Citations

Abstract Background: Abemaciclib, a small molecule inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6, induces G1 cell cycle arrest in Rb-proficient human cancers.1 The clinical safety profile of abemaciclib enables continuous oral dosing to achieve sustained target inhibition, resulting in single-agent antitumor activity against multiple human cancers. The drug also reaches relevant concentrations in the central nervous system and, in patients taking the drug orally, can be detected in the cerebrospinal fluid.2 For women with previously treated hormone receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), abemaciclib as a single agent achieved a six-month clinical benefit rate of 61.1% and an objective response rate of 33.3%.3 Clinical trials investigating abemaciclib combined with fulvestrant4 or aromatase inhibitors5 have led to randomized Phase 3 studies for women with HR+ breast cancer.6,7 Methods: This Phase 1b study (NCT02057133) with multiple cohorts evaluates safety and tolerability of abemaciclib combined with endocrine or HER2-targeted therapies for MBC. Secondary objectives include pharmacokinetics (PK) and antitumor activity of abemaciclib when given in combination with other therapies. Cohorts were opened to enrollment sequentially. Patients with HR+ HER2 negative MBC received abemaciclib orally every 12 hours (Q12H) in combination with the following standard therapies daily until progression: letrozole (Part A), anastrozole (Part B), tamoxifen (Part C), exemestane (Part D), or exemestane plus everolimus (Part E). Patients with HER2 positive MBC received abemaciclib orally Q12H in combination with trastuzumab every 21 days until progression (Part F). Adverse events (AEs) were graded by NCI CTCAE v4.0 and tumor response was assessed radiographically using RECIST v1.1. Results: Abemaciclib has been combined with multiple targeted therapies for the treatment of women with MBC. We previously reported safety and early efficacy results for the combinations of abemaciclib with letrozole, anastrozole, tamoxifen, exemestane, and exemestane plus everolimus.5 Due to limited follow-up at that time, the efficacy results were not mature. Safety, PK, and efficacy results with approximately 6 months of additional follow-up will be reported across all parts of the study. The most common treatment-emergent AEs include effects on the gastrointestinal and hematopoietic systems. Consistent with previously reported results for both single-agent abemaciclib and the combination of abemaciclib with fulvestrant, tumor responses have been observed among women receiving abemaciclib in combination with targeted therapies for MBC. Conclusions: This study for women with MBC demonstrates the potential for abemaciclib to be combined with therapies targeting specific signaling pathways. References: 1Gelbert et al. Invest New Drugs. 2014;32(5):825-37. 2Shapiro et al. J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr 2500). 3Tolaney et al. SABCS 2014: Abstract 763. 4Patnaik et al. J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr 534). 5Tolaney et al. J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 522). 6Llombart et al. SABCS 2014: OT1-1-07 (MONARCH 2, NCT02107703). 7Goetz et al. J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr TPS624) (MONARCH 3, NCT02246621). Citation Format: Goetz MP, Beeram M, Beck T, Conlin AK, Dees EC, Dickler MN, Helsten TL, Conkling PR, Edenfield WJ, Richards DA, Turner PK, Cai N, Chan EM, Pant S, Becerra CH, Kalinsky K, Puhalla SL, Rexer BN, Burris HA, Tolaney SM. Abemaciclib, an inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6, combined with endocrine and HER2-targeted therapies for women with metastatic breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-13-25.

Abstract Background LIV-1, a multispan transmembrane protein and downstream target of STAT3, is highly expressed in breast cancer cells (Sussman 2014). It has been associated with lymph node involvement and linked with malignant progression to metastasis (Manning 1994). SGN-LIV1A is an anti-LIV-1 antibody conjugated via a protease-cleavable linker to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE). Upon binding to cell-surface LIV-1, SGN-LIV1A is internalized and releases MMAE, which binds to tubulin and induces G2/M arrest and apoptosis. Methods A phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study is ongoing to evaluate the safety, tolerability, antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of SGN-LIV1A monotherapy (q3 wks IV) in women with LIV-1-positive, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (NCT01969643). Patients (pts) with either hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2–) or triple-negative (TN) disease were eligible if they had measurable disease and received ≥2 prior cytotoxic regimens in the metastatic setting. Pts with ≥ Grade 2 neuropathy were excluded. Response was assessed per RECIST v1.1, and pts with stable disease (SD) or better were eligible to continue treatment until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Fresh tumor biopsies were obtained pre- and post-treatment to evaluate the LIV-1 expression-response relationship, mechanism of action, and tumor sensitivity to SGN-LIV1A. Results To date, 21 pts (17 HR+/HER2–, 4 TN) have received a median of 3 cycles (range, 1–7) of SGN-LIV1A at doses of 0.5–2.8 mg/kg. Median age was 58 yrs (range, 34–73), and pts had a median of 8 prior systemic metastatic therapies (range, 2–15). At baseline, 19 pts had visceral disease and 15 had bone involvement. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in Cycle 1 were observed in the 18 DLT-evaluable pts; MTD has not yet been identified. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) reported in ≥30% of pts were primarily Grade 1/2 in severity and were: nausea (57%), fatigue and peripheral neuropathy (43% each), alopecia (38%), and vomiting (33%). Two pts discontinued treatment due to AEs (1 nausea, 1 tachycardia). Preliminary PK data suggest a linear increase in antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) exposure with increasing dose. In the 19 efficacy-evaluable pts, the overall response rate (ORR) was 11% (2 partial responses [PRs]) with clinical benefit of SD or better achieved in 63% (2 PR, 10 SD) of pts. Of note, all 4 pts with TN MBC achieved clinical benefit: 2 PR and 2 SD. Currently, the median duration of clinical benefit is 12.7 wks (range, 6.1–26.3). Four pts remain on treatment. To date, of the 179 MBC tumor specimens evaluated for LIV-1, 156 (87%) were LIV-1-positive; moderate-to-high LIV-1 expression (H-score ≥100) was present in 91% (94 of 103) of HR+/HER2– and 81% (47 of 58) of TN samples. Conclusions LIV-1 is expressed in the majority of metastatic breast cancer tissue samples, with moderate-to-high expression in both HR+/HER2- and TN disease. To date, SGN-LIV1A monotherapy has been generally well tolerated and resulted in a clinical benefit of SD or better in 63% of these heavily pre-treated pts, including 2 PRs in the 4 TN MBC pts. Response duration data continue to evolve. Clinical subtype-specific expansion cohorts are planned. Citation Format: Forero A, Burris III H, Mita M, Specht J, Weise A, Liu MC, Modi S, Pusztai L, Kostic A, Yang J, Li M, Hengel S, Miller K. Interim analysis of a phase 1 study of the antibody-drug conjugate SGN-LIV1A in patients with metastatic breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-14-05.

Abstract Purpose: First-in-human phase I trial to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of BIND-014, a novel, tumor prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–targeted nanoparticle, containing docetaxel. Experimental Design: Patients with advanced solid tumors received BIND-014 every three weeks (n = 28) or weekly (n = 27), with dose levels ranging from 3.5 to 75 mg/m2 and 15 to 45 mg/m2, respectively. Results: BIND-014 was generally well tolerated, with no unexpected toxicities. The most common drug-related toxicities (>20% of patients) on either schedule included neutropenia, fatigue, anemia, alopecia, and diarrhea. BIND-014 demonstrated a dose-linear pharmacokinetic profile, distinct from docetaxel, with prolonged persistence of docetaxel-encapsulated circulating nanoparticles. Of the 52 patients evaluable for response, one had a complete response (cervical cancer on the every three week schedule) and five had partial responses (ampullary adenocarcinoma, non–small cell lung, and prostate cancers on the every-three-week schedule, and breast and gastroesophageal cancers on the weekly schedule). Responses were noted in both PSMA-detectable and -undetectable tumors. Conclusions: BIND-014 was generally well tolerated, with predictable and manageable toxicity and a unique pharmacokinetic profile compared with conventional docetaxel. Clinical activity was noted in multiple tumor types. The recommended phase II dose of BIND-014 is 60 mg/m2 every three weeks or 40 mg/m2 weekly. Clin Cancer Res; 22(13); 3157–63. ©2016 AACR.

Abstract Background First identified as an estrogen-inducible gene in a breast cancer cell line, LIV-1 is a multispan transmembrane protein of the solute-carrier family 39 with putative zinc transporter and metalloproteinase activity. As a downstream target of STAT3, it promotes the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition that is important in the malignant progression to metastasis. LIV-1 is expressed in a number of cancers with the highest prevalence and level of expression in breast, prostate, and melanoma. Additionally, LIV-1 has been linked with malignant progression to metastasis and associated with lymph node involvement in breast cancer. Normal tissue expression is predominantly limited to hormonally regulated tissues, including breast and prostate. In metastatic breast cancer tissue samples, the current validated immunohistochemistry assay for LIV-1 has detected moderate to high expression in 82% of samples tested, with 88% positivity in hormone receptor-positive tumors and 73% in triple-negative tumors. SGN-LIV1A is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) composed of a humanized anti-LIV-1 monoclonal antibody conjugated to the microtubule-disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) via a protease-cleavable linker. In vitro, SGN-LIV1A shows target-specific internalization and cytotoxic activity against LIV-1-positive neoplastic cell lines. Significant dose-dependent tumor regression was demonstrated in mouse xenograft models. Methods The primary objective of this first-in-human phase 1, open label, multicenter study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability, and to identify the maximum tolerated dose of SGN-LIV1A using a 3+3 dose-escalation study design. Pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and antitumor activity will also be evaluated (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01969643). Enrollment to this US-based trial began in late 2013. Eligible patients are adult females who have hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative or triple-negative metastatic breast cancer. Tumor tissue must be positive for expression of LIV-1 per central assessment. Patients must have received at least 2 prior cytotoxic regimens in the metastatic setting and have measurable disease per RECIST v1.1. Pre-existing neuropathy ≥ Grade 2 is not permitted. SGN-LIV1A is administered intravenously every 3 weeks at protocol-defined doses starting at 0.5 mg/kg. Patients who achieve an objective response or stable disease per RECIST v1.1 are eligible to continue treatment until disease progression. At the completion of dose escalation, expansion cohorts may be opened to enroll patients with specific breast cancer subtypes to further define safety and antitumor activity. Tumor biopsies are being obtained at baseline and after one cycle of treatment to evaluate the role of LIV-1 expression, target saturation, and other tumor-specific measurements in the antitumor activity of SGN-LIV1A. Citation Format: Andres Forero, Howard Burris III, Patricia LoRusso, Jennifer Specht, Kathy Miller, Monica Mita, Minetta C Liu, Shanu Modi, Lajos Pusztai, Django Sussman, Ana Kostic. SGN-LIV1A: A phase 1 trial evaluating a novel antibody-drug conjugate in patients with LIV-1-positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-3-01.

We have previously demonstrated that estrogen (E2) downregulates phosphate transporter NaPi-IIa and causes phosphaturia and hypophosphatemia in ovariectomized rats. In the present study, we examined whether E2directly targets NaPi-IIa in the proximal tubule (PT) and studied the respective roles of estrogen receptor isoforms (ERα and ERβ) in the downregulation of NaPi-IIa using both in vivo and an in vitro expression systems. We found that estrogen specifically downregulates NaPi-IIa but not NaPi-IIc or Pit2 in the kidney cortex. Proximal tubules incubated in a “shake” suspension with E2for 24 h exhibited a dose-dependent decrease in NaPi-IIa protein abundance. Results from OVX rats treated with specific agonists for either ERα [4,4′,4″;-(4-propyl-[1 H]-pyrazole-1,3,5-triyl) trisphenol, PPT] or ERβ [4,4′,4″-(4-propyl-[1 H]-pyrazole-1,3,5-triyl) trisphenol, DPN] or both (PPT + DPN), indicated that only the latter caused a sharp downregulation of NaPi-IIa, along with significant phosphaturia and hypophosphatemia. Lastly, heterologous expression studies demonstrated that estrogen downregulated NaPi-IIa only in U20S cells expressing both ERα and ERβ, but not in cells expressing either receptor alone. In conclusion, these studies demonstrate that rat PT cells express both ERα and ERβ and that E2induces phosphaturia by directly and specifically targeting NaPi-IIa in the PT cells. This effect is mediated via a mechanism involving coactivation of both ERα and ERβ, which likely form a functional heterodimer complex in the rat kidney proximal tubule.

Abstract Purpose: The objectives of this phase 1, first-in-human study were to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary activity of the hypoxia-activated prodrug TH-302 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Experimental Design: TH-302 was administered intravenously over 30 to 60 minutes in two regimens: three times weekly dosing followed by 1 week off (arm A) and every 3-week dosing (arm B). Results: Fifty-seven patients enrolled (arm A: N = 37 and arm B: N = 20). The TH-302 dose was escalated from 7.5 to 670 mg/m2 in arm A and from 670 to 940 mg/m2 in arm B. The most common adverse events were nausea, skin rash, fatigue, and vomiting. Hematologic toxicity was mild and limited. Grade 3 skin and mucosal toxicities were dose limiting at 670 mg/m2 in arm A; the MTD was 575 mg/m2. In arm B, grade 3 fatigue and grade 3 vaginitis/proctitis were dose limiting at 940 mg/m2; the MTD was 670 mg/m2. Plasma concentrations of TH-302 and the active metabolite Br-IPM (brominated version of isophosphoramide mustard) increased proportionally with dose. Two partial responses were noted in patients with metastatic small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and melanoma in arm A at 480 and 670 mg/m2. Stable disease was observed in arms A and B in 18 and 9 patients, respectively. Conclusions: The MTD of TH-302 was 575 mg/m2 weekly and 670 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Skin and mucosal toxicities were DLTs. On the basis of responses in metastatic melanoma and SCLC, further investigations in these indications were initiated. Clin Cancer Res; 17(9); 2997–3004. ©2011 AACR.