Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

567 citation(s) found for "Szőke, Anita".

Complications after thigh sarcoma resection
Elswick, Sarah M. , Curiel, Daniel , Akhavan, Arya , Molinar, Vanessa E., Mohan, Anita T. , Sim, F H, Martinez‐Jorge, Jorys, Saint‐Cyr, Michel, Curiel, Daniel A , Wu, Peter , Sim, Frank H, Martinez-Jorge, Jorys

Journal of Surgical Oncology | February 5, 2020 | Volume: 121 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 945-951

10.1002/jso.25830 | PMID 32020627 Get It

AbstractBackground and ObjectivesStandard treatment for extremity sarcoma is limb‐sparing surgery often with radiation, but complications occur frequently. We sought to determine factors predictive of wound complications after thigh sarcoma resection and reconstruction while analyzing trends over time.MethodsWe reviewed all thigh defects requiring plastic surgeon reconstruction following sarcoma resection at our institution from 1997 to 2014. Patient demographics, comorbidities, operative characteristics, multi‐modality therapies, and complications were analyzed. Wound complications were: infection, dehiscence, seroma, hematoma, or partial/total flap loss.ResultsThere were 159 thigh reconstructions followed for 30 months on average. Eighty‐seven percent of patients underwent radiation and 42% had chemotherapy. Almost half (49.1%) had a complication. The most common wound complication was surgical site infection (23.3%) followed by dehiscence (19.5%), and seroma (10.7%). Less common were partial (2.5%) or total flap loss (0.6%). Reoperation was required in 21 patients (13.2%). Tobacco use, older patient age, cardiac disease, and higher body mass index were independently associated with wound complications. Complications trended towards decreasing over time, but this was not statistically significant.ConclusionsTobacco use, cardiac disease, and higher body mass index, but not the timing of reconstruction, appear to increase the risk of wound complications after thigh soft tissue sarcomas resection and plastic surgery reconstruction.
Leveraging Gene Expression Subgroups to Classify DLBCL Patients and Enrich for Clinical Benefit to a Novel Agent
Risueño, Alberto, Hagner, Patrick R. , Towfic, Fadi , Fontanillo, Celia , Djebbari, Amira, Parker, Joel S. , Drew, Clifton P., Nowakowski, Grzegorz S. , Maurer, Matthew J. , Cerhan, James R. , Wei, Xin , Ren, Yan , Lee, Chung-Wein, Couto, Suzana S. , Wang, Maria , Pourdehnad, Michael , Gandhi, Anita K. , Trotter, Matthew , Maurer, Matthew , Cerhan, James R , Parker, Joel S

Blood | January 24, 2020 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1182/blood.2019002414 | PMID 31977005 Get It

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is a heterogeneous disease, commonly described by cell-of-origin (COO) molecular subtypes. We sought to identify novel patient subgroups through an unsupervised analysis of a large public dataset of gene expression profiles from newly diagnosed de novo DLBCL patients, yielding two biologically distinct subgroups characterized by differences in the tumor microenvironment. Pathway analysis and immune deconvolution algorithms identified higher B-cell content and a strong proliferative signal in subgroup A and enriched T-cell, macrophage, and immune/inflammatory signals in subgroup B, reflecting similar biology to published DLBCL stratification research. A gene expression classifier, featuring 26 gene expression scores, was derived from the public dataset to discriminate subgroup A (classifier-negative, immune-low) and subgroup B (classifier-positive, immune-high) patients. Subsequent application to an independent series of diagnostic biopsies and replicated the subgroups with immune cell composition confirmed via immunohistochemistry. Avadomide, a CRL4CRBN E3 ubiquitin ligase modulator, demonstrated clinical activity in relapsed/refractory DLBCL patients, independent of COO subtypes. Given the immunomodulatory activity of avadomide and need for a patient selection strategy, we applied the gene expression classifier to pretreatment biopsies from relapsed/refractory DLBCL patients receiving avadomide (NCT01421524). Classifier-positive patients demonstrated an enrichment in response rate and progression-free survival of 44% and 6.2 months versus 19% and 1.6 months for classifier-negative patients (HR=0.49 [0.280, 0.86]; P=.0096). The classifier was not prognostic for R-CHOP or salvage immunochemotherapy. The classifier described here discriminates DLBCL tumors based on tumor and non-tumor composition and has potential utility to enrich for clinical response to immunomodulatory agents including avadomide.
The use of PROMIS patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to inform light chain (AL) amyloid disease severity at diagnosis
D’Souza, Anita , Magnus, Brooke E. , Myers, Judith, D'Souza, Anita , Dispenzieri, Angela , Flynn, Kathryn E.

Amyloid | January 23, 2020 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 111-118

10.1080/13506129.2020.1713743 | PMID 31971467 Get It

Biomarkers in Patients with Heart Failure and Central Sleep Apnoea: Findings From the SERVE-HF Trial
Ferreira, João Pedro , Duarte, Kévin, Woehrle, Holger , Cowie, Martín , Angermann, Christiane E. , d’Ortho, Marie‐Pia , Erdmann, Erland , Lévy, Patrick , Simonds, Anita K. , Teschler, Helmut, Rossignol, Patrick , Köenig, Wolfgang , Zannad, Faı̈ez , Lévy, Patrick , Koenig, Wolfgang , Ferreira, João Pedro , Cowie, Martin R , Wegscheider, Karl , Somers, Virend K.

ESC Heart Failure | January 17, 2020 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 503-511

10.1002/ehf2.12521 | PMID 31951323 Get It

Abstract Aims The Treatment of Sleep-Disordered Breathing with Predominant Central Sleep Apnoea by Adaptive Servo Ventilation in Patients with Heart Failure trial investigated the effects of adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) (vs. control) on outcomes of 1325 patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and central sleep apnoea (CSA). The primary outcome (a composite of all-cause death or unplanned HF hospitalization) did not differ between the two groups. However, all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality were higher in the ASV group. Circulating biomarkers may help in better ascertain patients' risk, and this is the first study applying a large set of circulating biomarkers in patients with both HFrEF and CSA. Methods and results Circulating protein-biomarkers (n = 276) ontologically involved in CV pathways, were studied in 749 (57% of the trial population) patients (biomarker substudy), to investigate their association with the study outcomes (primary outcome, CV death and all-cause death). The mean age was 69 ± 10 years, and > 90% were male. The groups (ASV vs. control and biomarker substudy vs. no biomarker) were well balanced. The “best” clinical prognostic model included male sex, systolic blood pressure < 120 mmHg, diabetes, loop diuretic, cardiac device, 6-min walking test distance, and N-terminal pro BNP as the strongest prognosticators. On top of the “best” clinical prognostic model, the biomarkers that significantly improved both the discrimination (c-index) and the net reclassification index (NRI) of the model were soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 for the primary outcome; neurogenic locus notch homolog protein 3 (Notch-3) for CV-death and all-cause death; and growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) for all-cause death only. Conclusions We studied 276 circulating biomarkers in patients with HFrEF and central sleep apnoea; of these biomarkers, three added significant prognostic information on top of the best clinical model: soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (primary outcome), Notch-3 (CV and all-cause death), and GDF-15 (all-cause death).
Recommended Treatment for Antibody-mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation: The 2019 Expert Consensus From the Transplantion Society Working Group
Mannon, Roslyn B. , Budde, Klemens , Lefaucheur, Carmen , Nickerson, Peter , Tullius, Stefan G. , Askar, Medhat , Man, Kwan , Morris, Randall E., O’Doherty, Inish , Özdemir, B. Handan , Tambur, Anat R. , Tanabe, Kazunari , Taupin, Jean‐Luc, Mannon, Roslyn B , Budde, Klemens , Schinstock, Carrie A. , Chong, Anita S. , Haas, Mark , Knechtle, Stuart J. , Montgomery, Robert A. , Ahn, Curie , Crespo, Marta , Chadban, Steven James , Feng, Sandy , Jordan, Stanley C. , Mengel, Michael , Serón, Daniel , O’Connell, Philip J.

Transplantation | December 31, 2019 | Volume: 104 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 911-922

10.1097/tp.0000000000003095 | PMID 31895348 Get It

With the development of modern solid-phase assays to detect anti-HLA antibodies and a more precise histological classification, the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has become more common and is a major cause of kidney graft loss. Currently, there are no approved therapies and treatment guidelines are based on low-level evidence. The number of prospective randomized trials for the treatment of AMR is small, and the lack of an accepted common standard for care has been an impediment to the development of new therapies. To help alleviate this, The Transplantation Society convened a meeting of international experts to develop a consensus as to what is appropriate treatment for active and chronic active AMR. The aim was to reach a consensus for standard of care treatment against which new therapies could be evaluated. At the meeting, the underlying biology of AMR, the criteria for diagnosis, the clinical phenotypes, and outcomes were discussed. The evidence for different treatments was reviewed, and a consensus for what is acceptable standard of care for the treatment of active and chronic active AMR was presented. While it was agreed that the aims of treatment are to preserve renal function, reduce histological injury, and reduce the titer of donor-specific antibody, there was no conclusive evidence to support any specific therapy. As a result, the treatment recommendations are largely based on expert opinion. It is acknowledged that properly conducted and powered clinical trials of biologically plausible agents are urgently needed to improve patient outcomes.
Extremity free fillet flap for reconstruction of massive oncologic resection—Surgical technique and outcomes
Kreutz‐Rodrigues, Lucas , Mohan, Anita T. , Moran, Steven L. , Carlsen, Brian T. , Mardini, Samir , Houdek, Matthew T. , Rose, Peter S. , Bakri, Karim , Houdek, Matthew T

Journal of Surgical Oncology | December 18, 2019 | Volume: 121 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 465-473

10.1002/jso.25795 | PMID 31853992 Get It

Abstract Background and Objectives The purpose of this study is to present our experience using free fillet flaps to reconstruct massive oncologic defects of the upper and lower extremity. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed to include patients who underwent oncologic resection followed by reconstruction using free fillet flaps from July 2001 to October 2018. Patient demographics, clinical and surgical characteristics, and postoperative complications were reviewed. Results In total, 12 patients were identified and included in this study. Mean age was 48.9 years old. Five patients had extended forequarter amputations and seven patients had external hemipelvectomies, all for locally advanced tumors. Mean tumor size was 15 ± SD 6.4 cm, and negative tumor margins were achieved in all the patients. Mean flap size was 1028 ± SD 869 cm 2 . The mean follow‐up was 13 months. There were no partial or total flap losses in the postoperative period. Two patients had flap‐related postoperative complications, including flap bleeding and wound dehiscence. Median survival was 18 months. Conclusion The free fillet flap is a safe, reliable, and valuable approach for reconstructing oncological defects. It offers the advantage of avoiding donor site morbidity, while providing extensive soft‐tissue coverage as a one‐step solution for massive oncologic defects.
Cognitive processing speed in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis: Baseline characteristics of impairment and prediction of decline
Wallach, Asya I. , Waltz, Michael , Casper, T. Charles , Aaen, Gregory , Belman, Anita , Chitnis, Tanuja , Gorman, Mark , Graves, Jennifer , Harris, Yolanda, Lotze, Timothy , Mar, Soe , Moodley, Manikum , Ness, Jayne , Rodriguez, Moses , Rose, John , Schreiner, Teri , Tillema, Jan‐Mendelt , Charvet, Leigh , Krupp, Lauren , Chitnis, Tanuja , Graves, Jennifer , Krupp, Lauren , Rodriguez, Moses , Charvet, Leigh E , Benson, Leslie, Rensel, Mary R. , Schreiner, Teri , Waubant, Emmanuelle L. , Weinstock‐Guttman, Bianca

Multiple Sclerosis Journal | November 28, 2019 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 14 | Pages: 1938-1947

10.1177/1352458519891984 | PMID 31775571 Get It

Background: Cognitive impairment occurs in approximately one-third of pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) patients. The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), a widely used cognitive screen in adults, has yet to be incorporated early into the standard care of POMS. Objective: To screen for cognitive impairment early in the course of POMS and analyze predictive factors. Methods: Of the 955 POMS or clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) patients prospectively assessed from March 2014 to July 2018, 500 POMS and 116 CIS patients met inclusion criteria (disease onset before the age of 18, one or more SDMTs, and 8 years or older at the time of testing). Those with relapse were analyzed separately from those who were relapse-free. Results: At initial assessment, the mean (interquartile range (IQR)) age at symptom onset was 13.5 years (12.0, 15.9) and the mean (±SD) disease duration was 3.0 ± 2.9 years. Impaired processing speed occurred in 23.4% of POMS and in 16.4% of CIS. On serial testing ( n = 383, mean follow-up: 1.8 years), 14.1% had clinically meaningful decline predicted by older age of multiple sclerosis (MS) onset and male gender. Disease relapse or steroid use led to transient worsening on the SDMT. Conclusion: Early in the disease, some POMS and CIS patients are at risk for cognitive impairment and subsequent decline.
Superior Intellectual Outcomes After Proton Radiotherapy Compared With Photon Radiotherapy for Pediatric Medulloblastoma
Kahalley, Lisa S. , Ris, M. Douglas , Janzen, Laura , Okcu, M. Fatih , Grosshans, David R. , Mahajan, Anita , Tsang, Derek S. , Whitehead, William E. , Dauser, Robert C., Conklin, Heather M. , Chintagumpala, Murali , Kahalley, Lisa S , Peterson, Rachel K. , Ramaswamy, Vijay , Paulino, Arnold C. , Hodgson, David , Laperrière, Normand , Taylor, Michael D. , Bouffet, Éric , Mabbott, Donald

Journal of Clinical Oncology | November 27, 2019 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 454-461

10.1200/jco.19.01706 | PMID 31774710 Get It

PURPOSE Proton radiotherapy (PRT) may lessen the neuropsychological risk traditionally associated with cranial radiotherapy for the treatment of pediatric brain tumors by reducing the dose to normal tissue compared with that of photon radiotherapy (XRT). We examined the change in intellectual scores over time in patients with pediatric medulloblastoma treated with craniospinal PRT versus XRT. METHODS Intelligence test scores were obtained for a sample of pediatric patients treated between 2007 and 2018 on the same medulloblastoma protocols that differed only in radiotherapy modality (PRT v XRT). Growth curve analyses compared change in scores over time since diagnosis between groups. RESULTS Longitudinal intelligence data from 79 patients (37 PRT, 42 XRT) were examined. Groups were similar on most demographic/clinical variables, including sex (67.1% male), age at diagnosis (mean, 8.6 years), craniospinal irradiation dose (median, 23.4 Gy), length of follow-up (mean, 4.3 years), and parental education (mean, 14.3 years). Boost dose ( P < .001) and boost margin ( P = .001) differed between groups. Adjusting for covariates, the PRT group exhibited superior long-term outcomes in global intelligence quotient (IQ), perceptual reasoning, and working memory compared with the XRT group (all P < .05). The XRT group exhibited a significant decline in global IQ, working memory, and processing speed (all P < .05). The PRT group exhibited stable scores over time in all domains with the exception of processing speed ( P = .003). CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare intellectual trajectories between pediatric patients treated for medulloblastoma with PRT versus those treated with XRT on comparable, contemporary protocols. PRT was associated with more favorable intellectual outcomes in most domains compared with XRT, although processing speed emerged as a vulnerable domain for both groups. This study provides the strongest evidence to date of an intellectual sparing advantage with PRT in the treatment of pediatric medulloblastoma.
Cognitive mediators of adaptive functioning outcomes in survivors of pediatric brain tumors treated with proton radiotherapy
Roth, Alexandra , Ris, M. Douglas , Orobio, Jéssica , Xue, Judy, Mahajan, Anita , Paulino, Arnold C. , Grosshans, David R. , Okcu, M. Fatih , Chintagumpala, Murali , Kahalley, Lisa S. , Roth, Alexandra K , Paulino, Arnold C , Kahalley, Lisa S

Pediatric Blood & Cancer | November 18, 2019 | Volume: 67 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/pbc.28064 | PMID 31736188 Get It

Abstract Background Cranial radiotherapy (RT) is associated with risk for cognitive and adaptive dysfunction. Proton RT (PRT) is a technique hypothesized to spare cognition by reducing exposure to nontarget brain tissue. However, little is known regarding functional outcomes in survivors of pediatric brain tumor (BT) treated with PRT. The present study examined the relationship between cognitive and adaptive outcomes in pediatric BT survivors post‐PRT. Methods Survivors treated with either focal (n = 33) or craniospinal irradiation (CSI; n = 37) PRT completed neurocognitive evaluations approximately 5 years post‐treatment. Results of intelligence testing and ratings of adaptive functioning are reported. Mediation models examined the relationship among radiation field, cognition, and adaptive functioning. Results The PRT CSI group demonstrated worse cognitive outcomes than the PRT Focal group across each cognitive index (Cohen's d = 0.56–0.70). Parent ratings of adaptive functioning were also worse in the PRT CSI group than the PRT Focal group (Global Adaptive Composite, d = 0.53; conceptual skills, d = 0.67). Cognitive performance fully mediated the relationship between radiation field and adaptive outcomes, while controlling for group differences in tumor histology and RT dose. Conclusions Focal PRT survivors demonstrated generally positive outcomes with weaknesses in processing speed and aspects of adaptive functioning. CSI exposure was associated with more consistently poor cognitive and adaptive outcomes. The increased risk for adaptive dysfunction in the PRT CSI group appeared due to the effects of CSI on cognition. Efforts to reduce the volume of tissue exposure to RT remain important.
Chronic Opioid Therapy and Sleep: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Position Statement
Rosen, Ilene M. , Aurora, R. Nisha , Kirsch, Douglas B. , Carden, Kelly A., Malhotra, Raman K. , Ramar, Kannan , Abbasi-Feinberg, Fariha, Kristo, David A., Olson, Eric J. , Rosen, Carol L. , Rowley, James A. , Shelgikar, Anita V., Martin, Jennifer L.

Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine | November 14, 2019 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1671-1673

10.5664/jcsm.8062 | PMID 31739858 Get It