies.

Evaluation of rapidly progressive dementia (RPD) is usually challenging. In most cases, patients progress to dementia in weeks to months, and the differential diagnosis is broad. In this case, a woman in her 60s presented with a 1-month history of episodic vertigo, cognitive decline, ataxia and myoclonus. Cerebrospinal fluid total tau was markedly elevated, which was helpful in establishing the diagnosis and discussing prognosis/end-of-life measures with the patient’s family. This case summarises a stepwise diagnostic approach for patients with RPD and highlights recent literature on biomarkers of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and autoimmune encephalitis.

Objective: Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) has demonstrated success in treating radioresistant disease within the head and neck, owing to its unique physical and radiobiological properties. Construction cost remains prohibitive; a center offering only a horizontal port may bridge this difficulty, but removal of the vertical port may prohibit treatment of disease near critical organs-at-risk. Building a center only containing a horizontal treatment port has been proposed as one method for cost savings. Methods: 20 complex cases of head and neck cancer previously treated with conventional CIRT were retrospectively planned using horizontal-port-only treatment incorporating non-coplanar treatment angles to achieve greater degrees of freedom. These were dosimetrically compared with the previous plans. Results: Comparable D95 coverage of both planning target volume and gross tumor volume with ability to meet organ-at-risk constraints were feasible with horizontal-port-only treatment. Collectively differences were noted in PTV D95, brain stem Dmax, contralateral eye Dmax and V10 Gy (RBE); further qualitative differences were noted on a plan-by-plan basis dependent on disease location. Conclusion: Horizontal-port-only treatment employing non-coplanar angles was feasible for complicated head and neck disease typically treated with CIRT, though careful consideration is necessary on a plan-by-plan basis. Advances in knowledge: It is worth noting that non-coplanar approaches are not typically used with the current treatment gantry and may extend further the difference between horizontal port planning and a gantry-based gold-standard.

No standard treatment paradigm exists for previously irradiated locally recurrent rectal cancer (PILRRC). Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) may improve oncologic outcomes and reduce toxicity compared with combined modality therapy (CMT). Eighty-five patients treated at Institution A with CIRT alone (70.4 Gy/16 fx) and eighty-six at Institution B with CMT (30 Gy/15 fx chemoradiation, resection, intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT)) between 2006 and 2019 were retrospectively compared. Overall survival (OS), pelvic re-recurrence (PR), distant metastasis (DM), or any disease progression (DP) were analyzed with the Kaplan–Meier model, with outcomes compared using the Cox proportional hazards model. Acute and late toxicities were compared, as was the 2-year cost. The median time to follow-up or death was 6.5 years. Median OS in the CIRT and CMT cohorts were 4.5 and 2.6 years, respectively (p ≤ 0.01). No difference was seen in the cumulative incidence of PR (p = 0.17), DM (p = 0.39), or DP (p = 0.19). Lower acute grade ≥ 2 skin and GI/GU toxicity and lower late grade ≥ 2 GU toxicities were associated with CIRT. Higher 2-year cumulative costs were associated with CMT. Oncologic outcomes were similar for patients treated with CIRT or CMT, although patient morbidity and cost were lower with CIRT, and CIRT was associated with longer OS. Prospective comparative studies are needed.

10580 Background: Blood-based tests are an emerging option for non-invasive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening for which the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has proposed coverage every 3 years for average-risk individuals. Analyses with the CRC-AIM microsimulation model demonstrated that triennial screening with blood-based tests with CMS minimum performance often yields inferior outcomes to stool-based CRC screening (fecal immunochemical test [FIT] and multi-target stool DNA [mt-sDNA]). CRC-AIM was used to explore the impact of blood-based screening intervals, using reported performance characteristics from the ECLIPSE study (Guardant Health, Inc.)1, on estimated clinical outcomes vs FIT and mt-sDNA screening. Methods: Outcomes were simulated for average-risk individuals screened between ages 45-75 years. Intervals were set at 1, 2, or 3 years for blood-based, 3 years for mt-sDNA and annually for FIT screening. The blood-based test was modeled at 83% CRC sensitivity, 13% advanced adenoma sensitivity, and 90% specificity. Perfect adherence (100%) was modeled for blood-based tests and real-world adherence rates used for CRC initial screening tests (mt-sDNA=65.6%; FIT=42.6%) and follow-up colonoscopy (mt-sDNA=72.1%; FIT=46.0%). Primary outcomes were life-years gained (LYG) and colonoscopies (COL) per 1000 individuals for blood-based screening compared to mt-sDNA and FIT. As a secondary analysis, estimates were generated with perfect (100%) adherence assumed for initial screening and follow-up colonoscopy for mt-sDNA and FIT as well. Results: Blood-based testing at a 3-year interval with 100% adherence led to 11% fewer LYG than mt-sDNA at RWE adherence (240 vs 270, respectively), and 9% more COL (1402/1000 vs 1288/1000). Meanwhile, blood-based testing at a 1-year interval and perfect adherence (best case scenario) resulted in the lowest LYG per COL ratio across all scenarios (16% more LYG and 87% more COL compared to mt-sDNA at RWE adherence). Blood-based test results showed similar trends when compared to FIT. Conclusions: Outcomes for blood-based screening every 3 years based on reported test performance characteristics and unrealistic perfect adherence demonstrate fewer LYG as compared to either mt-sDNA or FIT. When compared to real-world adherence for mt-sDNA and FIT, blood-based tests with 1- and 2-year intervals and perfect adherence had higher LYG with the tradeoff of a greater number of diagnostic colonoscopies. [Table: see text]

10567 Background: Average-risk screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) is effective and recommended. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force issued grade A and B recommendations for screening ages 50-75 and 45-49, respectively, however the recommendation for the older population (ages 76-85) is grade C (moderate certainty that the net benefit is small). With emerging blood-based CRC screening, we evaluated the benefits of screening the older population with continued multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) or FIT strategies and/or with a modality shift to blood-based tests after age 75. Methods: Using the validated CRC-AIM microsimulation model, triennial mt-sDNA and annual FIT screening (ages 45-75) followed by four strategies for ages 76-85 (no screening, continued mt-sDNA/FIT, or a modality shift to blood-based screening using either CMS criteria [CMS] or recently reported blood test data from the ECLIPSE study1 [BT; Guardant Health, Inc.] were considered. For CMS criteria and BT, CRC sensitivity were set at 74% and 83%; and adenoma sensitivity was set to 20%, and 13%; and CRC specificity was set to 90% for both tests. Real-world (RWE) adherence for initial screening was set to 80% (CMS, BT), 65.6% (mt-sDNA), and 42.6% (FIT). Adherence for follow-up colonoscopy was set to 72.1% (mt-sDNA, CMS, BT) and 46.0% (FIT). Results: Screening among the population aged 45-85 resulted in 281 life years gained (LYG) with continued mt-sDNA as compared to 193 with continued FIT. Furthermore, mt-sDNA reduced CRC mortality by 70% as compared to 49% by FIT (Table). When screening modality was shifted to CMS (76-85 year olds), mt-sDNA/CMS resulted in 279 LYG as compared to 196 for FIT/CMS. CRC incidence was reduced by 59% (mt-sDNA/CMS) as compared to 38% (FIT/CMS), and mortality declined by 69% (mt-sDNA/CMS) as compared to 51% (FIT/CMS). Reductions in disease burden were lower when modality was switched to BT after age 75 due to reduced test performance. Conclusions: Extending CRC screening to the older population with continued mt-sDNA demonstrated the best health outcomes compared to other modalities. A modality shift after age 75 to blood-based testing resulted in greater LYG as compared to no screening, with performance at CMS criteria yielding better results than BT. Therefore, despite inferior performance, blood-based tests may offer a CRC screening option for older patients who are unable to complete stool testing. [Table: see text]