Citations

Abstract Congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDG) are a group of neurogenetic conditions resulting from disruptions in the cellular glycosylation machinery. The majority of CDG patients have compound heterozygous pathogenic variants in the phosphomannomutase 2 ( PMM2) gene. Individuals with PMM2-CDG exhibit multi-systemic symptoms, prominently featuring neurological deficits with nearly all patients exhibiting cerebellar hypoplasia and ataxia. To overcome embryonic lethality caused by whole body knock-out of Pmm2 and mimic patient-related compound heterozygous pathogenic variants, we paired a Pmm2 flox allele ( Pmm2 fl ) with a catalytically inactive knock-in allele ( Pmm2 R137H ), commonly present in PMM2-CDG patients. Mice with post-mitotic loss of PMM2 from neurons or astrocytes are indistinguishable from unaffected littermates, including in a broad battery of neurological assessments. In contrast, removal of PMM2 from embryonic neural precursor cells leads to cerebellar hypoplasia, ataxia, seizures, and early lethality. Comprehensive multi-omics profiling, including metabolomics, glycomics, single-cell transcriptomics, proteomics, and glycoproteomics, reveal widespread molecular disturbances throughout the brain, with the cerebellum showing the most pronounced disruption. These findings highlight the heightened dependency of the developing cerebellum on intact N-glycosylation, aligning with clinical observations in PMM2-CDG patients. Importantly, glycoproteomic alterations identified in our mouse model are corroborated in PMM2-CDG patient post-mortem cerebellar tissue, underscoring the translational relevance of our findings and implicating impaired synaptic transmission as a key pathogenic mechanism.

Key Points Preexisting CKD, elevated serum creatinine, and severe interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy were linked to poor renal prognosis in renal sarcoidosis. Steroid therapy was strongly associated with renal recovery and improved long-term outcomes in renal sarcoidosis. Early detection and management of renal involvement in sarcoidosis are critical to preventing irreversible kidney damage. Background Renal sarcoidosis (RS) is a rare but potentially severe manifestation of sarcoidosis, primarily affecting the kidneys through granulomatous interstitial nephritis and calcium metabolic disturbances. This study evaluates the clinicopathologic features and renal outcomes of biopsy-proven RS, focusing on identifying predictors of renal recovery and disease progression. Methods This retrospective study included 43 biopsy-proven RS at Mayo Clinic (2012–2024). Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and histopathologic data were analyzed. Renal recovery within 6 months was classified as complete, partial, or no recovery based on serum creatinine (sCr) changes. Long-term adverse composite outcomes included the CKD onset, CKD progression, ESKD, dialysis initiation, or death. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to assess predictors of renal outcomes. Results Among the cohort, 84% exhibited interstitial nephritis, with granulomatous interstitial nephritis in 33%. Calcium phosphate deposits were found in 58% of cases. Hypercalciuria (90%) was more common than hypercalcemia (74%). Within 6 months, 86% achieved recovery (74% complete, 12% partial), while 40% experienced long-term adverse composite outcomes. Higher sCr at biopsy (≥2.4 mg/dl) and moderate-to-severe interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy were associated with reduced complete recovery and worse long-term outcomes, while preexisting CKD significantly increased the risk of adverse long-term outcomes. Steroid therapy significantly increased the likelihood of complete recovery and reduced the risk of adverse long-term outcomes. Conclusions Preexisting CKD, elevated sCr at biopsy, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, and steroid therapy are key predictors of renal outcomes in RS. Early diagnosis and intervention are crucial to preventing irreversible kidney damage.

PURPOSE Continued improvement in outcomes is needed for advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Methods Alliance A091802 is a randomized phase II trial of avelumab (800 mg IV once every 2 weeks) plus cetuximab (500 mg/m 2 IV once every 2 weeks) versus avelumab alone once every 2 weeks for up to 2 years. Cetuximab was given for 1 year in the avelumab + cetuximab arm. Crossover at progression to avelumab + cetuximab was allowed. Randomization was 1:1, stratified by PD-L1 and HIV status. Patients had distant metastatic or unresectable locally advanced cSCC, were anti–PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibody–naive, had no previous cetuximab in the advanced setting, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and could be HIV+ (CD4 >200, viral load <200). Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, immunosuppression, or active autoimmune diseases were excluded. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS; null hypothesis: median = 12 months v alternative hypothesis: 21 months or a 75% improvement, power of 80% with one-sided alpha .2, n = 57, 37 PFS events required). Secondary end points were overall survival, objective response rates (ORRs), clinical benefit rate, and toxicity. RESULTS Sixty patients were enrolled; 57 patients were evaluable. The median age was 72 years, all were HIV–; 75.4% was PD-L1+, 84.2% had head/neck origin, 47.4% had distant metastasis, and there were no differences in baseline characteristics by arm. Avelumab + cetuximab significantly improved PFS versus avelumab (median, 11.1 [7.6-not reached (NR)] v 3.0 months [2.7-13.6] hazard ratio, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.23 to 0.97], P = .018). Avelumab patients who crossed over (n = 9) to combination had a median PFS after crossover of 11.3 months (5.8-NR). The confirmed ORR was 27.6% with avelumab + cetuximab and 21.4% with avelumab. Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 48.3% and 21.5% of patients with avelumab + cetuximab (most common: rash [20.7%], infusion reaction [20.7%]) and avelumab, respectively. CONCLUSION Avelumab + cetuximab significantly improved PFS versus avelumab alone in patients with advanced cSCC. Alliance A091802 supports a larger confirmatory study with the combination of cetuximab and PD-1:PD-(L)1 blockade.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare long-term patient-reported outcomes in bowel and urinary domains between intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for localized prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: Patients with clinical T1–T2 prostate cancer receiving IMRT or IMPT at a tertiary cancer center from 2015–2018 were analyzed to determine the changes in the prospectively collected bowel function (BF), urinary irritative/obstructive symptoms (UO), and urinary incontinence (UI) domains of EPIC-26. The mean changes in EPIC-26 scores were evaluated from pretreatment to 24 months post-radiotherapy for each modality. A score change >50% of the baseline standard deviation was considered a clinically meaningful change. Results: A total of 82 patients treated with IMRT (52.2%) and 56 patients treated with IMPT (53.3%) completed the questionnaire at baseline and 24 months post-RT. There were no baseline differences in domain scores between treatment modalities. At 24 months post-radiotherapy, there was a significant and clinically meaningful decline in the BF mean score in the IMRT cohort (−4.52 (range −50, 29.17), p = 0.003), whereas the decline in BF score did not reach clinical relevance or significance (−1.88 (range −37.5, 50), p = 0.046) when accounting for the Bonferroni adjustment in the IMPT cohort. A higher proportion of patients treated with IMRT had a clinically relevant reduction in BF when compared with IMPT (47.37% vs. 25.93%, p = 0.017). The mean changes in the UI and UO scores of the IMRT and IMPT cohorts were neither statically significant nor clinically relevant. Conclusions: IMPT leads to a smaller decrease in BF than IMRT at 24 months post-RT, while there was no differential effect on UO and UI.

Background The digital transformation in medical education is reshaping how clinical skills, such as point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), are taught. In nephrology fellowship programs, POCUS is essential for enhancing diagnostic accuracy, guiding procedures, and optimizing patient management. To address these evolving demands, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven POCUS curriculum using a multiagent approach that integrates human expertise with advanced AI models, thereby elevating educational standards and better preparing fellows for contemporary clinical practice. Methods In April 2024, the Mayo Clinic Minnesota Nephrology Fellowship Program initiated a novel AI-assisted process to design a comprehensive POCUS curriculum. This process integrated multiple advanced AI models—including GPT-4.0, Claude 3.0 Opus, Gemini Advanced, and Meta AI with Llama 3—to generate initial drafts and iteratively refine content. A panel of blinded nephrology POCUS experts subsequently reviewed and modified the AI-generated material to ensure both clinical relevance and educational rigor. Results The curriculum underwent 12 iterative revisions, incorporating feedback from 29 communications across AI models. Key features of the final curriculum included expanded core topics, diversified teaching methods, enhanced assessment tools, and integration into inpatient and outpatient nephrology rotations. The curriculum emphasized quality assurance, POCUS limitations, and essential clinical applications, such as fistula/graft evaluation and software integration. Alignment with certification standards further strengthened its utility. AI models contributed significantly to the curriculum's foundational structure, while human experts provided critical clinical insights. Conclusion This curriculum, enhanced through a multiagent approach that combines AI and human collaboration, exemplifies the transformative potential of digital tools in nephrology education. The innovative framework seamlessly integrates advanced AI models with expert clinical insights, providing a scalable model for medical curriculum development that is responsive to evolving educational demands. The synergy between technological innovation and human expertise holds promising implications for advancing fellowship training. Future studies should evaluate its impact on clinical competencies and patient outcomes across diverse practice environments.

Abstract Background Neuro-oncology education in American neurology departments is highly variable, with no clear guidelines on appropriate practices. To better understand its current state, we focus on the perspective of departmental Grand Rounds (GR), views of adult neurology residency program directors (ANRPD), neuro-oncologists, and residents. Methods First, we obtained GR series from academic years 2017–2018 and 2018–2019 via an online search and direct emails to neurology residency programs. Second, two online surveys were dispensed to ANRPD and neuro-oncologists. Third, a cohort of neurology residents completed surveys with pre/post-didactic tests. Results Neuro-oncology consisted of 7% (28/ 411) GR in 2017–2018 and 6% (29/463) in 2018–2019; approximately 20% of institutions had no neuro-oncology GR. Twenty neuro-oncologists and 25 of the 175 ANRPDs completed the surveys. Respondents thought 1-to-4 GR annually was adequate. Thirty-five residents completed the survey. Residents might consider neuro-oncology with more exposure (77%, 27/35) and a stronger knowledge base (57%, 20/35). After 8-hours of didactics, residents demonstrated significant (P = .019) pre-/post-test improvement. Conclusions Here, we begin to define the status of several aspects of neuro-oncology education: 1 in 5 academic institutions do not have any neuro-oncology GR lectures annually, and both ANRPDs and neuro-oncologists agree that 1-to-4 lectures annually are adequate. Residents overwhelmingly stated they would be more interested in neuro-oncology with more exposure, and a pilot study of 8 hours of didactic did show knowledge improvement. While these initial datasets require confirmation in larger studies, it suggests that small changes to the current state at some institutions could have a meaningful impact.

Abstract Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell products axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), and lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) are approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Emerging evidence indicates that delayed CAR T-cell infusion, including prolonged time from leukapheresis to infusion, known as vein-to-vein time (V2Vt), may adversely impact clinical outcomes. We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis to identify differences in V2Vt in patients with R/R LBCL treated with axi-cel, tisa-cel, or liso-cel. The impact of V2Vt (&lt;28 days vs ≥28 to &lt;40 days vs ≥40 days) on effectiveness and safety outcomes was evaluated in patients treated with axi-cel enrolled in a post-authorization safety study using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research data. SLR and meta-analysis showed that patients treated with axi-cel had the shortest median V2Vt (30.6 days) compared with tisa-cel (48.4 days) or liso-cel (35.9 days). Real-world analysis of patients treated with axi-cel demonstrated that V2Vt ≥40 days was associated with significantly lower complete response rate than V2Vt &lt;28 days (odds ratio [OR], 0.61) or ≥28 to &lt;40 days (OR, 0.66) and significantly worse overall survival than V2Vt &lt;28 days (hazard ratio [HR], 1.33) or ≥28 to &lt;40 days (HR, 1.36). Higher prolonged thrombocytopenia rates were observed in patients with axi-cel V2Vt ≥28 to &lt;40 days or ≥40 days compared with &lt;28 days (OR, 1.44 or 1.95, respectively). Together, these results show the impact of V2Vt on patient outcomes with axi-cel therapy and that earlier infusion with CD19-CAR therapies may be beneficial.