Citations

ABSTRACT Metastatic cancer to the pancreas is uncommon, accounting for only 2%–4% of pancreatic malignancies. Prostate cancer spreading to the pancreas is exceptionally rare. We present 2 cases of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with histologic transformation from adenocarcinoma to neuroendocrine prostate cancer. Both patients developed new pancreatic lesions, in which endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy confirmed the diagnosis. These cases highlight therapy-emergent neuroendocrine prostate cancer with loss of prostate lineage markers (prostate-specific antigen, NKX3.1), positive neuroendocrine markers (synaptophysin, INSM1, chromogranin), very high proliferative indices, and serum marker discordance that can mimic primary pancreatic cancer. These scenarios present a diagnostic challenge with an aggressive and complex nature, requiring multidisciplinary management. With newer therapies and prolonged survival of patients with prostate cancer, clinicians will likely encounter more cases in the future. Gastroenterologists can play a key role in diagnosis and palliative treatment.

Background Outcome selection in regional anesthesia and acute pain research is inconsistent, often lacking patient-centered priorities and validated instruments. We aimed to prioritize key outcomes and propose suitable measurement tools to improve the quality, consistency, and relevance of regional anesthesia research. Methods We conducted a multiround Delphi process, including two electronic voting rounds, a multiday in-person meeting, and a patient panel. Experts and patients evaluated existing and proposed outcomes for importance, validity, and relevance. Outcomes reaching ≥70% agreement were prioritized, and appropriate measurement instruments were identified. Results Thirty-two experts and three patients participated. Across three Delphi rounds, 10 outcomes were prioritized for future regional anesthesia research: seven efficacy outcomes (pain scores; opioid consumption; Brief Pain Inventory; functional outcomes; cognitive function; length of stay; block duration); two multidimensional outcomes (quality of recovery and development of a regional anesthesia-specific quality-of-recovery instrument); one safety outcome (chronic postsurgical pain). Patients prioritized cognitive recovery, function, chronic pain, and pain scores. Conclusions This consensus-based, patient-centered framework defines the core priorities for future regional anesthesia and acute pain research. Future work should focus on developing and validating a regional anesthesia-specific quality-of-recovery instrument, refining multidimensional measures such as functional recovery, cognitive outcomes, and the Brief Pain Inventory, and standardizing the reporting of chronic pain and opioid-related outcomes. Adoption of these priorities will enhance methodological consistency, comparability, and patient relevance in future clinical trials.

Importance Adverse events in otolaryngology–head and neck surgery (OHNS) are inconsistently reported. The Clavien-Dindo Classification has been modified and validated in several surgical subspecialties but has yet to be validated in OHNS. Objective To create and validate a modified Clavien-Dindo Classification for OHNS that reflects the severity and duration of harm for complications experienced by patients undergoing OHNS. Design, Setting, and Participants This is a multicenter survey study of subject matter experts (SMEs) from OHNS subspecialties from academic institutions within the US. A literature review identified publications reporting surgical complications in OHNS in the English language between January 2019 and April 2020. Complications were summarized and used to inform a modified Clavien-Dindo Classification. Feedback from internal SMEs was incorporated. Thirty-five clinical vignettes were created, and an electronic survey was sent to SMEs at outside institutions. Each SME was randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups to evaluate 8 to 9 vignettes. The survey was conducted in September 2023, and data were analyzed from February to May 2024. Exposure Participation in the electronic survey. Main Outcomes and Measures Vignette scores were assessed and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) calculator was used to assess cumulative morbidity. The scale is based on the grading by the Clavien-Dindo Classification and reflects overall morbidity on a scale from 0 (no complication) to 100 (death). Variability of the CCIs between reviewers, the primary outcome, was summarized with the SD. The percentage of reviewers with a high (≥26.2) or low (<26.2) CCI within a vignette was reported. Reliability was summarized using Krippendorff α. Results Of 106 SMEs, 43 (response rate, 40.6%) completed at least 1 vignette. Eighteen of 35 vignettes (51.4%; 95% CI, 34.9%-68.0%) had unanimous high CCI, and 8 of 35 vignettes (22.9%; 95% CI, 8.9%-36.8%) had unanimous low CCI (overall categorical agreement, 74.3%; 95% CI, 59.8%-88.8%). On average, the Krippendorff α was 0.74, indicating moderate reliability. A total of 21 850 OHNS complications were reviewed and categorized as surgical or medical with 12 including subcategorization for specificity. Each category was then assigned a modified OHNS Clavien Dindo classification grade. Conclusions and Relevance In this survey study of OHNS experts, a modified OHNS Clavien-Dindo Classification was developed and validated using case vignettes. The modified Clavien-Dindo Classification provided a granular subcategorization for each complication category and grade, duration of harm, and an overall summary complication score (CCI). Results suggest the modified OHNS Clavien-Dindo Classification reliably differentiated between high-grade and low-grade OHNS complications and could be utilized for assessing surgical outcomes.

ABSTRACT Background The impact of psychosocial health and socioeconomic status (SES) on long‐term lung transplant survival remains unclear. Methods We conducted a single‐center, retrospective 2:1 matched case‐control study of adult lung transplant recipients (1999–2019). Cases survived ≥6 years post‐transplant; controls survived <6 years. Matching was based on transplant year (±5 years) and indication. Psychosocial health and SES were assessed using the Psychosocial Assessment of Candidates for Transplant (PACT) score, Mayo Clinic Housing‐Based Socioeconomic Status (HOUSES) index, and Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Secondary covariates included insurance, marital status, employment, caregiver relationship, and proximity to the transplant center. Conditional logistic regression adjusted for age and gender was used. Results Among 189 patients (63 cases, 126 controls), PACT score, HOUSES index, and ADI were not significantly associated with long‐term survival. Patients with non‐family caregivers had lower odds of survival compared to those with a spouse or partner (OR = 0.16, p = 0.022). Regional residents had lower odds of long‐term survival compared to local recipients (OR = 0.55, p = 0.001). Conclusions Pre‐transplant psychosocial and SES measures were not significantly associated with long‐term survival. Caregiver relationships and geographic proximity may have a greater impact on outcomes, highlighting the importance of support systems and access to care.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) can be described relative to biomarker positivity onset time. METHODS We estimated time from amyloid positivity (A+) using sampled iterative local approximation (SILA) in a longitudinal autosomal dominant AD (ADAD) sample ( N = 379) with amyloid positron emission tomography. We compared (1) predicted age at A+ to imputed age, (2) estimated age at A+ to estimated age at symptom onset, and (3) variance in cognitive performance explained. RESULTS Mean error between imputed and SILA‐estimated age at A+ ( N = 26) was 1.15 years. Age at A+ explained 39% of estimated years to symptom onset (EYO) variance. Time from A+ explained 19% of cognitive composite variance and 14% of Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes CDR‐SB variance; EYO explained 43% and 57%, respectively. DISCUSSION SILA estimates A+ age in ADAD with reasonably good accuracy. SILA‐estimated time from A+ describes the start of pathology, but the time from A+ onset to symptoms is variable in ADAD and better described by EYO. Highlights Amyloid chronicity predicts a 14‐year preclinical AD phase in ADAD. SILA accurately estimates age at A+ (MAE < 2 years). EYO outperforms chronicity in predicting symptom onset. APP mutation carriers show atypical amyloid accumulation. Chronicity models help reveal AD heterogeneity in preclinical stages.

ABSTRACT Suicidality contributes substantially to global morbidity and mortality, yet despite its heritability, its biological etiology remains largely elusive. We conducted multi-ancestry genome-wide association study meta-analyses of suicidal ideation (259,747 cases), suicide attempt (64,993 cases), suicide death (9,197 cases), and suicidal behavior (suicide attempt/ death, 75,300 cases), across 54 cohorts (e.g., the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Million Veteran Program, UK Biobank). We identified 77 significant loci across meta-analyses, including 59 previously unreported for suicidality. SNP-based heritability ranged from 2.0-6.7% and there were strong, yet incomplete, genetic correlations between suicidality phenotypes (0.70-0.88). Fine-mapping prioritized putative causal SNPs and 20 credible genes. Enrichment analyses implicated synaptic pathways and neuronal populations predominantly in subcortical brain regions (e.g., amygdala excitatory, medium spiny, hippocampal CA1-3). Together, these findings establish suicidality as a polygenic set of traits with both shared and distinct genetic influences, providing a foundation for future studies of suicide biology and etiology.

Abstract Disclosure: R.J. Auchus: Has been involved in contracted research with companies such as Neurocrine Biosciences/Neurocrine UK, LTD, Spruce Biosciences, Corcept Therapeutics, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Recordati Rare Diseases, Adrenas Therapeutics, and Mineralys Pharmaceuticals, Served as consultant for organizations like Quest Diagnostics, Corcept Therapeutics, Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Neurocrine Biosciences/Neurocrine UK, LTD, Recordati Rare Diseases, H Lundbeck A/S, Sparrow Pharmaceuticals, Astellas Pharmaceuticals, and Acerand Therapeutics. O. Hamidi: Advisory board member for Neurocrine Biosciences, Corcept Therapeutics, Recordati Rare Diseases, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Camurus, Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Educational speaking engagement with Recordati Rare Diseases. I. Bancos: None. K. Saag: Recieved grants or contracts from Amgen, Arthrosi, Horizon, LG Pharma, Radius, and Olatec, Received consulting fees from Amgen, Anthrosi, Atom Bioscience, Horizon, LG Pharma, Angitia, and Gruenthal. H. Falhammar: None. U. Srirangalingam: Consulting fees from Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Diurnal Ltd and H Lundbeck A/S. M. Calanchini: None. E. Jen: Full-time employee of Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. V.H. Lin: Full-time employee of Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. J. Sturgeon: Full-time employee of Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. J.L. Chan: Full-time employee of Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. Background: Crinecerfont, a corticotropin releasing factor type 1 receptor (CRF1) antagonist, is a first-in-class medication that is FDA-approved for adjunctive treatment to glucocorticoid (GC) replacement to control androgens in patients with classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH). In the Phase 3 CAHtalyst™ Adult study (NCT04490915), crinecerfont (100 mg BID) significantly reduced adrenal androgens, enabling substantial GC dose reductions from Day 1 baseline (BL) at the end of double-blind placebo-controlled (DBPC) treatment at Week 24, with a least-squares (LS) mean percent change of -27.3% vs. -10.3% for placebo (LS mean difference [LSMD] -17.0%, P&lt;0.0001). At the end of open-label (OL) treatment at Month 12, mean percent decreases from BL in GC dose were -24.6% in participants who continued on crinecerfont (CFT/CFT) and -29.7% in those who switched from placebo (PBO/CFT). Objective: To evaluate clinical outcomes in adults with CAH who received up to 1 year of crinecerfont, in the context of substantial GC dose reductions. Methods: Outcomes related to excess adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)/androgens (e.g., hirsutism in female participants) and GC exposure (e.g., body mass index [BMI], insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia) were analyzed at the end of DBPC treatment (Week 24) and the end of OL treatment (Month 12). DBPC outcomes with P-values are presented as LS mean changes with LSMD. Results: In female participants, mean hirsutism visual analog scale scores (out of 0 [no symptoms] to 100 [very severe symptoms]) were 40.6 (crinecerfont) and 37.4 (placebo) at BL. Changes from BL at end of DBPC (Week 24) and OL (Month 12) were: Week 24 (-9.8 for crinecerfont [n=58] vs -2.8 placebo [n=27], LSMD -7.0, P=0.1564); Month 12 (-11.5 CFT/CFT [n=56], -12.9 PBO/CFT [n=27]). Mean BMI at BL was 30.1 kg/m2 (crinecerfont) and 29.0 kg/m2 (placebo). Changes from BL were: at Week 24 (-0.4 vs. -0.02 for crinecerfont [n=118] vs. placebo [n=57], LSMD -0.40, P=0.1068); at Month 12 (-0.8 CFT/CFT [n=114], -0.4 PBO/CFT [n=56]). Mean homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance values were high at BL (crinecerfont 3.2, placebo 3.0). Changes from BL were: at Week 24 (-0.6 vs. -0.4 for crinecerfont [n=61] vs placebo [n=29], LSMD -0.29, P=0.3454); at Month 12 (-0.5 CFT/CFT [n=107], -0.9 PBO/CFT [n=54]). Mean values for cholesterol (total, LDL, and HDL) and triglycerides were within normal range or near optimal at BL and remained stable. Conclusion: Adults with CAH who received up to 1 year of crinecerfont continued to show improvements in BMI and insulin resistance, as expected with lower GC doses. Moreover, despite substantial GC dose reductions, hirsutism in female participants improved with crinecerfont. Given the known adverse effects of ACTH/androgen excess and chronic supraphysiologic GC exposure, these results represent a promising therapeutic advancement in CAH. Presentation: Sunday, July 13, 2025

Abstract The Patient‐Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO‐CTCAE) was developed by the US National Cancer Institute to allow patients to directly report their side effects, enhancing the accuracy and patient‐centeredness of cancer clinical trial adverse event reporting. Clinician‐based reporting often misses the full range of patient symptoms, resulting in underreporting of side effects. The selection of adverse events for patient reporting must be defined in advance and consistently applied across all study arms. Investigators can use core symptom sets, including diarrhea, fatigue, and nausea, alongside tailored items specific to the treatments being studied. PRO‐CTCAE has demonstrated similar scores across electronic, paper‐based, and automated telephone administration methods. PRO‐CTCAE administration typically occurs before start of treatment and regularly throughout treatment, with the administration frequency tailored to the expected trajectory of side effects. Ensuring high survey completion rates is essential for PRO‐CTCAE success. Standard reporting can include tabular reporting of the proportion of patients with any (score ≥1) and high (score ≥3) levels of symptoms at the individual item level. A baseline‐adjustment approach should be applied to account for symptoms before start of treatment to isolate treatment‐emergent adverse events. The distribution of PRO‐CTCAE scores at each time point can be visualized using stacked bar charts. PRO‐CTCAE integration into cancer clinical trials is crucial for capturing a comprehensive range of treatment‐related symptomatic adverse events and improving the evaluation of therapy tolerability. Ongoing research continues to refine its implementation, supported by regulatory guidance.

Introduction The rapidly growing population of older adults (individuals aged 65 years and older) presents a new set of challenges for healthcare providers in the emergency department (ED), given the prevalence of severe and life-threatening conditions among this group, such as chronic cancer, Alzheimer’s disease/dementia and congestive heart failure. ED encounters often represent a critical point in an older patient’s trajectory of care and can thus be an important opportunity for various interventions such as palliative care consultation. Therefore, identifying those who will benefit most from palliative care is of high importance, especially in determining the course of future treatment. Thus, we aim to conduct a systematic review assessing the efficacy of palliative care screening in the ED by assessing inpatient length of stay as the primary outcome and quality of life, percentage of hospitalisation and cost of care as secondary outcomes. Methods This study will use Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, EBSCO CINAHL, Web of Science and Cochrane as databases. The study population comprises adults aged 60 years and older, with no focus on any specific clinical specialty or disease. Patients who have not received palliative care screening will serve as the comparator. Only studies with an applicable comparator will be considered. Studies published from 1 January 2000 to 1 July 2025 will be included. All articles will be reviewed independently and in duplicate, and every author will participate in the review, data abstraction and conflict resolution process. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required as it is a protocol for a systematic review. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. PROSPERO registration number CRD42024562389.

Abstract Purpose: The role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) remains unclear in hormone receptor (HR)–positive/HER2-negative breast cancer, particularly in young patients, whose immune microenvironment could be altered by age-related host and tumor differences. Experimental Design: Patients with stage I to III HR-positive/HER2-negative tumors were identified from a prospective cohort study of patients with breast cancer diagnosed at age ≤40 years. Multiplexed immunofluorescence and semiautomated quantitative software measured cytotoxic T, non–CD8 T, T regulatory, exhausted T, and PDL1+ cells in stroma and tumor. Univariate analyses assessed differences in clinicopathologic characteristics by high versus low immune infiltration, divided based on median. TIL subtypes were evaluated as a continuous variable per 10% increase in Cox regression analyses for invasive breast cancer–free survival, distant disease–free survival (DDFS), and overall survival, adjusted for clinicopathologic parameters. Results: Among 390 patients, high immune infiltration was associated with increasing age, Black race, grade 3 tumors, and metaplastic or micropapillary histologic subtypes. Over a median follow-up of 8 years, higher stromal and intratumoral non–CD8 T-cell infiltration, T regulatory–cell infiltration, and PDL1 expression were associated with improved invasive breast cancer–free survival. Higher intratumoral non–CD8 T-cell infiltration, T regulatory–cell infiltration, and PDL1 expression were associated with improved DDFS; higher stromal PDL1 expression was also associated with improved DDFS. Higher intratumoral cytotoxic T-cell infiltration and PDL1 expression were associated with improved overall survival. Conclusions: Characterization of immune subpopulations could help refine the prognostic value of TILs in young patients with HR-positive breast cancer, who may benefit from risk stratification for treatment individualization. See related commentary by Salgado and Kok, p. 2133