Heng, Yujing J.

Abstract The INFORM trial (NCT01670500) was a randomized, two-arm Phase II neoadjuvant study comparing the efficacy of a platinum-based regimen (cisplatin) versus an anthracycline (AC)-based regimen in participants with germline BRCA1/2 mutations and early-stage, HER2-negative breast cancer. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are emerging as promising non-invasive biomarkers for disease detection and treatment monitoring. The initial aim of this study was to evaluate whether pretreatment plasma miRNA profiles were associated with treatment outcomes in the INFORM trial cohort. Pretreatment plasma samples from 97 INFORM participants (n=53 cisplatin and n=44 AC) were screened for 352 miRNAs commonly implicated in cancer using the qPCR-based ID3EALTM Cancer Panel. Twenty out of 53 participants achieved residual cancer burden (RCB) score of 0 or 1 with cisplatin and 20/44 with AC. Higher plasma miR-362-3p expression was associated with a favorable response to cisplatin (1.7-fold; p<0.01), but not to AC. MiR-362-3p expression in paired pretreatment tumor biopsies (n=79) did not significantly correlate with plasma expression and was not associated with RCB 0/1 (p>0.05). In TCGA, miR-362-3p expression was higher in breast tumors than in adjacent normal tissue, and higher in triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs) compared with hormone receptor-positive tumors (both FDR<0.001), independent of BRCA mutation or Single Base Substitution Signature 3 (SBS3) status. The miR-362-3p findings in INFORM did not replicate in a sister trial, TBCRC 030 (NCT01982448; 11 out of 46 cisplatin-treated patients achieved RCB 0/1, p=0.46). These results suggest that while miR-362-3p is unsuitable as a circulating biomarker for cisplatin response, it may play an important biological role in mediating cisplatin sensitivity in TNBCs, independent of BRCA1/2 mutations. Functional studies demonstrated that miR-362-3p is expressed and secreted by TNBC cell lines, operates as a tumor suppressor, and generally correlates with cisplatin sensitivity. Overexpression of miR-362-3p rendered MDA-MB-231 and CAL-51 cells cisplatin sensitive, while knockdown induced resistance in MDA-MB-436 cells. Ongoing studies are testing whether these effects translate in xenograft models. In silico and functional assays identified BCLAF1, a DNA damage response (DDR) regulator, as a direct target of miR-362-3p. Overexpression of miR-362-3p suppresses BCLAF1 mRNA and protein levels. Our findings demonstrate that miR-362-3p enhances cisplatin responsiveness by targeting BCLAF1. A miR-362-3p-based therapeutic may be useful as a co-agent to enhance tumor responses to platinum-based chemotherapy. Citation Format: Zhaoji Liu, Shizhong Ke, Xiaohui Li, Catherine Wu, Madison M. Uyemura, Brian R. Sardella, Erica S. Massicott, Lin Wang, Emily K. Aronson, Dimitra Karagkouni, Nikolas Kalavros, Ioannis S. Vlachos, Felipe Batalini, Cristina S. Bogsan, Jit Kong Cheong, Lihan Zhou, He Cheng, Phillip Munson, Erica L. Mayer, Judy E. Garber, Stuart J. Schnitt, Nadine M. Tung, Andrea L. Kasinski, Frank J. Slack, Gerburg M. Wulf, Yujing J. Heng. MiR-362-3p enhances platinum response in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 7903.

Abstract Platinum-based chemotherapy remains a cornerstone of treatment for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), yet the molecular determinants governing platinum response remain poorly defined. By leveraging the randomized Phase II INFORM trial, which compared neoadjuvant cisplatin to anthracycline-based therapy in BRCA1/2 -mutant breast cancer—we identified miR-362-3p as a specific regulator of cisplatin sensitivity. Higher plasma miR-362-3p expression was exclusively associated with favorable clinical outcome in the cisplatin arm, with no association observed in the AC arm, decoupling platinum-specific vulnerability from general chemotherapy response. We used gain- and loss-of-function TNBC models to establish that miR-362-3p functions as a potent sensitizer to cisplatin in vitro and in vivo . Integrated TCGA analysis and experimental validation identified BCLAF1, a key regulator of DNA damage response, as a direct repression target of miR-362-3p. We uncovered a novel role for the miR-362-3p/ BCLAF1 axis in overcoming platinum resistance in TNBC.

Abstract Purpose: The role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) remains unclear in hormone receptor (HR)–positive/HER2-negative breast cancer, particularly in young patients, whose immune microenvironment could be altered by age-related host and tumor differences. Experimental Design: Patients with stage I to III HR-positive/HER2-negative tumors were identified from a prospective cohort study of patients with breast cancer diagnosed at age ≤40 years. Multiplexed immunofluorescence and semiautomated quantitative software measured cytotoxic T, non–CD8 T, T regulatory, exhausted T, and PDL1+ cells in stroma and tumor. Univariate analyses assessed differences in clinicopathologic characteristics by high versus low immune infiltration, divided based on median. TIL subtypes were evaluated as a continuous variable per 10% increase in Cox regression analyses for invasive breast cancer–free survival, distant disease–free survival (DDFS), and overall survival, adjusted for clinicopathologic parameters. Results: Among 390 patients, high immune infiltration was associated with increasing age, Black race, grade 3 tumors, and metaplastic or micropapillary histologic subtypes. Over a median follow-up of 8 years, higher stromal and intratumoral non–CD8 T-cell infiltration, T regulatory–cell infiltration, and PDL1 expression were associated with improved invasive breast cancer–free survival. Higher intratumoral non–CD8 T-cell infiltration, T regulatory–cell infiltration, and PDL1 expression were associated with improved DDFS; higher stromal PDL1 expression was also associated with improved DDFS. Higher intratumoral cytotoxic T-cell infiltration and PDL1 expression were associated with improved overall survival. Conclusions: Characterization of immune subpopulations could help refine the prognostic value of TILs in young patients with HR-positive breast cancer, who may benefit from risk stratification for treatment individualization. See related commentary by Salgado and Kok, p. 2133

Abstract Background: Understanding the molecular influence of epidemiological risk factors can provide insights into breast cancer etiology and progression, and lead to better prevention efforts and treatment guidelines. The link between modifiable breast cancer risk factors and tumor genomic alterations remains unexplored. This study evaluated the association of tobacco use and alcohol consumption with somatic copy number variation (SCNV), total somatic mutation burden (TSMB), seven single base substitution (SBS) signatures (SBS1, SBS2, SBS3, SBS5, SBS13, SBS29, and SBS30) (1-3), and nine breast cancer driver mutations (CDH1, GATA3, KMT2C, MAP2K4, MAP3K1, NCOR1, PIK3CA, RUNX1, and TP53) (4,5), in a subset of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Method: Clinical and genomic data were retrieved from the TCGA database, and breast cancer risk factor information was collected from four TCGA sites; in all, 219 female breast cancer cases were included. Pre-diagnostic tobacco use was defined as never or ever; alcohol consumption was defined as drinkers or non-drinkers. Total SCNV was obtained by summing all segments with ≥|0.2|. TSMB was calculated by summing all significant mutations for each case. SBS signatures were computed using whole exome sequencing data. Analyses were conducted in all tumors (i.e., pooled) and by stratifying according to estrogen receptor (ER) status using multivariate regression, adjusting for co-variables. Results: Tobacco users had higher TSMB compared to non-users (p<0.05 all tumors). Alcohol drinkers had higher SCNV compared to non-drinkers (p<0.05 all tumors and among ER+ tumors). Tobacco use was not associated with any SBS signature. SBS3 signature (defective homologous recombination-based repair) was exclusively found in alcohol drinkers with ER- disease. No breast cancer driver mutation was associated with tobacco use or alcohol consumption. Conclusion: This study provides preliminary evidence that tobacco use and alcohol consumption can influence breast tumor biology, in particular, DNA alterations. Future larger epidemiological studies are required to confirm these findings. References 1. Vineis P, et al. Mutational signatures associated with tobacco smoking in human cancer. Science. 2016;354(6312):618-22. 2. Alexandrov LB, et al. Clock-like mutational processes in human somatic cells. Nat Genet. 2015;47(12):1402-7. 3. Petljak M, Alexandrov LB. Understanding mutagenesis through delineation of mutational signatures in human cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2016;37(6):531-40. 4. Heng YJ, et al. The molecular basis of breast cancer pathologic phenotypes. J Pathol. 2017 Nov;241(3):375-91. 5. Ciriello G, et al. Comprehensive Molecular Portraits of Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer. Cell. 2015 Oct 10;163(2):506-19. Citation Format: Yujing J Heng, Susan E Hankinson, Jun Wang, Ludmil B Alexandrov, Christine B Ambrosone, Victor Piana de Andrade, Adam M Brufsky, Fergus J Couch, Tari A King, Francesmary Modugno, Celine M Vachon, A. Heather Eliassen, Rulla M Tamimi, Peter Kraft. Tobacco use, alcohol consumption, and breast cancer somatic genomic alterations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-08-07.

Abstract Background: The link between modifiable breast cancer risk factors and tumor genomic alterations remains largely unexplored. We evaluated the association of prediagnostic body mass index (BMI), cigarette smoking, and alcohol consumption with somatic copy number variation (SCNV), total somatic mutation burden (TSMB), seven single base substitution (SBS) signatures (SBS1, SBS2, SBS3, SBS5, SBS13, SBS29, and SBS30), and nine driver mutations (CDH1, GATA3, KMT2C, MAP2K4, MAP3K1, NCOR1, PIK3CA, RUNX1, and TP53) in a subset of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Methods: Clinical and genomic data were retrieved from the TCGA database. Risk factor information was collected from four TCGA sites (n = 219 women), including BMI (1 year before diagnosis), cigarette smoking (smokers/nonsmokers), and alcohol consumption (current drinkers/nondrinkers). Multivariable regression analyses were conducted in all tumors and stratified according to estrogen receptor (ER) status. Results: Increasing BMI was associated with increasing SCNV in all women (P = 0.039) and among women with ER− tumors (P = 0.031). Smokers had higher SCNV and TSMB versus nonsmokers (P < 0.05 all women). Alcohol drinkers had higher SCNV versus nondrinkers (P < 0.05 all women and among women with ER+ tumors). SBS3 (defective homologous recombination-based repair) was exclusively found in alcohol drinkers with ER− disease. GATA3 mutation was more likely to occur in women with higher BMI. No association was significant after multiple testing correction. Conclusions: This study provides preliminary evidence that BMI, cigarette smoking, and alcohol consumption can influence breast tumor biology, in particular, DNA alterations. Impact: This study demonstrates a link between modifiable breast cancer risk factors and tumor genomic alterations.