Citations

Background Antibiotics are frequently prescribed at the end of life, though the benefits and harms are not well understood. Methods We abstracted relevant findings from articles published in English in the past 25 years to answer questions generated by discussion among the authors and with stakeholders in Palliative Care and Infectious Diseases. Findings Prescribing practices vary based on individual situation and geographic location. Patients with cancer and those hospitalized receive more antibiotics than those enrolled in outpatient hospice. Urinary tract infections and pulmonary infections are the most common conditions treated with antibiotics at the end of life -most often with penicillin derivatives and vancomycin in the hospital, fluoroquinolones in outpatient, and cephalosporins in both settings. When asked, patients most often prefer limiting antibiotics to symptom management at the end of life. Physicians’ over-estimation of patient preference for antibiotics and the increased probability of misdiagnosis increases antibiotic prescription rates. Antibiotics can improve symptoms when used for specific diseases at the cost of drug reactions, resistant organisms, and delayed discharge. Antibiotic use has variable results on survival duration. Antimicrobial stewardship exists in hospital and long-term care facilities, but not outpatient hospice groups. Stewardship interventions could increase proper use of antibiotics, but more information is needed to apply these interventions to hospice groups. Conclusions Antibiotics at the end of life are impactful and efforts to educate patients and providers will be invaluable in optimizing care.

Background The optimal duration for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after stent-assisted coiling (SAC) of intracranial aneurysms is unclear. Longer-term therapy may reduce thrombotic complications but increase the risk of bleeding complications. Methods A retrospective review of prospectively maintained data at 12 institutions was conducted on patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms who underwent SAC between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020, and were followed ≥6 months postprocedure. The type and duration of DAPT, stent(s) used, outcome, length of follow-up, complication rates, and incidence of significant in-stent stenosis (ISS) were collected. Results Of 556 patients reviewed, 450 met all inclusion criteria. Nine patients treated with DAPT <29 days after SAC and 11 treated for 43–89 days were excluded from the final analysis as none completed their prescribed duration of treatment. Eighty patients received short-term DAPT. There were no significant differences in the rate of thrombotic complications during predefined periods of risk in the short, medium, or long-term treatment groups (1/80, 1.3%; 2/188, 1.1%; and 0/162, 0%, respectively). Similarly, no differences were found in the rate of hemorrhagic complications during period of risk in any group (0/80, 0%; 3/188, 1.6%; and 1/162, 0.6%, respectively). Longer duration DAPT did not reduce ISS risk in any group. Conclusions Continuing DAPT >42 days after SAC did not reduce the risk of thrombotic complications or in-stent stenosis, although the risk of additional hemorrhagic complications remained low. It may be reasonable to discontinue DAPT after 42 days following non-flow diverting SAC of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

The COVID-19 pandemic challenged healthcare organisations in safely providing healthcare to patients while protecting employees and reducing the spread of the virus. This paper shows how the Mayo Clinic responded by implementing innovations, including screening, testing and tracing patients for COVID-19; expanding telehealth services; adjusting surgical and procedural operations and reallocating staffing and supplies. These changes were operationalised rapidly through the coordinated response from its leadership, partnership of experts across the organisation, prompt decision-making driven by data, redistribution of resources and expedited training. These innovations and methods of rapid implementation enabled Mayo Clinic to safely continue its mission of providing healing and hope to its patients worldwide, and quickly return to financial sustainability.

8106 Background: Due to lack of prospective data, the optimal first line treatment approach for patients (pts) with pure LCNEC histology remains uncertain. Methods: Across 17 centers, we conducted a retrospective analysis of metastatic pure LCNEC (diagnosed at local institutions) who received 1st-line systemic therapy between 2015-2023. Pts were either treated with chemotherapy (chemo), immunotherapy (IO), or a combination (chemoIO). Clinical outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rates (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (trAE) as defined using CTCAE 5.0. Survival analysis by genomic alteration status ( TP53, RB1, STK11, KEAP1, KRAS) and PD-L1 status were performed. Results: We identified 161 pts with median age of 67 years (IQR: 58-83) at 1st line systemic therapy; 54% (n = 87) were males. Median follow-up was 55 months (mo), 62 mo, and 29 mo for the chemo, IO, and chemoIO groups, respectively. 79% (n = 127) were former or current smokers. 1st-line treatments were chemo (n = 94), IO (n = 11), or chemoIO (n = 56). Of 85 pts with PD-L1 status, 58 (68%) were 0% and 27 (32%) were ≥1%. The most common chemo regimen was platinum-etoposide (n = 72, 78%). ChemoIO regimens included carboplatin/etoposide/atezolizumab (n = 23, 43%) and carboplatin/pemetrexed/pembrolizumab (n = 17, 31%). In the IO group, 1 patient received dual IO. Lung (n = 74, 46%) and liver (n = 71, 41%) were the most common sites of metastasisThere was no significant difference in PFS across the groups (median PFS [mPFS] chemoIO: 5.7 mo, 95% CI: 5.0-6.3, chemo: 5.1 mo, 95% CI: 3.1-5.9; IO: 3.6 mo, 95% CI: 1.7-6.5) on multivariable analysis adjusting for ECOG and “M” stage (p = 0.2 and 0.24 for chemoIO-chemo and chemoIO-IO comparisons, respectively). There was no difference in OS (mOS chemo: 11 mo, 95% CI: 7.6-17.4; IO: 13.6 mo, 95% CI: 5.9-not reached; chemoIO: 12.2 mo, 95% CI: 7.4-20.6, p = 0.5 and 0.8 for chemoIO-chemo and chemoIO-IO comparisons, respectively). ORR was 35.2% (31/88) in chemo, 25% (2/8) in IO, and 35.7% (20/56) in chemoIO ( p= 0.46). There were no significant differences in PFS and OS outcomes by treatment group when divided by genetic profile (n = 79, methods), or by PD-L1 status (0% vs ≥1%). Any grade trAE occurred in 48 (51%), 5 (45%), and 28 (50%) pts treated with chemo, IO, and chemoIO, respectively. Grade ≥3 toxicity profiles are shown (table). Conclusions: For 1st-line treatment of LCNEC, similar PFS, OS, and ORR were seen for chemo, IO, and chemoIO. This questions the added benefit of chemoIO compared to chemo alone, and warrants future clinical trials to discern the optimal 1st line treatment. [Table: see text]

8602 Background: LCNECs are a rare subtype of lung cancer, with limited clinical trial data and an unclear consensus on first-line treatment. Even less is known about the optimal treatment approach for pts with mixed LCNECs, a pathologic subtype where tumors contain both LCNEC histology as well as features of adenocarcinoma, squamous cell, or small cell lung cancer. Methods: We conducted an international multi-institutional retrospective analysis (n=13 institutions) of pts with advanced or metastatic mixed LCNECs who received 1st-line systemic therapy with either chemotherapy alone (chemo) or chemo-immunotherapy (chemoIO) between 2010-2023. Clinical outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (trAEs). Survival comparisons were made via the log-rank test. Results: Seventy-three pts with mixed LCNECs received either chemo (n=42, 57.5%) or chemoIO (n=31, 42.5%). The most common chemo regimens were carboplatin/etoposide (n=27) and cisplatin/etoposide (n=8), while the most common chemoIO was carboplatin/etoposide/atezolizumab (n=19). Median age at 1st-line therapy initiation was 65 (IQR: 60-72). 64% of pts were male (n=47). The majority were former smokers (n=41, 56.2%), with 22 current smokers (30.1%), and 10 non-smokers (13.7%). Mixed histologies included LCNEC/NSCLC (n=45, 56.2%), LCNEC/SCLC (n=17), LCNEC/carcinoid (n=1), and unspecified mixed LCNEC (n=10). Median PFS for chemo was 5 months (95% CI 2.7-9.2) vs. 6 months (95% CI 4.4-8.3) for chemoIO ( p=0.86). Median OS for chemo was 14.2 months (95% CI 10.4-22.5) vs. 17.2 months (95% CI 9.4-27.2) for chemoIO ( p=0.66). The ORR did not differ between chemo (n=18, 45%) and chemoIO (n=15, 48.4%) ( p=0.81). In the chemo group, 60% (n=25) experienced trAEs of any grade, with 23.8% (n=10) experiencing grade 3+ events and four requiring hospitalizations. For chemoIO pts, 61% (n=19) experienced trAEs, with 25.8% (n=8) experiencing grade 3+ events and six requiring hospitalizations. Neutropenia was the most common grade 3+ trAE for both chemo (n=5) and chemoIO (n=4). Overall, there were no significant differences between chemo or chemoIO groups for ORR ( p=0.81), all-grade trAEs ( p=0.88), grade 3+ trAEs ( p=0.84), PFS ( p=0.86), or median OS ( p=0.66). There were no significant differences in median PFS ( p=0.46) or OS ( p=0.99) for pts with mixed LCNEC/NSCLC vs. LCNEC/SCLC. Conclusions: For mixed LCNECs, there was no significant difference in PFS or OS between first-line treatment with chemo vs. chemoIO, suggesting limited benefit from immunotherapy for these pts. Additionally, survival outcomes did not differ between mixed LCNEC/NSCLC and LCNEC/SCLC, suggesting a biology primarily driven by their neuroendocrine component.

TPS3173 Background: ELU001, pasifolate exatecan, is an ultra-small nanoparticle drug conjugate, known as a CDC (~6 nm), designed to target and penetrate into solid tumors. Due to its size, ELU001 exhibits rapid renal elimination which is expected to reduce or eliminate the toxicities associated with many antibody drug conjugates. ELU001 has ~13 folic acid targeting moieties and ~21 cathepsin-B cleavable exatecan topoisomerase-1 inhibitor payloads covalently bound to short polyethylene glycol chains surrounding a silica core, the C’Dot. ELU001 binds to cancer cells expressing FRα and is internalized into the lysosome where it releases the exatecan payload. ELU001’s dose escalation study reported at ESMO Congress 2023 (1), examined weekly, bi-weekly (Q2W), and tri-weekly schedules over a range of doses in 42 patients. The study revealed that ELU001 could be administered safely and identified a dose level and schedule for the Expansion Studies described below. 22 of the patients with ovarian or endometrial cancers had >1 post-baseline scan(s), of these 2 had a PR and 19 had SD by RECIST v1.1 criteria. ELU001 demonstrated activity against tumors across a range of FRα expression levels, from low to high, retrospectively assessed using the VENTANA FOLR1 RxDx assay and the PS2+ scoring system. Methods: The current multicenter, Tumor Group Expansion open-label phase 1/2 clinical trial investigates ELU001 in patients with ovarian and endometrial cancers and is enrolling three cohorts; 1) ovarian cancer with high FRα expression, 2) ovarian cancer with moderate and low expression and 3) endometrial cancer with low to high expression with assessments based upon the PS2+ scoring system (high = ≥ 75%, moderate = ≥ 50% to < 75%, low = 25% to < 50%, negative = <25% of tumor cells with 2+ or 3+ staining intensity). An initial exploratory dose of 2.0 mg/m2 Q2W was employed in all three cohorts and a second dose of 1.7 mg/m2 Q2W will be studied in the ovarian cancer cohorts. Patients will ultimately be randomized to one of two or more doses to optimize dosing for registration. Primary endpoint: Objective Response Rate (ORR); secondary endpoints include DOR, PFS, TFST, PFS2, OS, adverse events, PK, and ADA assessments. Approximately 20 patients per tumor group will be recruited in the U.S. 1. Ann. Oncol. (2023) 34 (suppl_2): S458-S497. Clinical trial information: NCT05001282 .

3078 Background: Q901 is a potent, covalently binding CDK7 inhibitor with excellent specificity for CDK7 against other protein kinases. Transcriptional regulation by CDK7 inhibition in cancer cells leads to DNA damage repair response inhibition and increased genomic instability. Q901 also regulates cell cycle checkpoints by inhibiting T-loop phosphorylation and transcriptionally downregulating CDK1, 2 and 4. In preclinical in vivo models, intravenous (iv) administration of Q901 once a week and once every three-week dosing regimen was well tolerated and showed significant antitumor activity. The safety profile, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and efficacy data for 18, 36 and 60 mg/m2 are presented. Methods: QRNT-009 (NCT05394103) is an ongoing Phase 1/2 multicenter, open-label, dose escalation and expansion study. Q901 is administered iv once weekly for four weeks, then once every two weeks thereafter in patients with advanced or metastatic ovarian cancer, castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), breast cancer, endometrial cancer, colorectal cancer, small cell lung cancer (SCLC), or pancreatic cancers. Results: As of data cutoff (12Jan2024), 17 patients received Q901 across 3 dose levels: 5 patients at 18 mg/m2, 4 patients at 36 mg/m2, and 8 patients at 60 mg/m2. The median prior lines of systemic therapy were 4 (range 2 - 17). Of 17 patients who received Q901 across all doses, there were no treatment related SAEs, treatment discontinuations, or dose reductions. Most common TRAEs ≥ 15% were nausea (29.4%), anemia (23.6%) and fatigue (23.5%). As of data cutoff, no DLTs were observed. All plasma PK analyses across dose levels showed dose dependent increase of AUC0-last and Cmax. No major metabolite was observed. POLR2A, which is a CDK7 target engagement marker showed biologically effective change starting from 18 mg/m2. 1 patient with pancreatic cancer who received 18 mg/m2 had a partial response with CA19-9 reduction from 4,632 to 219. 2 patients at 18 mg/m2 and 2 patients at 36 mg/m2 had stable disease. Additional safety and efficacy data will be presented. Conclusions: Preliminary data from QRNT-009 study showed that selective CDK7 inhibitor Q901 is well tolerated. Preliminary antitumor activity and pharmacodynamic observations are encouraging. Dose escalation is ongoing to identify MTD or recommended dose for further studies. Clinical trial information: NCT05394103 .

1022 Background: The Bria-IMT regimen is a combination immunotherapy using an allogeneic whole cell cancer vaccine combined with checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). Intradermally administered irradiated SV-BR-1-GM breast cancer cells secrete GM-CSF and present tumor associated antigens (TAAs) on HLA-I and –II molecules to directly stimulate anti-tumor immunity. Anti-PD1 CPI further stimulates T-cells and synergizes with SV-BR-1-GM. Here we report the results of the phase 1/2 trial (NCT03328026) of Bria-IMT in metastatic/advanced breast cancer evaluating sequencing of SV-BR-1-GM inoculation and CPI. Methods: Analysis of the phase 1 with expansion phase 2 cohort randomized by sequence using SV-BR-1-GM, checkpoint inhibitor (pembrolizumab or retifanlimab), low dose cyclophosphamide (Day –2) and post-dose local pegylated interferon α, with cycles every 3 weeks. In the 1:1 randomized cohort, CPI is either dosed at C1 prior to SV-BR-1-GM (original sequence) or delayed to C2 post-SV-BR-1-GM (alternative sequence). Cancer-associated macrophage-like cells (CAMLs) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were monitored as biomarkers. Results: A total of 54 patients were dosed: 11 with pembrolizumab, 44 with retifanlimab (1 patient received pembrolizumab and later retifanlimab). Median age=61 (38-81); Median prior regimen=6 (2-13); 72% ER+/PR+/HER2-; 6% HER2+ and 22% triple negative. Bria-IMT regimen was well tolerated with only 9% drop-out rate due to AE. AEs related to IPs were seen in 74% of patients; the majority (91%) being grade 1-2, and few (1.7%) grade 4 cases including pulmonary embolism, dehydration and increased lipase. Among 30 patients with post-dose CAML/CTC data and evaluable outcome, CAML count <5 associates with disease control (p=0.06, Chi square test). Patients who developed DTH to SV-BR-1-GM had significantly better PFS and higher OS. Patients treated with phase III formulation had an increase in PFS. Quality of life improvement correlates with disease outcome and survival. Among the patients treated with the phase III formulation of SV-BR-1-GM (n=23 with evaluable outcomes), objective response rate (ORR) is 13% and disease control rate (DCR) is 61%, with median PFS and OS are 4.1 and 13.3 months, respectively. In the randomized portion, the original sequence cohort had higher DCR (43% vs 36%) and OS (P=0.08, HR 0.30, 95%CI 0.08-1.17) compared to the alternative sequence cohort. Conclusions: BRIA-IMT has shown a favorable safety profile while providing benefits to heavily treated aMBC patients. Superior outcomes and survival were seen in patients treated with the phase III formulation and regimen now being used in the ongoing Ph3 trial, confirming the improvement in efficacy of the novel regimen. The results from this randomized phase 2 study informed the study design of the ongoing Ph3 trial comparing BRIA-IMT to standard of care physician choice treatments (NCT06072612). Clinical trial information: NCT03328026 .

Abstract Introduction Despite progress in MBC, too many continue to succumb due to treatment resistance or intolerance. SV-BR-1-GM is an allogenic human breast cancer cell line with antigen presenting cell activity designed to overcome the immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment while being acceptable to extensively pretreated contemporary MBC patients. We report interim exploratory analysis of the ongoing RCT of the Bria-IMT regimens. Methods An interim exploratory analysis using preliminary partially available evaluable data of the ongoing prospective, randomized phase 2 (NCT03328026; 2018-present) of Bria-IMT (irradiated SV-BR-1-GM) with a PD-1check point inhibitor (CPI) every 3 weeks (25 patients dosed to date). Both regimens include cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 48-72 hours prior to intradermal Bria-IMT (~20 x 106 cells) followed by interferon-alpha at the inoculation sites 2 days later. The control arm used the original sequence with simultaneous start of Bria-IMT and CPI in cycle 1. The experimental arm started CPI in cycle 2 after the 2nd inoculation. Candida skin test was performed before cycle 1 to determine anergy status while delayed-type hypersensitivity skin test (DTH), defined as &gt;5mm erythema & induration, was done at every cycle by intradermal injection of a small test dose of Bria-IMT prior to full dose inoculation. Results Median age: 58 (range 37-81); median prior therapies: 8 lines (range 4-18); 89% were grade 2/3 (n=18); 68% hormone receptor positive; 61% HER2 negative, 33% HER2 low, and 6% HER2 high; 33% triple negative. Overall, 53% of subjects had a clinical benefit as best response by BICR, PI or target lesion measurement. The two treatment arms were similar with a trend showing longer median durations on therapy (mDOT) of 3.7 mo in the experimental delayed CPI arm compared with mDOT = 2.9 for original sequence control arm. 47% of patients were anergic to candida. Among all anergic subjects, the mDOT was 3.5 compared to 2.5 mo for non-anergic patients. However, among anergic subjects, the alternative treatment arm had a lower risk of treatment discontinuation (improved HR) with mDOT of 3.7 compared to the 3.3 mo mDOT of the original treatment. 50% of anergic subjects eventually developed DTH to SV-BR-1-GM. mDOT was 4.0 mo for DTH+ pts vs 3.0 mo for those who did not mount DTH. Median OS was not yet reached; mean OS was higher in non-anergic vs anergic pts. Among those who developed an inoculation site reaction to Bria-IMT, OS was greater than for those who did not. Time on the Bria-IMT regimen exceeded the time on penultimate treatment in 22% of subjects while 33% of subjects with prior CPI use exceeded last therapy. AEs were mild with 28% of subjects (n=7) having &gt; grade 3 events. The most common grade 3+ AE was lipase increase (n=3). One subject with encouraging changes in peripheral blood tumor markers and CTCs completed a PET study using Zr-89 crefmirlimab berdoxam, a zirconium-89 labelled truncated antibody specific to human CD8α (CD8 Immuno-PET) and demonstrated increased uptake in some metastatic lesions and draining lymph nodes. Updated results will be provided at the meeting. Conclusion Sequencing of CPI with Bria-IMT is associated with differential clinical outcome trends but not statistically significant in this interim preliminary exploratory analysis regardless of prior CPI use. Bria-IMT is immunogenic with clinical benefit demonstrated for both treatment schedules among patients with inducible DTH reactions. Patients who develop an immune response to Bria-IMT had an increase in OS compared to those who did not. The nodal localization of CD8+ cells on PET may indicate a systemic activation of CD8 positive lymphoid cells. It also provides support that the Bria-IMT + CPI combination immune-based therapy can result in an increase of CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer metastatic sites. These preliminary results will be evaluated in the ongoing randomized phase 3 pivotal registrational trial. Citation Format: Carmen Calfa, Chaitali Nangia, Minal Barve, John Knecht, Jarrod Holmes, Kendrith Roland, Ralph Boccia, Frances Valdes-Albini, Zach Gostout, Mingjin Chang, William Williams, Charles Wiseman, Bonnie Guerin, Shaker Dakhil, Giuseppe Del Priore, Saranya Chumsri. Randomized Phase 2 of Bria-IMT, an Allogenic Human Cell Line with Antigen Presenting Activity, in Heavily Pretreated Metastatic Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-05-12.