Citations

Abstract Background: IDH mutated gliomas are critically dependent on glutaminase for glutamate biosynthesis. CB-839 is a novel glutaminase-1 inhibitor which has demonstrated efficacy in both genetically engineered and patient derived IDH mutated glioma cells, especially in combination with radiation. These preclinical studies evaluate the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic impact of combining CB-839 with TMZ in patient derived xenograft (PDX) glioma models. Methods: GBM164 is a PDX model derived from an IDH1 mutant, 1p/19q non-codeleted glioma. D- and L-2HG levels in untreated GBM164 tumors were compared to GBM6 tumors (IDH wildtype glioma PDX) by GC/MS. Athymic nude mice bearing GBM164 flank tumors were treated with CB-839 (200 mg/kg PO BID x 9 doses) and/or temozolomide (50 mg/kg PO daily x 5 doses) and sacrificed four hours after the last dose to harvest plasma, normal brain and flank tumor. Tumor metabolomics were assessed by GC/MS. DNA damage signaling in tumors was assessed by Western blotting for KAP1 / Chk1 / Chk2 phosphorylation and H2AX / Rad51. Tumor, plasma and brain pharmacokinetics were assessed by LC/MS/MS. Results: Total 2HG levels in GBM164 were 18-fold higher than GBM6. CB-839 monotherapy reduced tumor glutamate (18% reduction, p = 0.15) and aspartate (30% reduction, p = 0.06) when compared to vehicle, however these changes did not reach statistical significance. The combination of CB-839 and TMZ more significantly reduced both tumor glutamate (30% reduction, p = 0.03) and aspartate (34% reduction, p < 0.001) when compared to TMZ monotherapy. CB-839 did not significantly increase DNA damage compared to vehicle, and the combination of CB-839 and TMZ did not significantly increase DNA damage compared to TMZ monotherapy. The mean tumor: plasma ratios of CB-839 concentrations were 0.68 and 0.58 in mice treated with CB-839 monotherapy and CB-839/TMZ, respectively. The mean brain: plasma ratios of CB-839 concentrations were 0.07 and 0.12 in mice treated with CB-839 monotherapy and CB-839/TMZ, respectively. Conclusion: The addition of CB-839 to TMZ significantly reduces glioma aspartate and glutamate in an IDH1 mutant PDX glioma model, without any impact on DNA damage. Survival studies are in progress to assess the efficacy of CB-839 when used in combination with RT and/or TMZ. Citation Format: Sani Haider Kizilbash, Danielle M. Burgenske, Samuel McBrayer, Sandhya Devarajan, Shiv K. Gupta, Taro Hitosugi, Lihong He, Mark A. Schroeder, Brett L. Carlson, Marina Gelman, Charles A. Kunos, Joel M. Reid, Alex A. Adjei, Jann N. Sarkaria. The addition of CB-839 to temozolomide significantly reduces glioma aspartate and glutamate in an IDH mutated patient derived glioma xenograft model [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3870.

Abstract Small pulmonary nodules are most often managed by surveillance imaging with computed tomography (CT) of the chest, but the optimal frequency and duration of surveillance are unknown. The Watch the Spot Trial is a multicenter, pragmatic, comparative-effectiveness trial with cluster randomization by hospital or health system that compares more- versus less-intensive strategies for active surveillance of small pulmonary nodules. The study plans to enroll approximately 35,200 patients with a small pulmonary nodule that is newly detected on chest CT imaging, either incidentally or by screening. Study protocols for more- and less-intensive surveillance were adapted from published guidelines. The primary outcome is the percentage of cancerous nodules that progress beyond American Joint Committee on Cancer seventh edition stage T1a. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported anxiety and emotional distress, nodule-related health care use, radiation exposure, and adherence with the assigned surveillance protocol. Distinctive aspects of the trial include: 1) the pragmatic integration of study procedures into existing clinical workflow; 2) the use of cluster randomization by hospital or health system; 3) the implementation and evaluation of a system-level intervention for protocol-based care; 4) the use of highly efficient, technology-enabled methods to identify and (passively) enroll participants; 5) reliance on data collected as part of routine clinical care, including data from electronic health records and state cancer registries; 6) linkage with state cancer registries for complete ascertainment of the primary study outcome; and 7) intensive engagement with a diverse group of patient and nonpatient stakeholders in the design and execution of the study.

Abstract Background: Bioluminescence imaging (BLI) of firefly luciferase expressing cells is widely used for analysis of growth, metastasis and drug response in tumor xenografts. D-luciferin, a commonly used luciferase substrate, has limited brain distribution that may undermine BLI for intracranial xenografts. The synthetic luciferin cyclic alkylamino-luciferin (CycLuc1) is a purported brain penetrant luciferase substrate not yet tested in intracranial xenografts. We compared BLI with CycLuc1 and D-luciferin in a glioblastoma (GBM) xenograft model. Methods: GBM6 cells were lentivirally transduced to express LUC2=tdTomato fusion protein. In vivo BLI were performed in orthotopic and heterotopic xenografts established in athymic nude mice. Concentrations of D-luciferin and CycLuc1 were measured by LC-MS/MS. Results: In a dose-response analysis, CycLuc1 at 5 mg/kg provided robust and reproducible imaging; however, an increased photon flux was observed with 10 mg/kg, while escalation to 15 or 20 mg/kg provided marginal additional gains in photon flux. In comparison of CycLuc1 (5 or 25 mg/kg) and D-luciferin (30 or 150 mg/kg, respectively) with serial, crossover BLI at both dose levels, CycLuc1 resulted in less variability and significantly higher photon flux as compared to D-luciferin in GBM6 intracranial xenografts (15 days after implantation). On average BLI with 25 mg/kg CycLuc1 resulted in ~8 fold greater photon flux from these early-stage xenografts as compared to 150 mg/kg D-luciferin (2.9±0.6x106 vs. 3.3±2.8x105 p/sec/cm2, p<0.001). Interestingly, bioluminescence emission with CycLuc1 and D-luciferin was comparable in xenografts imaged 28 days after implantation. In samples harvested after last imaging session, there was no significant difference in substrate distribution in intracranial tumors (tumor to plasma ratios for CycLuc1 and D-luciferin were 0.012 ± 0.020 and 0.012 ± 0.015, respectively; p=0.89). These results suggest that intracranial tumors at early stage may comprise relatively intact blood-brain barrier, which is disrupted at later stage. Consistent with notion that suboptimal delivery may interfere with D-luciferin mediated BLI in intracranial xenografts, photon flux in heterotopic tumors with D-luciferin or CycLuc1 was comparable (4.9±4.6x108 vs. 1.3±0.8x108 p/sec/cm2, p=0.10). Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that CycLuc1 may be a superior BLI substrate as compared to D-luciferin for monitoring tumor growth of intracranial GBM xenografts. Citation Format: Shiv K. Gupta, Minjee Kim, Bianca-Maria Marin, Lihong He, Katelyn Swanson, Tuma Tuma, Brett L. Carlson, Mark A. Schroeder, William F. Elmquist, Jann N. Sarkaria. Synthetic luciferin, CycLuc1, improves bioluminescence imaging for intracranial glioblastoma xenografts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4112.

LBA2000 Background: Formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded GBM tumor tissue, adequate for conventional MGMT methylation analyses, was required for entry onto the RTOG 0525 clinical trial. Methods: Four prognostic biomarkers were evaluated on a training set of 220 retrospectively obtained GBM samples, consisting of IDH1 mutation, the glioma-CpG island methylator phenotype (G-CIMP), a microarray-based mRNA panel and a novel MGMT promoter methylation assay. For each biomarker, 2 (IDH1 and mRNA) or 3 subgroups (G-CIMP and MGMT) were defined based on associations with overall survival. All combinations (36 possible) of each of the 4 biomarker-derived subgroups were then defined and compared with survival data and then consolidated into 4 risk groups. Once created in the training set, this model was applied to the RTOG 0525 samples (n=763) for external validation. Results: Application of the molecular risk classification to RTOG 0525 samples (left table) showed a highly significant survival association (p<0.001). When compared to the recursive partitioning analysis (RPA, table on right), this composite molecular classifier better identified patients with long term survival and appears to improve resolution by revealing an additional distinct risk group. The molecular classifier was prognostic in each of the treatment arms individually. Conclusions: Four distinct biomarkers or biomarker panels were tested in GBM. These biomarkers were compared with clinical outcome in a training set to optimize a method to combine them into a classifier. This classifier was then validated on a large sample set from a large phase III clinical trial. This composite panel may represent an improvement over the existing RPA with respect to risk stratification of patients for GBM. Additionally, it has the potential to impact future clinical trial designs and provide enhanced opportunities for personalization of therapy for GBM. Support: NCI U10 CA2121661, U10 CA37422, P50 CA127001. [Table: see text]