Citations

In phase 2 of ZUMA-1, a single-arm, multicenter, registrational trial, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy demonstrated durable responses at 2 years in patients with refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Here, we aimed to assess survival and safety in ZUMA-1 after 5 years of follow-up. Eligible adults with refractory LBCL (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, and transformed follicular lymphoma) received lymphodepleting chemotherapy followed by axi-cel infusion targeted at 2×106 cells/kg. Investigator-assessed response, updated survival, safety, and pharmacokinetic outcomes were assessed in treated patients. The objective response rate in the 101 treated patients was 83% (58% complete response rate), and with a median follow-up of 63.1 months, responses were ongoing at data cutoff in 31%. Median overall survival (OS) was 25.8 months and the estimated 5-year OS rate was 42.6%. Disease-specific survival (excluding deaths unrelated to disease progression) estimated at 5 years was 51.0%. No new serious adverse events or deaths related to axi-cel were observed after additional follow-up. Peripheral blood B cells were detectable in all evaluable patients at 3 years with polyclonal B-cell recovery in 91%. Ongoing responses at 60 months were associated with early CAR T-cell expansion. In conclusion, this 5-year follow-up analysis of ZUMA-1 demonstrates sustained overall and disease-specific survival, with no new safety signals in patients with refractory LBCL. Protracted B-cell aplasia was not required for durable responses. These findings support the curative potential of axi-cel in a subset of patients with aggressive B-cell lymphomas. ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02348216

ImportanceThe conflict in Ukraine has forced civilian hospitals with limited trauma and battlefield medicine experience to care for casualties of war, placing significant strain on the health care system. Using the Checklist for Early Recognition and Treatment of Acute Illness and Injury (CERTAIN) program, a multimodal trauma critical care knowledge-exchange platform was created for clinicians practicing in these institutions.ObjectivesTo describe the development and implementation of the CERTAIN for Ukraine program and to evaluate the reach of this intervention, together with participant engagement and satisfaction.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis quality improvement study included clinicians caring for critically ill patients during the ongoing Ukrainian conflict who were part of a community developed using a messaging app. The program was implemented by a group of international trauma and critical care experts in collaboration with critical care leaders from the Shupyk National Healthcare University in Kyiv, Ukraine. This study evaluates data collected from the CERTAIN for Ukraine program from its launch on April 9, 2022, to August 31, 2022.InterventionsThe initiative comprised a longitudinal series of interactive tele-education sessions, a webpage containing the CERTAIN approach and current trauma critical care guidelines translated into Ukrainian and Russian, and a private messaging chat for asynchronous discussion.Main Outcomes and MeasuresParticipant engagement and satisfaction were tracked using multimedia analytics and a post-session survey.ResultsSince program launch, 838 participants have joined the messaging group, and 6 tele-education sessions have been delivered, with 1835 total views. The CERTAIN website has had 3527 visits, mainly from Ukraine (1378 [39%]) and the United States (1060 [30%]). Of the 74 completed postsession surveys, 65 respondents (88%) rated the course content excellent or very good, and 73 (99%) recommended it to others.Conclusions and RelevanceThe findings of this quality improvement study indicate that, using widely available and low-cost platforms, knowledge was shared rapidly and efficiently to a large community of clinicians practicing in a wartime environment with broad-based engagement and a high level of learner satisfaction.

Abstract A quadrupole time‐of‐flight mass spectrometer coupled with a trapped ion mobility spectrometry (timsTOF) operated in parallel accumulation‐serial fragmentation (PASEF) mode has recently emerged as a platform capable of providing four‐dimensional (4D) features comprising of elution time, collision cross section (CCS), mass‐to‐charge ratio, and intensity of peptides. The PASEF mode provides ∼100% ion sampling efficiency both in data‐dependent acquisition (DDA) and data‐independent acquisition (DIA) modes without sacrificing sensitivity. In addition, targeted measurements using PASEF integrated parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) mode have also been described. However, only limited number of studies have used timsTOF for analysis of clinical samples. Although Orbitrap mass spectrometers have been used for biomarker discovery from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in a variety of neurological diseases, these Orbitrap‐derived datasets cannot readily be applied for driving experiments on timsTOF mass spectrometers. We generated a catalog of peptides and proteins in human CSF in DDA mode on a timsTOF mass spectrometer and used these data to build a spectral library. This strategy allowed us to use elution times and ion mobility values from the spectral library to design PRM experiments for quantifying previously discovered biomarkers from CSF samples in Alzheimer's disease. When the same samples were analyzed using a DIA approach combined with a spectral library search, a higher number of proteins were identified than in a library‐free approach. Overall, we have established a spectral library of CSF as a resource and demonstrated its utility for PRM and DIA studies, which should facilitate studies of neurological disorders.

Abstract Checkpoint blockade has improved patient outcome through reinvigorating T cells against cancer. Despite this success, many patients don’t respond, leaving them with few options. Tumors utilize many immunosuppressive mechanisms, including altering the function of innate immune cells. Cancer cells can promote differentiation of macrophages into tolerogenic “M2-like” macrophages, which support tumor growth. Macrophage differentiation by cancer cells is influenced by many receptors, including Siglec-E. Siglec-E binds to α2,8-linked disialic acids, generated by the enzyme ST8Sia6, on O-linked glycoproteins, and functions to inhibit activation of innate immune cells. In some tumor types, higher expression of ST8Sia6 correlates with poorer survival. Therefore, ST8Sia6 overexpressing tumors may engage Siglec-E, leading to immune suppression and accelerating tumor growth. Mice injected with ST8Sia6 overexpressing MC38 and B16-F10 tumors had increased tumor burden, reduced survival and increased M2 macrophage polarization, which suppresses the immune response. This acceleration of tumor growth was abrogated when injected into Siglec-E knockout mice. Thus, the primary function of ST8Sia6 in tumors is an extrinsic alteration of the immune response, rather than an intrinsic effect on cell growth. Similarly, in a spontaneous colon cancer model, ST8Sia6 overexpression in a murine colon cancer model accelerated the development of tumors, decreasing survival to 2.5 months instead of 6 months. The overexpression of ST8Sia6 leads to increased Arg-1 expression by colonic tumor macrophages. Therefore, ST8Sia6 expression in tumors inhibits the immune response to promote tumor growth in a Siglec-E dependent manner.

Abstract The immune responses to anti-PD-1 therapy in cancer patients are not completely defined due to lack of reliable biomarkers that identifies responsive and functional T cells. Bim, a molecule of the Bcl-2 family, was recently identified as a downstream signaling molecule of PD-1 pathway in CD8+ T cells and has both pro-apoptotic and effective roles in CD8 T cells. Our clinical data shown that high level of Bim in CD8+ T cells (before checkpoint blockade) was predictive of response in metastatic melanoma whereas in colorectal cancer, low level of Bim was associated with treatment response. Using co-immunoprecipitation, high resolution microscopy and FRET we identified ANT2 (Adenine Nucleotide Translocase 2, an inner membrane protein of mitochondria) as a protein interacting with Bim. Accordingly, we found CD8+ T cells with low and high mitochondrial potential demonstrated different ANT2/Bim ratio, and high ANT2/Bim ratio fall in effector T cells with low mitochondrial potential but high cytotoxic activity. Given the pro-survival of ANT2, our results indicate that ANT2 may function to balance the pro-apoptotic and effective role of Bim in mitochondria in order to preserve effector T cells before contraction. Understanding the molecular mechanism of Bim and ANT2 interaction in CD8+ T cells may provide a novel marker to identify resilient CD8+ T cells responsive to anti-PD-1 therapy, and predict clinical response to the therapy.

AbstractBackgroundDecisions to transplant organs from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) nucleic acid test‐positive (NAT+) donors must balance risk of donor‐derived transmission events (DDTE) with the scarcity of available organs.MethodsOrgan Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) data were used to compare organ utilization and recipient outcomes between SARS‐CoV‐2 NAT+ and NAT– donors. NAT+ was defined by either a positive upper or lower respiratory tract (LRT) sample within 21 days of procurement. Potential DDTE were adjudicated by OPTN Disease Transmission Advisory Committee.ResultsFrom May 27, 2021 (date of OTPN policy for required LRT testing of lung donors) to January 31, 2022, organs were recovered from 617 NAT+ donors from all OPTN regions and 53 of 57 (93%) organ procurement organizations. NAT+ donors were younger and had higher organ quality scores for kidney and liver. Organ utilization was lower for NAT+ donors compared to NAT– donors. A total of 1241 organs (776 kidneys, 316 livers, 106 hearts, 22 lungs, and 21 other) were transplanted from 514 NAT+ donors compared to 21 946 organs from 8853 NAT– donors. Medical urgency was lower for recipients of NAT+ liver and heart transplants. The median waitlist time was longer for liver recipients of NAT+ donors. The match run sequence number for final acceptor was higher for NAT+ donors for all organ types. Outcomes for hospital length of stay, 30‐day mortality, and 30‐day graft loss were similar for all organ types. No SARS‐CoV‐2 DDTE occurred in this interval.ConclusionsTransplantation of SARS‐CoV‐2 NAT+ donor organs appears safe for short‐term outcomes of death and graft loss and ameliorates the organ shortage. Further study is required to assure comparable longer term outcomes. image

TPS780 Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with a limited number of therapeutic options. One subset of patients (up to 15%) carries germline and/or somatic mutations in homologous recombination repair genes, most notably BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2 amongst others, that confer sensitivity to PARP inhibition. Combinations of PARP inhibitors with anti-PD1 immunotherapy have shown activity in breast and ovarian cancer and have not yet been thoroughly studied in pancreatic cancer. Methods: We designed a single-arm phase 2 investigator-initiated study utilizing the combination of niraparib, a highly selective PARP inhibitor and a dostarlimab, an anti PD1 antibody, in the subset of pancreatic cancer patients with germline or somatic mutations in BRCA1/2, PALB2, BARD1, RAD51C, or RAD51D. Additional inclusion criteria include metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, receipt of a platinum agent in 1st or 2nd line unless contraindicated, and at least 1 but not more than 2 prior lines of systemic therapy not including maintenance. Prior PARP inhibition is allowed, but not immediately prior to enrollment. Exclusion criteria include active unstable autoimmune disease or prior malignancy requiring active treatment within 2 years. Patients are treated with niraparib 200 mg orally once daily on days 1 through 21 of a 21 day cycle. Dostarlimab is administered IV 500 mg every 3 weeks for the 1st 4 cycles and then 1000 mg IV every 6 weeks subsequently. The primary endpoint of the study is the disease control rate at 12 weeks using standard iRECIST criteria. Twenty patients will be enrolled to ensure 19 evaluable. The design has 80% power to detected improvement in disease control rate from 25-50% with significance level of 0.10. Descriptive factors include gene mutated for inclusion, germline/somatic, and platinum refractoriness. Given the size of the study along with genetic heterogeneity there will be no interim analysis. Patients are being enrolled at 3 Mayo clinic sites in Rochester Minnesota, Phoenix Arizona, Jacksonville Florida. To date, 13 patients have been enrolled across all 3 sites. Full accrual is anticipated by early 2023. Correlative studies include genomic characterization of baseline tumors, assessment of immune infiltration of tumor microenvironment, tumor collection for organoid/xenograft, and serial circulating cell-free DNA and immune biomarkers. Trial Identifiers: NCT04493060, Mayo: MC1841. Supported by Glaxo Smith Kline. Clinical trial information: NCT04493060 .

575 Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a lethal hepatobiliary adenocarcinoma with increasing incidence and poor outcomes. Treatment success has been hindered by resistance, and new therapeutic strategies are necessary. The Src-family tyrosine kinase, LCK, activates Yes-associated protein (YAP), a known oncogene in CCA. While YAP has been historically difficult to target, we recently described LCK inhibition as a potential therapeutic option in CCA. We probed the LCK interactome employing biotinylation site identification technology (BioSITe) to discover molecular co-dependencies in the LCK-YAP axis. Methods: LCK-deficient HuCCT1, wild-type HuCCT1, and wild-type RBE cells were transfected with pEF-LCK-TurboID and used to reveal protein-protein interactions. Biotinylated peptides were enriched using anti-biotin antibodies followed by mass spectrometry analysis. Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) was used to confirm interactions between LCK and identified interactors. Phosphoproteome profiling of human CCA tumors and patient derived xenografts was conducted to identify active kinase signatures in CCA. Tyrosine phosphorylated peptides were enriched using anti-phosphotyrosine antibody beads and analyzed by high-resolution mass spectrometery/liquid chromatography. Immunoblot analysis of HuCCT1 and LCK-deficient HuCCT1 cells was used to map the mechanistic interaction between LCK and epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR. Inhibitors of EGFR and LCK, afatinib and NTRC 0652-0, respectively, were tested in vitro on human and murine CCA cell lines. Cell viability was determined with CellTiter-Glo; Calcusyn software was used to determine synergistic drug effects. Results: We discovered intracellular interactors of LCK in CCA using BioSITe. We identified both known and novel LCK interactors, including EGFR. Given that EGFR functions as a molecular driver of tumorigenesis and is increasingly recognized as a biomarker of resistance in a variety of tumors, we performed a phosphoproteomic evaluation of CCA tumors in which activated EGFR was identified by the presence of EGFR-Y1092, Y1197, and Y1172 phosphorylation. EGFR phosphorylation decreased under conditions of genetic LCK knock out and inhibition by NTRC 0652-0. Co-IP confirmed the interaction of EGFR with LCK. EGFR-Y1092 phosphorylation was downregulated with genetic knockout of LCK by immunoblot. Finally, EGFR inhibition was evaluated as a therapeutic strategy utilizing afatinib. Effects on cell viability were noted in both human and murine CCA cells. Afatinib and NTRC 0652-0 demonstrated a synergistic effect in vitro, with calculated combination indices of 0.007 – 0.790. Conclusions: A novel interaction between EGFR and LCK in CCA was identified using an unbiased proximity-dependent biotinylation technique. Dual blockade of LCK and EGFR is synergistic in CCA and may be a viable therapeutic approach for patients.

424 Background: Understanding the impact of anticancer therapies on immune system is critical to successful design and incorporation of immunotherapies. We developed a novel immune monitoring platform that measures the relative amount of circulating effector T cells and antitumor cytotoxicity of circulating immune cells. We previously showed that this assay can differentiate patients’ clinical response to anti-PD-1 therapy. Here, we applied this assay to patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GGEA) who received chemoradiation or chemotherapy-based therapies. Methods: Patients underwent peripheral blood collection at baseline and during follow-up. Levels of circulating effector T cells (CX3CR1+NKG7+/CD3+CD8+) were quantified by flow cytometry using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Antitumor cytotoxicity of circulating immune cells was evaluated by co-culturing CD3/CD28 activated PBMCs with calcein-AM labeled GGEA tumor cells (FLO-1). Antitumor cytotoxicity of individual patients’ PBMCs was calculated based on the amount of calcein released by dead tumor cells. Results: In a pilot study of 8 patients with mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) GGEA, the changes in the frequency of effector T cells appeared to be associated with radiographic response to treatment based on RECIST (3 partial response [PR], 3 stable disease [SD], and 2 progressive disease [PD]). The median interval between sequential blood collections was 64 days and an increase in effector T cells was observed in patients with PD. Antitumor cytotoxicity was evaluated in 4 patients who did not receive targeted therapies or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Two of these patients (a, b) had blood collected at the time of diagnosis (treatment naïve) and after neoadjuvant therapy. One developed pulmonary metastases after chemoradiation while the other had significant tumor shrinkage after chemotherapy. The decrease in antitumor cytotoxicity of PBMCs was less in the patient with PD (-19.4%) than the one with PR (-48.5%). Two patients (c, d) had blood collected twice while receiving the same chemotherapy for metastatic disease (not treatment naïve). The decrease in antitumor cytotoxicity of PBMCs was less in the patient with SD (-0.3%) than the one with PR (-14.5%). Conclusions: We demonstrated the feasibility of using PBMCs to monitor immune response to anticancer therapies. Our data raise the possibility that the amount of circulating effector T cells and antitumor cytotoxicity of PBMCs may be associated with tumor burden in patients with pMMR solid tumors. [Table: see text]

Abstract Seven different anti–PD-1 and PD-L1 mAbs are now widely used in the United States to treat a variety of cancer types, but no clinical trials have compared them directly. Furthermore, because many of these Abs do not cross-react between mouse and human proteins, no preclinical models exist in which to consider these types of questions. Thus, we produced humanized PD-1 and PD-L1 mice in which the extracellular domains of both mouse PD-1 and PD-L1 were replaced with the corresponding human sequences. Using this new model, we sought to compare the strength of the immune response generated by Food and Drug Administration–approved Abs. To do this, we performed an in vivo T cell priming assay in which anti–PD-1/L1 therapies were given at the time of T cell priming against surrogate tumor Ag (OVA), followed by subsequent B16-OVA tumor challenge. Surprisingly, both control and Ab-treated mice formed an equally robust OVA-specific T cell response at the time of priming. Despite this, anti–PD-1/L1-treated mice exhibited significantly better tumor rejection versus controls, with avelumab generating the best protection. To determine what could be mediating this, we identified the increased production of CX3CR1+PD-1+CD8+ cytotoxic T cells in the avelumab-treated mice, the same phenotype of effector T cells known to increase in clinical responders to PD-1/L1 therapy. Thus, our model permits the direct comparison of Food and Drug Administration–approved anti–PD-1/L1 mAbs and further correlates successful tumor rejection with the level of CX3CR1+PD-1+CD8 + T cells, making this model a critical tool for optimizing and better utilizing anti–PD-1/L1 therapeutics.