Citations

Abstract INTRODUCTION: The majority of patients (pts) with MDS become red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependent with escalating risk for transfusional hemosiderosis and its adverse effect on morbidity and mortality. The US03 trial is designed to evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of the oral iron chelator, deferasirox (DFX), in pts with lower risk MDS. In this ongoing study 53 pts have completed 12 months’ (mos) treatment. METHODS: US03 is a Phase II, open-label, 3-year trial in pts with Low- or Int-1 IPSS risk MDS and transfusional iron overload (SF ≥1000 μg/L and >20 units RBC transfusions [tx]), with serum creatinine (SCr) ≤2-fold the upper limit of normal (ULN). Initial DFX dose was 20 mg/kg/day and could be increased to 40 mg/kg/day based on tolerability and response. SF was monitored monthly; LPI, the reactive species of non-transferrin-bound iron, was assessed quarterly. BASELINE FEATURES: 176 pts were enrolled at 45 centers. Mean age was 70 years (range, 21−90), including 102 men, 71 women; and IPSS risk groups of Low 46 pts (27%), Int-1 123 (71%), other 4 (2%). Mean baseline iron status: SF 3398 μg/L (range, 863−36,280); LPI 0.4 μmol/L (0.0−3.6); mean lifetime txs prior to study, 63; years of prior tx 3.5 (0−34). MDS therapy at study entry included chemotherapy, 22 pts; growth factors, 46. Estimated creatinine clearance: normal (>80 mL/min), 77 pts; mild (51−80 mL/min), 68; moderate, (30–50 mL/min) 25; severe (<30 mL/min) 2. Over 12 mos the mean dose was 21 mg/kg/day, and the mean tx rate was 4.1 units/mo. Forty percent of pts had elevated LPI at baseline (≥0.5 μmol/L). RESULTS: Mean SF±SD (μg/L) values: baseline 3398±3088; 3 mos 3065±1743; 6 mos 2775±1355; 9 mos 2759±1562; 12 mos 2603±1336. Sustained suppression of mean LPI to the normal range was achieved after 3 mos of treatment. (Figure shows changes in SF and LPI). Hematologic improvement by IWG criteria: 5 pts (6%); erythroid response: 3 (major 1; minor 2); platelet 2 (major); neutrophil 1 (major). SAFETY: Of 165 pts, only 10 (6%) discontinued secondary to suspected adverse events (AEs), and 7 (4%) serious AEs. There were 11 deaths (7%), all unrelated to DFX. Of 140 pts with normal baseline SCr, 35 (25%) increased >ULN (2.2 mg/dL max SCr). SCr increased >33% above baseline in 11 pts (8%) abnormal at baseline. New onset of thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were 52/165 (32%) and 22/165 (13%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DFX therapy decreased mean SF over 1 year in this heavily iron-replete MDS population. Trough LPI normalized in 100% of pts over 12 mos, indicating 24-hour sustained suppression. DFX had a manageable safety profile in this population; new cytopenias were consistent with hematologic progression of MDS. Recent reviews show a 30% increase in hazard ratio for every 500 ng/mL increase in SF >1000 ng/mL; NCCN guidelines recommend consideration of iron chelation in iron-overloaded MDS pts. Ongoing assessments evaluating cardiac, hepatic and endocrine function will evaluate the impact of iron reduction on morbidity and mortality in MDS. Figure Figure

AbstractObjectiveTo conduct a systematic literature review of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation for pain.DesignGrade the evidence for DRG stimulation.MethodsAn international, interdisciplinary work group conducted a literature search for DRG stimulation. Abstracts were reviewed to select studies for grading. General inclusion criteria were prospective trials (randomized controlled trials and observational studies) that were not part of a larger or previously reported group. Excluded studies were retrospective, too small, or existed only as abstracts. Studies were graded using the modified Interventional Pain Management Techniques–Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment, the Cochrane Collaborations Risk of Bias assessment, and the US Preventative Services Task Force level-of-evidence criteria.ResultsDRG stimulation has Level II evidence (moderate) based upon one high-quality pivotal randomized controlled trial and two lower-quality studies.ConclusionsModerate-level evidence supports DRG stimulation for treating chronic focal neuropathic pain and complex regional pain syndrome.

AbstractObjectiveTo conduct a systematic literature review of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) for pain.DesignGrade the evidence for PNS.MethodsAn international interdisciplinary work group conducted a literature search for PNS. Abstracts were reviewed to select studies for grading. Inclusion/exclusion criteria included prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with meaningful clinical outcomes that were not part of a larger or previously reported group. Excluded studies were retrospective, had less than two months of follow-up, or existed only as abstracts. Full studies were graded by two independent reviewers using the modified Interventional Pain Management Techniques–Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment, the Cochrane Collaborations Risk of Bias assessment, and the US Preventative Services Task Force level-of-evidence criteria.ResultsPeripheral nerve stimulation was studied in 14 RCTs for a variety of painful conditions (headache, shoulder, pelvic, back, extremity, and trunk pain). Moderate to strong evidence supported the use of PNS to treat pain.ConclusionPeripheral nerve stimulation has moderate/strong evidence. Additional prospective trials could further refine appropriate populations and pain diagnoses.

Given the relationship between explosive-type training and power adaptation, tracking movement velocity has become popular. However, unlike previous variables, tracking velocity necessitates the use of a valid and reliable tool to monitor adaptation over time. Therefore, the primary purpose of this research was to assess the validity and reliability of a commercially-available linear position transducer (LPT). Nine resistance-trained men completed four sessions consisting of a single set of barbell back squat to volitional failure at 75% or 90% one-repetition maximum. Kinetic and kinematic data were captured for each repetition by the LPT and a 3-dimensional motion capture system and bipedal force platforms. In total, 357 instances of data from both systems were analyzed using intraclass correlations (ICC), effect size estimates, and standard error of measurement. Overall, the LPT yielded excellent ICCs (all ≥0.94) and small/trivial differences (d < 0.60). When categorized by median values, ICCs remained high (all ≥0.89) and differences remained small or trivial with the exception of high peak velocities (d = −1.46). Together, these data indicate that the commercially-available LPT is a valid and reliable measure for kinetic and kinematic variables of interest with the exception of high peak velocities.

Abstract Cancer-associated inflammation is a molecular key feature in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Oncogenic KRAS in conjunction with persistent inflammation is known to accelerate carcinogenesis, although the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here, we outline a novel pathway whereby the transcription factors NFATc1 and STAT3 cooperate in pancreatic epithelial cells to promote KrasG12D-driven carcinogenesis. NFATc1 activation is induced by inflammation and itself accelerates inflammation-induced carcinogenesis in KrasG12D mice, whereas genetic or pharmacologic ablation of NFATc1 attenuates this effect. Mechanistically, NFATc1 complexes with STAT3 for enhancer–promoter communications at jointly regulated genes involved in oncogenesis, for example, Cyclin, EGFR and WNT family members. The NFATc1–STAT3 cooperativity is operative in pancreatitis-mediated carcinogenesis as well as in established human pancreatic cancer. Together, these studies unravel new mechanisms of inflammatory-driven pancreatic carcinogenesis and suggest beneficial effects of chemopreventive strategies using drugs that are currently available for targeting these factors in clinical trials. Significance: Our study points to the existence of an oncogenic NFATc1–STAT3 cooperativity that mechanistically links inflammation with pancreatic cancer initiation and progression. Because NFATc1–STAT3 nucleoprotein complexes control the expression of gene networks at the intersection of inflammation and cancer, our study has significant relevance for potentially managing pancreatic cancer and other inflammatory-driven malignancies. Cancer Discov; 4(6); 688–701. ©2014 AACR. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 621

Abstract Purpose. The Oncotype DX assay predicts likelihood of distant recurrence and improves patient selection for adjuvant chemotherapy in estrogen receptor–positive (ER-positive) early stage breast cancer. This study has two primary endpoints: to evaluate the impact of Oncotype DX recurrence scores (RS) on chemotherapy recommendations and to compare the estimated recurrence risk predicted by breast oncology specialists to RS. Methods. One hundred fifty-four patients with ER-positive early stage breast cancer and available RS results were selected. Clinicopathologic data were provided to four surgeons, four medical oncologists, and four pathologists. Participants were asked to estimate recurrence risk category and offer their chemotherapy recommendations initially without and later with knowledge of RS results. The three most important clinicopathologic features guiding their recommendations were requested. Results. Ninety-five (61.7%), 45 (29.2%), and 14 (9.1%) tumors were low, intermediate, and high risk by RS, respectively. RS significantly correlated with tumor grade, mitotic activity, lymphovascular invasion, hormone receptor, and HER2/neu status. Estimated recurrence risk by participants agreed with RS in 54.2% ± 2.3% of cases. Without and with knowledge of RS, 82.3% ± 1.3% and 69.0% ± 6.9% of patients may be overtreated, respectively (p = 0.0322). Inclusion of RS data resulted in a 24.9% change in treatment recommendations. There was no significant difference in recommendations between groups of participants. Conclusions. Breast oncology specialists tended to overestimate the risk of tumor recurrence compared with RS. RS provides useful information that improves patient selection for chemotherapy and changes treatment recommendations in approximately 25% of cases.

Abstract Background: The decision to use adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early stage breast cancer is based in part on the estimation of risk of tumor recurrence by physicians, which traditionally relies heavily on tumor size, nodal status and a set of biologic tumor characteristics such as hormone receptor and HER2 expression. The Oncotype DX® assay is a 21-gene expression profile aiming to improve risk stratification, recurrence prediction and optimize selection of patients for adjuvant chemotherapy.Methods: We selected 154 consecutive patients with early stage estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer and available Oncotype Dx® recurrence score (RS) for the study. Clinicopathologic data, including patient age, menopausal status, tumor size, histologic type, grade, mitotic activity, presence of lymphatic invasion (LVI), nodal status, hormone receptor and HER2 status on all patients were provided to four surgical oncologists, four medical oncologists and three pathologists, specializing in breast cancer diagnosis and management. Participants were asked to estimate the risk of recurrence of tumors based on available clinicopathologic data and to provide the three most important tumor features their risk estimates were based on. Risk estimates of participants were compared with RS results.Results: Based on the Oncotype Dx® results, 95 (61.7%), 45 (29.2%) and 14 (9.1%) tumors were of low (RS &lt;18), intermediate (RS 18-30) and high (RS ≥31) risk, respectively. RS values showed a highly significant correlation with tumor grade, mitotic activity, LVI, hormone receptor and HER2 status, while no correlation with patient age, menopausal status, tumor size and histologic type was found. Participants' risk estimates agreed with those of the Oncotype Dx® assay in 54.2 ± 2.3 % (mean ± SEM, range 41.6 - 63.0%) of cases, while the risk of recurrence was over- and underestimated compared to RS results in 31.8 ± 3.1% (16.2 - 43.5%) and 14.1 ± 1.4% (7.1 - 22.7%), respectively. The rates of overestimation were significantly higher than those of underestimation (p = 0.0003). Although medical oncologists tended to overestimate the risk more frequently (38.1 ± 2.0%) compared to surgeons (28.7 ± 5.9%) and pathologists (27.5 ± 7.8%), the difference did not reach statistical significance. Estimation of the agreement of participants' risk assessment with RS results showed a mean kappa value of 0.2955 (range 0.1506 - 0.4123). No statistically significant difference in overall concurrence with RS results was found between surgeons, medical oncologists and pathologists. Participants ranked tumor stage/nodal status, hormone receptor status and tumor size to be the most important features when estimating recurrence risk.Conclusions: Based on traditional clinicopathologic features alone, surgeons, medical oncologists and pathologists tend to overestimate the risk of tumor recurrence as compared to Oncotype Dx® assay results. The RS may provide additional information regarding the intrinsic biological features of ER positive breast cancers and help tailoring treatment recommendations. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 4061.