Citations

Abstract Background: As the development and use of oral anticancer agents increases, it is critical to understand patient adherence to both standard and investigational agents. The open label, phase 3 multicenter PALLAS trial investigates whether adding 2 years of the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib (P) to adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) improves invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) over adjuvant ET alone in patients (pts) with HR- positive, HR2-negative, stage II-III breast cancer. Pts were randomly assigned to either Palbociclib (125 mg/day, 3 weeks on, 1 week off, in a 28-day cycle) plus ongoing provider/patient-choice adjuvant ET (P+ET) versus ET alone. We examined patient-reported adherence to ET +/- P during the first two years of study treatment. Methods: Adherence outcomes were measured in English-speaking pts in the U.S., UK, Ireland and Australia, Spanish-speaking pts in Spain and Mexico, and German-speaking pts in Germany and Austria. Adherence measures included drug diaries completed at each cycle, pill counts (for P only) collected at each study visit, and the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-4 item and the McHorney Adherence Estimator questionnaires completed at cycles 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 (22 months). Mean adherence for each cycle was defined as the average proportion of prescribed pills taken (via drug diary) across all patients who initiated that cycle. Persistence was defined as the duration of drug initiation to treatment cessation (via drug diary). Generalized estimating equations were used to model the “most adherent” pts on the Morisky (score = 5 vs score <5) and “low risk” for adherence problems on the McHorney (score=0 vs score >0) to compare the average difference between arms over time for ET, adjusting for baseline demographic and clinical variables. Results: 81% (N=4688) of PALLAS pts were included in this analysis. Median persistence to ET was 23.6 months in P + ET (n=2169), 23.7 months in ET alone (2136) and 20.4 months for P (n=2194). The number of pts who initiated each cycle for ET declined over time and was similar between arms; the decline was more marked for P (Table 1). Mean adherence range as measured by drug diary was 98.2-99.3% for ET in P+ET and 98.0 - 99.4% in ET alone; and for P, ranged from 93.4 - 98.8%. The adherence and persistence results were nearly identical whether measured by drug diary or pill count for P. The observed percent “most adherent” for P measured by the Morisky scale ranged from 71.9% - 79.6% and the percent “low risk” for adherence problems measured by the McHorney scale, 64.0% - 73.4%. The percent of pts “most adherent” and “low risk” for adherence problems to ET was higher, on average over time, in the P+ET group compared to ET alone (75% vs 68%, p<0.01; 75% vs 72%, p=.05, respectively). Conclusions: Self-reported mean adherence for both P + ET and ET alone was strikingly high for pts who remained on therapy; persistence was also high with ET during the 2-year treatment period. Current analyses suggest that nonadherence to either P or ET was likely not a major contributor to the iDFS results seen in the overall PALLAS trial. These results illustrate the importance of measuring and monitoring patient adherence to oral study agents. Support: AFT, Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02513394) and EudraCT (2014-005181-30). https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org Table 1.Adherence and persistence in PALLAS over the 24 month treatment periodPalbocicilb + ETETPalbociclibETETTreatment cycleMean Adherence (SD)N*Mean Adherence (SD)NMean Adherence (SD)N193.4 (13.8)229098.7 (6.1)230999.0 (5.2)2343294.7 (13.3)218198.8 (6.4)220398.4 (7.1)2206397.4 (10.1)211298.7 (7.3)214298.8 (6.3)2168497.6 (10.2)203598.6 (7.8)211099.0 (5.7)2154597.6 (11.1)197598.3 (7.9)209398.1 (8.3)2148698.1 (8.7)189998.7 (6.6)203798.5 (8.2)2116798.1 (9.3)185599.0 (6.3)201298.6 (7.3)2102898.0 (9.1)181098.2 (8.2)199798.1 (8.2)2092998.4 (7.4)173399.0 (6.4)196298.8 (6.8)20511098.3 (8.6)171499.2 (4.9)194699.0 (5.5)20381198.3 (8.0)169198.5 (7.3)193798.2 (8.2)20311298.7 (6.2)161299.1 (5.3)191098.7 (7.5)19861398.5 (7.7)159698.9 (6.4)189398.8 (7.1)19691497.9 (9.3)157698.4 (7.3)188298.0 (9.1)19611598.5 (6.9)151499.2 (4.6)185499.0 (6.0)19281698.2 (8.7)148699.1 (4.6)183599.1 (5.7)19131798.1 (9.8)147998.3 (7.8)182698.5 (6.4)19031898.7 (6.8)141699.3 (4.1)176899.2 (5.3)18601998.7 (7.3)140899.3 (3.8)175699.4 (3.1)18482098.4 (8.9)139798.9 (5.3)174298.7 (5.8)18382198.5 (7.5)130199.0 (6.1)167698.8 (7.1)17842297.8 (9.7)124698.8 (6.2)164799.2 (5.7)17692398.1 (8.8)118098.2 (8.5)161998.4 (8.0)17552498.8 (7.2)108699.0 (6.3)146898.9 (7.1)16192598.8 (6.7)99699.2 (5.2)143298.8 (7.1)15892697.9 (11.2)84599.1 (5.7)140998.6 (8.8)1578ET=Endocrine therapy * Number of pts who initiated the treatment cycle. Citation Format: Eileen Shinn, David Zahrieh, Angela DeMichele, Nick Zdenkowski, Julie Lemieux, Jun Mao, Vesna Bjelic-Radisic, Michelle Naughton, Georg Pfeiler, Karen Gelmon, Ingrid Mayer, Daniel Egle, Gabriele Zoppoli, Tiffany Traina, Miguel Martin Jiménez, Silvia Antolin Novoa, Tufia Haddad, Arlene Chan, Alistair Edward Ring, Antonio Wolff, Jose JuanPonce Lorenzo, Dhanusha Sabanathan, Hal Burstein, Zbigniew Ireneusz Nowecki, Gunda Pristauz-Telsnigg, Adam Brufsky, Meritxell Bellet-Ezquerra, Theodoros Foukakis, Yelena Novik, Gabor Rubovszky, Karoline Muehlbacher, Otto Metzger, Theodora Goulioti, Ernest Law, Ann Partridge, Lisa Carey, Alex Zoroufy, Dominik Hlauschek, Christian Fesl, Erica Mayer, Michael Gnant. Adherence with adjuvant endocrine therapy with or without Palbociclib in the PALLAS trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-12-01.

Abstract Background: Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) accounts for ~60-70% of all BC cases. CDK4/6i combined with endocrine therapy (ET) is the standard of care for first- and second-line therapy of patients with HR+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) based on substantial improvements in progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival compared to ET alone. Unfortunately, most patients (pts) develop resistance to CDK4/6i. The mechanisms underlying CDK4/6i resistance have not been fully elucidated. Robust in vivo CDK4/6i resistant animal models from pts with de novo and acquired CDK 4/6i resistance are lacking. Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) are important preclinical tools in oncology to advance our understanding of cancer biology and to evaluate drug response phenotypes. Unfortunately, the establishment of sustainable PDXs from pts with HR+ BC is much more difficult than from HR-negative BC. In order to obtain clinically relevant models that can be utilized to better understand mechanisms of primary and acquired resistance to ET and CDK4/6i, we report the development of PDXs from a prospective study in which percutaneous biopsies were obtained from women receiving palbociclib for the treatment of HR+ advanced or MBC (PROMISE; NCT03281902). Methods: PROMISE (Prospective Study to Evaluate the Role of Tumor Sequencing in Women Receiving Palbociclib for Advanced Hormone Receptor (HR)-Positive Breast Cancer) is a prospective trial which enrolled pts with HR+, HER2-negative MBC who planned to start treatment with palbociclib and letrozole (1st line [FL]) or palbociclib and fulvestrant (2nd line [SL]). For pts enrolled at Mayo Clinic Rochester (MCR), serial tumor biopsies were obtained prior to the start of treatment and at disease progression to establish PDXs. Because baseline take rate was low, we amended the protocol to attempt PDX generation after the 2nd cycle (C2) of therapy. Tissues were received within an hour of excision and were orthotopically implanted in the mammary fat pad of 6~8-week-old nonobese diabetic (NOD)/SCID/IL-2g-receptor null (NSG) mice. Tumor growth was defined as tumor volume ≥ 50 mm3. Tumor take rate was defined as percent of patients with development of at least one stably transplantable (passed at least for two generations) xenograft that was pathologically confirmed as BC. Results: Of the 50 pts enrolled at MCR, 37 were FL pts (2 ineligible) and 13 were SL pts (1 ineligible). Fresh tumor samples obtained pre-treatment from 43 eligible pts (32 FL), after C2 from 17 eligible pts (13 FL), and at disease progression from 10 eligible pts (5 FL) were implanted. Tumor growth was seen in at least one mouse from a pre-treatment specimen in 1 (3.1%) FL pt (confirmed BC) and 4 (36.4%) SL pts (2 confirmed BC); from end of C2 specimens in 2 (15.4%) FL pts and 2 (50%) SL pts (1 confirmed BC); and at progression in 1 (20%) FL pt and 2 (40%) SL pts (1 confirmed BC). The take rate from pre-treatment samples among FL pts was 1/32 (3.1%; 95% CI: 0.08-16.2%). Take rates in other groups are pending histological review. Discussion: In pts receiving palbociclib for HR+ MBC, the take rate using a pre-treatment percutaneous biopsy was low (3.1%) in the FL setting. However, higher growth rates were seen in the SL setting. The observation of higher growth rates at the end of C2 and at progression may relate to the activation of G1/S that occurs with withdrawal of palbociclib, and should be further studied. PDX remains a valuable tool for the evaluation of tumor biology and the development of new therapeutics, especially for those models established from pts with palbociclib and ET resistance. Proteogenomic and sequencing studies are ongoing to fully characterize these PDXs. Citation Format: Jia Yu, Vera J. Suman, Jun He, Jason P. Sinnwell, Ann M. Moyer, Bo Qin, Yayun Gu, Huan Zhang, Jodi M. Carter, Krishna R. Kalari, Brendan P. McMenomy, Minetta C. Liu, Tufia C. Haddad, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Fergus J. Couch, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Donald W. Northfelt, Richard Weinshilboum, Ciara O'Sullivan, Matthew P. Goetz, Liewei Wang. Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) generated from hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (BC) before and after cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) treatment: Initial findings from the PROMISE study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-01-07.

Abstract Background: Quality of life (QOL) in breast cancer patients (pts) can be greatly impacted by initial treatment and ongoing therapy, particularly if side effects and symptoms are not well tolerated. The PALLAS trial investigated whether the addition of 2 years of palbociclib (palbo) to adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) improved invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) over adjuvant ET alone. We report on the main patient-reported outcome (PRO) quality of life (QOL) and symptom severity results of this trial by treatment arm. Methods: PALLAS is an ongoing multicenter, open label phase 3 trial that enrolled hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative, stage II-III breast cancer patients at 406 cancer centers across 21 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either 2 years of palbo (125mg/day, 3 weeks on 1 week off) plus ongoing provider or patient-choice adjuvant ET (palbo+ET) versus ongoing ET alone. The primary study endpoint was iDFS. Treatment with palbo in all pts stopped at the time of the second interim analysis (5/2020) due to futility; all pts then moved to follow up. The PRO analyses were triggered for completion after awareness of the pre-specified 469 iDFS cases in November 2020. Eight PRO endpoints were measured serially (i.e., day 1 of each monthly cycle for the first 3 months, then every 3 months for the first 2 years, and once at year 3). The endpoints were the EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status/QOL score, the Brief Fatigue Inventory score, the modified Brief Pain Inventory severity and pain interference scores, the EORTC QLQ-BR23 alopecia score, and the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial hot flash symptoms, vaginal problems, and musculoskeletal pain scores. Linear mixed models compared the average difference between arms across time points during the initial 2-year treatment period adjusting for cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1) PRO scores, demographic and clinical variables. The average differences between arms (palbo+ET vs ET alone) and the two-sided (1-[0.05/8]) x 100% confidence intervals, adjusted for multiple comparisons, were calculated. Analysis of covariance compared the average between-arm differences by endpoint at 3 years. Results: The PRO intention to collect population included 4688 (81%) of the overall trial pts, and was clinically and demographically representative of the remaining 1073 pts. Each analysis population, with measures at C1D1 and at least 1 post-C1D1 assessment for each PRO endpoint, comprised ≥ 89% of the 4688 pts and the proportions were similar between arms. After adjustment for baseline covariates, on average, no clinically important differences between arms were observed for any of the eight endpoints over the 2 year treatment period (Table 1). All effect sizes were below the pre-specified 0.2 threshold. These PRO results were similar at the 3 year time point. Conclusions: No clinically significant differences in either patient-reported QOL or symptom severity were found, on average, between participants in the two PALLAS treatment arms while either taking palbo+ET or ET alone, or after study-wide termination of palbo. In general, the addition of palbociclib in the adjuvant breast cancer setting did not contribute to increased symptom burden within this survivorship population. Further analyses will examine the relationship between PROs and treatment discontinuation by arm and study time point. Support: AFT, Pfizer, https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org Table 1.Results of the Patient-Reported QOL and Symptom Severity Analyses Between the Two Treatment Arms During the First 2 Years of PALLASPRO Endpoint *Palbo + ET Adjusted average score (95% CI)ET alone Adjusted average score (95% CI)Average Difference + (Palbo + ET vs ET alone)[99.38% CI] Clinically ++ Important DifferenceEORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL71.7 (71.2, 72.2)74.0 (73.5, 74.5)-2.3 (-3.3, -1.4)**NoBrief Fatigue Inventory Score2.3 (2.2, 2.3)2.1 (2.0, 2.1)0.2 (0.1, 0.3)NoModified Brief Pain Inventory - Severity Score2.3 (2.2, 2.3)2.4 (2.4, 2.5)-0.2 (-0.3, -0.1)NoModified Brief Pain Inventory - Interference Score1.7 (1.6, 1.7)1.7 (1.6, 1.7)0.0 (-0.1, 0.1)NoEORTC QLQ-BR23 Alopecia1.4 (1.4, 1.4)1.3 (1.3, 1.3)0.1 (0.1, 0.1)NoBreast Cancer Prevention Trial - Hot Flash Symptoms1.2 (1.2, 1.3)1.2 (1.2, 1.3)0.0 (-0.1, 0.1)NoBreast Cancer Prevention Trial - Vaginal Problems0.8 (0.8, 0.8)0.8 (0.7, 0.8)0.0 (0.0, 0.1)NoBreast Cancer Prevention Trial - Musculoskeletal Pain1.2 (1.2, 1.2)1.3 (1.3, 1.3)-0.1 (-0.2, 0.0)No* For the EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL subscale, higher scores indicate better QOL. For all other PRO endpoints, higher scores indicate worse symptom levels. ** The lower bound of the one-sided CI (adjusted for multiple comparisons) was -3.3. Because the lower limit is greater than the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of -3.44, non-inferiority of palbo+ET relative to ET-alone was concluded. The non-inferiority margin corresponds to a 0.2 SD in the EORTC QLQ-C30 global health/QOL score. +The average difference was adjusted for the following baseline covariates: Cycle 1 day 1 score, region (if applicable), age category, first adjuvant ET, race, ethnicity, N-stage, T-stage, histological grade, PgR, prior chemotherapy, ECOG Performance Status. ++Based on each instrument’s published clinically relevant cut-offs, if available. After calculating Cohen’s d treatment effect sizes, (i.e. by dividing the average difference by the ET-alone arm standard deviation from cycle 1 day 1), all effect sizes were below the pre-specified 0.2 threshold, and would not be considered clinically important. Citation Format: Michelle Joy Naughton, David Zahrieh, Michael Gnant, Nicholas Zdenkowski, Julie Lemieux, Jun J Mao, Vesna Bjelic-Radisic, Eileen Shinn, Marija Balic, Christoph Thomssen, Jane Neisel, Manuel Ruiz-Echarri, Sibylle Loibl, Claudine Isaacs, David Cameron, Fernando Manuel Henao Carrasco, Matthew Goetz, Viktor Wette, Gustavo Werutsky, Hope Rugo, Marcus Vetter, Ling-Ming Tseng, Kathy Miller, Florian Fitzal, Juan Miguel Gil Gil, Haeseong Park, Barbro Linderholm, Emilio Bajetta, Zoneddy Dayao, Aleix Prat, Karin Ehrhardt, Otto Metzger, Amal Arahmani, Ernest Law, Ann Partridge, Lisa Carey, Alex Zoroufy, Amylou Dueck, Dominik Hlauschek, Angela DeMichele, Erica Mayer. Quality of life and symptom severity in the PALLAS randomized trial of palbociclib with adjuvant endocrine therapy in early breast cancer (AFT-05) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-10-01.

Abstract Background: Cyclin-dependent 4/6 kinase inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and endocrine therapy (ET) have improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), but endocrine resistance is a major challenge. PROMISE [NCT0281902; n=63] is a multicenter study that enrolled women with HR+ HER2- MBC commencing palbociclib (Pb) with letrozole (1st line [1L]) or fulvestrant (2nd line [2L]), and was designed to perform a comprehensive “omic” assessment of prospectively collected biospecimens (pre-treatment (M1), at 2 months (M2), and at disease progression). The goal is to identify novel genomic variants and pathways associated with resistance to CDK4/6i and ET and PFS outcomes. Here we report the association between the proteomic, metabolomics, and lipidomics data generated from pre-Pb and 2-month serum samples and PFS. Methods: Untargeted mass spectrometry data was generated from Metabolon, assaying 1308 metabolites and 831 lipids. Additionally, 1436 proteins were assayed on the Olink platform. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the univariate hazard ratio (HR) for all features with respect to PFS. The analyses were performed on samples from 45 patients (N=33 1Lwith 9 progression events and 12 2L with 8 progression events), obtained from M1 and M2 timepoints on Pb + ET. Enrichment analysis p-values are calculated using Fisher’s exact test. Results: Proteomics: In the M1 timepoint, 93 and 43 proteins were associated with PFS in the 1L and 2L settings, respectively; inflammation genes were enriched among the 1L setting (p= 0.034); 33 proteins presented HRs ranging between 0.026 and 0.56. The FABP9 protein (HR of 1.98, 95% CI 1.02-3.83) was associated with worse PFS. Conversely, inflammation genes were not observed to be enriched in 2L. In the M2 timepoint, we observed 60 and 21 proteins significantly associated with PFS, but no biological function was enriched in 1L and 2L. Metabolites: In the M1 timepoint, metabolism of the sulfur-containing amino acids (methionine, cysteine, SAM and taurine) were enriched in the 1L setting (p= 0.035, HR range 0.15-0.33); and the branched-chain amino acids (leucine, isoleucine, and valine) were significantly associated with PFS in the 2L setting (p= 0.028, HR range 0.013-0.33). At the M2 timepoint, the amino acids were no longer enriched, but fatty acid metabolism was significantly enriched for both 1L and 2L (p= 0.048 and 0.067, respectively). Pathways involving lipids, amino acids, and xenobiotics were enriched in metabolites related to PFS (p <0.05) for both treatment lines at M1 and M2. Lipidomics: In the M1 timepoint, 10 and 19 lipids were associated with PFS for 1L and 2L, respectively. The most notable lipid associated with worse PFS in the 1L was an 18 carbon phosphatidylinositol, PI(18:1/18:2), (HR 7.34 (CI 1.27-42.50); 8 triglycerides were associated with improved PFS (HR range 0.39 and 0.55). In 2L, the 19 lipids associated with PFS included 12 phosphatidylcholines (enrichment p = 5.6X10-8). In the M2 timepoint, 15 and 8 lipids were significantly associated with PFS for 1L and 2L. An enrichment of phosphatidylinositols was observed in 1L (p= 1.2X10-5); none were observed in the 2L.Future Directions: Networks are being constructed using the proximity scores of the proteins, lipids, and metabolites associated with PFS in M1 and M2 for 1L and 2L. Network similarities and analyses will be conducted.Conclusion: Distinct multi-omic changes identified in serum samples obtained from PROMISE participants M1 and M2 on Pb correlate with disease progression in both 1L and 2L settings. Additionally, validation studies will determine the significance of these findings. Citation Format: Krishna R. Kalari, Kevin J. Thompson, Jason Sinnwell, Xiaojia Tang, Vera J. Suman, Jun He, Seul Kee Byeon, Akhilesh Pandey, Abe Eyman Casey, Peter T. Vedell, Ann M. Moyer, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Donald W. Northfelt, Minetta C. Liu, Tufia C. Haddad, Saranya Chumsri, Prema Peethambaram, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Karthik V. Giridhar, Roberto A. Leon-Ferre, Richard M. Weinshilboum, Liewei Wang, Ciara C. O’ Sullivan, Matthew P. Goetz. Multiomics data reveal novel biomarkers for CDK4/6 resistance [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-01-03.

Abstract Background: Although major advances have been made in the treatment of HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC), the goal of care remains largely palliative, therefore better treatments are needed. Given encouraging preclinical and clinical data, the combination of cyclin dependent 4/6 kinase inhibitors and HER2-directed therapy is further being evaluated in this trial. Trial Design: In this phase I/II multicenter trial, we will determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of abemaciclib (Abem) combined with T-DM1. Three Abem dose levels will be examined, 50 mg, 100 mg and 150 mg. The phase 2 portion of this trial will examine whether PFS is increased with addition of Abem to T-DM1 in two pt cohorts - those with ER+ HER2+ MBC and those with ER-HER2+ MBC. For phase 2, a pre-registration biopsy is required to confirm ER and HER2-status and to determine levels of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes; vimentin (an epithelial-mesenchymal transition marker); and CD8 and FOXP3 expression. Blood samples will be collected pretreatment , at 6 weeks, and at progression for all pts. Eligibility Criteria: Phase I&II: All pts must have HER2+ MBC per ASCO-CAP guidelines and prior treatment with a taxane, trastuzumab and pertuzumab. For the phase Iportion, pts can have measurable or non-measurable disease with no restriction on the number of prior lines of therapy. In the phase II portion, pts must have measurable disease with ≤1-2 prior lines of chemotherapy alone, ≤1 HER2-directed therapy alone, and/or chemotherapy with HER2-directed therapies. There is no limit on prior endocrine therapy. Specific Aims: The primary objective of the phase II trial is to assess whether addition of Abem to T-DM1 increases PFS in one or both patient cohorts. Secondary objectives include an assessment of toxicity, objective response rates and overall survival. Correlative studies will assess the association between baseline TIL levels, vimentin expression, and CD8/FOXP3 expression with PFS. Changes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, CTCs, ctDNA and serum thymidine kinase 1 during the course of treatment will be examined to determine if there is a link with PFS outcomes overall and separately for each cohort. Pharmacogenomic studies will determine if pts with the FCGR3A-158 polymorphism derive less benefit from T-DM1 and have inferior PFS outcomes compared with pts who do not have this polymorphism. Statistical Methods:Phase I: Standard 3+3 design, with dose limiting toxicities as per protocol. Phase II: For each pt cohort, a stratified randomization scheme will be used to assign pts to treatment with liver mets as a stratification factor. For each pt cohort, a stratified log rank test will be used to assess whether PFS is increased with the addition of Abem to T-DM1. A non-binding futility analysis will be applied in each cohort after 58 events in the ER+ HER2+ MBC study cohort and 48 events in the ER- HER2+ MBC study cohort. Present Accrual: 0; target accrual: minimal 120 pts., maximal 140 pts CohortOne-sidedalphaPowerAccrual Period (accrual rate)Follow-up after close of enrollmentPFS with T-DM1PFS with abema and T-DM1Number of eligible patientsER+/HER2+0.100.912 months (5-6 pts per month)12 months12 weeks24 weeks64 (32 per arm)ER-/HER2+0.100.8512 months (3-4 pts per month)12 months6 weeks12 weeks50 (25 pts per arm) Citation Format: Ciara C O Sullivan, Jun He, Vera J Suman, Krishna R Kalari, Roberto A Leon-Ferre, Jose C Villasboas-Bisneto, Pratima Chalasani, Demet Gokalp Yasar, Daniel M Anderson, Philip J Stella, Anthony J Jaslowski, Susan H Tannenbaum, Angela Saverimuthu, Donald Northfelt, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Jodi M Carter, Minetta C Liu, Liewei Wang, Zhenkun Lou, Matthew P Goetz. A phase I/II trial of abemaciclib and T-DM1 in women and men with HER2-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer that has progressed on treatment with a taxane, trastuzumab and pertuzumab (THP) (ACCRU-BR-1801) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-19-05.

Abstract Background: Diagnosis of rare diseases remains a challenge in China. We describe our experience with Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome (BHDS) encountered at a Rare Lung Disease Clinic recently established in China.Methods: After the first patient with BHDS was recognized in 2017, a Rare Lung Disease Clinic with a multidisciplinary team of specialists was established. We retrospectively analyzed the data of consecutive patients with BHDS encountered from inception to December 2021.Results: There were 1, 1, 15, 12 and 21 cases with BHDS diagnosed from year 2017 to 2021, respectively. All 50 patients (34 women) were of Han race with a mean age of 47.3 years. The common manifestations were pulmonary cysts (98%), pneumothorax (54%) and skin lesions (68%). Renal cancer was detected in two patients and renal angiomyolipoma in four other patients. The main presentations leading to diagnosis were pneumothorax (42%), family screening (36%) and lung cysts identified on radiologic imaging (20%). The average delay in diagnosis was 8.3 years, and 4.7 years in patients with only pulmonary cysts. The most frequent pathogenic variant was c.1285del/dup on exon 11 (23%) among 44 patients confirmed by genetic testing. Renal cancer has not been found on follow-up surveillance thus far.Conclusions: There has been increasing number of patients with BHDS recognized in China, facilitated by establishment of a Rare Lung Disease Clinic. Pulmonary cysts and pneumothorax were commonly encountered features, but skin lesions appeared to be more prevalent in Chinese subjects than previously reported in other Asian countries.

Background: There is a paucity of data regarding the association between radiation exposure of heart substructures and the incidence of major coronary events (MCEs) in patients with esophageal cancer (ESOC) undergoing chemoradiation therapy. We studied radiation dosimetric determinants of MCE risk and measured their impact on patient prognosis using a cohort of ESOC patients treated at a single institution. Methods: Between March 2005 and October 2015, 355 ESOC patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy were identified from a prospectively maintained and institutional-regulatory-board-approved clinical database. Dose-distribution parameters of the whole heart, the atria, the ventricles, the left main coronary artery, and three main coronary arteries were extracted for analysis. Results: Within a median follow-up time of 67 months, 14 patients experienced MCEs at a median of 16 months. The incidence of MCEs was significantly associated with the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) receiving ≥30 Gy (V30Gy) (p = 0.048). Patients receiving LAD V30Gy ≥ 10% of volume experienced a higher incidence of MCEs versus the LAD V30Gy < 10% group (p = 0.044). The relative rate of death increased with the left main coronary artery (LMA) mean dose (Gy) (p = 0.002). Furthermore, a mutual promotion effect of hyperlipidemia and RT on MCEs was observed. Conclusion: Radiation dose to coronary substructures is associated with MCEs and overall survival in patients with ESOC. In this study, the doses to these substructures appeared to be better predictors of toxicity outcomes than mean heart dose (MHD) or whole-heart V30Gy. These findings have implications for reducing coronary events through radiation therapy planning.

Abstract Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and reflux esophagitis remain problems after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). This study aimed to elucidate the risk factors and long-term course of reflux esophagitis and symptomatic GERD after POEM. Methods This multicenter cohort study involved 14 high volume centers. Overall, 2905 patients with achalasia-related esophageal motility disorders treated with POEM were analyzed for reflux esophagitis, severe reflux esophagitis (Los Angeles classification C or D), and symptomatic GERD. Results Reflux esophagitis was diagnosed in 1886 patients (64.9 %). Age ≥ 65 years (risk ratio [RR] 0.85), male sex (RR 1.11), posterior myotomy (RR 1.12), esophageal myotomy > 10 cm (RR 1.12), and gastric myotomy > 2 cm (RR 1.17) were independently associated with reflux esophagitis. Severe reflux esophagitis was diagnosed in 219 patients (7.5 %). Age ≥ 65 years (RR 1.72), previous treatments (RR 2.21), Eckardt score ≥ 7 (RR 0.68), sigmoid-type achalasia (RR 1.40), and esophageal myotomy > 10 cm (RR 1.59) were factors associated with severe reflux esophagitis. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were more effective for reflux esophagitis at 5-year follow-up (P = 0.03) than after 1 year (P = 0.08). Symptomatic GERD was present in 458 patients (15.9 %). Symptom duration ≥ 10 years (RR 1.28), achalasia diagnosis (RR 0.68), integrated relaxation pressure ≥ 26 (RR 0.60), and posterior myotomy (RR 0.80) were associated with symptomatic GERD. The incidence of symptomatic GERD was lower at 5-year follow-up compared with that after 1 year (P = 0.04), particularly in PPI users (P < 0.001). Conclusions The incidence of severe reflux esophagitis was low after POEM, but excessive myotomy for older patients with previous treatments should be avoided. Early phase symptomatic GERD is non-acid reflux dependent and the natural course is favorable, basically supporting conservative treatment.