Citations

Significant progress has been made in treating Coronavirus disease (COVID) – an infectious disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). An ominous turn in the pandemic is the evolving public health crisis emanating from persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection and its associated long-term impact. Long COVID or post–COVID syndrome describes protean symptoms that persist at least 3 months after the onset of acute illness and last for at least 2 months in individuals with a history of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Long COVID has become a public health concern. Millions of infected individuals are now facing chronic multi-organ failures, including neuropsychiatric, cardiovascular, pulmonary, and kidney complications. In general, the cause of long COVID syndrome is unclear but factors such as prolonged activation of immune responses, and viral persistence triggering transcription dysregulation of genes associated with normal thrombotic disease may play a role in cardiovascular complications. Although inflammatory biomarkers are reported in other disorders, it remains unclear whether similar biomarkers are associated with cardiovascular manifestations following COVID. Medications such as sulodexide directed at glycocalyx and coagulation have demonstrated benefits for long COVID in smaller studies. Here, we describe the outcomes of the symposium on the underlying cardiovascular mechanisms of the long COVID.

BACKGROUND: Increased specialty competitiveness, alongside the inception of virtual interviews, has increased the number of applications submitted to the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) in anesthesiology. ERAS introduced signals to provide applicants with a means to demonstrate interest in a select group of residency programs. In the 2023 to 2024 application cycle, anesthesiology applicants had the opportunity to send 5 gold and 10 silver signals in a tiered system. METHODS: This multicenter, cross-sectional (exempt) research survey was created by members of the executive council of the Association of Anesthesiology Core Program Directors (AACPD) and housed and distributed through REDCap and the University of Nebraska Medical Center. Publicly available contact information of anesthesiology core program directors was obtained from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) website and membership roster of the AACPD. In total, 174 anesthesiology programs were identified. A survey invitation was distributed on March 12, 2024, to all programs via e-mail with reminders. The survey closed on April 30, 2024. Survey responses were collected anonymously, with instructions to provide 1 response per program. All statistical summaries and analyses were performed using SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute). RESULTS: The survey was sent to all 174 identified programs, with a response rate of 48.9%. Small programs were defined as having <44 residents, medium 44 to 62 residents, and large >62 residents. Small programs received significantly fewer applications (median 1255) than medium (1420) and large (1558) programs ( P = .0005). There was a statistically significant difference in the number of gold signals received based on program size, with large programs receiving significantly more than medium (169 vs 116, P = .0238) or small programs (168 vs 71, P < .0001). Applicants sending gold signals were more likely to receive an interview compared to those who sent silver signals (56.7% vs 31%, P ≤ .0001). Of the those interviewed, applicants who sent gold signals comprised 42% (28.7%–52.6%), whereas applicants who sent silver signals comprised 45.5% (33%–54.7%). Applicants who did not send a program signal but signaled geographically made up a smaller portion of the interview group at 3% (0%–15.4%). The percentage of matched residents sending gold signals made up 66.7% (47.1%–82.4%) of a program’s match list, whereas those sending silver signals were 25% (11.1%–33.3%) of the matched cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesiology applicants who sent program signals were selected for a large majority of available interview positions, and interviewed applicants who submitted gold and silver signals comprised the vast majority of matched resident cohorts.

SUMMARY Results of systolic time interval recordings obtained serially on 104 female New Zealand White rabbits were analyzed for reproducibility, variation with respect to changes in heart rate (hr), and interrelationship of the various systolic time intervals. A table of values for systolic time intervals in the healthy rabbit was constructed. The preejection period (pep), left ventricular ejection time (lvet), and pep/lvet ratio were 0.040 ± 0.008 s, 0.119 ± 0.014 s, and 0.337 ± 0.066 respectively. The major systolic time intervals, pep and lvet, varied with respect to hr according to the regression equations: pep = 0.057 − 0.000078 hr and lvet = 0.175 − 0.000251 hr. The QS2 interval, S1S2 interval and isovolumic contraction time also varied with changes in hr.

SUMMARY Systolic time interval recordings were performed serially on 104 healthy female New Zealand White rabbits and 51 rabbits with congestive heart failure (chf) induced by chronic anthracycline drug therapy. The results were analyzed and the comparisons were made with studies of systolic time interval recordings of chf in persons. In the rabbit, chf is manifested by prolongation of the isovolumic contraction time, the preejection period (pep), and by shortening of the left ventricular ejection time (lvet). The ratio of pep/lvet was a sensitive indicator of left ventricular failure, with values in excess of 0.466 reflecting significant cardiac dysfunction at the 95% confidence level. The mean pep/lvet = 0.337 ± 0.66 in healthy rabbits and pep/lvet = 0.502 ± 0.075 in rabbits with chf. The pep index increased from 0.057 ± 0.007 in healthy rabbits to 0.074 ± 0.007 in rabbits with heart failure. The lvet index decreased from 0.173 ± 0.007 in healthy rabbits to 0.166 ± 0.010 in rabbits with chf.

Background: We previously reported the 5-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) implant. This study evaluates BHR survivorship as well as radiographic and clinical outcomes at long-term follow-up. Methods: A total of 224 patients with contemporary indications, including 179 patients from the original study, were included in this analysis. Survivorship was calculated. Metal ion levels and radiographs were updated. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were compared with those for matched patients who had undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA). The mean follow-up was 14 years. Results: Survivorship free from any revision and from aseptic revision was 96.0% and 97.4% at 15 years, respectively. Two patients had undergone revision since the original study. The median serum cobalt and chromium levels were 1.4 and 1.5 ppb, respectively. The PROs were similar to those for the THA cohort. Equal proportions of patients remained active; however, the BHR group trended toward more remaining highly active (p = 0.12). Conclusions: Although activity was similar to THA at long-term follow-up, the BHR implant remains an excellent option for the treatment of osteoarthritis in younger male patients. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Abstract Background Bicuspid aortic valve(BAV) disease carries a cumulative lifetime morbidity &gt;80%. This morbidity includes surgery for aortic valve dysfunction, aortic dilatation, infective endocarditis, and aortic dissection. This study assessed surgical intervention patterns for BAV-related morbidity and long-term survival of these patients in a community-based cohort versus a tertiary referral cohort. Methods The tertiary-referral cohort included all patients with BAV-related surgeries across Mayo Clinic sites (Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota), from January 1990 to May 2024. The community-based cohort included all patients with BAV-related surgeries in Olmsted County, Minnesota, from January 1980 to May 2024. The tertiary-referral cohort comprised 2529 BAV patients of which 991(39%) [mean age 53±15 years, 76% males] underwent aortic valve surgery(AVR), aorta surgery, or a combination thereof, while the community-based cohort included 652 BAV patients of whom 262(40%) [mean age 43±20 year, 70% males] had the mentioned interventions. Cumulative survival was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method compared to the U.S population. Statistical significance was evaluated using one-sample log rank statistics. Results In the tertiary-referral cohort, 530/991(54%) patients underwent isolated AVR, 62/991(6%) had isolated aortic surgery, and 399(40%) underwent combined procedures. In the community-based cohort, 179/262(68%) patients underwent isolated AVR, 30/262(11%) underwent isolated aortic surgery, and 53(21%) had combined surgeries. In the tertiary-referral cohort, 940 patients underwent AVR; 57% for aortic stenosis(AS), 29% for aortic regurgitation(AR), 13% for mixed valvular disease, and 1% for endocarditis. In comparison, in the community-based cohort, 236 patients underwent AVR for AS in 71%, AR 20%, mixed valvular disease 7%, and endocarditis 2%. In the tertiary-referral cohort, 459 patients underwent aortic surgery; 21% for the root, 69% for the ascending aorta, 1% for the arch, &lt;1% for aortic dissection, and 8% for coarctation repair. In comparison, 105 patients from the community-based cohort underwent aortic surgery; 33% for the root, 44% for the ascending aorta, 1% for the arch, 4% for aortic dissection and 18% coarctation repair. Compared to age- and sex-matched U.S. population, the relative risk for all cause death in the tertiary-referral cohort was 0.89 [95% CI: 0.70-1.11, p=0.35], whereas in the community-based cohort was 1.06 [95% CI: 0.85-1.32, p=0.57](Figure1). Conclusion Surgical intervention patterns were similar for community and tertiary BAV cohorts, with most patients undergoing isolated AVR or AVR plus aortic surgery, and isolated aortic surgery being uncommon. AVR indications were driven by AS, followed by AR and mixed valvular disease. Aortic surgery indications were driven by ascending aorta dilatation, followed by root dilatation and coarctation. Survival in both cohorts was similar to the U.S. general population.