Citations

Abstract Objectives: Infection with the bacteria Helicobacter pylori has been classified as class one carcinogen associated with increasing susceptibility of gastritis and gastric carcinoma. This study is aiming at investigating the prevalence of H. pylori among colon polyps and colon cancer patients. A descriptive cross-sectional hospital-based study was conducted between February and June 2017. Sixty-nine formalin-fixed paraffin blocks collected from colon polyps and colon cancer patients to detect H. pylori using immunohistochemistry technique. Results: Of the Sixty-nine patients included in the study, 39 (56.5%) males and 30 (43.5%) were females, their age ranged from 21 to 80 years with a mean age of 47.1±19.7. Of the 69 colon polyps and colon cancer patients, 44 (63.8%) were diagnosed as adenocarcinoma, 10 (14.5%) colitis, 15 (21.7%) juvenile polyposis syndrome. The results of immunohistochemistry technique showed the presence of 16 (23.2%) positive patients for H. pylori infection. Of these 16, 13 (81.3%) patients were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma and 3 (18.7%) patients were diagnosed with juvenile polyps. The results of H. pylori detection among the different colon polyps and colon cancer patients were showing a statistically significant association for H. pylori infection and adenocarcinoma, P value 0.028.

Abstract Objectives: infection with the bacteria Helicobacter pylori has been classified as class 1 carcinogen associated with increasing susceptibility of gastritis and gastric carcinoma. This study is aiming at investigating the prevalence of H. pylori in colon polyps and colon cancer lesions. A descriptive cross-sectional hospital-based study was conducted between February and June 2017. Sixty-nine formalin fixed paraffin blocks from colon polyps and colon cancer lesions to detect H. pylori using immunohistochemistry technique.Results: Of the Sixty-nine patients included in the study, 39 (56.5%) males and 30 (43.5%) were females, their age ranged from 21 to 80 years with a mean age of 47.1 ± 19.7. Of the 69 colon polyps and colon cancer cases, 44 (63.8%) were diagnosed as adenocarcinoma, 10 (14.5%) colitis, 15 (21.7%) juvenile polyposis syndrome. The results of immunohistochemistry technique showed the presence of 16 (23.2%) positive patients for H. pylori infection. Of these 16, 13 (81.3%) patients were off those diagnosed with adenocarcinoma and the remaining 3 (18.7%) patients were diagnosed with juvenile polyps. the results of H. pylori detection among the different colon polyps and colon cancer diagnosis was showing a statistically significant association for H. pylori infection and adenocarcinoma, P value 0.028.

8507 Background: The introduction of immunomodulatory agents, proteasome inhibitors, and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has improved outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma (MM), but those with high risk MM (HRMM) have a poor long-term prognosis. To date, no trials have addressed optimal treatment for these patients. Methods: S1211 is a randomized phase II trial (NCT01668719) comparing 8 cycles of lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (RVd) induction followed by dose-attenuated RVd maintenance until disease progression with or without elotuzumab. Stem cell collection was allowed, but ASCT was deferred until progression. HRMM was defined by one of the following: gene expression profiling high-risk (GEPhi), t(14; 16), t(14; 20), del(17p) or amplification 1q21, primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) and elevated serum LDH (> 2X ULN). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end-point, using a one-sided stratified log-rank test at a one-sided significance level of 0.1. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), adverse events (AE), serious adverse events (SAE) and OS. Response was assessed using the IMWG 2009 criteria. Results: S1211 enrolled 103 evaluable patients, RVd n = 54, RVd-Elo n = 49. 75% had ISS II/III, 47% amp1q21, 38% del17p, 12% t(14; 16), 9% GEPhi, 7% pPCL, 5% t(14; 20) and 4% elevated serum LDH (18.5% > 1 feature). With median follow-up of 53 months (mos.), no difference in median PFS was observed [RVd-Elo = 31 mos., RVd = 34 mos.,HR = 0.968 (80% CI = 0.697-1.344), p = 0.449]. No difference in OS was observed [RVd-Elo = 68 mos, RVd = not reached, HR = 1.279 (80% CI: 0.819, 2.000), p-value = 0.478]. 72% pts had > Grade 3 AEs, no differences in the safety profile were observed except >Grade 3 infections (RVd 8%, RVd-Elo 16%), >Grade 3 sensory neuropathy (RVd 8%, RVd-Elo 13%). Conclusions: In the first randomized HRMM study reported to date, the addition of elotuzumab to RVd induction and maintenance did not improve patient outcomes. However, the PFS and OS seen in both arms of the study exceeded the original statistical assumptions and support the role for PI/IMiD combination maintenance therapy for this patient population. The S1211 data will serve as an important benchmark for future HRMM clinical trials. Clinical trial information: NCT01668719 .

8026 Background: CLL progression and CLL-related complications (infections and second malignancies) were the leading cause of death (COD) in a prospective cohort of CLL patients (Strati, BJH 2017). The CLL-IPI integrates major clinical and molecular prognostic factors and stratifies patients into 4 risk groups with distinct prognosis. It is unknown if COD differs according to CLL-IPI risk group in patients with newly diagnosed CLL. Methods: Patients diagnosed with CLL between 1/2000-12/2019 and seen within 1 year of diagnosis were identified from the Mayo Clinic CLL database. Cumulative incidences of cause-specific death were analyzed using Gray’s test, with deaths from different causes treated as competing events and deaths from unknown causes excluded. Results: 1276 patients were included in this study. The median age at diagnosis was 63 years (range 24-92), and 880 (69%) were male. Based on CLL-IPI score, 449 (35%) had low risk disease, 443 (35%) had intermediate risk disease, and 384 (30%) had high/very high risk disease. Median follow-up time for the study was 6 years; 286 deaths occurred. The COD was CLL progression in 99 (35%), infection in 16 (6%), second malignancy in 47 (16%), CLL-unrelated in 59 (21%), and unknown in 65 (23%) patients. The rates of death due to CLL progression were higher (17.3% at 5 years; 30.3% at 10 years) than the rates due to CLL-related complications (5.7% at 5 years; 12.9% at 10 years) or due to CLL-unrelated causes (8.6% at 5 years; 16.9% at 10 years) in the CLL-IPI high/very high risk group, but not the CLL-IPI low or intermediate risk group (Table). A higher CLL-IPI risk group was associated with a higher rate of death due to CLL progression ( P < 0.001), as well as a higher rate of death due to CLL-related complications ( P = 0.013), and CLL-unrelated causes ( P < 0.001). Conclusions: Causes of death in newly diagnosed CLL patients differ according to their CLL-IPI risk group. In patients with high/very high risk CLL, improving CLL disease control with novel agents seems justified. In patients with low/intermediate risk CLL, there should be increased efforts to reverse immune dysfunction to reduce infections and second malignancies. [Table: see text]

e16662 Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a relatively rare malignancy accounting for 3% of gastrointestinal cancers in the US. While multiple risk factors for CCA are established and well-studied, other potential risk factors are still controversial and not well established. Herein, we used a large national database to investigate possible risk factors and associations. Methods: We used the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to review all admissions between 2011 and 2015. We grouped patients based on the presence and absence of CCA using the appropriate ICD-9 codes. We used multivariate logistic regression to assess the association between obesity, alcohol abuse, smoking, diabetes mellitus (DM), and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Results: We reviewed 30,955,295 admissions of which 20,030 had CCA. CCA Patients were older compared to the rest of the patients (mean age 67 years ±12.8 vs. 57±20.6, P < .001) and had less female patients (48% vs 59%, P < .001). Patients’ characteristics are shown in the table. After adjusting for viral hepatitis B (HBV), viral hepatitis C (HCV), liver cirrhosis, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), and bile duct stones, logistic regression showed DM to be proportionately associated with CCA (OR = 1.04, 95%CI[1.01-1.08], P < .001), whereas alcohol, smoking and obesity were all inversely associated with CCA; OR = 0.75, 95%CI [0.69-0.81], P < .001, OR = 0.75, 95%CI [0.71-0.79], P < .001 and OR = 0.71, 95%CI [0.67-0.75], P < .001, respectively. In addition, compared to whites, Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander races were proportionally associated with CCA; OR = 1.27, 95%CI [1.21-1.34], P < .001, and OR = 1.79, 95%CI, [1.67-1.92], P < .001, respectively, while black race was inversely associated with CCA (OR = 0.85, 95%CI [0.81-0.89], P < .001). Conclusions: In our large database study, we found that patients with diagnosis of DM or being from certain minority ethnic groups are associated with increased incidence of CCA. Other factors like alcohol and smoking were associated with decreased incidence of CCA, but those factors may be under reported. This raises the need for further evaluation for these factors and their effect on CCA incidence and outcomes in those specific groups. [Table: see text]

e16059 Background: Anal cancer is an uncommon malignancy accounting for less than 3% of gastrointestinal malignancies in the US. In this large database study, we aimed to re-evaluate the difference in the incidence and mortality trend in both genders. Methods: We used SEER 18 database to study anal cancer cases in the US during 2000-2016. Incidence and mortality rates of anal cancer were calculated by gender and were expressed by 1,000,000 person-years. Annual percent change (APC) was calculated using join point regression software. Results: We reviewed 25,418 patients with anal cancer, of which 61.4% were females. Incidence of anal cancers was 14.375 and 19.427 per 1,000,000 person-years, in males and females, respectively. Incidence rates of anal cancer significantly increased over the study period, but this increase was sharper in females (APC = 2.220%, 95%CI [1.924-2.517], P < .001) when compared to males (APC = 0.915%, 95%CI [0.303-1.531], P = .006). Mortality rates from anal cancer over the study period were 7.425 and 7.532 per 1,000,000 person-years, in males and females, respectively. Overall anal cancer mortality rates did not change between 2000-2009 but started to decrease starting from 2010 and this decrease became sharpest between 2014-2016; APC = -44.905%, 95%CI [-57.572- -28.457], P = .001). Mortality rates followed the same trend in both genders. Conclusions: Anal cancer incidence is increasing with significant increase in the incidence trend is noticed in females compared to males which is a change from the previous trend that was seen from 1973-2000. On the other hand, anal cancer mortality has started to decrease for the first time starting from 2010 with no difference in the mortality trend between males and females. This improvement in mortality rate can be explained by the improvement in early detection rate and possibly improvement in the treatment approach for these high-risk patients.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) involves the infusion of hematopoietic progenitor cells into patients with hematologic disorders with the goal of re-establishing normal hematopoietic and immune function. HCT is classified as autologous or allogeneic based on the origin of hematopoietic cells. Autologous HCT uses the patient’s own cells while allogeneic HCT uses hematopoietic cells from a human leukocyte antigen-compatible donor. Allogeneic HCT is a potentially curative treatment option for patients with certain types of hematologic malignancies, and autologous HCT is primarily used to support patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy. Advances in HCT methods and supportive care in recent decades have led to improved survival after HCT; however, disease relapse and posttransplant complications still commonly occur in both autologous and allogeneic HCT recipients. Allogeneic HCT recipients may also develop acute and/or chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which results in immune-mediated cellular injury of several organs. The NCCN Guidelines for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation focus on recommendations for pretransplant recipient evaluation and the management of GVHD in adult patients with malignant disease.

PURPOSE There is no consensus on the best choice of an alternative donor (umbilical cord blood [UCB], haploidentical, one-antigen mismatched [7/8]–bone marrow [BM], or 7/8-peripheral blood [PB]) for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for patients lacking an HLA-matched related or unrelated donor. METHODS We report composite end points of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)–free relapse-free survival (GRFS) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD)–free relapse-free survival (CRFS) in 2,198 patients who underwent UCB (n = 838), haploidentical (n = 159), 7/8-BM (n = 241), or 7/8-PB (n = 960) HCT. All groups were divided by myeloablative conditioning (MAC) intensity or reduced intensity conditioning (RIC), except haploidentical group in which most received RIC. To account for multiple testing, P < .0071 in multivariable analysis and P < .00025 in direct pairwise comparisons were considered statistically significant. RESULTS In multivariable analysis, haploidentical group had the best GRFS, CRFS, and overall survival (OS). In the direct pairwise comparison of other groups, among those who received MAC, there was no difference in GRFS or CRFS among UCB, 7/8-BM, and 7/8-PB with serotherapy (alemtuzumab or antithymocyte globulin) groups. In contrast, the 7/8-PB without serotherapy group had significantly inferior GRFS, higher cGVHD, and a trend toward worse CRFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.69; P = .002) than the 7/8-BM group and higher cGVHD and trend toward inferior CRFS (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.63; P = .0006) than the UCB group. Among patients with RIC, all groups had significantly inferior GRFS and CRFS compared with the haploidentical group. CONCLUSION Recognizing the limitations of a registry retrospective analysis and the possibility of center selection bias in choosing donors, our data support the use of UCB, 7/8-BM, or 7/8-PB (with serotherapy) grafts for patients undergoing MAC HCT and haploidentical grafts for patients undergoing RIC HCT. The haploidentical group had the best GRFS, CRFS, and OS of all groups.