Citations

AbstractBackgroundHuman pegivirus (HPgV) is a single-strand RNA virus belonging to the Flaviviridae. Although no definitive association between HPgV infection and disease has been identified, previous studies have suggested an association of HPgV viremia with risk of lymphomas.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, including 1 cohort study and 14 case-control studies, assessing the association of HPgV viremia with adult lymphomas. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model, overall and by geographic region and lymphoma subtype.ResultsThe overall OR for lymphoma was 2.85 (95% CI, 1.98–4.11), with statistically significantly elevated ORs observed in 8 of 15 studies. There was a small amount of heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 28.9%; Q = 18.27, P = .16), and the funnel plot provided no evidence for publication bias. The strongest association with lymphoma risk was observed for studies from Southern Europe (OR, 5.68 [95% CI, 1.98–16.3]), whereas weaker ORs (with 95% CIs) were observed for studies from North America (2.24 [1.76–2.85]), Northern Europe (2.90 [.45–18.7), and the Middle East (2.51 [.87–7.27]), but all of similar magnitude. Participants with HPgV viremia had statistically significantly increased risks (OR [95% CI]) for developing diffuse large B-cell (3.29 [1.63–6.62]), follicular (3.01 [1.95–4.63]), marginal zone (1.90 [1.13–3.18]), and T-cell (2.11 [1.17–3.89]) lymphomas, while the risk for Hodgkin lymphoma (3.53 [.48–25.9]) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (1.45 [.45–4.66]) were increased but did not achieve statistical significance.ConclusionsThis meta-analysis supports a positive association of HPgV viremia with lymphoma risk, overall and for the major lymphoma subtypes.

Abstract In this month's CME article, an analysis of over 1300 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), Wang et al demonstrate that the approximately 13% of patients with concurrent indolent lymphoma at diagnosis had the same prognosis as those patients with isolated DLBCL.

Background:Predicting early clinical failure in patients with untreated follicular lymphoma (FL) is important but difficult. Lymphoma involvement of extranodal (EN) sites is better detected by FDG‐PET/CT than CT alone, but PET parameters are not part of the usual predictive indices.Aims:We aimed to determine the incidence and patterns of EN and spleen disease, and learn if they were useful in predicting early clinical failure.Methods:PET/CT images from 613 cases of newly diagnosed FL between 2003 – 2016 were retrospectively reviewed for EN and spleen involvement. The location, number, and pattern of EN sites, as well as splenic involvement, were recorded. Associations with outcomes were assessed using event‐free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and early clinical failure at 24 months (EFS24).Results:49% (301/613) of patients had PET/CT‐detected EN involvement, and 28% (171/613) had spleen involvement. Presence of ≥2 EN sites, spleen, bone or soft tissue involvement all predicted failure to achieve EFS24. These factors, as well as pattern of bone involvement by imaging, were predictors of EFS on univariate analysis; presence of ≥2 EN sites and bone involvement pattern were also predictive of OS. In a multivariate analysis with FLIPI‐2 factors, spleen involvement, pattern of bone involvement, and soft tissue involvement independently predicted a lower EFS (Table 1). When the multivariate analysis was performed using PRIMA‐PI factors (marrow and B2 M), the presence of ≥2 EN sites was an adverse independent prognostic factor for OS (HR 2.28; 95% CI 1.01–5.18; p = 0.05).Table 1: Extranodal and spleen involvement by PET/CT as predictors of event‐free survival Summary/Conclusion:Baseline PET/CT identifies EN and spleen sites of disease that can predict early clinical failure in FL. These results, when combined with other factors, may better identify high‐risk patients and guide appropriate therapy.imageimage

Background:Lenalidomide plus rituximab (R2) has established efficacy and a tolerable safety profile in patients with previously untreated and relapsed/refractory (R/R) indolent NHL. This includes patients with marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) who are generally treated in a similar manner to follicular lymphoma (FL).Aims:Primary results for the AUGMENT study in R/R FL grade 1–3a and MZL showed significantly improved progression‐free survival (PFS) for R2 over R/placebo in the overall population and in the subgroup analyses, with the exception of the MZL subgroup. Given the small sample size for MZL patients, post hoc analyses of baseline characteristics and univariate/multivariate analyses of PFS were conducted to examine possible explanations for these results.Methods:The phase III AUGMENT study randomized patients 1:1 to R2 (lenalidomide PO 20 mg/day (d), d1–21/28 X12 cycles plus rituximab IV 375 mg/m2 weekly in cycle 1 and d1 of cycles 2–5) or rituximab‐placebo (R/placebo; same dosing schedule). PFS by 2007 IWG (without PET) was the primary endpoint. Post hoc Cox regression models were used for univariate analysis of one risk factor and multivariate analyses including treatment arm and significant risk factors (P < 0.05) from the univariate analyses.Results:A total of 63/358 (18%) MZL patients were part of the overall study population, including n = 14/16 MALT, n = 9/6 splenic, and n = 8/10 nodal MZL subtypes for respective R2 and R/placebo arms. Numerical differences between treatment arms for baseline demographics and disease characteristics for MZL patients favoring the R/placebo arm were: fewer R2 patients had an ECOG score of 0 (55% R2 vs 72% R/placebo), and more R2 (vs R/placebo) patients were older (≥65 y: 68% vs 59%; ≥70 y: 42% vs 38%), were refractory to the last prior regimen (13% vs 3%), had Ann Arbor stage IV disease at enrollment (65% vs 41%), high‐risk MALT‐IPI score (50% vs 19%), elevated LDH (29% vs 19%), B symptoms (13% vs 3%), and high tumor burden per GELF criteria (65% vs 56%). The most common grade 3/4 AEs for MZL patients receiving R2 vs R/placebo, respectively, were neutropenia (47% vs 16%), pneumonia (3% vs 13%), and leukopenia (10% vs 0). A total of 5 deaths occurred in the R2 arm (most associated with progression of disease; 2 deaths occurred early at 3 and 13 days after randomization [one prior to receiving R2 and one 2 days after treatment initiation]) and 2 in the R/placebo arm. Despite worse prognostic features, best response was improved with R2 (vs R/placebo) with ORR = 65% vs 44% (P = 0.13) and CR = 29% vs 13% (P = 0.13), although neither were statistically significant. Improved response rates did not translate into a survival advantage for R2. Median PFS for MZL patients was 20.2 mo R2 vs 25.2 mo R/placebo (HR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.47–2.13; P = 1.0). Univariate analyses showed that several baseline factors were prognostic for MZL patients (P < 0.05): Ann Arbor stage IV, elevated LDH, and unfit for chemotherapy (Table). Multivariate analyses adjusting for the imbalance in these 3 significant prognostic factors showed an adjusted PFS HR of 0.51 (95% CI, 0.20–1.28) favoring the R2 arm, similar to the PFS HR in the overall population (HR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.34–0.63). The univariate and multivariate analyses suggested that the imbalance in baseline prognostic factors impacted PFS results for MZL patients.Summary/Conclusion:Overall, these findings suggest that the PFS results in MZL patients were negatively impacted by the imbalance in baseline prognostic factors and more aggressive disease in the R2 over the R/placebo arm.image