Citations

AbstractPulmonary hypertension (PH) associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) (PH‐CKD) affects approximately 20%–40% of CKD patients and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. PH and CKD are both pathophysiologically associated with nitric oxide (NO) deficiency. The NO pathway, an important therapeutic domain in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), is an intriguing but unexplored target in PH‐CKD. We sought to improve understanding of the clinical significance of the NO pathway in patients with PH‐CKD by assessing the hemodynamic response to inhaled NO (iNO) during right heart catheterization (RHC). In this retrospective cohort study, patients with diagnosis codes of PH and stage IV/V CKD or end‐stage renal disease and estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/body surface area who underwent RHC and hemodynamic drug study between July 2011 and June 2021 were eligible. Patients with mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) > 20 mmHg and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) > 3 Wood units were included. The final cohort included 37 patients (45.9% female, mean age 72.5 ± 9.7 years). A total of 56.7% of the cohort (21/37) had precapillary PH, while 43.2% (16/37) had combined precapillary postcapillary PH (Cpc‐PH). Median survival was 3.1 years after RHC. iNO was associated with a significant decrease in both mPAP and PVR. Hemodynamic changes in mPAP and PVR were similar in precapillary and Cpc‐PH groups. Among a small subset (n = 14) who were subsequently treated with PAH‐targeted therapy, treatment response was mixed and did not reveal significant benefit. Further studies are warranted to better define the potential role of PAH therapy in PH‐CKD.

PURPOSE Multidisciplinary molecular tumor boards (MTBs) decode complex genomic data into clinical recommendations. Although MTBs are well-established in the oncology practice in developed countries, this strategy needs to be better explored in developing countries. Herein, we describe the possible benefits and limitations of the first MTB established in Colombia. METHODS Demographic, clinical, and genomic information was collected between August 2020 and November 2021. By mid-2020, an MTB strategy was created to discuss clinical cases with one or more genomic alterations identified by next-generation sequencing using an open-access virtual platform. We characterized the patient population as benefiting from the recommended treatment option. We assessed the benefits and access to available targeted therapies that have the potential to change clinical management by making recommendations to treating oncologists on the basis of genomic profiling. However, we did not assess the treatment oncologists' compliance with MTB recommendations because they were not intended to replace clinical judgment/standard of care. RESULTS A total of 146 patients were included in the discussions of the MTB. The median age was 59 years, and 59.6% were women. Genomic results prompting a change in therapeutic decisions were obtained in 53.1% of patients (95% CI, 44.9 to 61.3). The most prevalent malignancy was non–small-cell lung cancer (51%). Other malignancies represented 60%, 50%, and 30% of patients with soft-tissue sarcomas, brain tumors, and breast cancer, respectively. CONCLUSION Using an open-access virtual platform, MTBs were feasible in low- and middle-income countries on the basis of the capability to provide the benefits and access to available targeted therapies that are not standard of care. Furthermore, MTB recommendations were made available to the treating oncologist in different locations across Colombia, providing the option to modify clinical management in most of these patients.

AbstractNew‐onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) in COVID‐19 raises significant clinical and public health issues. This systematic review and meta‐analysis aims to compile and analyze the current literature on NOAF in COVID‐19 and give a more comprehensive understanding of the prevalence and outcomes of NOAF in COVID‐19. A comprehensive literature search was carried out using several databases. The random effect model using inverse variance method and DerSimonian and Laird estimator of Tua2 was used to calculate the pooled prevalence and associated 95% confidence interval (CI). Results for outcome analysis were presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CI and pooled using the Mantel‐Haenszel random‐effects model. The pooled prevalence of NOAF in COVID‐19 was 7.8% (95% CI: 6.54%–9.32%),a pooled estimate from 30 articles (81 929 COVID‐19 patients). Furthermore, our analysis reported that COVID‐19 patients with NOAF had a higher risk of developing severe disease compared with COVID‐19 patients without a history of atrial fibrillation (OR = 4.78, 95% CI: 3.75–6.09) and COVID‐19 patients with a history of pre‐existing atrial fibrillation (OR = 2.75, 95% CI: 2.10–3.59). Similarly, our analysis also indicated that COVID‐19 patients with NOAF had a higher risk of all‐cause mortality compared with, COVID‐19 patients without a history of atrial fibrillation (OR = 3.83, 95% CI: 2.99–4.92) and COVID‐19 patients with a history of pre‐existing atrial fibrillation (OR = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.35–3.96). The meta‐analysis did not reveal any significant publication bias. The results indicate a strong correlation between NOAF and a higher risk of severe illness and mortality. These results emphasize the importance of careful surveillance, early detection, and customized NOAF management strategies to improve clinical outcomes for COVID‐19 patients.

Introduction: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most devastating cancers, and therapies to treat this malignancy have not evolved rapidly to fulfill the need of affected patients. PDAC, like many solid malignancies, is considered a “cold immunological tumor” where the lack of targetable tumor-associated antigens has hampered the development of successful immunotherapies. Despite newer treatment approaches, PDAC patients with advanced disease have a dismal prognosis. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop new therapies. Plectin-1 is a high molecular weight protein (∼500 kDa) that participates in cytoskeleton network organization linking intermediate filaments to microtubules and microfilaments. Plectin-1 is aberrantly expressed in the PDAC cellular membrane, contributes to PDAC pathogenesis, and confers a poor prognosis. Plectin-1-targeting peptides (PTP) in mice and humans have been successfully explored for their use in PDAC imaging and targeted payload delivery (small molecules, radioisotopes, and chemotherapy). We sought to take advantage of the specific binding of PTP and develop a peptide-based plectin-1 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR), and test T-cell transduced with this construct in vitro against PDAC cell lines. Methods: Using in silico tools, we optimized different pepto-CAR constructs and selected one that showed the highest levels of cytotoxicity against plectin-1-expressing PDAC cell lines. A myc tag was incorporated in the hinge region for flow cytometry or western blot detection. The intracellular signaling domain of these CAR sequences included 4-1BB and the zeta chain of the CD3 molecule ( Figure 1A). Plasmids containing the CAR sequence were packaged on lentivirus particles using HEK293T cells. Purified plectin-1 CAR lentiviruses were used to transduce T-cells derived from human peripheral blood T-cells obtained and purified from healthy donor whole blood. The expanded CAR T-cells were used for cytotoxic experiments against different cell lines. Results: Expression of plectin-1 CAR was confirmed by flow cytometry using an anti-myc tag antibody ( Figure 1B). Plectin-1 expression was analyzed in different pancreatic cancer cell lines, and the BxPC-3 cells showed the highest expression level ( Figure 1B). Using a luciferase-based assay, we plated 50,000 BxPC-3 cells per well in duplicates with different effector-to-target (E:T) ratios. After 24 hours, luciferin was added, and the plate was read using a luminometer. As a negative control for effector cells, we use T-cells without a CAR ( Figure 1B), and for the target cells, we use the plectin-1 negative lung cancer cell line A549 ( Figure 1B). Plectin-1 CAR T-cells effectively killed BxPC-3 cells at different E:T ratios in a specific manner compared with controls using unmodified T-cells. Furthermore, no cytotoxicity was observed against plectin-1 negative A549 cells ( Figure 1A). Conclusion: Our results show that a novel peptide-based CAR construct design against plectin-1 can induce specific cytotoxicity on plectin-1 expressing PDAC cell line BxPC-3. Furthermore, these data demonstrate the feasibility of using a CAR with a peptide-based antigen binding domain instead of the traditional antibody-derived scFv. This novel peptide-based CAR design offers alternatives for cellular therapy bioengineering. Moreover, our results can significantly impact immune-oncology therapeutic applications, particularly in challenging diseases like pancreatic cancer. Figure 1 . A) In the above section, the Plectin-1 CAR construct is depicted. Cytotoxicity of unmodified T-cells and Plectin-1 CAR T-cells against BxPC-3 and A549 is shown below. B) Expression of Plectin-1 CAR in unmodified T-cells and Plectin-1 CAR T-cells is shown on the left. The expression of plectin-1 antigen on the surface of BxPC-3 cells and A549 cells is shown on the right. PTP: plectin-1 targeting peptide.

Keywords: Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cell, Pharmacoeconomic, Pediatric, Clinical Trials With the success of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in the pediatric population, new clinical trials have surged worldwide. To date, no previous study has analyzed the effect of socioeconomic factors on the development of clinical trials for CAR T-cells in the pediatric population. In recent years new countries and emerging economies have contributed significantly to the development of CAR T-cell clinical trials. A better understanding of the socioeconomic factors that influenced these trends will facilitate the future development of this cellular therapy field. To assess the impact of socioeconomic factors related to the development of clinical trials on CAR T-cell therapies in the pediatric population, we analyzed data entries from clinical trials registered to the Clinicaltrials.gov database. To query the information, we used the following keywords “(leukemia OR cancer OR lymphoma OR malignancies OR tumor OR solid tumor) AND (CAR OR chimeric antigen receptor OR CAR T-cell OR adoptive immunotherapy OR immune effector OR cellular therapy) AND (Child)”. In addition, we used different filters that allowed the selection of studies that focused on patients 18 years of age and younger. Data corresponding to entries with a data cut-off of July-2023 were included. In addition, we use the World Bank country's macroeconomic database (January 1 st, 2009 to December 31 st, 2022). We found 4,297 results in the Clinicaltrials.gov platform; we excluded 3,978 clinical trials that did not involve the pediatric population (≤18 years) or CAR T-cell intervention. There were 319 clinical trials included, sponsored in 19 countries, as shown in Figure A. Of those studies, 207 (64.9%) were conducted in China, 74 (23.2%) in the U.S., and 21 (6.5%) in Europe. Not surprisingly, the number of clinical trials is strictly proportional to each country's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and Research and Development (R&D) expenditure, as shown in Figure B. Pearsons' coefficient between GDP and the number of trials registered per country is 0.8 (p-value &lt; 0.001); similarly, Pearsons's coefficient between R&D expenditure and the number of problems reported per country is 0.64 (p-value &lt; 0.004). The United States and China are developing 88% of the Clinical trials, and 96% of the clinical trials occur in countries ranked in the top 10 highest GDP. Our database analysis shows a notable disparity in the countries leading cutting-edge research in CAR T-cell therapy for pediatric oncology. The primary locations for these clinical studies are countries ranked in the top 10 in terms of GDP, with China and the USA being the main contributors. Access to clinical trials plays a crucial role in improving cancer patients' outcomes, and this disparity in the development of cellular therapies is likely to impact children from middle and low-GDP countries significantly. Urgent strategies are required to address this issue and ensure more equitable access to advanced technologies and clinical trials in cellular therapy for pediatric cancers. These strategies should become a high priority for national and international health departments and organizations in the coming years. By promoting more comprehensive clinical trial access and collaboration, we can work towards reducing these disparities and providing better treatment options for all children facing pediatric cancer.

Introduction Indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM) is a rare clonal mast cell disease driven by the KIT D816V mutation in nearly all patients. Patients with ISM can present with debilitating acute and chronic cutaneous, gastrointestinal, neurocognitive, and systemic symptoms caused by the release of inflammatory mediators from abnormal mast cells. In some patients, symptoms are not adequately controlled with best supportive care (BSC) medications. Elenestinib (BLU-263) is a novel, investigational, oral, next-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor that potently and selectively inhibits KIT D816V with limited central nervous system penetration and pharmacokinetics (PK) that support once daily dosing. HARBOR (NCT04910685) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2/3 study assessing efficacy and safety of elenestinib in patients with ISM. Methods Eligible adult patients with ISM, confirmed following central review of bone marrow (BM) pathology, clinical, and laboratory findings per World Health Organization criteria and a moderate-to-severe symptom score based on minimum mean total symptom score (TSS) of the ISM-Symptom Assessment Form (ISM-SAF©2018), were stratified by baseline serum tryptase (&lt;20 ng/mL vs ≥20 ng/mL) and randomly assigned 3:1 to elenestinib 25 mg, 50 mg, or 100 mg once daily + BSC (“elenestinib”) or placebo + BSC (“placebo”). The primary objective of Part 1 was to determine the recommended dose based on safety, PK, and pharmacodynamics. Secondary endpoints included changes in biomarkers of disease burden (serum tryptase, KIT D816V variant allele fraction [VAF], and BM mast cells) and ISM-SAF TSS. Three additional open-label PK groups enrolled patients at 50 mg, 75 mg, and 100 mg to further characterize PK and safety. Results As of data cutoff on July 3, 2023, a total of 122 patients with ISM have received their assigned treatment in Part 1 of the study; 39 were blinded and randomized to elenestinib or placebo, and 83 were treated with open-label elenestinib in the PK groups (21 patients at 50 mg, 34 patients at 75 mg, and 28 patients at 100 mg). Baseline demographics were similar to those reported for the general ISM population. After 12 weeks of therapy, symptom improvement was observed for all dose cohorts, and symptom reduction by TSS was greater for patients on elenestinib versus placebo in the blinded portion of Part 1. Patients receiving elenestinib at 25 mg, 50 mg, and 100 mg doses showed reduction (mean percent) from baseline for tryptase (-15.4%, -50.9%, and -68.4% vs 3.3%, respectively) and KIT D816VVAF (-37.5%, -70.3%, and -77.0% vs -2.5%, respectively) as compared to placebo. Similar reductions in TSS and disease-related biomarkers were observed in the open-label PK cohorts. After a median treatment duration of 35.3 weeks, elenestinib was well-tolerated at all dose levels. There were no treatment-related serious adverse events and no treatment-related adverse events that led to drug discontinuation. Conclusion Elenestinib at all tested doses demonstrated beneficial effects on disease-related symptoms and biomarkers of mast cell burden in this large and maturing cohort of patients with ISM with a moderate-to-severe symptom burden. Elenestinib was well tolerated across all dose levels with a promising early benefit-risk profile in ISM. These preliminary findings will inform dosing for the planned Part 2 of HARBOR, which will examine elenestinib versus placebo in a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled setting.

Background: We previously reported that treatment with the anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin (BV) in combination with the checkpoint inhibitors targeting CTLA-4 and/or PD-1 (ipilimumab (I) and nivolumab (N)) led to high overall response rates (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates in relapsed/refractory (R/R) Hodgkin's lymphoma patients in a Phase 1 ECOG-ACRIN sponsored clinical trial. As previously presented in the Phase 1 component of NCT01896999 (E4412), the ORR for the treatment arms were: BV+I 76%, BV+N 89%, and BV+I+N 82%, with CR rates of 57%, 61%, and 73% across the groups, respectively. This suggested that not all patients who responded derived equal benefit. Moreover, with a median follow-up of 2.24 years, the PFS of 1.1 year, NR, and 2.49 years across the groups suggest that even some patients who achieved CR progressed on or subsequent to treatment. Currently biomarkers have no ability to predict which patients will maximally benefit from these therapies. We investigated blood-based immune biomarkers mechanistically across all cohorts which may explain differential responses and guide future treatment decisions for R/R HL patients. Methods: Peripheral blood plasma for 54 of 61 (89%) patients evaluable for response was collected at up to 4 time points and tested for 92 immuno-oncology soluble analytes with Olink proximity extension assay and for antibody titers to 20 known tumor antigens by ELISA. Matching peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were analyzed by CyTOF mass cytometry for major immune cell subsets and marker surface expression, and for T cell receptor diversity by Immunoseq®. Mixed effect linear models were used to identify significantly associated changes (P&lt;0.05) related to treatment longitudinally within groups and to ORR between groups. Results: Analysis of plasma demonstrated durable increase in soluble plasma PD-1 and decreases in CCL17, ANGPT2, MMP12, IL13, and CXCL13 in N-containing regimens, and higher GZMA and CAIX in BV+I (P&lt;0.05). Despite baseline heterogeneity in PBMC composition, we found durable increases in plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC) after N-containing treatments, and transient increases in plasmablasts and memory B cells, as well as early decreases in naïve CD4+ T cells and neutrophils across treatments. Treatment with BV+I+N demonstrated late increases in neutrophils, and changes in memory B cell markers. Clinical benefit analyses revealed that elevated soluble CD5, ADA, CXCL13, and CCL17 at baseline or after two treatment cycles were associated with worse ORR (P&lt;0.05), and that a module of co-regulated soluble analytes at baseline, including MUC16, was associated with worse progression free survival (PFS) (P&lt;0.05). NY-ESO-1 autoantibodies were more frequent in non-responders, and the top 10% of expanded TCR clonotypes were increased in responders after one treatment cycle (P&lt;0.05). Conclusion: This data reveals differential immune activation based on treatment modality for patients with R/R HL receiving checkpoint-based regimens in combination with an ADC. Our data highlights potential tumor- and immune-derived predictive and pharmacodynamic biomarker candidates of response and resistance. These novel findings have relevance for R/R HL patients receiving immunotherapy and other immunotherapy combinations such as immuno-chemotherapy platforms. Prospective evaluation of these biomarkers in the Phase II component of this study, a randomized comparison of BV+N vs. BV+N+I which has completed adult accrual, is planned. Figure Legend Clinical responders and non-responder patient samples were analyzed using ELISA (auto antibodies), CyTOF (Cell populations), TCRseq (T cell clonality) and Olink (proteomics). The results showed that pDCs, Neutrophils and B-Plasmablasts increased with specific drug combinations independently of clinical response. While T Cell expansion was associated with clinical response, the increase of auto antibodies against NY-ESO-1 and circulating proteins CD5, ADA, MUC16, CXCL13, CXCL9 and CCL17 were associated with worse prognosis

The Health Level 7 (HL7) organization introduced the Information Sensitivity Policy Value Set with 45 sensitive data categories to facilitate the implementation of granular electronic consent technology. The goal is to allow patients to have control over the sharing of their sensitive medical records. This study represents the first attempt to explore physicians’ viewpoints on these categories. Twelve physicians participated in a survey, leading to revisions in 21 HL7 categories. They later classified 600 clinical data items through a second survey using the updated categories. Participants’ perspectives were documented, and data analysis included descriptive measures and heat maps. In the first survey, six participants suggested adding 19 new categories (e.g., personality disorder), and modifying 25 category definitions. Two new categories and sixteen revised category definitions were incorporated to support more patient-friendly content and inclusive language. Fifteen new category recommendations were addressed through a revision of category definitions (e.g., personality disorder described as a behavioral health condition). In the second survey, data categorizations led to recommendations for more categories from ten participants. Future revisions of the HL7 categories should incorporate physicians’ viewpoints, validate the categories using patient data or/and include patients’ perspectives, and develop patient-centric category specifications.

Background: New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) in COVID-19 raises significant clinical and public health issues. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compile and analyze the current literature on NOAF in COVID-19 and give a more comprehensive understanding of the prevalence and outcomes of NOAF in COVID-19. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was carried out using several databases. The random effect model using inverse variance method and DerSimonian and Laird estimator of Tua2 was used to calculate the pooled prevalence and associated 95% confidence interval (CI). Results for outcome analysis were presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CI and pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model. Results: The pooled prevalence of NOAF in COVID-19 was 7.8% (95% CI, 6.54% to 9.32%), pooled estimate from 30 articles (81,929 COVID-19 patients). Furthermore, our analysis reported that COVID-19 patients with NOAF had a higher risk of developing severe disease compared with COVID–19 patients without a history of atrial fibrillation (OR= 4.78, 95% CI 3.75 to 6.09) and COVID-19 patients with a history of pre-existing atrial fibrillation (OR= 2.75, 95% CI 2.10 to 3.59) . Similarly, our analysis also indicated that COVID–19 patients with NOAF had a higher risk of all-cause mortality compared with, COVID–19 patients without a history of atrial fibrillation (OOR= 3.83, 95% CI 2.99 to 4.92) and COVID-19 patients with a history of pre-existing atrial fibrillation (OR= 2.32, 95% CI 1.35 to 3.96). The meta-analysis did not reveal any significant publication bias. Conclusion: The results of the current meta-analysis a high prevalence rate of NOAF among COVID-19 patients. Further the study reported higher disease severity with NOAF compared with COVID-19 patients without a history of atrial fibrillation and with a history of atrial fibrillation.