Citations

OBJECTIVE Isthmic spondylolisthesis impacts up to 11.5% of the general population. For patients who have failed conservative therapy, decompression and fusion or decompression alone are options for surgical management. However, there remains debate as to whether reduction of mobile spondylolisthesis is integral to good patient outcomes. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to address this by comparing clinical and radiological outcomes between patients treated with fusion in situ and those undergoing fusion with reduction of isthmic spondylolisthesis. METHODS The Scopus, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane databases were systematically queried on the basis of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify studies comparing treatment outcomes in patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis after in situ fusion or fusion with spondylolisthesis reduction. Endpoints of interest included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, hospitalization duration, operative morbidity, and rates of surgical revision. Data from individual studies were aggregated using random-effects models to assess combined effects. RESULTS Of 277 identified studies, 7 studies were included with an aggregate 308 patients (143 underwent fusion in situ and 165 underwent reduction). Patients who underwent reduction for isthmic lumbar spondylolisthesis had significantly lower rates of pseudarthrosis at last follow-up (OR 0.22, p = 0.03). Estimated blood loss, operative time, hospitalization duration, change in ODI score, change in back pain (visual analog scale [VAS]), and reoperation rate did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS For patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis, the present data suggest that fusion with reduction of spondylolisthesis may lower rates of pseudarthrosis as compared to in situ fusion. However, operative morbidity and improvement in patient-reported outcomes were similar between strategies.

OBJECTIVE Hundreds of thousands of Americans undergo decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis annually. The mild (minimally invasive lumbar decompression) procedure was developed as a potentially less invasive alternative to open decompression; however, much of the evidence has been gathered from industry-sponsored studies. The present study sought to compare real-world clinical outcomes between the mild procedure and open decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS All patients who underwent the mild procedure at a single-institution, multisite, tertiary care center from 2005 to October 2024 were included. One-to-one propensity score matching was used to identify patients who underwent open decompression at the same institution, with age, sex, smoking, and comorbidities as covariates. Primary outcomes were change in pain on the numeric rating scale (NRS), surgical reoperation, and perioperative complications. For pain, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was defined as a 30% improvement in NRS score. RESULTS A total of 175 patients who underwent the mild procedure (mean age 76.3 ± 8.7 years; 44.6% female) were matched to 175 patients treated with open decompression (mean age 75.4 ± 8.7 years; 44.0% female). Among patients with at least 60 days of follow-up, those treated with open decompression were more likely to achieve the MCID for pain (43.1% vs 22.2%, p < 0.001). Patients treated with mild were more likely to require reoperation (46.2% vs 29.3%, p = 0.008). Those who underwent the mild procedure experienced lower rates of durotomies (0% vs 2.9%, p = 0.024) but had higher rates of neurological deficits (6.3% vs 0.6%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS For patients with symptomatic lumbar stenosis, those who underwent open decompression were more likely to achieve pain improvement and less likely to require reoperation compared with those who underwent the mild procedure.

ABSTRACT Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is a primary immunodeficiency disorder causing hypogammaglobulinemia. Although rare, nodular regenerative hyperplasia is the most common liver complication in CVID, which can progress to noncirrhotic portal hypertension. We report a case of a young male with CVID presenting with recurrent parastomal bleeding secondary to noncirrhotic portal hypertension from CVID-associated nodular regenerative hyperplasia.

Abstract DDX3X dysfunction causes an X-linked multisystem disorder with high penetrance and variable expressivity. The phenotypic spectrum spans from learning disability without somatic involvement to profound intellectual disability with severe impairments in the central nervous system and other organs. A few multicenter studies and single case reports have previously highlighted some common phenotypic patterns but were unable to delineate correlations between underlying DDX3X variants and phenotypic findings.From the second largest patient cohort published to date, we analysed clinical, psychometric and diagnostic findings of 52 female and 7 male individuals, harbouring de novo and inherited DDX3X variants. These female patients revealed previously unknown quantitative correlations between variant type and localization and specific phenotypic findings (growth features, epilepsy, brain anomalies, dysmorphisms, motor-focused neurological findings). Moreover, by analysing the in silico folding and RNA binding capability of mutant DDX3X monomers, we were able to delineate novel correlations between DDX3X monomer misfolding grade and phenotypic severity.

Background Despite the widespread adoption of established and emerging forensic training and education modalities, there is limited evidence supporting effective ways in which to systematically evaluate their adoption into forensic nursing practice. To address this, our team developed the Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner (SANE) Practice Integrated Competency Evaluation (SPICE) as an innovative tool to support self-reflection, goal setting, and an evaluation of role development. Aim To establish expert consensus on the content and capacity of SPICE to evaluate role development across essential forensic nurse competencies, responsibilities, and clinical practice expectations. Method We utilized a modified Delphi method to establish expert consensus. Results We engaged forensic experts in multiple rounds of review. A deductive, rapid thematic analysis synthesized qualitative discussion. Survey-based results were summarized descriptively. Discussion The expert consensus approach we describe here highlights the potential and promising utility of SPICE to evaluate, guide, and enhance SANE role performance and ongoing professional development.

Abstract BACKGROUND Craniopharyngiomas are a rare tumor along the pituitary-hypothalamic axis. Genetic analysis revealed that 95% of papillary craniopharyngiomas (PCP) have BRAF V600E mutations (Brastianos et al. Nature Genetics 2014). We previously reported that BRAF/MEK inhibition was associated with significant anti-tumor activity in newly-diagnosed PCP patients (Brastianos et al. NEJM 2023). We have now evaluated the efficacy of vemurafenib/cobimetinib in a separate cohort of patients with recurrent PCP whose tumors progressed after prior radiation. METHODS In this multicenter, NCI-sponsored cooperative group trial, patients with histologically confirmed BRAF-positive PCP who progressed after radiation were treated with vemurafenib/cobimetinib. The primary endpoint of response rate (RR) based on centrally determined imaging data was to be evaluated in 16 patients, where a partial response was defined as ≥20% decrease in volume. This single arm, Simon two-stage phase 2 trial had 89% power to detect a true RR ≥ 30% (vs. null 5%; α=0.04). In this design, 3 or more observed responses in 16 evaluable patients would be considered evidence of promising activity. RESULTS Of the planned 16 patients, a total of 5 patients enrolled before the study was closed due to slow accrual. Median follow-up was 50 months (95% CI: 32 to not yet reached). Based on volumetric response criteria, all 5 patients had a response to treatment (100%; 95% CI: 47.8% to 100%). To date, 2 patients progressed, one of whom died 22 months after study entry. This cohort met the criteria for efficacy under the original design with &gt;3 responders. No grade 4 or 5 toxicities were observed. CONCLUSIONS Vemurafenib/cobimetinib resulted in an objective response in all patients with previously treated PCP. The study met primary endpoint, similar to that reported for previously untreated PCP. Thus, BRAF/MEK inhibitors could be an effective tool for previously treated PCP and warrants further evaluation. SUPPORT U10CA180821; U10CA180882; Genentech, https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org;ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03224767

Abstract Glioblastoma is a highly lethal malignancy with dismal overall survival and near universal recurrence despite maximal multimodal therapy. Patients with unmethylated O6-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promoters do not derive survival benefit from adjuvant temozolomide. Immunotherapies have revolutionized cancer care; however, this modality has yet to translate into survival benefits in glioblastoma in part due to both local and systemic immunosuppressive states. Here, we report the results of a phase 1 clinical trial (NCT04015700) evaluating the safety and feasibility of GNOS-PV01, a personalized DNA vaccination platform that safely immunized against up to 40 patient-specific neoantigens in a clinically relevant timescale following surgical resection and radiation for MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma patients. Multisector tumor sampling at time of resection enabled personalized and spatially representative neoantigen identification through an established pipeline. In the nine participants receiving vaccines, there were no unexpected toxicities or serious adverse events with a median vaccine delivery time of 10 weeks post-radiation. The vaccination was strongly immunogenic and induced activation and expansion of both local infiltrating CD8+ and CD4+ T-cells and circulating peripheral T-cells. T-cell receptor sequencing revealed both expanded pre-existing populations as well as novel neoantigen-specific populations, suggesting that vaccination both reinvigorates pre-existing immunity and generates novel immune reactivity. We developed a new technology to profile T-cells at single-nuclei resolution from frozen tissue revealing that vaccination altered gene expression signatures involved in inflammatory response and lymphocyte activation in the tumor microenvironment. Exposure to dexamethasone greatly suppressed immune reactivity, while PD-1 blockade enhanced local immune responses. With respect to efficacy, one third of patients survived longer than 24 months with one long-term survivor living &gt;40 months from time of diagnosis, exceeding survival of recently published trials. Thus, our study demonstrates the safety, feasibility, and preliminary clinical efficacy of a personalized multivalent neoantigen vaccination platform in a devastating cancer.